Erhalten Sie Zugang zu diesem und mehr als 300000 Büchern ab EUR 5,99 monatlich.
There are events every day that you can see from different sides. It's possible that you might have a different opinion.
Das E-Book New World Order 1 wird angeboten von Books on Demand und wurde mit folgenden Begriffen kategorisiert:
time change, energy, new world order, Inflation, War
Sie lesen das E-Book in den Legimi-Apps auf:
Seitenzahl: 81
Veröffentlichungsjahr: 2023
Das E-Book (TTS) können Sie hören im Abo „Legimi Premium” in Legimi-Apps auf:
Foreword
January 2023
Klima-Glue receive salary for actions
Corona imports from China
Young people who riot against the state
Republicans and their democracy
Brazil and civil war?
Putin and the Orthodox Church
Floods in California
Politics and their projects
Top Secret and how the Presidents deal with it
Golden Piano in the People's Representation - Parliament
World Economic Summit in Davos
No electricity for electric cars
Russia and Nazism
Tank deliveries from America and Germany?
Pension systems before the collapse
Battle tanks for Ukraine
Visit to Bulgaria
Sweden – Erdogan – NATO (North Atlantic Defense Alliance)
Lack of skilled workers and refugees
Death of a Black African in the USA
US military attack on Iran
Fences around the European Union?
February 2023
Increase in retirement age
Federal President in Ukraine
Terror trial and its verdicts
Battle of Stalingrad
Spy balloons or not
Deaths in avalanches
Earthquakes in Turkey and Syria
Increased income, expenses and inflation
Earthquakes in Turkey and Syria
Asylum and Migration Policy in the European Union
Next wave of refugees from Turkey and Syria?
President Sandu and Russian influence
Trench warfare or conflict resolution
Federal Chancellor and European Union
OSCE meeting in Vienna
Security Conference in Munich
Arms deliveries to Ukraine
17 more years and then what?
State of the Union speech
Contemporary neutrality or not
Kidnapping in Ukraine
China Peace Initiative
Peace demonstration in Berlin
4-day week
International advertising in Africa
You should not kill
Child abduction in Ukraine
Iran and the harassment of women
Strike wave in France
Exceptions for EU member states?
Stemming the flow of refugees
New technology for disposal of CO2
No end for combustion engines?
Half social benefits for refugees
Seizure of power in China
Putin before the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR)?
Nuclear power and alternative energies
Democracy with an expiration date?
Decency and character required?
Kneeling before Mammon "Money"
Bonus payment without scruples
President Xi Jinping and Putin
Dmitry Medvedev and other aggressors in Russia
E-Fuels the solution for our climate
Democracy and its rulers
Trust in politics
British and American main battle tanks in Ukraine
Theater in politics
E-fuels can be a useful part of the solution
Average salary increases of 12.3 percent and that's not enough
12 years old and it's all over
The lawsuit against former US President Donald Trump stems from a hush money payment
Ukrainian President present in the Austrian Parliament
Far be it from me to attack anyone here or to judge anyone. Rather, it is my view of things, as I interpret it below. It may well be that one or the other thinks that would be a radical view of things. But sometimes it seems to me that you stick your head in the sand. Don't react, it will resolve itself. I believe this thread runs through the whole writing. As I said, this is not patronizing anyone, but my opinion on various things at home and abroad.
According to a German daily newspaper, the protests, such as the soiling of art and sticking on the street, are being sponsored by an American fund. This means that young people are paid for their actions with a salary and social security contributions. This is handled by a German association. It is very questionable what one wants to achieve with this. But since this funding comes from the USA, one wonders what the purpose of it is. What culture looks like in this state could already be seen in January 2021 with the storming of the Capitol. It can only be seen again and again that the European Union is being demonstrated by this country. The background is correct, in that something should be done about climate change, but such means are not necessarily effective. One should pay much more attention to pollution in America before financially supporting these actions, even if the president wants to invest an enormous amount of money against climate change. In my opinion, such disruptive actions are extremely questionable as far as the goal is concerned and should be punished rigorously and not with a few hundred euros. This is about our identity, which we have laboriously acquired over centuries and which is destroyed by such actions.
If there are plans in individual states to check the waste water from airplanes for corona infections, you can actually only agree to this procedure. Finally, almost every fifth person in this country is infected with this virus. But, as always, there is chaos once again as far as agreement on such measures is concerned. Due to the increasing numbers, we will have the virus all over the world again, only through such controls could the increase be contained somewhat. The only thing that is incomprehensible is China's reaction, which threatens to take countermeasures. It should also be in their interest to control this pandemic and not react to it straight away, but maybe it's also because the past restrictions had actually only achieved negative aspects.
How can it be that more and more young people are taking to the barricades against the state and its legal forms and democracy? That's right, we in the Western world live in countries where you can express your opinion openly, but the whole thing should also be in the area of the rule of law. Attacks are being made on emergency organizations, works of art are being destroyed and the judiciary is watching. Have you once again "overslept" something in politics or the judiciary, or do you want to watch these excesses for a longer time. It's true that young people show us what's going wrong, only this should be within the legal framework. However, since the countermeasures are only insufficient with penalties that are perhaps too low, one should react to such tendencies towards violence. If one also hears that the majority of the "rioters" have a migration background, then migrants and refugees should also be discussed in this context. It just cannot be that such people come to us and then willfully damage our infrastructure and thus also try to undermine the value of a democracy. There are, for example, people entitled to asylum in our country who have already committed crimes and live in the country where they are staying and will not be deported. Do we have to put up with that in the western world?
North America praises itself as the largest democracy and votes are carried out like in a dictatorship. Only after the 15th time could a speaker for the House of Representatives be found. One wonders how much influence the former president still has. But as can be observed around the world, the democratic form of government is no longer obsolete.
Some people think that only they have the absolute truth and try to enforce these points of view rigorously, regardless of whether the sovereign has decided otherwise or not. Is that democracy then? Above all, it should be noted that such methods of exercising power can also be found in other countries. History has shown us again and again that power should come from the people and not necessarily from individuals who only cling to their own ideas and, if necessary, want to implement them with radical means. What then comes out of it is presented to us drastically in the Ukraine. There, too, a despot enforces his abstruse ideas by force of arms at the expense of the population.
It was almost exactly two years ago that the Capitol was stormed in the USA and this has set a precedent. When a president who has been voted out incites his supporters to storm democratic institutions, there are many parallels to America. A vote by the sovereign is not accepted either, such as by Trump, who also poured fuel on the fire by saying that the election victory two years ago had been stolen from him. Former President Bolsonaro of Brazil does not seem to be able to come to terms with his defeat either and is likely to mobilize the mob to enforce his intentions. Is something like that still democracy, where people want to hold on to power through revolts? Only in contrast to his colleague in America, Bolsonaro fled to the United States, probably to continue igniting from there. How badly does the form of democracy get affected when some people think they can only stay in power by force.
That the head of this church stands by the ruler and his attitude to the special operation in Ukraine is one thing, but how does one interpret the willful killing of tens of thousands of people in this belief? In Christianity there is a commandment that says: You shall not kill”. Whether Christianity has always adhered to this is of course questionable. But then, for what is probably the biggest celebration of the Orthodox Church, a truce is declared for 36 hours, but neither of the two warring parties is sticking to it. Russia continues to bombard it and, understandably, Ukraine