New world order 2 E-Book

Wagner Eduard

• Herausgeber: Books on Demand
• Kategorie: Geisteswissenschaft
• Serie: Neue Weltordnung 2
• Sprache: Englisch

Seitenzahl: 78

Veröffentlichungsjahr: 2023

Beschreibung

What is happening today is very surprising. Is it because people are only out to enrich themselves and to oppress others. It should also be a peaceful coexistence and not always just wars and other conflicts.

Leseprobe

Table of Contents

Foreword

April

International Criminal Court in The Hague

Guilty or not

Taiwan's President in the U.S.

No alternative for Finland and NATO

Circumvention of sanctions?

Patriarch Kirill I

The EU and the pharmaceutical industry

State of emergency in Italy

Intelligent "human" being

Jupiter Mission der ESA (European Space Agency)

Nuclear power plant phase-out from the FRG

Integration of foreigners

EU trade agreements with Latin American countries

Objectivity and journalism

Shooting money into the air

Howitzers carted through Austria

Lyrics of the national anthem

Ukraine, Sudan, Yemen and what else?

Generation retired or not

Elections in a federal state

Guilty or not?

Full success of self-destruction

May

Asylum, Immigration and Immigration

What do all three terms have in common?

How far is the understanding of politics?

Asylum centres at the EU's external borders

Does there have to be a gender delusion?

Drone warfare or partisan tactics

Gun violence among "children"

Coronation of a king

Reappraisal of the Corona measures

Fortress Europe

Inflation, demand and advertising

End of the 2nd World War 78 years ago

Corona vaccine for 340 years

78 years later

Free market economy or planned economy

Continue autocracy, or maybe democracy

Elections in Turkey

Obligations to supply arms

F-16 fighter jets for Ukraine

31 trillion and maybe even more

Gender nonsense from above

Asylum debate without end

Release of smugglers

Positional warfare in the SPÖ

Is this the beginning of the end?

DeSantis tritt an

Communism – Autocracy – Democracy

Reward for Russia's special operation

Banknotes for the population

Election results and Turks in Vienna

Power of Siberia 2 doch nicht?

Viktor Orbán gegen 11 Sanktionspaket

The elderly and their hunger for power

June

Bible with pornographic and offensive content

Post, but don't post content

Pipeline stop at the end of 2024

Rupture of the Kakhovka Dam in southern Ukraine

There is now a party chairman

Conference in Luxembourg and what results

Terrorist attack or not?

Violations of the law and the presidency

Shift to the right and left as the future

The taxpayer must "pay the price"

Are smugglers murderers?

Are former presidents immune?

Call for help from Africa

Success for DSN (Directorate of State Security and Intelligence)

Phasing out fossil fuels

Lack of money in the EU coffers

Seeing a global economy

Tired of life or the ultimate kick

Mini-submarine broke up while diving

Wagner troops in front of Moscow

Unrest in France

Neutrality or perhaps a duty to cooperate?

European Sky Shield necessary or not?

Foreword

Far be it from me to attack or condemn anyone here. Rather, it is my view of things as I interpret them below. It may well be that one or the other thinks that this is a radical view of things. But sometimes it seems to me like burying your head in the sand. Not reacting resolves itself. I believe this common thread runs through the entire written work. As I said, this is not paternalism of anyone, but my opinion on various things at home and abroad.

April

International Criminal Court in The Hague

Again and again we hear that this criminal court issues international arrest warrants and that they are also executed and executed, as in the case of Milosevic. But if the Uyghurs make such a demand of the Chinese president, then this is probably the right one, because you can't oppress a minority of 10 million just because they have different views. The only question is what effect such measures will have if they are actually carried out and such presidents are imprisoned. It may well be that people are very averse to such events and, in the best case, take to the streets to demonstrate. However, this can also lead to much harsher reactions, up to and including confrontations with weapons. It's only when you look at these rulers that you see again and again that you give them too much power and that's very difficult to fix afterwards. As we know from the past, such tendencies have repeatedly led to dictatorships that have a certain "expiration period", but the population has suffered as a result. One should not allow too much power and influence to the individual in advance in order to avoid such developments.

Guilty or not

Of course, as for everyone else, the presumption of innocence applies here. Only by looking at the 34 indictments of the prosecution can one doubt whether this person is really innocent. The prosecutor is not supposed to go to court until his charges are consolidated. It's just a little surprising that this former president is thinking about running for office next year. This is already shown by his attitude to the highest office in the greatest democracy. It is noteworthy, however, that consequences have been drawn from the storming of the Capitol and that demonstrations for or against this person have so far been brought under control. It is doubtful whether this will also be the case for a court hearing, as well as for a possible conviction. But that would certainly not be a good picture in the world if there were unrest.

Taiwan's President in the U.S.

Until now, it could be assumed that China would be neutral in the face of global crises. Now the presidents of Taiwan will travel to America and will be received by the chairman of the US House of Representatives, Kevin McCarthy. China's reaction with threatening gestures was not long in coming. Even though this world power considers Taiwan to be part of the People's Republic, this island nation is a sovereign country and one should assume that such visits to America are in Taiwan's interest. The relationship between the great powers is another matter. Both Russia and China regret an everlasting friendship between these two countries, without responding in the slightest to Russian aggression. As for America-China relations, there is a dangerous tension in the space that could perhaps escalate. It would be better to reconsider the situation before getting upset about a president's visit to the United States.

No alternative for Finland and NATO

Now the Finns have been able to join NATO, and this step will certainly benefit unity in this defensive alliance. Since this country has a border of well over 1,000 kilometers with a state that has attacked its neighbor without further notice, there is no alternative. It may well be that Russia, or at least a few, feel threatened. But what would have happened if Finland had remained "pact neutral"? One might suspect that Putin might feel called upon to occupy other states as well. And then? Wouldn't this scenario be the beginning of a new world war? But since man and his rulers keep believing that they have to defend themselves with more weapons, this is probably the end of the line for our planet. Thoughts of destruction buzz through the room. It is simply unreal that we put almost all our energy into the arms industry and forget about many other crises such as climate change. Such an approach to dealing with the current crises would certainly be beneficial for the international community, and not for the production and research of new materials of destruction.

Circumvention of sanctions?

As follows from the media, a domestic manager is trying to circumvent the sanctions of the European Union. This Siegfried Wolf is always on everyone's lips when it comes to benefits for one's own person. He wants to pump billions of dollars in investment into the Russian auto industry, which is struggling with EU sanctions, but how far does this person go? It may well be that his networks are almost endless and he addresses the attacker by his first name. However, the European Union not only deliberately decided on these sanctions, but rather these actions of the world economy were perhaps intended to force the aggressor to negotiate. Then this manager comes on the scene and, apparently only for his own motives, wants to torpedo such a measure of the international community. The only interesting thing is that the car company involved doesn't know very much about the entire procedure or this person's request. Apparently, the carmaker is on the side of the EU and not necessarily on profit optimization, as this manager probably imagines.

Patriarch Kirill I