1,99 €
Niedrigster Preis in 30 Tagen: 1,99 €
Niedrigster Preis in 30 Tagen: 1,99 €
Mehr erfahren.
- Herausgeber: DigiCat
- Kategorie: Gesellschafts- und Liebesromane
- Sprache: Englisch
In "The Diary of a Superfluous Man," Ivan Turgenev captures the introspective musings of a disenchanted gentleman, embodying the existential malaise of the Russian gentry in the mid-19th century. Written in a poignant diary format, the narrative adopts a confessional style, providing readers with an intimate glimpse into the protagonist's alienation and societal critique. Turgenev adeptly employs lyrical prose and vivid imagery, reflecting the influences of Romanticism while paving the way for Realism, masterfully intertwining personal reflection with broader social commentary on the futility of existence in an increasingly complex world. Ivan Turgenev, a pivotal figure in Russian literature, was deeply influenced by his own experiences of societal disconnection and philosophical exploration in a rapidly evolving Russia. Raised in a privileged yet stifling environment, Turgenev's encounters with urban intellectuals and his extensive travels across Europe enriched his understanding of human nature and the class struggles of his time. These themes resonate throughout the narrative as he presents a poignant portrait of the superfluous man, a figure emblematic of his era's existential quandaries. This book is a compelling read for anyone interested in the intersections of identity, class, and societal change. Turgenev's profound insights and emotional depth invite readers to reflect on their own place within the landscape of life, making "The Diary of a Superfluous Man" not only a literary classic but also an enduring exploration of the human condition. In this enriched edition, we have carefully created added value for your reading experience: - A succinct Introduction situates the work's timeless appeal and themes. - The Synopsis outlines the central plot, highlighting key developments without spoiling critical twists. - A detailed Historical Context immerses you in the era's events and influences that shaped the writing. - An Author Biography reveals milestones in the author's life, illuminating the personal insights behind the text. - A thorough Analysis dissects symbols, motifs, and character arcs to unearth underlying meanings. - Reflection questions prompt you to engage personally with the work's messages, connecting them to modern life. - Hand‐picked Memorable Quotes shine a spotlight on moments of literary brilliance. - Interactive footnotes clarify unusual references, historical allusions, and archaic phrases for an effortless, more informed read.
Das E-Book können Sie in Legimi-Apps oder einer beliebigen App lesen, die das folgende Format unterstützen:
Veröffentlichungsjahr: 2022
The Diary of a Superfluous Man
Table of Contents
Introduction
A man, sensing his life flicker to a close, takes up a pen to measure the chasm between the self he once envisioned and the one the world has seen. In this poignant premise lies the book’s core conflict: the struggle between inward aspiration and outward impotence. The Diary of a Superfluous Man offers not spectacle but the intimate drama of consciousness, where small hesitations ripple into fate. Its atmosphere is quiet, almost domestic, yet charged with the urgency of a final reckoning. What emerges is a portrait of a life defined less by events than by the meanings imposed upon them.
Ivan Turgenev, a foundational voice of Russian realism, composed The Diary of a Superfluous Man in the mid-nineteenth century; it was first published in 1850. The novella belongs to the period when Russian prose turned decisively toward psychological scrutiny and social observation. Turgenev, known for lucid style and humane insight, built here a compact study of character that anticipates his later, larger works. The book’s historical setting reflects the era’s constraints on the provincial gentry, though its concerns reach beyond any single place or time. Its concision and clarity make it an accessible point of entry into Turgenev’s art.
The premise is disarmingly simple. A minor nobleman, gravely ill, begins a diary to recount what he considers the substance of his life. He revisits scenes of youth, a love that shaped his self-understanding, and encounters that exposed his limitations. The pages are not a chronicle of grand deeds but a reckoning with missed chances and uncomfortable truths. Turgenev’s narrator writes from isolation, aware of his faltering voice yet compelled to speak. The diary form invites the reader into an unguarded intimacy, while the author’s restraint ensures the story remains focused on moral and psychological discovery rather than sensational incident.
The very title foregrounds a figure that had been emerging in Russian letters: the “superfluous man,” an educated, sensitive individual who feels redundant within the social order. Earlier writers had depicted kindred characters, but Turgenev’s explicit naming crystallized the type in critical discourse. In this novella, the condition is not a slogan but a lived experience, explored through the cadences of self-examination. The result is less a social diagnosis than a moral and existential inquiry: what does it mean to be surplus to one’s own ambitions, and how does such knowledge reshape memory, love, and the possibility of action?
Turgenev achieves this inquiry through stylistic economy and tonal balance. The prose moves with calm precision, joining elegance to exactness of observation. Irony glints at the edges of confession, yet mockery never overruns compassion. The diary’s episodic structure, mediated by a fading consciousness, produces a rhythm of approach and retreat that mirrors the narrator’s hesitations. Setting, too, is deftly sketched: rooms, roads, and provincial salons emerge just enough to carry psychological weight. The narrative voice, tempered and controlled, refuses melodrama, allowing the smallest gestures—an overlooked word, an unmade visit—to assume lasting significance.
The novella’s classic status rests on this fusion of moral seriousness and technical refinement. It speaks to the evolution of Russian prose toward psychological realism, illuminating how interior life can be rendered without theatricality. In classrooms and criticism, the work is often cited for its concise articulation of a literary type that shaped nineteenth-century debates about character and society. Readers return to it not for elaborate plot but for the austere beauty of its insight. By fixing attention on an ordinary life, Turgenev elevates observation to art, revealing how literature can dignify the neglected corners of experience.
The book also occupies a pivotal place in the genealogy of character studies across Russian literature. The figure it defines is frequently discussed alongside earlier examples in Pushkin and Lermontov, and in proximity to later portraits of inertia and alienation. Critical conversations often place the novella in dialogue with works such as Goncharov’s Oblomov and Dostoevsky’s explorations of self-conscious narrators, as well as with Chekhov’s quiet anatomies of disappointment. While each author pursues different ends, Turgenev’s concentrated sketch helps set the terms for how Russian writers would examine unfulfilled potential, moral paralysis, and the ache of social misfit.
Beneath its modest frame, the book engages enduring themes: the tension between desire and duty, the drift of days under social constraint, and the estrangement that follows from measuring oneself against elusive ideals. Turgenev considers how love illuminates character—exposing vanity, generosity, and fear—without reducing it to sentimentality. He shows how memory is both balm and snare, capable of refining experience even as it edits out uncomfortable detail. The diary becomes a laboratory for testing motives, where the protagonist tries to discern whether his failures arise from circumstance, temperament, or a subtler mixture of both.
The first-person form heightens these questions by inviting, then complicating, trust. The diarist speaks candidly, yet he also arranges events, selects phrases, and softens edges. Turgenev allows readers to sense both sincerity and self-deception, making interpretation part of the experience. This subtle play with reliability is not an exercise in trickery; it reflects the ordinary human wish to cast one’s life in a tolerable light. Such narrative tact anticipates later developments in psychological fiction, where the act of telling a story about oneself becomes as revealing as the story told.
Historically, the novella unfolds against the backdrop of mid-nineteenth-century Russian provincial life, a milieu shaped by hierarchy and habit. The minor gentry occupy a social space that permits education and leisure yet limits meaningful outlets for initiative. Expectations of service and propriety hover over private life, while distances—geographical and social—thicken inertia. Turgenev does not write a tract; he sketches conditions under which certain temperaments risk atrophy. In doing so, he captures a climate of constraint that resonates beyond its immediate setting, giving the personal narrative a broader social dimension without sacrificing specificity.
Part of the work’s enduring appeal lies in its brevity and clarity, which encourage careful rereading. Each page carries more than one register: a literal account, a psychological undertow, and a quiet ethical invitation. Translations have brought this economy of expression to readers worldwide, sustaining the book’s presence in discussions of realism and the history of narrative forms. For new readers, the novella offers the concentrated pleasure of a voice speaking plainly from a decisive moment. For returning readers, it yields fresh shades of meaning, as experience modifies what counts as “superfluous.”
Today, the themes of The Diary of a Superfluous Man remain unmistakably alive. In a world crowded with voices, many still fear disappearing into the margins, or mistaking activity for purpose. Turgenev’s diarist reminds us that self-knowledge is neither automatic nor final; it is a practice conducted in time, under pressure, and in language that may falter even as it seeks clarity. The book endures because it honors that fraught practice with poise and sympathy. By tracing the contour of one seemingly negligible life, it asks readers to weigh their own, and it does so with grace that does not age.
Synopsis
Ivan Turgenev’s The Diary of a Superfluous Man is a mid-nineteenth-century novella framed as the final reflections of a dying provincial nobleman. Writing in the first person, the diarist surveys the few experiences he believes define his existence, assembling a calm, unsentimental record rather than a dramatic confession. The form emphasizes interiority and measured self-assessment, while the setting evokes the constrained rhythms of provincial Russian life. As the narrator adopts the label “superfluous,” he sketches the social conditions that enable passivity and the personal habits that consolidate it. The book’s spare structure, anchored in dated entries, gradually reveals character through remembered scenes and closely observed motivations.
The diary opens with the narrator acknowledging his imminent death and the short time left to write. He proposes to set down only what matters, offering a truthful self-portrait without ornament. He presents himself as a minor landowner with a desultory education and a meandering, undistinguished path through officialdom. From the outset, he emphasizes his tendency to watch rather than act, to defer decisive moments until they pass. He disclaims the role of victim, aiming instead to arrange the fragments of his past into a legible whole. The scope will be modest: a handful of episodes that, in his judgment, carry the weight of his life.
He turns to his earlier years in a provincial town, where he drifted into bureaucratic routines and the gentle tedium of calls, card tables, and evening visits. Turgenev presents a society of polite surfaces and quiet hierarchies, sustained by small favors and inherited expectations. The diarist describes acquaintances who pass through salons and gardens, exchanging formalities more than convictions. He remains on the margins—neither scorned nor sought—accepted as an agreeable presence without consequence. This atmosphere, both comfortable and stifling, forms the ground of his self-doubt. He marks the gap between sensitivity and initiative, and begins to suspect that his temperament suits observation more than participation.
Amid this milieu, a meeting alters the tone of his recollection: he becomes acquainted with a young woman whose vitality unsettles his guarded equilibrium. Visits to her household intensify his attention to the nuances of speech and gesture. Under the watchful propriety of her family, he moves within the limits of approved conversation, while inwardly magnifying every glance into a promise. Turgenev renders the growth of feeling as a study in self-consciousness—hope expands, then turns into hesitation. The narrator’s idealization collides with ritual politeness; he strives to appear composed and worthy, yet discovers in himself a chronic delay that makes even simple candor feel perilous.
Social gatherings provide occasions for small advances and larger misunderstandings. At name-days and promenades, the diarist seeks a private word, then retreats into ceremony. His attempts to fix meaning in a smile or a remark bring him no closer to commitment. He rehearses declarations, chooses silence, and afterward chastises himself for cowardice. Meanwhile, the town’s talk tightens around the household he frequents, dramatizing ordinary visits. Turgenev’s scenes expose the precarious balance between sincerity and performance in courtship governed by etiquette. The young woman remains courteous yet ultimately unreadable to him, and the narrator’s isolation grows more acute within the very circles he frequents.
A rival presence crystallizes his uncertainty: a confident, socially assured man whose competence commands easy regard. Where the diarist watches, the newcomer decides; where the diarist weighs possibilities, the rival acts. Family and acquaintances, following convention and instinct, respond to this decisiveness. The narrator, measuring himself against the contrast, confronts the structural advantages of birth, bearing, and practiced ease. He recognizes that chance has a place, but that habit and character rule the field. In response, he resolves to speak more plainly, to cut through his own self-scrutiny, and to risk the embarrassment he has so carefully avoided.
The effort to assert himself arrives at the wrong moment and in the wrong manner. A misjudged overture, shaped by pride as much as feeling, leaves him exposed to gentle but unmistakable rebuff. Turgenev keeps the scene unsensational, preferring the accuracy of minor humiliations to theatrics. The diarist’s health, strained by anxiety and long-deferred crises, begins to falter. He withdraws, oscillating between attempts to assign blame and a clearer recognition of his complicity. Rather than dramatize the town’s verdict, the narrative tightens around his interior reckoning—how vanity dressed itself as delicacy, and how fear of vulgarity became an alibi for inaction.
Returning to the present, the narrator assembles his conclusions about the “superfluous man,” a figure shaped by idle privilege, timid ambition, and a social order that rewards polish over purpose. He does not absolve institutions that sustain mediocrity, yet he refuses to place responsibility entirely outside himself. He considers an education that sharpened perception while blunting resolve, and a moral code that prized decorum over decision. The diary’s final entries aim less to complain than to classify, offering a restrained case study of a temperament ill-suited to its occasions. In setting his papers in order, he seeks a measure of composure he seldom found in life.
