The Interpretation of Dreams E-Book

Sigmund Freud

• Herausgeber: John Wiley & Sons
• Kategorie: Geisteswissenschaft
• Serie: Capstone Classics
• Sprache: Englisch
• Veröffentlichungsjahr: 2020

Seitenzahl: 1057

Beschreibung

Part of the bestselling Capstone Classics Series edited by Tom Butler-Bowdon, this collectible, hard-back edition of The Interpretation of Dreams provides an accessible and insightful edition of this important work of psychology Sigmund Freud's The Interpretation of Dreams introduced his ground-breaking theory of the unconscious and explored how interpreting dreams can reveal the true nature of humanity. Regarded as Freud's most significant work, this classic text helped establish the discipline of psychology and is the foundational work in the field of psychoanalysis. Highly readable and engaging, the book both provides a semi-autobiographical look into Freud's personal life - his holidays in the Alps, spending time with his children, interacting with friends and colleagues - and delves into descriptions and analyses of the dreams themselves. Freud begins with a review of literature on dreams written by a broad range of ancient and contemporary figures - concluding that science has learned little of the nature of dreams in the past several thousand years. Although the prevailing view was that dreams were merely responses to 'sensory excitation,' Freud felt that the multifaceted dimensions of dreams could not be attributed solely to physical causes. By the time Freud began writing the book he had interpreted over a thousand dreams of people with psychoses and recognised the connection between the content of dreams and a person's mental health. Among his conclusions were that a person's dreams: * Prefer using recent impressions, yet also have access to early childhood memories * Unify different people, places, events and sensations into one story * Usually focus on small or unnoticed things rather than major events * Are almost always 'wish fulfilments' which are about the self * Have many layers of meaning which are often condensed into a single image The Interpretation of Dreams: The Psychology Classic is as riveting today as it was over a century ago. Anyone with interest in the workings of the unconscious mind will find this book an invaluable source of original insights and foundational scientific concepts. This edition includes an insightful Introduction by Sarah Tomley, a psychology writer and practicing psychotherapist. Tomley considers paints a picture of Freud's life and times, reveals the place of The Interpretation of Dreams in the context of Freud's other writings, and draws out the key points of the work.

Leseprobe

Also available in the same series:

Beyond Good and Evil: The Philosophy Classicby Friedrich Nietzsche (ISBN: 978-0-857-08848-2)

Meditations: The Philosophy Classicby Marcus Aurelius (ISBN 978-0-857-08846-8)

On the Origin of Species: The Science Classicby Charles Darwin (ISBN: 978-0-857-08847-5)

Tao Te Ching: The Ancient Classicby Lao Tzu (ISBN: 978-0-857-08311-1)

The Art of War: The Ancient Classicby Sun Tzu (ISBN: 978-0-857-08009-7)

The Game of Life and How to Play It: The Self-Help Classicby Florence Scovel Shinn (ISBN: 978-0-857-08840-6)

The Prince: The Original Classicby Niccolo Machiavelli (ISBN: 978-0-857-08078-3)

The Prophet: The Spiritual Classicby Kahlil Gibran (ISBN: 978-0-857-08855-0)

The Republic: The Influential Classicby Plato (ISBN: 978-0-857-08313-5)

The Science of Getting Rich: The Original Classicby Wallace Wattles (ISBN: 978-0-857-08008-0)

The Wealth of Nations: The Economics Classicby Adam Smith (ISBN: 978-0-857-08077-6)

Think and Grow Rich: The Original Classicby Napoleon Hill (ISBN: 978-1-906-46559-9)

THE INTERPRETATION OF DREAMSThe Psychology Classic

SIGMUND FREUD

With an Introduction bySARAH TOMLEY

This edition first published 2020Introduction copyright © Sarah Tomley, 2020

The material for The Interpretation of Dreams is based on the first English edition, translated by A.A. Brill, published by The Macmillan Company, 1913: New York, and is now in the public domain. This edition is not sponsored or endorsed by, or otherwise affiliated with Sigmund Freud or A.A. Brill, their families or heirs.

Registered officeJohn Wiley & Sons Ltd, The Atrium, Southern Gate, Chichester, West Sussex, PO19 8SQ, United Kingdom

For details of our global editorial offices, for customer services and for information about how to apply for permission to reuse the copyright material in this book please see our website at www.wiley.com.

The right of the author to be identified as the author of this work has been asserted in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988.

All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, except as permitted by the UK Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988, without the prior permission of the publisher.

Wiley publishes in a variety of print and electronic formats and by print-on-demand. Some material included with standard print versions of this book may not be included in e-books or in print-on-demand. If this book refers to media such as a CD or DVD that is not included in the version you purchased, you may download this material at http://booksupport.wiley.com. For more information about Wiley products, visit www.wiley.com.

Designations used by companies to distinguish their products are often claimed as trademarks. All brand names and product names used in this book are trade names, service marks, trademarks or registered trademarks of their respective owners. The publisher is not associated with any product or vendor mentioned in this book.

Limit of Liability/Disclaimer of Warranty: While the publisher and author have used their best efforts in preparing this book, they make no representations or warranties with respect to the accuracy or completeness of the contents of this book and specifically disclaim any implied warranties of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose. It is sold on the understanding that the publisher is not engaged in rendering professional services and neither the publisher nor the author shall be liable for damages arising herefrom. If professional advice or other expert assistance is required, the services of a competent professional should be sought.

A catalogue record for this book is available from the Library of Congress.

A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library.

ISBN 978–0–857–08844–4 (hardback) ISBN 978–0–857–08843-7 (ePDF)ISBN 978–0–857–08845-1 (ePub)

Cover design: Wiley

Printed in Great Britain by TJ International Ltd, Padstow, Cornwall, UK

An Introduction

By Sarah Tomley1

‘It became possible to prove that dreams have a meaning, and to discover it.’

Freud, An Autobiographical Study, 19251

The publication of The Interpretation of Dreams in 1899 marked the birth of psychoanalysis, which was to have a vast impact on the culture of the twentieth century.

During the nineteenth century, Darwin had disarmed the powers of religion with his evolutionary theories, while Marx had stirred the working people of the world into taking political power. Freud was the last of this great triumvirate who sought to free people, and his quarry was no less than the human mind itself. His theories of the unconscious and the idea that we are all driven by desires and impulses that are not capable of being fully known – let alone controlled – were both thrilling and terrifying to his contemporaries.

More than 120 years after the publication of The Interpretation of Dreams, neuroscientists are resurrecting Freud’s most important insights as they discover more about the workings of the human brain, and especially its fast, implicit (non-conscious) functioning. Among them, Antonio Damasio has reflected that ‘Freud’s insights on the nature of affect [emotion] are consonant with the most advanced contemporary neuroscience views’.2 How did a nineteenth-century physician come to understand so much about the brain and the mind without any of the tools that are available today?

Who was Sigmund Freud?

Freud was born in 1856, three years before the publication of Darwin’s On the Origin of Species, and at a time of ‘fragile democracies and unstable aristocracies, inexhaustible capitalism and economic depression, of the de-traditionalising of societies and an exorbitant arms race’.3 His family lived in a small town in Moravia, now part of the Czech Republic, but at the age of four they moved to Vienna. Jakob and Amalia Freud were outsiders, being both Jewish and immigrants, or ‘resident aliens’. They were keen for their first child and son, Sigismund Schlomo Freud, to take up a profession such as medicine or law. Not so much for the guaranteed income, though this was a welcome thought to a family that had suffered huge financial difficulties, but for the prestige and status it would bring. If their children could make a significant and honourable contribution to their adopted culture, they might be granted acceptance and have some sense of ‘home’ – always a challenge for Jewish families in an age of diaspora.

Freud was the firstborn son to his mother, but not his father. Jakob had been married once (perhaps twice) before, and had sons aged 23 and 26 when Sigismund was born. A wool merchant, he is known to have been a kind, easy-going man. Freud recorded nothing about his mother Amalia at all (a fact of no small interest to psychoanalysts). This may be due to the fact that, when Sigismund was one year old, Amalia gave birth to a son, Julius, who died just six to eight months later. Freud effectively lost his mother, in terms of emotional support and daily care, and he was looked after for six months by a Czech Catholic nanny. He later credited this woman with having provided him ‘with the means for living, and going on living’.

Nonetheless, according to his sister Anna, Freud grew up as the favourite of his parents. They were particularly keen that he be given peace and quiet for his studies, even banishing his sisters’ beloved piano from the house. From the age of nine until he left school to go to university, Freud was always ‘top of his class’, as he noted in his Autobiographical Study. The young Freud loved literature and was talented at languages, learning Greek, Latin, Spanish, Italian, French, and English. He also had a love of ancient history and archaeology. All of these interests would later play into his discovery of the human mind and his psychoanalytic approach.

Young Doctor

Freud always considered himself a scientist and atheist (‘I was always an unbeliever’, he wrote in 1926). On leaving school in 1873, he enrolled at the University of Vienna, where he studied biology and physiology (he confessed to being a ‘dismal failure’ in chemistry and zoology). From his third year onwards, he specialized in neurology in Ernst Brücke’s institute of physiology. Shortly after receiving his degree, he reluctantly left the research laboratory and took up a job at Vienna General Hospital. He had become engaged to Martha Bernays and needed a secure income.

During this time he also met Josef Breuer, a Viennese doctor. Breuer’s insights and friendship would steer Freud away from medicine and towards psychology, specifically through his interest in the cure of physical symptoms with psychological causes. Freud’s visit to Paris in 1885 to study female ‘hysterics’ under the care of Jean-Martin Charcot also heightened his interest in the connections between mind and body.

On his return to Vienna in 1886, Freud married Martha and set up in private practice. Between 1887 and 1895, the couple had six children, making for a hectic and busy home life. At the same time, Freud continued to work with Breuer on formulating their ‘talking cure’ for hysteria.

In 1895, Breuer and Freud published Studies on Hysteria. It was not a bestseller and would take six years to sell 600 copies. The following year, Freud’s father died. As he was now a father himself it had extra poignance and sparked a rigorous self-analysis. This was to be almost entirely conducted through an analysis of his dreams – and this is what forms the core of The Interpretation of Dreams. For this reason, the book gives the reader a unique insight into Freud’s mind and also into the practice of psychoanalysis in the making. In other words, Freud used his own self-analysis to lay the foundations of psychoanalysis.

Publication and Impact

On its publication in Vienna at the end of 1899, Die Traumdeutung was read in large numbers by the general public, who were fascinated by its innovative method of interpreting dreams. Though Freud came to doubt and revise many of his works and ideas, he never lost faith in the book, saying ‘it has always been The Interpretation of Dreams that has given me back my certainty’.4

It explained to the world, for the first time, his theory of the unconscious, which would revolutionize thinking about the human mind. During the following 39 years, Freud published over 320 books, essays, and articles. From the humble beginnings of the Wednesday Society (made up of Freud and four colleagues) in 1902, psychoanalysis as an idea and a practice would spread across the world.

Upon Freud’s death from throat cancer in 1939, his obituary in The New York Times did not hold back, lauding him as perhaps ‘the greatest single influence on the thought of the 20th century’.

A Science of the Unconscious

If, as Freud asserted, our dreams are created within the unconscious, we need to know a little about this subterranean part of the mind in order to interpret their messages. Nobel-prize-winning neuroscientist Eric Kandel points out that ‘most of our mental life, including most of our emotional life, is unconscious at any given moment’.5

So the unconscious operates 24/7, but what exactly is it? The idea of the unconscious dates back around 2000 years to the physician Galen, who realized that people drew inferences from perceptions that they were not aware of having made. For example, we might assume someone is wealthy because we’ve taken in details about their clothing without even consciously knowing we’ve done so. The Christian philosopher St Thomas Aquinas described the unconscious mind as being felt like a ghost – we sense it as a presence, but without substantiality.

The idea of the unconscious continued to fascinate thinkers, but it was not until Freud that it began to be systematically addressed. As a physician, Freud wanted to discover the structure and processes of the unconscious. He also wanted to be able to engage and work with it in a scientific way. This was an entirely novel idea. How could even the most brilliant of physicians work with an invisible and essentially unknowable entity? One that is, by definition, beyond our awareness? Freud articulated the question in 1915 as: ‘How are we to arrive at a knowledge of the unconscious?’ It became the defining question of his life and would lead him to create the ‘talking cure’ of psychoanalysis – the starting point for every psychotherapeutic approach that has been developed since 1900.

Freud claimed that ‘we possess manifold proofs of the existence of the unconscious’,6 and by ‘we’ he meant everybody. All of us, he said, have noticed the sudden arrival in our minds of an idea unconnected to anything else we were thinking about. We have all suddenly realized something as though we had just reached a conclusion, but without having been aware of puzzling over a problem at all. These things are only possible, he said, if there is a part of the mind working outside conscious awareness, always busy, but rarely intruding upon the rational, conscious mind.

Freud initially described the structure of the mind as consisting of three areas, which hold thoughts and impulses that are either conscious, preconscious, or unconscious. We might experience a conscious impulse to go for a bicycle ride; we might mentally grope for a friend’s name that is temporarily just outside conscious awareness (held in the preconscious); or we might react to a thought or impulse that we have no conscious awareness of at all (perhaps the real reason we are taking that bike ride is to avoid seeing our partner’s father, who is visiting).

Freud investigated all three areas, but the unconscious was the one that fascinated him most. How did information come to be placed in it, and why? What influence did it continue to have? Was unconscious information the stuff of dreams? And what would happen if the material held within the unconscious mind was brought into the light of conscious awareness?

An Organized System

Freud suggested that there are particular ways that information flows into and around the system that is the mind. This information is then used and stored according to certain ‘rules’, particularly those imposed by self-censorship. We are very strict with ourselves, he noticed, in terms of what we feel we should and should not think or do. We do this in order to be able to think of ourselves as essentially good people.

This realization became key to Freud’s thinking. He explained the mind in dynamic terms, as a system in motion, with information and energy flowing or being blocked through defensive or repressive actions. These actions served to protect our own idea of ourselves. This is uncannily similar to the position that psychotherapists take today. The neuroscientist and psychotherapist Daniel Siegel, for instance, describes the mind as: ‘an emergent, self-organizing, embodied and relational process that regulates the flow of energy and information’.7 The mind is not a ‘thing’ but (in simple terms) a collection of neural pathways and processes, like the internet. It makes links (associations) and runs from one site to another (along neural pathways), often coming to dead ends (incomplete or blocked memories) or feedback loops (circular thinking). And it operates extremely fast – we now know that the unconscious processing capability of the brain is approximately 11 million bits of information per second. Conscious processing is incredibly slow in comparison, at a maximum of 40 bits of information per second.8 This means that the vast majority of our thinking goes on without our having any awareness of it at all.

Psychologists have devised experiments to access the processes of the non-conscious mind (as today’s scientists prefer to refer to it, perhaps wanting to distance themselves from Freud). However, in the late 1890s, Freud was very aware that he lacked any of the tools that would be necessary to gain a true, neuroscientific study of the mind. His only option was to base all his research on the clinical experience of patients. He also happened to begin his clinical work, almost accidentally, with a group of extremely troubled women who were classed as ‘female hysterics’.

The Birth of Psychoanalysis

Freud’s medical career began when he studied under Ernst von Brücke, a pioneer in the field of physiology. Under his tutelage Freud produced outstanding work on the brain, according to Brücke, but the professor steered Freud away from continuing research. The reason was prosaic: he pointed out that Freud’s engagement to Martha Bernays and impending marriage necessitated a move towards more remunerative work.

Brücke introduced Freud to Josef Breuer, who in turn introduced Freud to the idea of psychosomatic (‘hysterical’) symptoms in his patients, such as ‘Anna O’. This young woman was paralysed in three limbs, had severe disturbances of sight and hearing, and continually suffered from a strange cough. Breuer told Freud that Anna O’s symptoms seemed to improve when she was asked to say whatever came into her mind – even if ‘ridiculous, apparently meaningless or shameful’.9 She was allowed to freely associate from one word to another, without trying to make sense of any of it.

Breuer encouraged Freud to set up in private practice, specializing in hysteria. Freud travelled to Paris to study under the famous physician Jean-Martin Charcot, who was using hypnosis to replicate hysterical attacks and possibly cure them. Charcot had found that hysteria occurred equally in men and women and suggested that it was a disease of the nervous system. This strange intermingling of the health of body and mind intrigued Freud, who began to train his focus on psychology, rather than medicine. He noticed that Charcot not only induced trances, but listened to his patients with great attention, noticing every nuance and detail. This was to become a key part of the psychoanalytic practice.

Returning to Vienna, Freud attempted hypnosis with his patients, but failed to achieve inspiring results. Then, one afternoon in 1892, he tried something different. He asked his patient, the 24-year-old ‘Elisabeth von R’ to lie down on the couch and close her eyes. Freud, meanwhile, kept his hand pressed to her forehead, asking her to say out loud anything and everything that passed through her mind. Employing this ‘chimney sweeping’ technique (as Breuer called it), and the attentive listening of Charcot, Freud also kept on his analytic hat, ‘paying careful attention wherever a connection remained enigmatical or where a link in the chain of causation seemed to be lacking’.10 This moment marked the birth of psychoanalysis.

The young woman, whose symptoms included acute leg pains, was eventually able to tell Freud of her forbidden love for her deceased sister’s husband, and how they had enjoyed long walks together until she became incapable of walking. The woman experienced her thoughts and impulses towards the man she loved as totally unacceptable; they challenged her idea of herself as a good and moral person. It was clear that self-censorship was at play and the stakes were very high; in order to retain an idea of ourselves as being ‘good’ we will strenuously attempt to banish unwanted and disturbing thoughts from our consciousness. We will, in fact, without consciously knowing it, push the ‘bad’ thoughts and impulses into the unconscious. But some part of us does know that we’re doing this, Freud realized, because it takes a form of determination to enact the process. ‘The presupposition of the whole work was … the expectation that a perfect and sufficient determination could be demonstrated.’11

The unconscious was operating knowingly (with intention) but not consciously. Hysteria was not a disease of the nervous system, as Charcot had said, but psychologically caused. And the hysterical symptoms were not random, but a solution to the real underlying problem. This marked a major step forward in Freud’s thinking.

Id, Ego, Superego – The Fight for Supremacy

Freud recognized that although human intelligence outstrips that of other animals, we are fundamentally unhappy, regardless of the circumstances of our lives. This is due to two factors. First, we have the ability to time-travel in our minds, so we can re-experience the past, and pre-experience the future. This allows us to learn very quickly, as we are constantly building on past experience. At the same time, past experience may be a faulty way to map out a future, and it can act to trap us within ‘old thinking’ that prevents us from moving forward. The two-year-old may experience an emotional event of such impact that the adult may still be guided by its ‘lesson’ even 70 years later.

Secondly, humans have a level of meta-intelligence that most other mammals lack. In other words, we are aware of our thoughts and impulses. This self-awareness adds to our learning abilities and empowers us as social animals to build large societies. At the same time, it allows us to judge ourselves very harshly, sometimes to the point of immobility. The source of this judgement, Freud proposed, was the development of a kind of inner conscience that he called the Superego. As children grow, they absorb the rules and values of their parents, teachers, other authority figures and the wider culture. In the process, they build an idea of what’s ‘normal’ without realizing either that they’re doing this, or that these norms are unique to them. The absorbed rules are taken in as objective truths, rather than subjective opinions, whether it is small things like ‘you must always clear your plate’ to far-reaching ideas such as the inferiority of another race.

The Superego has to enforce these rules rigidly, Freud saw, because it is always fighting an equally powerful internal force that he called the Id. This is the source of our primitive drives, especially the sexual and aggressive ones. The Id wants food, stuff, people, sex – and it wants it ‘now’. It doesn’t care about other people, or society’s norms, it just seeks instant gratification. The Superego tries to control the rampant desires coming up from the Id, while the more adult Ego, which has the best grip on reality, tries to make the final decision. However, ‘[a]s the child was once under a compulsion to obey its parents,’ Freud observed, ‘so the Ego submits to the categorical imperative of its Superego.’ This is why our conscious self loses out to the control of the unconscious.

Freud realized that this internal monitor functions to stop us saying or doing ‘wrong’ things in the external world, but also works to push away thoughts or impulses felt within ourselves that are recognized as ‘bad’. That lustful feeling towards someone else’s partner? The sudden realization that you don’t like your mother? Some of our thoughts and impulses are considered unacceptable, even to ourselves, and Freud discovered that the mind had developed a sophisticated system for dealing with this very problem. We consciously try to ‘abrogate’ (evade) or ‘annihilate’ these unwanted thoughts or impulses, he says; we try to get rid of them in some way. But Freud discovered that what actually happens is that the mind somehow boxes off the unwanted thoughts, impulses, and memories, by using one of a variety of methods, so that they are no longer available for access by the conscious mind. It feels as though we’ve got rid of them, but in fact we’re just holding them somewhere else. This process is what Freud refers to as ‘repression’. He also realized that if ‘the essence of the process of repression lies … in withholding it from becoming conscious’,12 there must be particular processes that bring about this ‘withholding’. How are we keeping these secrets from ourselves?

Techniques for Hiding from Ourselves

Freud’s theory of psychoanalysis rested on a belief in finding logic within an apparently illogical situation, by discovering links between the conscious and unconscious worlds. He believed that his method, which involved data gathering and the definition and measurement of unconscious processes, was scientific.

There were, for instance, many different ways in which we withhold repressed material and discharge its associated emotions.

He identified processes such as denial (pretending the feeling doesn’t exist); displacement (expressing the feeling – such as anger – on a safer target than its real one); projection (telling yourself that someone else feels anger, not you); rationalization (coming up with a rational, acceptable reason for your behaviour, not the real one); intellectualization (focusing on the facts of the situation and avoiding the feelings); and sublimation (doing something socially acceptable to gratify the impulse, such as taking up boxing because you feel aggressive towards someone).

Freud’s discovery passed the idea of reacting ‘defensively’ into common language, and his daughter Anna Freud would do further work in the area of defence mechanisms. What’s most important about these forms of repression, Freud said, is that the repressed ideas – and their energy – continue to motivate our behaviour and govern our whole perspective on the world. They impact on our lives every single day, and yet we are usually completely unaware of their existence.

At the conscious level, Freud recognized that we do a good job of trying to distract ourselves from uncomfortable knowledge or feelings. These efforts may bring temporary relief, but they are unable to shift the problem itself, which always has roots in the unconscious. So we might distract ourselves from the weight of our suffering (from grief, anxiety, or depression, for instance) by increasing the hours we spend in work and intellectual activity. Or we try to counteract it by increasing the things that bring us pleasure, such as art, hobbies or entertainment (video games, box sets, shopping). Freud called these activities ‘substitutive satisfactions’. If these strategies fail, we may start to depend on intoxicants, such as alcohol or drugs, to numb ourselves to whatever feels so unbearably uncomfortable. If any of the coping mechanisms we use begins to work better than the others, we start to use it exclusively and in a greater, more repeated manner. Eventually, we become addicted to this solution, be it work, shopping, or drugs. At this point, where once the strategy (pleasure, busyness, numbing intoxicants) brought relief from suffering, now it brings only more suffering.

The tragic part of this, says Freud, is that we don’t even know what the problem is. We are just aware that life seems unbearable in some way, and the feeling may spiral until all seems hopeless and there appears to be no way out. At this point, the suffering may become somatized, so that it is felt in the body and shown in acute and chronic physical symptoms – such as those experienced by his ‘hysterical’ patients. In observing this, Freud believed he had found the interface between mind and body.

Today, the connection between mind and body in terms of health is largely taken for granted, and the physical symptoms may be every bit as severe as in Freud’s day. Many psychiatrists today undertake the treatment of severe physical symptoms resulting from traumatic events, and these have been widely documented by authors such as Gordon Turnbull and Suzanne O’Sullivan. In this respect, Freud was well ahead of his time.

Freudian Slips and the Power of Dreams

While many later psychoanalysts, such as Karen Horney, saw the goal of therapy as giving a person ‘the courage to be himself’, for Freud, the goal was slightly different; he said that we need to be helped to face ourselves. This looks at first like a subtle difference, but Freud’s idea contains the understanding that we fool ourselves about who we are. We tell ourselves that we are living in line with the Superego’s rules, but in fact the equally powerful demands of the Id mean that we very often break them. We cannot afford to see this, even while we are aware of an intense internal conflict and continue to try to deny those parts of ourselves that we dislike. We don’t like to admit to feeling envious of a friend’s success, for instance, or of anxiety in a social situation, or perhaps of a feeling of worthlessness around a parent or sibling. We would, understandably, just like to rid ourselves of these problems, once and for all (hence the popularity of ‘rational’ therapies such as CBT, which offer ways of controlling symptoms, thereby making the feelings easier to deny). We pretend that we’re fine, and just need to find a way to manage these ‘ridiculous’ feelings, which we spend much of our waking hours trying to avoid in some way, only to find them erupt in a myriad of ways in our sleep, or in ‘accidents’ such as Freudian slips. These slips of the tongue are where our real motivation or feelings become painfully apparent. Freud’s term for them was Fehlleistung, meaning ‘faulty action’ – because the conscious mind reaches for one word or action, but the unconscious sneaks out an entirely different one.

Freud used the method of free association pioneered by Breuer to explore these slips in speech and memory, and to explore the real significance of dreams. The task of the psychoanalytic method was to be ‘the task of discovering from the accidental utterances and fancies of the patient the thought contents, which, though striving for concealment, nevertheless unintentionally betray themselves’.13 For Freud, there are few true accidents in our speech and behaviour. This idea has gained such common currency, but in the early 1900s, when rationality and science were held as the highest – perhaps only – forms of truth, it was a revolutionary idea.

Dreams as the Royal Road to the Unconscious

It was through investigating his own dreams and those of others that Freud fleshed out his working method for psychoanalysis. The imaginative realm that we access during sleep, he said, offers us unique access to the unconscious. As he put it, ‘the interpretation of dreams is the royal road to a knowledge of the unconscious activities of the mind’ (Freud, IOD, ch 7). By analysing dreams, ‘we can take a step forward in our understanding of the composition of that most marvellous and most mysterious of all instruments’ – the mind itself.

In The Interpretation of Dreams, Freud begins by looking at the history of dream analysis. He finds theories suggesting that dreams are extremely powerful (they prophetically foretell the future) as well as those claiming that dreams are utterly meaningless (they are banal nonsense comprising muddled up pieces of everyday life). Freud picks up on Aristotle’s idea that there is something real-world in the content, but instead of dismissing dreams because of their irrationality, as Aristotle had done, Freud suggests that this is what gives dreams their power. They are logical, but their logic and meaning have been heavily disguised by the mind.

In a dream, the real content (Freud called this the ‘latent content’) has undergone a process of transformation, so that the unconscious is finding expression and yet, not quite. In order to understand the true meaning behind the dream and discover our deepest desires, we need a way to decipher the seemingly irrational dream material or story (the ‘manifest content’).

Dreams, according to Freud, are a way in which we communicate with ourselves. As psychoanalyst Adam Phillips says, every night the dreamer tells herself secrets about what she wants, like an informer, spying on her past, and especially the unmet needs of that past.14 What’s strange, Freud said, is that we have this extraordinary capability to create and transform material within the mind, and yet we’re completely unaware of doing it. He agreed with the philosopher Nietzsche, that everyone is an artist in creating their dreams.

Dreams as Wish Fulfilment

Freud claimed that all dreams are wish fulfilment, sometimes in the simplest of ways, such as when his daughter Anna dreamed of eating the strawberries she had been forbidden in the day (Freud refers to the day before the dream as the ‘dream day’). However, most of the time, dreams represent repressed wishes. This is how dreams tie in with the unconscious processes that take place during our waking days. When unwanted, unliked, perhaps shameful thoughts or desires come up during the day, we may repress them (using one of the methods mentioned above). They are now withheld from consciousness, but the effort involved uses considerable energy. While we are asleep these thoughts and desires (Freud calls them ‘involuntary ideas’) find a way to break through the barrier into the dreamer’s mind. This is because ‘the watchman’ who censors material emerging from the unconscious ‘goes to rest’ when we sleep. Freud explains that ‘[t]he unconscious impulse makes use of this nocturnal relaxation of repression in order to push its way into consciousness with the dream’.15

Our dreams move from the unconscious to the preconscious, latent level of the mind. But the self-censorship that was there in the day continues, so we now have a situation in which there are two opposing forces: one that constructs the dream wish, and one that that censors it. The compromise is distortion. In order to appear in the dream, the latent (real) content must be distorted into the manifest content (that shown in the dream). The repressed material is now heavily disguised within the dream, so that the dreamer does not recognize or come to know the latent material that it contains. This, said Freud, is why dreams are so bewildering and difficult to fathom: they were designed to be.

Yet psychoanalysis provides us with the techniques to decode dreams, Freud said. We can decipher the manifest content through free association, knowledge of recent events and older memories, and by adopting a curious, non-judgemental stance. The patient ‘must adopt a completely impartial attitude to what occurs to him, since it is precisely his critical attitude which is responsible for his being unable, in the ordinary course of things, to achieve the desired unravelling of his dream or obsessional idea or whatever it may be’ (Freud, IOD, ch 2). Initially, we must observe and recount, not reflect. If we allow our self-censoring part to step in and start editing the account of the dream, all the meaningful details will be lost. The lightning-fast forces of the unconscious (operating at 40 million bits per second), may step in quickly to distort, ‘make sense of’, or even delete the whole dream from our conscious minds.

Elements of the Dreamwork

‘At bottom, dreams are nothing other than a particular form of thinking. It is the dream-work which creates that form’ (Freud, IOD, ch 6). This dreamwork – the creative force that weaves the dream – uses four ways in which to disguise the elements of the dream.

The first, condensation, is where a number of dream elements are combined, so that a person in your dream, for instance, may be both your sister and your elementary school teacher. Words may also be combined, as Freudian slips or puns, so that a phone’s ring functions to replace a jewellery ring. The second form of encoding is displacement, whereby unimportant material in the dream is given great significance, while the truly important content passes by the dreamer in a very insignificant way. This allows heightened emotion to become attached to a seemingly strange thing (because the emotion really belongs with a different element of the dream).

The third form of encoding, known as secondary revision, is a process that takes place at the end of the dreaming to weave all the content into a semi-coherent narrative. Secondary revision allows the conscious mind to apply a normalizing sense of ‘what it was about’, by glossing over inconsistencies and gaps in the dream and allowing us to think that it had a story – in much the same way that we weave all the independent events in our lives into a life story in our minds.

The fourth element that Freud noticed was that dreams do not come to us as thoughts: ‘As the involuntary ideas emerge they change into visual and acoustic images’ (Freud, IOD, ch 6). This transformation into pictures, particularly, allows another form of encoding, because words and thoughts must be rendered into a new (pictorial) language, allowing further levels of condensation and displacement.

Deciphering Your Dreams

By reading The Interpretation of Dreams it may be possible to begin to decode your own dreams, just as many people did when the book was first published. This is a supremely powerful way to get to know yourself, Freud said, but he did not suggest it would be in any way an easy task.

The adoption of the required attitude towards ideas that seem to emerge ‘of their own free will’, and the abandonment of the critical function normally in operation against them, is hard to do for some people. Freud notes that “the ‘involuntary ideas’ habitually evoke the most violent resistance, which seeks to prevent them from coming to the surface” (Freud, IOD, ch 2). The resistance is there for the same reason as the self-censorship – we don’t really want to know ourselves, especially the ‘shadow’ parts of our personality, as Jung would say. In the Preface to the first edition, even Freud confesses that while he has included many of his own dreams in the book, ‘I have been unable to resist the temptation of taking the edge off some of my indiscretions by omissions and substitutions’.

To read this book is to undertake a high-risk adventure of self-revelation and, in order to proceed, the reader must throw caution (and sense, at least initially) to the wind. But also bear in mind that, for Freud, nothing could ever be entirely wrapped up or certain. He wrote:

It is … never possible to be sure that a dream has been completely interpreted. Even if the solution seems satisfactory and without gaps, the possibility always remains that the dream may have yet another meaning.

It seems we are always safe from letting ourselves know who we really are.

Notes

1

Freud, Sigmund,1925/1963.

An Autobiographical Study.

New York: W. W. Norton & Co.

2

Damasio A.R., 1999. ‘Commentary on J. Panksepp’s Emotions as viewed by psychoanalysis and neuroscience: An exercise in consilience.’

Neuropsychoanalysis,

Vol. 1.

3

Phillips, Adam, 2014.

Becoming Freud: The Making of a Psychoanalyst.

London: Yale University Press.

4

Jeffrey Moussaief Masson (ed.), 1986.

The Complete Letters of Sigmund Freud to Wilhelm Fliess: 1887–1904

Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, p. 269.

5

Kandel, Eric, 2012.

The Age of Insight

:

The Quest to Understand the Unconscious in Art, Mind, and Brain, from Vienna 1900 to the Present.

New York: Random House.

6

Freud, Sigmund, 1915. ‘The Unconscious’, in

The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud

. London: Hogarth Press, Vol. XIV (1914–1916) (ed. James Strachey).

7

Siegel, Daniel, 2012.

The Developing Mind

:

How Relationships and the Brain Interact to Shape Who We Are.

New York: Guilford Press.

8

Wilson, Timothy, 2002.

Strangers to Ourselves: Discovering the Adaptive Unconscious.

Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

9

Clack, Beverley, 2013.

Freud on the Couch: A Critical Introduction to the Father of Psychoanalysis.

London: Oneworld Publications.

10

Freud, Sigmund and Breuer, Josef, 1895/1995. ‘The Case of Fräulein Elisabeth von R.’ In

Studies on Hysteria.

Reproduced in James Strachey (ed.)

The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud.

London: Hogarth Press, Vol. II (1893–1895).

11

Freud, Sigmund, 1923. ‘The Ego and the Id.’

The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud

. London: Hogarth Press, Vol. XIX (1923-1925) (ed. James Strachey).

12

Freud, Sigmund, 1915. ‘The Unconscious.’

The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud

. London: Hogarth Press, Vol. XIV (1914–1916) (ed. James Strachey).

13

Freud, Sigmund, 1914.

The Psychopathology of Everyday Life

(trans. A.A. Brill). New York: The Macmillan Company.

14

Op. cit. (Philips, 2014).

15

Op. cit. (Freud, 1925).

About Sarah Tomley

Sarah Tomley is the author of What Would Freud Do? (translated into 11 languages) and senior editor of the award-winning The Psychology Book (Dorling Kindersley). She is an accredited psychotherapeutic counsellor and therapist working in private practice in Suffolk, UK. She has degrees in philosophy and psychotherapy, and is currently studying neuropsychoanalysis, which demonstrates the neuroscience underpinning Freud’s psychoanalytic theories.

About Tom Butler-Bowdon

Tom Butler-Bowdon is the author of the bestselling 50 Classics series, which brings the ideas of important books to a wider audience. Titles include 50 Philosophy Classics, 50 Psychology Classics, 50 Politics Classics, 50 Self-Help Classics and 50 Economics Classics.

As series editor for the Capstone Classics series, Tom has written Introductions to Plato’s The Republic, Machiavelli’s The Prince, Adam Smith’s The Wealth of Nations, Sun Tzu’s The Art of War, Lao Tzu’s Tao Te Ching, and Napoleon Hill’s Think and Grow Rich.

Tom is a graduate of the London School of Economics and the University of Sydney.

www.Butler-Bowdon.com

The Interpretation of Dreams

CONTENTS

Cover

An Introduction

About Sarah Tomley

About Tom Butler-Bowdon

The Interpretation of Dreams

Introductory Remarks

Preface to the Second Edition

Preface to the Third Edition

Translator’s Preface

I The Scientific Literature on the Problems of the Dream

(a) The Relation of the Dream to the Waking State

(b) The Material of the Dream—Memory in the Dream

(c) Dream Stimuli and Dream Sources

I. The External Sensory Stimuli

II. Internal (Subjective) Sensory Stimuli

III. Internal (Organic) Physical Excitation

IV. Psychic Exciting Sources

(d) Why the Dream is Forgotten after Awakening

(e) The Psychological Peculiarities of Dreams

(f) The Ethical Feelings in the Dream

(g) Dream Theories and Functions of the Dream

(h) Relations between the Dream and Mental Diseases

Notes

II Method of Dream InterpretationThe Analysis of a Sample Dream

Dream of July 23–24, 1895

Analysis

Notes

III The Dream is the Fulfilment of a Wish

Notes

IV Distortion in Dreams

Preliminary Statement

Analysis

Notes

V The Material and Sources of Dreams

(a) Recent and Indifferent Impressions in the Dream

(b) Infantile Experiences as the Source of Dreams

(c) Somatic Sources of Dreams

(d) Typical Dreams

Notes

VI The Dream-Work

(a) The Condensation Work

I. Dream Content

II. “A Beautiful Dream”

III. Content of the Dream

(b) The Work of Displacement

(c) Means of Representation in the Dream

(d) Regard for Presentability

(e) Examples—Arithmetic Speeches in the Dream

(f) Absurd Dreams—Intellectual Performances in the Dream

(g) The Affects in the Dream

(h) Secondary Elaboration

Notes

VII The Psychology of the Dream Activities

(a) Forgetting in Dreams

(b) Regression

(c) The Wish-Fulfilment

(d) Waking caused by the Dream—The Function of the Dream—The Anxiety Dream

(e) The Primary and Secondary Processes—Regression

(f) The Unconscious and Consciousness—Reality

Notes

VIII Literary Index

End User License Agreement

Guide

Cover

Table of Contents

An Introduction

Pages

ii

iii

iv

vii

viii

ix

x

xi

xii

xiii

xiv

xv

xvi

xvii

xviii

xix

xx

xxi

xxii

xxiii

xxiv

xxv

xxvii

1

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

32

33

34

35

36

37

38

39

40

41

42

43

44

45

46

47

48

49

50

51

52

53

54

55

56

57

58

59

60

61

62

63

64

65

66

67

68

69

70

71

72

73

74

75

76

77

78

79

80

81

82

83

84

85

86

87

88

89

90

91

92

93

94

95

96

97

98

99

100

101

102

103

104

105

106

107

108

109

110

111

112

113

114

115

116

117

118

119

120

121

122

123

124

125

126

127

128

129

130

131

132

133

134

135

136

137

138

139

140

141

142

143

144

145

146

147

148

149

150

151

152

153

154

155

156

157

158

159

160

161

162

163

165

166

167

168

169

170

171

172

173

174

175

176

177

178

179

180

181

182

183

184

185

186

187

188

189

190

191

192

193

194

195

196

197

198

199

200

201

202

203

204

205

206

207

208

209

210

211

212

213

214

215

216

217

218

219

220

221

222

223

224

225

226

227

228

229

230

231

232

233

234

235

236

237

238

239

240

241

242

243

244

245

246

247

248

249

250

251

252

253

254

255

256

257

258

259

260

261

262

263

264

265

266

267

268

269

270

271

272

273

274

275

276

277

278

279

280

281

282

283

284

285

286

287

288

289

290

291

292

293

294

295

296

297

298

299

300

301

302

303

304

305

306

307

308

309

310

311

312

313

314

315

316

317

318

319

320

321

322

323

324

325

326

327

328

329

330

331

332

333

334

335

336

337

338

339

340

341

342

343

344

345

346

347

348

349

350

351

352

353

354

355

356

357

358

359

360

361

362

363

364

365

366

367

368

369

370

371

372

373

374

375

376

377

378

379

380

381

382

383

384

385

386

387

388

389

390

391

392

393

394

395

396

397

398

399

400

401

402

403

404

405

406

407

408

409

410

411

412

413

414

415

416

417

418

419

420

421

422

423

424

425

426

427

428

429

430

431

432

433

434

435

436

437

438

439

440

441

442

443

444

445

446

447

448

449

450

451

452

453

455

456

457

458

459

460

461

462

463

464

465

466

467

468

469

470

471

472

473

474

475

476

477

478

479

480

481

482

483

484

485

486

487

488

489

490

491

492

493

494

495

496

497

498

499

500

501

502

503

504

505

506

507

508

509

510

511

512

513

514

515

516

517

518

519

520

521

522

523

524

525

526

527

528

529

530

531

532

533

534

535

536

537

538

539

540

541

542

543

544

545

546

547

548

549

550

551

552

553

554

555

556

557

558

559

560

561

Introductory Remarks

(First Edition)

IN attempting a discussion of the Interpretation of Dreams, I do not believe that I have overstepped the bounds of neuropathological interest. For, on psychological investigation, the dream proves to be the first link in a chain of abnormal psychic structures whose other links, the hysterical phobia, the obsession, and the delusion must, for practical reasons, claim the interest of the physician. The dream (as will appear) can lay no claim to a corresponding practical significance; its theoretical value as a paradigm is, however, all the greater, and one who cannot explain the origin of the dream pictures will strive in vain to understand the phobias, obsessive and delusional ideas, and likewise their therapeutic importance.

But this relation, to which our subject owes its importance, is responsible also for the deficiencies in the work before us. The surfaces of fracture which will be found so frequently in this discussion correspond to so many points of contact at which the problem of the dream formation touches more comprehensive problems of psychopathology, which cannot be discussed here, and which will be subjected to future elaboration if there should be sufficient time and energy, and if further material should be forthcoming.

Peculiarities in the material I have used to elucidate the interpretation of dreams have rendered this publication difficult. From the work itself it will appear why all dreams related in the literature or collected by others had to remain useless for my purpose; for examples I had to choose between my own dreams and those of my patients who were under psychoanalytic treatment. I was restrained from utilising the latter material by the fact that in it the dream processes were subjected to an undesirable complication on account of the intermixture of neurotic characters. On the other hand, inseparably connected with my own dreams was the circumstance that I was obliged to expose more of the intimacies of my psychic life than I should like and that generally falls to the task of an author who is not a poet but an investigator of nature. This was painful, but unavoidable; I had to put up with the inevitable in order not to be obliged to forego altogether the demonstration of the truth of my psychological results. To be sure, I could not at best resist the temptation of disguising some of my indiscretions through omissions and substitutions, and as often as this happened it detracted materially from the value of the examples which I employed. I can only express the hope that the reader of this work, putting himself in my difficult position, will show forbearance, and also that all persons who are inclined to take offence at any of the dreams reported will concede freedom of thought at least to the dream life.

Preface to the Second Edition

IF there has arisen a demand for a second edition of this rather difficult book before the end of the first decade, I owe no gratitude to the interest of the professional circles to whom I appealed in the preceding sentences. My colleagues in psychiatry, apparently, have made no effort to shake off the first surprise which my new conception of the dream evoked, and the professional philosophers, who are accustomed to treat the problem of dream life as a part of the states of consciousness, devoting to it a few—for the most part identical—sentences, have apparently failed to observe that in this field could be found all kinds of things which would inevitably lead to a thorough transformation of our psychological theories. The behaviour of the scientific critics could only justify the expectation that this work of mine was destined to be buried in oblivion; and the small troop of brave pupils who follow my leadership in the medical application of psychoanalysis, and also follow my example in analysing dreams in order to utilise these analyses in the treatment of neurotics, would not have exhausted the first edition of the book. I therefore feel indebted to that wider circle of intelligent seekers after truth whose co-operation has procured for me the invitation to take up anew, after nine years, the difficult and in so many respects fundamental work.

I am glad to be able to say that I have found little to change. Here and there I have inserted new material, added new views from my wider experience, and attempted to revise certain points; but everything essential concerning the dream and its interpretation, as well as the psychological propositions derived from it, has remained unchanged: at least, subjectively, it has stood the test of time. Those who are acquainted with my other works on the Etiology and Mechanism of the psychoneuroses, know that I have never offered anything unfinished as finished, and that I have always striven to change my assertions in accordance with my advancing views; but in the realm of the dream life I have been able to stand by my first declarations. During the long years of my work on the problems of the neuroses, I have been repeatedly confronted with doubts, and have often made mistakes; but it was always in the “interpretation of dreams” that I found my bearings. My numerous scientific opponents, therefore, show an especially sure instinct when they refuse to follow me into this territory of dream investigation.

Likewise, the material used in this book to illustrate the rules of dream interpretation, drawn chiefly from dreams of my own which have been depreciated and outstripped by events, have in the revision shown a persistence which resisted substantial changes. For me, indeed, the book has still another subjective meaning which I could comprehend only after it had been completed. It proved to be for me a part of my self-analysis, a reaction to the death of my father—that is, to the most significant event, the deepest loss, in the life of a man. After I recognised this I felt powerless to efface the traces of this influence. For the reader, however, it makes no difference from what material he learns to value and interpret dreams.

BERCHTESGADEN, Summer of 1908

Preface to the Third Edition

WHEREAS a period of nine years elapsed between the first and second editions of this book, the need for a third edition has appeared after little more than a year. I have reason to be pleased with this change; but, just as I have not considered the earlier neglect of my work on the part of the reader as a proof of its unworthiness, I am unable to find in the interest manifested at present a proof of its excellence.

The progress in scientific knowledge has shown its influence on the Interpretation of Dreams. When I wrote it in 1899 the “Sexual Theories” was not yet in existence, and the analysis of complicated forms of psychoneuroses was still in its infancy. The interpretation of dreams was destined to aid in the psychological analysis of the neuroses, but since then the deeper understanding of the neuroses has reacted on our conception of the dream. The study of dream interpretation itself has continued to develop in a direction upon which not enough stress was laid in the first edition of this book. From my own experience, as well as from the works of W. Stekel and others, I have since learned to attach a greater value to the extent and the significance of symbolism in dreams (or rather in the unconscious thinking). Thus much has accumulated in the course of this year which requires consideration. I have endeavoured to do justice to this new material by numerous insertions in the text and by the addition of footnotes. If these supplements occasionally threaten to warp the original discussion, or if, even with their aid, we have been unsuccessful in raising the original text to the niveau of our present views, I must beg indulgence for the gaps in the book, as they are only consequences and indications of the present rapid development of our knowledge. I also venture to foretell in what other directions later editions of the Interpretation of Dreams—in case any should be demanded—will differ from the present one. They will have, on the one hand, to include selections from the rich material of poetry, myth, usage of language, and folklore, and, on the other hand, to treat more profoundly the relations of the dream to the neuroses and to mental diseases.

Mr. Otto Rank has rendered me valuable service in the selection of the addenda and in reading the proof sheets. I am gratefully indebted to him and to many others for their contributions and corrections.

VIENNA, Spring of 1911

Translator’s Preface

Since the appearance of the author’s Selected Papers on Hysteria and other Psychoneuroses, and Three Contributions to the Sexual Theory,[1] much has been said and written about Freud’s works. Some of our readers have made an honest endeavour to test and utilise the author’s theories, but they have been handicapped by their inability to read fluently very difficult German, for only two of Freud’s works have hitherto been accessible to English readers. For them this work will be of invaluable assistance. To be sure, numerous articles on the Freudian psychology have of late made their appearance in our literature;[2] but these scattered papers, read by those unacquainted with the original work, often serve to confuse rather than enlighten. For Freud cannot be mastered from the reading of a few pamphlets, or even one or two of his original works. Let me repeat what I have so often said: No one is really qualified to use or to judge Freud’s psychoanalytic method who has not thoroughly mastered his theory of the neuroses—The Interpretation of Dreams, Three Contributions to the Sexual Theory, The Psychopathology of Everyday Life, and Wit and its Relation to the Unconscious, and who has not had considerable experience in analysing the dreams and psychopathological actions of himself and others. That there is required also a thorough training in normal and abnormal psychology goes without saying.

The Interpretation of Dreams