Tutankhamen
TutankhamenNOTESPREFACETHE REIGN OF TUTANKHAMENTUTANKHAMEN AND THE CULT OF AMENA HYMN TO AMEN AND ATENTHE CULT OF ATEN, THE GOD AND DISK OF THE SUN, ITS ORIGIN, DEVELOPMENT AND DECLINEDEVELOPMENT OF THE CULT OF ATEN UNDER AMENHETEP IVA.--A HYMN TO ATEN BY THE KINGB.--HYMN TO ATENHYMNS TO THE SUN-GODEGYPTIAN MONOTHEISMCopyright
Tutankhamen
E. A. Wallis Budge
NOTES
The kings of the XVIIIth dynasty reigned about 230
years,i.e., from about B.C.
1580 to 1350; their names are as follows:--Aahmes 1580, reigned about 22 years.Amenhetep I, about 1558-7, reigned about 10
years.Thothmes I, about 1546, reigned about 30 years.Thothmes II, about 1500, reigned about 3 years.Hatshepsut, Thothmes III about 1500 to 1447.Amenhetep II, about 1448, reigned about 26
years.Thothmes IV, about 1420, reigned about 8 years.Amenhetep III, about 1412, reigned 36 years.Amenhetep IV, about 1376, reigned 17 years.Sakara, Tutankhamen, Ai reigned 8-12 years.Heremheb, about 1350, reigned 34 years.Redactors Note: the diacritical marks in the original
have been omitted.
PREFACE
THE announcement made early in December, 1922, of the
discovery of the Tomb of Tutankhamen in the Valley of the Tombs of
the Kings in Western Thebes by the late Lord Carnarvon and Mr.
Howard Carter sent a thrill of wonder and expectation through all
the civilized peoples on the earth. In the accounts of the contents
of the Tomb, which were published with admirable promptness and
fullness in TheTimes, we read
of bodies of chariots, chairs of state, gilded couches, royal
apparel, boxes of trinkets and food and cosmetics and toilet
requisites, large bitumenized wooden statues, alabaster vessels of
hitherto unknown shapes and beauty, and countless other objects,
until the mind reeled in its attempts to imagine the sight that met
the eyes of the two discoverers when they entered the two outer
chambers. Those who have seen the smaller objects and have enjoyed
the privilege of examining them have been amazed at their exquisite
beauty and finish; and there is no doubt that the importance of the
"find," from an artistic point of view, can be expressed in words
only with difficulty. It is easy to believe Sarwat Pasha when he
says none of the accounts published have really done justice to the
"finds," which, however, is not surprising, since their beauty is
unique and indescribable (Times, Jan. 18, 1923, P. 9).All the writers who have described and discussed the
discovery have, quite rightly, lost no opportunity of proclaiming
the great value and importance of Lord Carnarvon's "find" as
illustrating the arts and crafts that were practised in the city of
Aakhut-Aten under its founder, the famous Atenite king, Amenhetep
IV. But some of them have been led astray by their eagerness to do
ample justice to the great discovery, and have introduced into
their eulogies statements of a historical character which are
incorrect. Some have declared that the information derived from the
"find" makes necessary the rewriting and recasting of the history
of the XVIIIth dynasty, but there is no foundation for this
statement, for the authorized accounts of the Tomb of Tutankhamen
and its contents include no new historical facts. Lord Carnarvon
may have obtained from the tomb information that would amplify our
knowledge of the reign of Tutankhamen, but if he did so he did not
publish it. As matters stand we know no more now about the reign of
this king than we did before Lord Carnarvon made his phenomenal
discovery. Other writers have tried to make out that Tutankhamen
was one of the greatest of the kings of Egypt, but this is not the
case. When he came to the throne he professed the same religion as
his wife, that is to say, the cult of Aten, the Solar Disk, or
Atenism, and for a short time he continued to do so. But he soon
realized that Atenism had failed, and then he substituted the name
of Amen for Aten in his own name and that of his wife, and became a
fervent follower of Amen and a worshipper of the old gods of his
country. The fame of Tutankhamen really rests on the fact that he
restored the national worship of Amen, and made the Atenites to
relinquish their hold upon the revenues of this god. Other writers
again have tried to show that Tutankhamen was the "Pharaoh of the
Exodus," and also that it was his wife Ankh-s-en-pa-Aten (or Amen)
who took Moses out of his ark of bulrushes and brought him up. But
there was more than one Exodus, and Tutankhamen was not King of
Egypt when any of them took place. And strange views have been
promulgated even about some of the articles of furniture that Lord
Carnarvon found in the tomb. Thus the funerary couch or bier with
legs made in the form of a strange beast has been declared to be of
Mesopotamian origin; but such is not the case. The beast
represented is the composite monster called "Ammit,"i.e."Eater of the Dead," and she is
found in the Judgment Scene in all the great papyri containing the
Theban Recension of the Book of the Dead. About her component parts
there is no doubt, for in the Papyrus of Hunefer it is written,
"Her fore-part is crocodile, her hindquarters are hippopotamus, her
middle part lion (or cat)". The Mesopotamians knew of no such
beast, and the couch or bier could only have been made in Egypt,
where the existence of Ammit was believed in and the fear of her
was great.Some of the writers on Lord Carnarvon's discoveries discussed
not only the Tomb of Tutankhamen, but the religious revolution
which seems to have been inaugurated by Amenhetep III, at the
instance of his wife Queen Ti, and was certainly carried on with
increasing vigour by their son, Amenhetep IV, who believed that he
was an incarnation of Aten, the god of the Solar Disk. Their
discussions gave many people an entirely false idea of the
character of Amenhetep IV, and of the nature of the cult of Aten.
This king was described as a reformer, an individualist, and an
idealist and a pacifist; but he was a reformer who initiated no
permanent reform, an individualist who diverted the revenues of the
gods of his country to his own uses, an idealist who followed the
cult of the material, and a pacifist who lost Egypt's Asiatic
Empire. His "Teaching" proclaimed the "oneness" of Aten, which has
been compared to the monotheism of Christian nations; but for
centuries before his time the priesthoods of Heliopolis, Memphis,
Hermopolis and Thebes had proclaimed this self-same oneness to be
the chief attribute of their gods. This "Teaching" was said to
inculcate a religion and morality superior to any doctrine found in
the Old Testament, and some enthusiasts would have us believe that
in spiritual conceptions and sublime precepts it surpassed Christ's
teaching as set forth in the Gospels. Practically all that we know
of the "Teaching" of Amenhetep IV is found in a short hymn, which
is attributed to the king himself, and in a longer hymn, which is
found in the Tomb of Ai, his disciple and successor, at Tall
al-'Amarnah. The language and phrasing of these works are very
interesting, for they show a just appreciation of the benefits that
man and beast alike derive from the creative and fructifying
influence of the heat and light of the sun. But I cannot find in
them a single expression that contains any spiritual teaching, or
any exhortation to purity of life, or any word of consciousness of
sin, or any evidence of belief in a resurrection and a life beyond
the grave. It is of course possible that all the religious works of
the Atenites, except these hymns, have perished, but the fact
remains that it is upon these two hymns, and the extracts from them
which are found in the tombs of officials at Tall al-'Amarnah, that
modem writers have founded their views and statements about the
highly spiritual character of the religion and morality of the
Atenites.Whilst discussing these and similar matters here with Lord
Carnarvon about the middle of last December, he suggested that I
should put together, in a small book, the known facts about the
reign of Tutankhamen, and add two or three chapters on the cults of
Amen, Aten, and Egyptian Monotheism, which had been so completely
misrepresented. He was particularly anxious that translations of
some of the hymns to Amen and Aten should be given, and that the
most important of them should be accompanied by the original
hieroglyphic texts, so that those who cared to go into the matter
might have the means of forming their own conclusions about the
character of the hymns to Aten, and deciding whether it was
spiritual or material. In the following pages I have tried to carry
out his suggestion, and in the circumstances perhaps it will not be
out of place to say a few words about his labours in the field of
Egyptian Archaeology.In the winter of 1907-08, Lord Carnarvon carried out a series
of comprehensive excavations at Drah abu'l Nakkah and in the Valley
of Der al-Bahari in Western Thebes. In these, as in all his
subsequent excavations, he was assisted by Mr. Howard Carter,
formerly Inspector in the Service of Antiquities of Egypt. This
gentleman possessed very special qualifications for the work that
he undertook for Lord Carnarvon, namely, a good .knowledge of
colloquial Arabic, great experience in dealing with the natives and
the "antica" dealers in the country, skill in the practical work of
excavation, and keen interest in Egyptian Archaeology. At Der
al-Bahari, Lord Carnarvon discovered two important ostraka
inscribed with texts, the one dealing with the deeds of King Kames,
and the other containing a portion of a new version of the Precepts
of Ptah-hetep. In 1908-09 he discovered the tomb of Tetaki, and a
tomb of the XXVth dynasty containing the coffins of nine persons.
In 1910-11 he discovered an unfinished temple of Hatshepsut, a
ruined temple of Rameses IV, a cemetery of the XIIth dynasty, and a
number of early burials. A full account of what he did at Thebes
will be found in hisFive Years' Explorations at
Thebes(1907-11), Oxford, 1912. This book is
illustrated by eighty fine folio plates, and is one of the fullest
accounts hitherto published of archaeological work done in Egypt.
In 1911-12 he continued his excavations at Thebes, and broke new
ground at Xoïs, in the Delta. In 1912, he discovered at Thebes a
large temple-deposit of Hatshepsut, consisting of alabaster jars,
tools, etc., and a number of pit-tombs of the XIIth dynasty. In
1915 he discovered and cleared out the Tomb of Amenhetep I, and in
1916-17 he discovered a tomb which had been prepared for
Hatshepsut. The latter contained a magnificent sarcophagus of
crystalline limestone inscribed with the Queen's name and titles as
wife of the reigning Pharaoh. It is impossible to enumerate here,
however briefly, the various excavations which he carried out at
Thebes between 1907 and 1921, but it must be stated that he
superintended them all personally, and that he alone defrayed all
the expenses, which, as will be readily understood, were very
considerable.In recent years he sought for a wider sphere of excavation,
and turned his attention to the Valley of the Tombs of the Kings in
Western Thebes, which was one of the sites reserved for Government
excavation. During the early years of this century Mr. T. Davis
obtained permission to dig there from the late Prof. Maspero,
Director of the Service of Antiquities of Egypt, and, with the help
of Mr. Howard Carter and Mr. Ayrton, he succeeded in locating and
excavating the tombs of Queen Hatshepsut, Thothmes IV, Heremheb,
Menephthah, Saptah, and the unopened tomb of Iuau and Tuau, the
father and mother of Queen Ti. When he had done this he announced
to Maspero, "The Valley is now cleared, there are no more royal
tombs in it"; and most people were willing to accept these words as
the statement of a fact. But Lord Carnarvon did not believe that
Mr. Davis's opinion was correct, and, having obtained the necessary
permission from the Government, he and Mr. Carter set to work
toprovethat it was not.
Eachfeltthat somewhere in the
Valley one or two royal tombs must still exist, and knowledge,
judgment, unceasing labour, and luck enabled them to light upon the
most magnificent archaeological "find" ever made in Egypt. The
following extract from a letter which he wrote to me on December 1,
1922, shows how he personally regarded his great triumph. He
says:--"One line just to tell you that we have found the most
remarkable 'find' that has ever been made, I expert, in Egypt or
elsewhere. I have only so far got into two chambers, but there is
enough in them to fill most of your rooms at the B.M. (upstairs);
and there is a sealed door where goodness knows what there is. It
is not only the quantity of the objects, but their exceptional
beauty, finish and originality, which makes this such an
extraordinary discovery. There is a throne, or chair, there more
beautiful than any object that has been found in Egypt; alabaster
vases of the most marvellous work, and quite unknown except as
represented in the tombs; couches of state, chairs, beds, wonderful
beadwork, four chariots encrusted with precious stones, life-size
bitumenised figures of the king in solid gold sandals and covered
with insignia, boxes innumerable, the king's clothes, a shawabti
about 3 feet high, sticks of state. I have not opened the boxes,
and don't know what is in them; but there are some papyrus letters,
faience, jewellery, bouquets, candles on ankh candlesticks. All
this is in [the] front chamber, besides lots of stuff you can't
see. There is then another room which you can't get into owing to
the chaos of furniture, etc., alabaster statues, etc., piled up 4
or 5 feet high. Then we come to the sealed door behind which, I am
sure, is the king and God knows what. Some of the stuff is in
excellent condition, some is poor, but the whole thing is
marvellous; and then there is that sealed door!! Even Lacau[1]was touched by
the sight. [Two paragraphs omitted.] It is going to cost me
something awful, but I am going to try to do it all myself. I think
it will take Carter and three assistants nearly two years to
remove, if we find much behind the seals. I am coming back in ten
days and will try and see you--Yours ever, CARNARVON."Having found the archaeological "pearl of great price," with
characteristic generosity he was anxious that all who could should
come to Luxor to see it and to rejoice over it with him. He made an
arrangement with TheTimesto
publish detailed accounts of the clearing of the outer chambers,
and to reproduce the splendid photographs of the most striking
objects, which were made for him by a member of the American
Archaeological Mission, and thus people in all parts of the world
were able to watch almost daily the progress of the work. Visitors
from many countries thronged to Luxor to see Tutankhamen's tomb and
the wonders that it contained, and Lord Carnarvon spent himself
freely in helping them in every way in his power. He gave them his
time and energy and knowledge ungrudgingly, but this work, alas!
used up his strength and exhausted him. He was not physically a
strong or robust man, and the effects of a serious motor accident,
sustained many years ago, and of two illnesses in recent years, had
taken toll of his vitality. His spirit and courage were invincible,
nothing could daunt those, but the work that he had imposed upon
himself was too exhausting for him. Then, when he was overtired and
overworked, came the mosquito bite on his face. Every traveller in
Egypt who has been the victim of the malignant and deadly
mosquitoes, which are blown into the country in millions by the hot
south winds in March and April, knows how serious are the fever and
prostration that follow their successful attacks on the human body.
The days passed and his work increased, and, as he refused to spare
himself, serious illness came upon him, and he was obliged to go to
Cairo and place himself in the hands of the doctors. There
everything that medical science and skill could devise was done for
him, but little by little he sank, and early in the morning of
April 5 he passed peacefully away. The sympathy of the whole world
went forth to him as he lay in that sick chamber in Cairo, fighting
his fight with Death; that he should die so soon after winning such
a glorious triumph seemed incredible.The death of Lord Carnarvon is a serious blow for Egyptian
Archæology, and his loss is irreparable. For sixteen long years he
devoted himself to excavations in Egypt, and he gave to them time,
energy, and money on a scale which no other archaeologist has ever
done. The spirit of Ancient Egypt gripped him nearly twenty years
ago, and every year that passed strengthened its hold upon him. The
dry bones of Egyptian philology left him cold, and when
Egyptologists squabbled over dates and chronology in his presence
his chuckle was a delightful thing to hear. But he was fired by the
exquisite beauty of form and colour which he found in the
antiquities of Egypt, and his collection of small Egyptian
antiquities at Highclere Castle is, for its size, probably the most
perfect known. He only cared for the best, and nothing but the best
would satisfy him, and having obtained the best he persisted in
believing that there must be somewhere something better than the
best! His quest for the beautiful in Egyptian design, form, and
colour became the cult of his life in recent years. His taste was
faultless, and his instinct for the true and genuine was
unrivalled. When compared with a beautiful "antica" money had no
value for him, and he was wont to say, with Sir Henry Rawlinson,
"It is easier to get money than anticas." His work in Egypt brought
him into contact with natives of all kinds, and he was universally
popular with them, and he will be remembered for a long time as a
generous employer and friend. His keen sense of humour, his quick
wit, his capacity for understanding a matter swiftly, his ready
sympathy, and his old world courtesy appealed greatly to the
governing classes in Egypt, and endeared him to his friends, who
were legion, both Oriental and Occidental. Here I have only
ventured to speak of Lord Carnarvon as the great and disinterested
archaeologist, who gave years of his life and untold treasure for
the sake of his love for science, for I have neither the knowledge
nor the ability to deal with his successes as a pioneer of colour
photography, and as a collector of prints, pictures, books, etc.
These, and many of the phases of his character and pursuits, are
treated felicitously and sympathetically in a careful appreciation
of his life and character which appeared in TheTimes, published on the day of his
burial on Beacon Hill (April 30)E. A. WALLIS BUDGE.
THE REIGN OF TUTANKHAMEN
("Living Image of Amen "), King of Egypt, about B.C.
1400.
WHEN and where TUTANKHAMEN was born is unknown, and
there is some doubt about the identity of his father. From a scarab
which was found in the temple of Osiris at Abydos,[2]we
learn that his mother was called Merit-Ra. In the inscription on
the red granite lion in the Southern Egyptian Gallery in the
British Museum (No. 431), he says that he "restored the monuments
of his father, King of the South and North, Lord of the Two Lands,
Nebmaatra, the emanation of Ra, the son of Ra, Amenhetep (III),
Governor of Thebes." It is possible that Tutankhamen was the son of
Amenhetep III by one of his concubines, and that when he calls this
king his father the statement is literally true, but there is no
proof of it. On the other hand, Tutankhamen may have used the word
"father" simply as a synonym of "predecessor." The older
Egyptologists accepted the statement made by him on the lion that
he dedicated to the Temple of Sulb in Nubia as true, but some of
the more recent writers reject it. The truth is that the name of
Tutankhamen's father is unknown. He became king of Egypt by virtue
of his marriage with princess ANKHSEN-PAATEN, the third daughter of
Amenhetep IV[3], at
least that is what it is natural to suppose, but it is possible
that he got rid of his immediate predecessor, Smenkhkara, or
Seaakara, who married the princess MERITATEN, or ATENMERIT, the
eldest daughter of Amenhetep IV, and usurped his
throne.When Tutankhamen ascended the throne he was, or at all events
he professed to be, an adherent of the cult of Aten, or the "Solar
Disk," and to hold the religious views of his wife and his
father-in-law. Proof of this is provided by the fragment of a
calcareous stone stele preserved at Berlin (No. 14197), on which he
is described as "Lord of the Two Lands, Rakheperuneb, Lord of the
Crowns, Tutankhaten, to whom life is given for ever."[4]