0,49 €
Niedrigster Preis in 30 Tagen: 1,99 €
Niedrigster Preis in 30 Tagen: 1,99 €
Mehr erfahren.
- Herausgeber: Booksell-Verlag
- Kategorie: Geisteswissenschaft
- Sprache: Englisch
In "A Treatise Concerning the Principles of Human Knowledge," George Berkeley presents a groundbreaking exploration of idealism, positing that existence is fundamentally tied to perception. His literary style is marked by a rigorous philosophical discourse, employing clear arguments to challenge the materialist views prevalent in 18th-century thought. Berkeley meticulously dismantles the notion of an objective reality independent of human perception, positing instead that all objects exist only as they are perceived, a thesis deeply interwoven with his famous dictum, 'Äòesse est percipi'Äô (to be is to be perceived). This work is a critical reflection of the Enlightenment period'Äôs intellectual currents, engaging with contemporaries such as Descartes and Locke while paving the way for modern philosophical inquiry. Berkeley, an Irish philosopher and logician, was influenced by theological, metaphysical, and epistemological concerns throughout his career. His background in mathematics, along with his devotion to the Anglican Church, fostered his belief in the necessity of a divine perceiver to sustain reality. His unique viewpoint was shaped by the intellectual milieu of his time and a desire to counteract growing skepticism about the divine and the nature of knowledge. For those intrigued by the complexities of perception and reality, Berkeley's treatise is an essential read. It challenges conventional wisdom and invites readers to reflect on the nature of existence itself. Whether you are a seasoned philosopher or a curious novice, Berkeley's insights offer profound implications for understanding the workings of the human mind and the fabric of reality. In this enriched edition, we have carefully created added value for your reading experience: - A succinct Introduction situates the work's timeless appeal and themes. - The Synopsis outlines the central plot, highlighting key developments without spoiling critical twists. - A detailed Historical Context immerses you in the era's events and influences that shaped the writing. - An Author Biography reveals milestones in the author's life, illuminating the personal insights behind the text. - A thorough Analysis dissects symbols, motifs, and character arcs to unearth underlying meanings. - Reflection questions prompt you to engage personally with the work's messages, connecting them to modern life. - Hand‐picked Memorable Quotes shine a spotlight on moments of literary brilliance. - Interactive footnotes clarify unusual references, historical allusions, and archaic phrases for an effortless, more informed read.
Das E-Book können Sie in Legimi-Apps oder einer beliebigen App lesen, die das folgende Format unterstützen:
Veröffentlichungsjahr: 2019
Ähnliche
A Treatise Concerning the Principles of Human Knowledge
Table of Contents
Introduction
A world that seems solid and unquestionable is suddenly made precarious when the mind asks whether anything can exist unperceived.
George Berkeley’s A Treatise Concerning the Principles of Human Knowledge holds classic status because it brings philosophical argument into crisp, accessible prose and dares to challenge assumptions that organize everyday life. Its enduring power lies not in ornament but in clarity: it forces readers to test what they mean by reality, experience, and certainty. The Treatise has remained a touchstone in debates about perception and knowledge, and its core questions have continued to echo far beyond philosophy, shaping the way later writers and thinkers frame the relation between mind and world.
Berkeley, an Irish philosopher and Anglican clergyman, published the Treatise in 1710, during the early eighteenth century’s intense rethinking of science, religion, and human understanding. The period’s confidence in new methods of inquiry also brought anxiety about skepticism and the limits of what can be known. Berkeley enters this setting with a work that is both systematic and polemical, aimed at readers who take themselves to be guided by common sense, yet are willing to follow an argument where it leads.
The Treatise’s central premise is Berkeley’s immaterialism: the view that what we call physical objects do not exist as mind-independent material substances. Instead, the things we experience are understood through perception and ideas, and the book examines what that implies for ordinary talk about tables, trees, and the external world. Berkeley’s aim is not to deny experience but to analyze its foundations, proposing a different account of what it means for something to be real.
In doing so, Berkeley takes aim at the concept of material substance as it appeared in much early modern philosophy. He argues that invoking matter as something existing independently of all perception creates confusion and opens the door to skepticism. The Treatise is structured as a set of closely linked sections rather than a narrative, building its case by examining what we mean by ideas, sensations, and the supposed qualities of bodies. The method is rigorous, but the pressure is always on language and everyday assumptions.
A distinctive feature of the book is its insistence that philosophical problems often arise from misusing words or reifying abstractions. Berkeley repeatedly returns to how we form general notions and how we talk about things we never directly perceive. By asking readers to attend to the contents of experience, he attempts to dissolve certain puzzles rather than merely answer them. This approach gives the Treatise a literary impact of its own: the writing often feels like a sustained act of intellectual persuasion, inviting the reader into an argument that is at once logical and personal.
The Treatise also matters historically because it participates in the period’s conversation with empiricism, especially the idea that knowledge begins with experience. Berkeley pushes this starting point in an unexpected direction, proposing that careful attention to experience undermines the need for a material world conceived as existing apart from any mind. The work’s influence can be traced through later discussions of idealism and through continuing debates in epistemology and the philosophy of perception. Its arguments became reference points that later philosophers had to confront, whether to adopt, refine, or reject them.
Berkeley’s themes endure because they are not confined to technical disputes about metaphysics. The Treatise asks what it means to claim that something exists, what counts as evidence for such a claim, and how much of the world is given to us through perception rather than inferred. It also explores the temptation to posit hidden entities to explain what we observe, and the cost of doing so when those entities cannot be directly experienced. These questions press on the reader’s habits of thought with an immediacy that still feels modern.
The work’s literary influence lies partly in its disciplined simplicity: it models a style of philosophical writing that is argumentative without being opaque. Berkeley’s controlled pace, his careful definitions, and his readiness to anticipate objections have made the Treatise a teaching text as well as a provocation. Its lasting appeal is also rhetorical; it is written to move a skeptical reader step by step, making the familiar strange and then offering a coherent reconstruction. That combination of bold thesis and patient exposition has continued to attract writers interested in how ideas reshape perception.
While firmly rooted in its early eighteenth-century context, the Treatise is not a museum piece. Its central premise touches questions that recur whenever people debate what is “really” out there versus what is constructed by minds and senses. The book’s challenge is not to everyday functioning but to unexamined metaphysical commitments. By insisting that philosophy begin with what is actually experienced, Berkeley invites a kind of disciplined humility about what can be claimed beyond perception.
Readers also return to the Treatise because it connects abstract reasoning with concrete examples drawn from ordinary life. Berkeley’s focus on familiar objects, sensory qualities, and common speech helps prevent the argument from drifting into mere speculation. At the same time, the work retains a bracing strangeness: it reorders the reader’s sense of what counts as basic and what counts as derivative. This tension—between everyday immediacy and conceptual upheaval—helps explain why the book remains compelling across centuries.
In contemporary terms, Berkeley’s questions resonate with ongoing concerns about perception, representation, and the boundaries between experience and interpretation. Discussions of virtual environments, mediated perception, and the reliability of sensory data all revive, in new forms, the issue of how the mind relates to what it takes to be a world. A Treatise Concerning the Principles of Human Knowledge endures because it makes that relation unavoidable, offering an argument that continues to provoke, clarify, and reward careful reading long after its 1710 publication.
Synopsis
George Berkeley’s A Treatise Concerning the Principles of Human Knowledge (1710) opens by proposing a reform of philosophy aimed at clearing away entrenched confusions that, in his view, foster skepticism and irreligion. He frames the project as an investigation into the foundations of human knowledge, especially the sources and limits of what can be meaningfully conceived. The treatise adopts a tightly argumentative progression rather than a narrative, moving from common assumptions about perception and the world to a reconsideration of what it is for things to exist. Berkeley signals that many disputes arise from misplaced abstraction and from treating words as if they guaranteed corresponding entities.
Berkeley begins with an analysis of how we experience the world through sense perception and reflection. He emphasizes that the immediate objects of awareness are ideas—colors, sounds, textures, shapes, motions, and other perceptual contents—and he asks what it means to claim that such objects exist independently of being perceived. This focus sets up his core question: whether there is intelligible content behind the notion of material substance understood as something existing outside any mind and supporting sensible qualities. By tracing ordinary experience, he aims to show how philosophical theories can depart from what perception actually presents and thereby invite skepticism about the reality of the world.
A pivotal move in the treatise is Berkeley’s critique of abstract ideas. He challenges the claim that the mind can form a general idea of a triangle that is neither equilateral nor scalene, or of extension that is neither large nor small, arguing that such abstractions are not genuine objects of thought. Generality, he contends, is better explained by the use of signs and language than by positing special abstract entities in the mind. This linguistic and psychological critique is designed to undermine theories that depend on abstraction to justify talk of matter, substance, or qualities existing in separation from any particular experience. The argument also prepares a more restrictive standard for meaningful conception.
From this critique Berkeley turns to the distinction commonly drawn between primary qualities, such as extension and motion, and secondary qualities, such as color and sound. Philosophers often treat secondary qualities as mind-dependent while granting primary qualities a privileged mind-independent status. Berkeley argues that this division cannot be sustained, because primary qualities are also known only as ideas and vary with perspective, conditions of perception, and the perceiver’s state. If secondary qualities cannot exist outside perception, he presses that the same reasoning applies to primary qualities, since they are inseparable in experience and equally relative. The aim is not to deny perceived things, but to deny that their being consists in an unperceived material substratum.
Having weakened the appeal to mind-independent qualities, Berkeley addresses the concept of material substance as a supposed support for qualities. He argues that the notion of a substance underlying ideas but itself unperceived and unconceived is unintelligible or at least lacks clear content. On his account, to be is to be perceived, so the existence of sensible things consists in their being present to a mind as ideas. This view reorients the traditional problem of the external world: instead of asking how ideas represent a material reality behind them, Berkeley asks why one should posit such a reality at all, given that experience already provides the objects we deal with in ordinary life.
Berkeley then distinguishes ideas from spirits or minds. Ideas are passive, dependent contents of perception, whereas spirits are active beings that perceive, will, and understand. He maintains that we have a different kind of awareness of ourselves as perceivers than we have of ideas as perceived objects, and he uses this difference to explain agency and causation. The treatise treats causal power as belonging properly to spirits, not to ideas conceived as inert contents. This step supports his rejection of the view that material things, understood as mind-independent substances, are the causes of our sensory experiences. Instead, he seeks an account of the orderly and lawlike character of experience without attributing causal efficacy to matter.
The work proceeds to explain how a stable, shared world can be preserved on immaterialist grounds. Berkeley emphasizes the regularity and coherence of sensory experience and suggests that what we call the laws of nature describe consistent patterns in the sequence of ideas we receive. He treats the difference between mere imagination and sense experience in terms of vividness, order, and involuntary occurrence. This allows him to retain ordinary distinctions between real and fictive, between waking perception and other mental episodes, without invoking a hidden material realm. The argumentative pressure is directed at skeptical worries: if reality is identified with the experienced world, the feared gap between appearance and reality is reframed rather than widened.
Berkeley also considers the role of language in generating metaphysical puzzles. He argues that words such as “matter,” “substance,” and related terms can be used without clear ideas, and that philosophers can mistake verbal facility for genuine understanding. By insisting that meaningful claims should be tied to what can be conceived and to the practical use of words, he aims to dissolve disputes that arise from treating abstract terminology as naming entities. He does not present this as an abandonment of science or common sense, but as a corrective to a philosophical method that multiplies unnecessary objects and then struggles to connect them to experience. The treatise thus combines metaphysical claims with a program for conceptual discipline.
The theological dimension becomes explicit as Berkeley links the order and dependence of ideas to a supreme spirit. He argues that the sustained availability and regularity of the sensible world require an ordering cause beyond finite human minds. In this framework, the persistence of objects when not perceived by an individual is addressed by appealing to their being perceived by an ever-present divine mind, while finite spirits encounter a world governed by stable rules. Berkeley presents this not as a speculative add-on but as integrated with his critique of matter and his account of causation. He portrays his view as supportive of religion and as a barrier against forms of skepticism and atheism that he associates with materialist philosophy, while still aiming to respect everyday experience and scientific practice as descriptions of regularities among ideas in nature. The treatise’s enduring significance lies in its forceful challenge to assumptions about mind, world, and meaning, and in its influential attempt to reconstruct metaphysics and epistemology around the immediacy of perception and the disciplined use of concepts.
Historical Context
Early eighteenth-century Britain and Ireland formed the immediate setting for George Berkeley’s A Treatise Concerning the Principles of Human Knowledge, first published in Dublin in 1710. The work emerged within a world shaped by established churches, expanding universities, and the growing authority of natural philosophy. Intellectual life was organized around institutions such as Trinity College Dublin—where Berkeley studied and later held posts—and the wider Republic of Letters conducted through books, correspondence, and learned societies. Public debate about religion, science, and politics was vigorous, and philosophical writing often addressed practical anxieties about skepticism, irreligion, and social stability in a rapidly changing Atlantic world.
paragraphs
Berkeley (1685–1753) came of age in Ireland after the Williamite settlement and amid the consolidation of Protestant political power. He was educated at Trinity College Dublin, a major Anglican institution that trained clergy and civil elites and promoted engagement with contemporary philosophy and mathematics. The intellectual curriculum in Dublin, as elsewhere, was increasingly attentive to new scientific methods associated with figures like Isaac Newton, while still rooted in classical learning and scholastic disputation. Berkeley’s early career as a clergyman-philosopher reflected how closely religious vocation and philosophical inquiry remained intertwined, and his Treatise was written to intervene in debates that were simultaneously metaphysical, scientific, and theological.
paragraphs
The immediate philosophical background was the late seventeenth-century “new philosophy,” especially the empiricism of John Locke’s An Essay Concerning Human Understanding (1690). Locke’s account of ideas, sensation, and reflection was widely read and contested in Britain and Ireland, shaping debates about the limits of knowledge, the status of substance, and the relationship between mind and world. Berkeley’s Treatise positions itself explicitly in relation to this empiricist framework, adopting its focus on experience and ideas while challenging conclusions he thought encouraged skepticism and materialism. The Treatise thus belongs to the intense post-Lockean effort to secure knowledge without returning to older scholastic explanations.
paragraphs
A further institutional force was the prestige of Newtonian science after the publication of the Principia (1687) and its early eighteenth-century reception. Newton’s mathematical physics was celebrated as a triumph of reason and experiment, and its success encouraged confidence that nature could be described by laws expressed in precise terms. Yet the philosophical interpretation of “matter,” “force,” and causation remained contested, and many readers treated Newtonian achievement as supporting a broadly mechanistic view of the world. Berkeley was well informed about contemporary mathematics and natural philosophy, and his Treatise can be read as responding to the conceptual pressures created by this scientific culture while attempting to safeguard religious and common-sense commitments.
paragraphs
The rise of print culture and expanding literacy helped create an audience for compact philosophical works like Berkeley’s. Dublin and London were connected by book trade networks, and shorter treatises and pamphlets circulated alongside sermons and periodicals. Philosophical disputes were not confined to universities; they reached clergy, professionals, and educated lay readers who encountered arguments about atheism, deism, and skepticism in accessible formats. Berkeley’s decision to publish in Dublin in 1710 reflects both his location and Ireland’s participation in these wider networks. The Treatise’s argumentative style—direct address, careful definitions, and engagement with familiar positions—fits a culture in which philosophy was increasingly a public, printed controversy.
paragraphs
Religious controversy formed another crucial context. In England and Ireland, the Church of England (and in Ireland, the Church of Ireland) was established, yet it faced persistent pressure from dissenting Protestant groups and from Catholic majorities in Ireland. At the same time, deist writers challenged orthodox doctrines and argued for a more “natural” religion, provoking extensive replies from Anglican clergy and philosophers. Berkeley’s own vocation and later episcopal career underscore that his metaphysics was never merely abstract. The Treatise’s anti-skeptical and anti-materialist aims were aligned with a broader Anglican apologetic effort to defend belief in God, providence, and moral accountability against intellectual trends seen as corrosive.
paragraphs
