Emile Zola E-Book

William Dean Howells

• Herausgeber: Booksell-Verlag
• Kategorie: Geisteswissenschaft
• Sprache: Englisch
• Veröffentlichungsjahr: 2019

Beschreibung

In "Emile Zola," William Dean Howells offers a meticulous study of the prolific French novelist, immersing readers in Zola's literary achievements and his robust influence on naturalism. This biographical critique not only elucidates Zola'Äôs narrative techniques and thematic preoccupations, such as his representations of social realism, but also examines the sociopolitical contexts that informed his work. Howells' sophisticated prose reflects a blend of critical analysis and appreciation, urging readers to grasp the intricacies of Zola's style and his capacity to confront contemporary issues with unflinching honesty. William Dean Howells, often hailed as the father of American realism, was profoundly influenced by European literature and especially Zola's contributions to the literary movement. His experiences in editing, writing, and critiquing, combined with a deep understanding of his contemporaries, led him to this exploration of Zola. Howells' respect for Zola's commitment to social causes and his fearless literary experimentation resonate throughout the text, reflecting a shared pursuit of authenticity in art. "Emile Zola" is essential reading for those interested in the evolution of realism in literature, offering critical insights into how Zola paved the way for modern narratives. Howells'Äô well-researched perspective serves not only as a testament to Zola'Äôs legacy but also as an invitation to engage with the broader implications of literature's role in society.

Leseprobe

William Dean Howells

Emile Zola

Published by Good Press, 2019

[email protected]

EAN 4064066230128

Table of Contents

I

II

III

IV

V

VI

I

Table of Contents

Zola embodied his ideal inadequately, as every man who embodies an ideal must. His realism was his creed, which he tried to make his deed; but, before his fight was ended, and almost before he began to forebode it a losing fight, he began to feel and to say (for to feel, with that most virtuous and voracious spirit, implied saying) that he was too much a romanticist by birth and tradition, to exemplify realism in his work. He could not be all to the cause he honored that other men were—men like Flaubert and Maupassant, and Tourguenieff and Tolstoy, and Galdos and Valdes—because his intellectual youth had been nurtured on the milk of romanticism at the breast of his mother-time. He grew up in the day when the great novelists and poets were romanticists, and what he came to abhor he had first adored. He was that pathetic paradox, a prophet who cannot practise what he preaches, who cannot build his doctrine into the edifice of a living faith. Zola was none the less, but all the more, a poet in this. He conceived of reality poetically and always saw his human documents, as he began early to call them, ranged in the form of an epic poem. He fell below the greatest of the Russians, to whom alone he was inferior, in imagining that the affairs of men group themselves strongly about a central interest to which they constantly refer, and after whatever excursions definitely or definitively return. He was not willingly an epic poet, perhaps, but he was an epic poet, nevertheless; and the imperfection of his realism began with the perfection of his form. Nature is sometimes dramatic, though never on the hard and fast terms of the theatre, but she is almost never epic; and Zola was always epic. One need only think over his books and his subjects to be convinced of this: "L'Assommoir" and drunkenness; "Nana" and harlotry; "Germinale" and strikes; "L'Argent" and money getting and losing in all its branches; "Pot-Bouille" and the cruel squalor of poverty; "La Terre" and the life of the peasant; "Le Debacle" and the decay of imperialism. The largest of these schemes does not extend beyond the periphery described by the centrifugal whirl of its central motive, and the least of the Rougon-Macquart series is of the same epicality as the grandest. Each is bound to a thesis, but reality is bound to no thesis. You cannot say where it begins or where it leaves off; and it will not allow you to say precisely what its meaning or argument is. For this reason, there are no such perfect pieces of realism as the plays of Ibsen, which have all or each a thesis, but do not hold themselves bound to prove it, or even fully to state it; after these, for reality, come the novels of Tolstoy, which are of a direction so profound because so patient of aberration and exception.