Medieval Myths and Legends
Medieval Myths and LegendsThe Wandering Jew.Prester John.The Divining Rod.The Seven Sleepers of Ephesus.William Tell.The Dog Gellert.Tailed Men.Antichrist and Pope Joan.The Man in the Moon.Copyright
Medieval Myths and Legends
Sabine Baring-Gould
The Wandering Jew.
WHO, that has looked on Gustave Doré’s marvellous illustrations to
this wild legend, can forget the impression they made upon his
imagination?
I do not refer to the first illustration as striking, where the
Jewish shoemaker is refusing to suffer the cross-laden Savior to
rest a moment on his door-step, and is receiving with scornful lip
the judgment to wander restless till the Second Coming of that same
Redeemer. But I refer rather to the second, which represents the
Jew, after the lapse of ages, bowed beneath the burden of the
curse, worn with unrelieved toil, wearied with ceaseless
travelling, trudging onward at the last lights of evening, when a
rayless night of unabating rain is creeping on, along a sloppy path
between dripping bushes; and suddenly he comes over against a
wayside crucifix, on which the white glare of departing daylight
falls, to throw it into ghastly relief against the pitch-black
rain-clouds. For a moment we see the working of the miserable
shoemaker’s mind. We feel that he is recalling the tragedy of the
first Good Friday, and his head hangs heavier on his breast, as he
recalls the part he had taken in that awful catastrophe.
Or, is that other illustration more remarkable, where the wanderer
is amongst the Alps, at the brink of a hideous chasm; and seeing in
the contorted pine-branches the ever-haunting scene of the Via
Dolorosa, he is lured to cast himself into that black gulf in quest
of rest,—when an angel flashes out of the gloom with the sword of
flame turning every way, keeping him back from what would be to him
a Paradise indeed, the repose of Death?
Or, that last scene, when the trumpet sounds and earth is shivering
to its foundations, the fire is bubbling forth through the rents in
its surface, and the dead are coming together flesh to flesh, and
bone to bone, and muscle to muscle—then the weary man sits down and
casts off his shoes! Strange sights are around him, he sees them
not; strange sounds assail his ears, he hears but one—the
trumpet-note which gives the signal for him to stay his wanderings
and rest his weary feet.
I can linger over those noble woodcuts, and learn from them
something new each time that I study them; they are picture-poems
full of latent depths of thought. And now let us to the history of
this most thrilling of all mediæval myths, if a myth.
If a myth, I say, for who can say for certain that it is not true?
“Verily I say unto you, There be some standing here, which shall
not taste of death till they see the Son of Man coming in His
kingdom,”[1] are our Lord’s words, which I can hardly think apply
to the destruction of Jerusalem, as commentators explain it to
escape the difficulty. That some should live to see Jerusalem
destroyed was not very surprising, and hardly needed the emphatic
Verily which Christ only used when speaking something of peculiarly
solemn or mysterious import.
Besides, St. Luke’s account manifestly refers the coming in the
kingdom to the Judgment, for the saying stands as follows:
“Whosoever shall be ashamed of Me, and of My words, of him shall
the Son of Man be ashamed, when He shall come in His own glory, and
in His Father’s, and of the holy angels. But I tell you of a truth,
there be some standing here, which shall not taste of death till
they see the kingdom of God.”[2]
There can, I think, be no doubt in the mind of an unprejudiced
person that the words of our Lord do imply that some one or more of
those then living should not die till He came again. I do not mean
to insist on the literal signification, but I plead that there is
no improbability in our Lord’s words being fulfilled to the letter.
That the circumstance is unrecorded in the Gospels is no evidence
that it did not take place, for we are expressly told, “Many other
signs truly did Jesus in the presence of His disciples, which are
not written in this book;”[3] and again, “There are also many other
things which Jesus did, the which, if they should be written every
one, I suppose that even the world itself could not contain the
books that should be written.”[4]
We may remember also the mysterious witnesses who are to appear in
the last eventful days of the world’s history and bear testimony to
the Gospel truth before the antichristian world. One of these has
been often conjectured to be St. John the Evangelist, of whom
Christ said to Peter, “If I will that he tarry till I come, what is
that to thee?”
The historical evidence on which the tale rests is, however, too
slender for us to admit for it more than the barest claim to be
more than myth. The names and the circumstances connected with the
Jew and his doom vary in every account, and the only point upon
which all coincide is, that such an individual exists in an undying
condition, wandering over the face of the earth, seeking rest and
finding none.
The earliest extant mention of the Wandering Jew is to be found in
the book of the chronicles of the Abbey of St. Albans, which was
copied and continued by Matthew Paris. He records that in the year
1228, “a certain Archbishop of Armenia the Greater came on a
pilgrimage to England to see the relics of the saints, and visit
the sacred places in the kingdom, as he had done in others; he also
produced letters of recommendation from his Holiness the Pope, to
the religious and the prelates of the churches, in which they were
enjoined to receive and entertain him with due reverence and honor.
On his arrival, he came to St. Albans, where he was received with
all respect by the abbot and the monks; and at this place, being
fatigued with his journey, he remained some days to rest himself
and his followers, and a conversation took place between him and
the inhabitants of the convent, by means of their interpreters,
during which he made many inquiries relating to the religion and
religious observances of this country, and told many strange things
concerning the countries of the East. In the course of conversation
he was asked whether he had ever seen or heard any thing of Joseph,
a man of whom there was much talk in the world, who, when our Lord
suffered, was present and spoke to Him, and who is still alive, in
evidence of the Christian faith; in reply to which, a knight
in his retinue, who was his interpreter, replied, speaking in
French, ‘My lord well knows that man, and a little before he took
his way to the western countries, the said Joseph ate at the table
of my lord the Archbishop of Armenia, and he has often seen and
conversed with him.’
“He was then asked about what had passed between Christ and the
said Joseph; to which he replied, ‘At the time of the passion of
Jesus Christ, He was seized by the Jews, and led into the hall of
judgment before Pilate, the governor, that He might be judged by
him on the accusation of the Jews; and Pilate, finding no fault for
which he might sentence Him to death, said unto them, “Take Him and
judge Him according to your law;” the shouts of the Jews, however,
increasing, he, at their request, released unto them Barabbas, and
delivered Jesus to them to be crucified. When, therefore, the Jews
were dragging Jesus forth, and had reached the door, Cartaphilus, a
porter of the hall in Pilate’s service, as Jesus was going out of
the door, impiously struck Him on the back with his hand, and said
in mockery, “Go quicker, Jesus, go quicker; why do you loiter?” and
Jesus, looking back on him with a severe countenance, said to him,
“I am going, and you shall wait till I return.” And according as
our Lord said, this Cartaphilus is still awaiting His return. At
the time of our Lord’s suffering he was thirty years old, and when
he attains the age of a hundred years, he always returns to the
same age as he was when our Lord suffered. After Christ’s death,
when the Catholic faith gained ground, this Cartaphilus was
baptized by Ananias (who also baptized the Apostle Paul), and was
called Joseph. He dwells in one or other divisions of Armenia, and
in divers Eastern countries, passing his time amongst the bishops
and other prelates of the Church; he is a man of holy conversation,
and religious; a man of few words, and very circumspect in his
behavior; for he does not speak at all unless when questioned by
the bishops and religious; and then he relates the events of olden
times, and speaks of things which occurred at the suffering and
resurrection of our Lord, and of the witnesses of the resurrection,
namely, of those who rose with Christ, and went into the holy city,
and appeared unto men. He also tells of the creed of the Apostles,
and of their separation and preaching. And all this he relates
without smiling, or levity of conversation, as one who is well
practised in sorrow and the fear of God, always looking forward
with dread to the coming of Jesus Christ, lest at the Last Judgment
he should find him in anger whom, when on his way to death, he had
provoked to just vengeance. Numbers came to him from different
parts of the world, enjoying his society and conversation; and to
them, if they are men of authority, he explains all doubts on the
matters on which he is questioned. He refuses all gifts that are
offered him, being content with slight food and clothing.’”
Much about the same date, Philip Mouskes, afterwards Bishop of
Tournay, wrote his rhymed chronicle (1242), which contains a
similar account of the Jew, derived from the same Armenian
prelate:—
“Adonques vint un arceveskes
De çà mer, plains de bonnes tèques
Par samblant, et fut d’Armenie,”
and this man, having visited the shrine of “St. Tumas de
Kantorbire,” and then having paid his devotions at “Monsigour St.
Jake,” he went on to Cologne to see the heads of the three kings.
The version told in the Netherlands much resembled that related at
St. Albans, only that the Jew, seeing the people dragging Christ to
his death, exclaims,—
“Atendés moi! g’i vois,
S’iert mis le faus profète en crois.”
Then
“Le vrais Dieux se regarda,
Et li a dit qu’e n’i tarda,
Icist ne t’atenderont pas,
Mais saces, tu m’atenderas.”
We hear no more of the wandering Jew till the sixteenth century,
when we hear first of him in a casual manner, as assisting a
weaver, Kokot, at the royal palace in Bohemia (1505), to find a
treasure which had been secreted by the great-grandfather of Kokot,
sixty years before, at which time the Jew was present. He then had
the appearance of being a man of seventy years.[5]
Curiously enough, we next hear of him in the East, where he is
confounded with the prophet Elijah. Early in the century he
appeared to Fadhilah, under peculiar circumstances.
After the Arabs had captured the city of Elvan, Fadhilah, at the
head of three hundred horsemen, pitched his tents, late in the
evening, between two mountains. Fadhilah, having begun his evening
prayer with a loud voice, heard the words “Allah akbar” (God is
great) repeated distinctly, and each word of his prayer was
followed in a similar manner. Fadhilah, not believing this to be
the result of an echo, was much astonished, and cried out, “O thou!
whether thou art of the angel ranks, or whether thou art of some
other order of spirits, it is well; the power of God be with thee;
but if thou art a man, then let mine eyes light upon thee, that I
may rejoice in thy presence and society.” Scarcely had he spoken
these words, before an aged man, with bald head, stood before him,
holding a staff in his hand, and much resembling a dervish in
appearance. After having courteously saluted him, Fadhilah asked
the old man who he was. Thereupon the stranger answered, “Bassi
Hadhret Issa, I am here by command of the Lord Jesus, who has left
me in this world, that I may live therein until he comes a second
time to earth. I wait for this Lord, who is the Fountain of
Happiness, and in obedience to his command I dwell behind yon
mountain.” When Fadhilah heard these words, he asked when the Lord
Jesus would appear; and the old man replied that his appearing
would be at the end of the world, at the Last Judgment. But this
only increased Fadhilah’s curiosity, so that he inquired the signs
of the approach of the end of all things, whereupon Zerib Bar Elia
gave him an account of general, social, and moral dissolution,
which would be the climax of this world’s history.[6]
In 1547 he was seen in Europe, if we are to believe the following
narration:—
“Paul von Eitzen, doctor of the Holy Scriptures, and Bishop of
Schleswig,[7] related as true for some years past, that when he was
young, having studied at Wittemberg, he returned home to his
parents in Hamburg in the winter of the year 1547, and that on the
following Sunday, in church, he observed a tall man, with his hair
hanging over his shoulders, standing barefoot, during the sermon,
over against the pulpit, listening with deepest attention to the
discourse, and, whenever the name of Jesus was mentioned, bowing
himself profoundly and humbly, with sighs and beating of the
breast. He had no other clothing, in the bitter cold of the winter,
except a pair of hose which were in tatters about his feet, and a
coat with a girdle which reached to his feet; and his general
appearance was that of a man of fifty years. And many people, some
of high degree and title, have seen this same man in England,
France, Italy, Hungary, Persia, Spain, Poland, Moscow, Lapland,
Sweden, Denmark, Scotland, and other places.
“Every one wondered over the man. Now, after the sermon, the said
Doctor inquired diligently where the stranger was to be found; and
when he had sought him out, he inquired of him privately whence he
came, and how long that winter he had been in the place. Thereupon
he replied, modestly, that he was a Jew by birth, a native of
Jerusalem, by name Ahasverus, by trade a shoemaker; he had been
present at the crucifixion of Christ, and had lived ever since,
travelling through various lands and cities, the which he
substantiated by accounts he gave; he related also the
circumstances of Christ’s transference from Pilate to Herod, and
the final crucifixion, together with other details not recorded in
the Evangelists and historians; he gave accounts of the changes of
government in many countries, especially of the East, through
several centuries; and moreover he detailed the labors and deaths
of the holy Apostles of Christ most circumstantially.
“Now when Doctor Paul v. Eitzen heard this with profound
astonishment, on account of its incredible novelty, he inquired
further, in order that he might obtain more accurate information.
Then the man answered, that he had lived in Jerusalem at the time
of the crucifixion of Christ, whom he had regarded as a deceiver of
the people, and a heretic; he had seen Him with his own eyes, and
had done his best, along with others, to bring this deceiver, as he
regarded Him, to justice, and to have Him put out of the way. When
the sentence had been pronounced by Pilate, Christ was about to be
dragged past his house; then he ran home, and called together his
household to have a look at Christ, and see what sort of a person
He was.
“This having been done, he had his little child on his arm, and was
standing in his doorway, to have a sight of the Lord Jesus
Christ.
“As, then, Christ was led by, bowed under the weight of the heavy
cross, He tried to rest a little, and stood still a moment; but the
shoemaker, in zeal and rage, and for the sake of obtaining credit
among the other Jews, drove the Lord Christ forward, and told Him
to hasten on His way. Jesus, obeying, looked at him, and said, ‘I
shall stand and rest, but thou shalt go till the last day.’ At
these words the man set down the child; and, unable to remain where
he was, he followed Christ, and saw how cruelly He was crucified,
how He suffered, how He died. As soon as this had taken place, it
came upon him suddenly that he could no more return to Jerusalem,
nor see again his wife and child, but must go forth into foreign
lands, one after another, like a mournful pilgrim. Now, when, years
after, he returned to Jerusalem, he found it ruined and utterly
razed, so that not one stone was left standing on another; and he
could not recognize former localities.
“He believes that it is God’s purpose, in thus driving him about in
miserable life, and preserving him undying, to present him before
the Jews at the end, as a living token, so that the godless and
unbelieving may remember the death of Christ, and be turned to
repentance. For his part he would well rejoice were God in heaven
to release him from this vale of tears. After this conversation,
Doctor Paul v. Eitzen, along with the rector of the school of
Hamburg, who was well read in history, and a traveller, questioned
him about events which had taken place in the East since the death
of Christ, and he was able to give them much information on many
ancient matters; so that it was impossible not to be convinced of
the truth of his story, and to see that what seems impossible with
men is, after all, possible with God.
“Since the Jew has had his life extended, he has become silent and
reserved, and only answers direct questions. When invited to become
any one’s guest, he eats little, and drinks in great moderation;
then hurries on, never remaining long in one place. When at
Hamburg, Dantzig, and elsewhere, money has been offered him, he
never took more than two skillings (fourpence, one farthing), and
at once distributed it to the poor, as token that he needed no
money, for God would provide for him, as he rued the sins he had
committed in ignorance.
“During the period of his stay in Hamburg and Dantzig he was never
seen to laugh. In whatever land he travelled he spoke its language,
and when he spoke Saxon, it was like a native Saxon. Many people
came from different places to Hamburg and Dantzig in order to see
and hear this man, and were convinced that the providence of God
was exercised in this individual in a very remarkable manner. He
gladly listened to God’s word, or heard it spoken of always with
great gravity and compunction, and he ever reverenced with sighs
the pronunciation of the name of God, or of Jesus Christ, and could
not endure to hear curses; but whenever he heard any one swear by
God’s death or pains, he waxed indignant, and exclaimed, with
vehemence and with sighs, ‘Wretched man and miserable creature,
thus to misuse the name of thy Lord and God, and His bitter
sufferings and passion. Hadst thou seen, as I have, how heavy and
bitter were the pangs and wounds of thy Lord, endured for thee and
for me, thou wouldst rather undergo great pain thyself than thus
take His sacred name in vain!’
“Such is the account given to me by Doctor Paul von Eitzen, with
many circumstantial proofs, and corroborated by certain of my own
old acquaintances who saw this same individual with their own eyes
in Hamburg.
“In the year 1575 the Secretary Christopher Krause, and Master
Jacob von Holstein, legates to the Court of Spain, and afterwards
sent into the Netherlands to pay the soldiers serving his Majesty
in that country, related on their return home to Schleswig, and
confirmed with solemn oaths, that they had come across the same
mysterious individual at Madrid in Spain, in appearance, manner of
life, habits, clothing, just the same as he had appeared in
Hamburg. They said that they had spoken with him, and that many
people of all classes had conversed with him, and found him to
speak good Spanish. In the year 1599, in December, a reliable
person wrote from Brunswick to Strasburg that the same mentioned
strange person had been seen alive at Vienna in Austria, and that
he had started for Poland and Dantzig; and that he purposed going
on to Moscow. This Ahasverus was at Lubeck in 1601, also about the
same date in Revel in Livonia, and in Cracow in Poland. In Moscow
he was seen of many and spoken to by many.
“What thoughtful, God-fearing persons are to think of the said
person, is at their option. God’s works are wondrous and past
finding out, and are manifested day by day, only to be revealed in
full at the last great day of account.
“Dated, Revel, August 1st, 1613.
“D. W.
“D.
“Chrysostomus Dudulœus,
“Westphalus.”
The statement that the Wandering Jew appeared in Lubeck in 1601,
does not tally with the more precise chronicle of Henricus Bangert,
which gives: “Die 14 Januarii Anno MDCIII., adnotatum reliquit
Lubecæ fuisse Judæum illum immortalem, qui se Christi crucifixioni
interfuisse affirmavit.”[8]
In 1604 he seems to have appeared in Paris. Rudolph Botoreus says,
under this date, “I fear lest I be accused of giving ear to old
wives’ fables, if I insert in these pages what is reported all over
Europe of the Jew, coeval with the Savior Christ; however, nothing
is more common, and our popular histories have not scrupled to
assert it. Following the lead of those who wrote our annals, I may
say that he who appeared not in one century only, in Spain, Italy,
and Germany, was also in this year seen and recognized as the same
individual who had appeared in Hamburg, anno MDLXVI. The common
people, bold in spreading reports, relate many things of him; and
this I allude to, lest anything should be left unsaid.”[9]