UUID: e9799ea6-09cb-11e5-956e-4fc950d1ab4a
This ebook was created with BackTypo (http://backtypo.com)by Simplicissimus Book Farm
Table of contents
PREFACE
PART I.
PART II.
PART III.
PART IV.A tall stalk of bluebells
PART V.
PREFACE
Is
this another collection of stupid poems that children cannot use?
Will they look hopelessly through this volume for poems that suit
them? Will they say despairingly, "This is too long," and
"That is too hard," and "I don't like that because it
is not interesting"?Are
there three or four pleasing poems and are all the rest put in to
fill up the book? Nay, verily! The poems in this collection are those
that children love. With the exception of seven, they are short
enough for children to commit to memory without wearying themselves
or losing interest in the poem. If one boy learns "The
Overland Mail,"
or "The Recruit," or "Wynken,
Blynken, and Nod,"
or "The
Song in Camp,"
or "Old
Ironsides,"
or "I
Have a Little Shadow,"
or "The
Tournament,"
or "The
Duel,"
nine boys out of ten will be eager to follow him. I know because I
have tried it a dozen times. Every boy loves "Paul Revere's
Ride" (alas! I have not been able to include it), and is
ambitious to learn it, but only boys having a quick memory will
persevere to the end. Shall the slower boy be deprived of the
pleasure of reading the whole poem and getting its inspiring
sentiment and learning as many stanzas as his mind will take? No,
indeed. Half of such a poem is better than none. Let the slow boy
learn and recite as many stanzas as he can and the boy of quick
memory follow him up with the rest. It does not help the slow boy's
memory to keep it down entirely or deprive it of its smaller activity
because he cannot learn the whole. Some people will invariably give
the slow child a very short poem. It is often better to divide a long
poem among the children, letting each child learn a part. The
sustained interest of a long poem is worth while. "The
Merman,"
"The
Battle of Ivry,"
"Horatius
at the Bridge,"
"Krinken,"
"The
Skeleton in Armour,"
"The
Raven"
and "Hervé
Riel"
may all profitably be learned that way. Nevertheless, the child
enjoys most the poem that is just long enough, and there is much to
be said in favour of the selection that is adapted, in length, to the
average mind; for the child hesitates in the presence of quantity
rather than in the presence of subtle thought. I make claim for this
collection that it is made up of poems that the majority of children
will learn of their own free will. There are people who believe that
in the matter of learning poetry there is no "ought,"
but this is a false belief. There is a
duty,
even there; for every American citizen
ought
to know the great national songs that keep alive the spirit of
patriotism. Children should build for their future—and get, while
they are children, what only the fresh imagination of the child can
assimilate.They
should store up an untold wealth of heroic sentiment; they should
acquire the habit of carrying a literary quality in their
conversation; they should carry a heart full of the fresh and
delightful associations and memories, connected with poetry hours to
brighten mature years. They should develop their memories while they
have memories to develop.Will
the boy who took every poetry hour for a whole school year to learn
"Henry
of Navarre"
ever regret it, or will the children who listened to it? No. It was
fresh every week and they brought fresh interest in listening. The
boy will always love it because he used to love it. There were boys
who scrambled for the right to recite "The
Tournament,"
"The
Charge of the Light Brigade,"
"The
Star-Spangled Banner,"
and so on. The boy who was first to reach the front had the
privilege. The triumph of getting the chance to recite added to the
zest of it. Will they ever forget it?I
know Lowell's "The
Finding of the Lyre."
Attention, Sir Knights! See who can learn it first as I say it to
you. But I find that I have forgotten a line of it, so you may open
your books and teach it to me. Now, I can recite every word of it.
How much of it can you repeat from memory? One boy can say it all.
Nearly every child has learned the most of it. Now, it will be easy
for you to learn it alone. And Memory, the Goddess Beautiful, will
henceforth go with you to recall this happy hour.
PART I.
The
Arrow and the Song."The
Arrow and the Song," by Longfellow (1807-82), is placed first in
this volume out of respect to a little girl of six years who used to
love to recite it to me. She knew many poems, but this was her
favourite.I
shot an arrow into the air,It fell to earth, I knew not
where;For, so swiftly it flew, the sightCould not follow
it in its flight.I
breathed a song into the air,It fell to earth, I knew not
where;For who has sight so keen and strongThat it can
follow the flight of song?Long,
long afterward, in an oakI found the arrow, still unbroke;And
the song, from beginning to end,I found again in the heart of
a friend.Henry
W. Longfellow.The
Babie.I
found "The Babie" in Stedman's "Anthology." It is
placed in this volume by permission of the poet, Jeremiah Eames
Rankin, of Cleveland (1828-), because it captured the heart of a
ten-year-old boy whose fancy was greatly moved by the two beautiful
lines:"Her
face is like an angel's face,I'm glad she has no wings."Nae
shoon to hide her tiny taes,Nae stockin' on her feet;Her
supple ankles white as snaw,Or early blossoms sweet.
Lesen Sie weiter in der vollständigen Ausgabe!
Lesen Sie weiter in der vollständigen Ausgabe!
Lesen Sie weiter in der vollständigen Ausgabe!
Lesen Sie weiter in der vollständigen Ausgabe!