I
I had taken Mrs. Prest into my confidence; in truth without
her I should have made but little advance, for the fruitful idea in
the whole business dropped from her friendly lips. It was she who
invented the short cut, who severed the Gordian knot. It is not
supposed to be the nature of women to rise as a general thing to
the largest and most liberal view—I mean of a practical scheme; but
it has struck me that they sometimes throw off a bold
conception—such as a man would not have risen to—with singular
serenity. “Simply ask them to take you in on the footing of a
lodger”—I don’t think that unaided I should have risen to that. I
was beating about the bush, trying to be ingenious, wondering by
what combination of arts I might become an acquaintance, when she
offered this happy suggestion that the way to become an
acquaintance was first to become an inmate. Her actual knowledge of
the Misses Bordereau was scarcely larger than mine, and indeed I
had brought with me from England some definite facts which were new
to her. Their name had been mixed up ages before with one of the
greatest names of the century, and they lived now in Venice in
obscurity, on very small means, unvisited, unapproachable, in a
dilapidated old palace on an out-of-the-way canal: this was the
substance of my friend’s impression of them. She herself had been
established in Venice for fifteen years and had done a great deal
of good there; but the circle of her benevolence did not include
the two shy, mysterious and, as it was somehow supposed, scarcely
respectable Americans (they were believed to have lost in their
long exile all national quality, besides having had, as their name
implied, some French strain in their origin), who asked no favors
and desired no attention. In the early years of her residence she
had made an attempt to see them, but this had been successful only
as regards the little one, as Mrs. Prest called the niece; though
in reality as I afterward learned she was considerably the bigger
of the two. She had heard Miss Bordereau was ill and had a
suspicion that she was in want; and she had gone to the house to
offer assistance, so that if there were suffering (and American
suffering), she should at least not have it on her conscience. The
“little one” received her in the great cold, tarnished Venetian
sala, the central hall of the house, paved with marble and roofed
with dim crossbeams, and did not even ask her to sit down. This was
not encouraging for me, who wished to sit so fast, and I remarked
as much to Mrs. Prest. She however replied with profundity, “Ah,
but there’s all the difference: I went to confer a favor and you
will go to ask one. If they are proud you will be on the right
side.” And she offered to show me their house to begin with—to row
me thither in her gondola. I let her know that I had already been
to look at it half a dozen times; but I accepted her invitation,
for it charmed me to hover about the place. I had made my way to it
the day after my arrival in Venice (it had been described to me in
advance by the friend in England to whom I owed definite
information as to their possession of the papers), and I had
besieged it with my eyes while I considered my plan of campaign.
Jeffrey Aspern had never been in it that I knew of; but some note
of his voice seemed to abide there by a roundabout implication, a
faint reverberation.Mrs. Prest knew nothing about the papers, but she was
interested in my curiosity, as she was always interested in the
joys and sorrows of her friends. As we went, however, in her
gondola, gliding there under the sociable hood with the bright
Venetian picture framed on either side by the movable window, I
could see that she was amused by my infatuation, the way my
interest in the papers had become a fixed idea. “One would think
you expected to find in them the answer to the riddle of the
universe,” she said; and I denied the impeachment only by replying
that if I had to choose between that precious solution and a bundle
of Jeffrey Aspern’s letters I knew indeed which would appear to me
the greater boon. She pretended to make light of his genius, and I
took no pains to defend him. One doesn’t defend one’s god: one’s
god is in himself a defense. Besides, today, after his long
comparative obscuration, he hangs high in the heaven of our
literature, for all the world to see; he is a part of the light by
which we walk. The most I said was that he was no doubt not a
woman’s poet: to which she rejoined aptly enough that he had been
at least Miss Bordereau’s. The strange thing had been for me to
discover in England that she was still alive: it was as if I had
been told Mrs. Siddons was, or Queen Caroline, or the famous Lady
Hamilton, for it seemed to me that she belonged to a generation as
extinct. “Why, she must be tremendously old—at least a hundred,” I
had said; but on coming to consider dates I saw that it was not
strictly necessary that she should have exceeded by very much the
common span. Nonetheless she was very far advanced in life, and her
relations with Jeffrey Aspern had occurred in her early womanhood.
“That is her excuse,” said Mrs. Prest, half-sententiously and yet
also somewhat as if she were ashamed of making a speech so little
in the real tone of Venice. As if a woman needed an excuse for
having loved the divine poet! He had been not only one of the most
brilliant minds of his day (and in those years, when the century
was young, there were, as everyone knows, many), but one of the
most genial men and one of the handsomest.The niece, according to Mrs. Prest, was not so old, and she
risked the conjecture that she was only a grandniece. This was
possible; I had nothing but my share in the very limited knowledge
of my English fellow worshipper John Cumnor, who had never seen the
couple. The world, as I say, had recognized Jeffrey Aspern, but
Cumnor and I had recognized him most. The multitude, today, flocked
to his temple, but of that temple he and I regarded ourselves as
the ministers. We held, justly, as I think, that we had done more
for his memory than anyone else, and we had done it by opening
lights into his life. He had nothing to fear from us because he had
nothing to fear from the truth, which alone at such a distance of
time we could be interested in establishing. His early death had
been the only dark spot in his life, unless the papers in Miss
Bordereau’s hands should perversely bring out others. There had
been an impression about 1825 that he had “treated her badly,” just
as there had been an impression that he had “served,” as the London
populace says, several other ladies in the same way. Each of these
cases Cumnor and I had been able to investigate, and we had never
failed to acquit him conscientiously of shabby behavior. I judged
him perhaps more indulgently than my friend; certainly, at any
rate, it appeared to me that no man could have walked straighter in
the given circumstances. These were almost always awkward. Half the
women of his time, to speak liberally, had flung themselves at his
head, and out of this pernicious fashion many complications, some
of them grave, had not failed to arise. He was not a woman’s poet,
as I had said to Mrs. Prest, in the modern phase of his reputation;
but the situation had been different when the man’s own voice was
mingled with his song. That voice, by every testimony, was one of
the sweetest ever heard. “Orpheus and the Maenads!” was the
exclamation that rose to my lips when I first turned over his
correspondence. Almost all the Maenads were unreasonable, and many
of them insupportable; it struck me in short that he was kinder,
more considerate than, in his place (if I could imagine myself in
such a place!) I should have been.It was certainly strange beyond all strangeness, and I shall
not take up space with attempting to explain it, that whereas in
all these other lines of research we had to deal with phantoms and
dust, the mere echoes of echoes, the one living source of
information that had lingered on into our time had been unheeded by
us. Every one of Aspern’s contemporaries had, according to our
belief, passed away; we had not been able to look into a single
pair of eyes into which his had looked or to feel a transmitted
contact in any aged hand that his had touched. Most dead of all did
poor Miss Bordereau appear, and yet she alone had survived. We
exhausted in the course of months our wonder that we had not found
her out sooner, and the substance of our explanation was that she
had kept so quiet. The poor lady on the whole had had reason for
doing so. But it was a revelation to us that it was possible to
keep so quiet as that in the latter half of the nineteenth
century—the age of newspapers and telegrams and photographs and
interviewers. And she had taken no great trouble about it either:
she had not hidden herself away in an undiscoverable hole; she had
boldly settled down in a city of exhibition. The only secret of her
safety that we could perceive was that Venice contained so many
curiosities that were greater than she. And then accident had
somehow favored her, as was shown for example in the fact that Mrs.
Prest had never happened to mention her to me, though I had spent
three weeks in Venice—under her nose, as it were—five years before.
Mrs. Prest had not mentioned this much to anyone; she appeared
almost to have forgotten she was there. Of course she had not the
responsibilities of an editor. It was no explanation of the old
woman’s having eluded us to say that she lived abroad, for our
researches had again and again taken us (not only by correspondence
but by personal inquiry) to France, to Germany, to Italy, in which
countries, not counting his important stay in England, so many of
the too few years of Aspern’s career were spent. We were glad to
think at least that in all our publishings (some people consider I
believe that we have overdone them), we had only touched in passing
and in the most discreet manner on Miss Bordereau’s connection.
Oddly enough, even if we had had the material (and we often
wondered what had become of it), it would have been the most
difficult episode to handle.The gondola stopped, the old palace was there; it was a house
of the class which in Venice carries even in extreme dilapidation
the dignified name. “How charming! It’s gray and pink!” my
companion exclaimed; and that is the most comprehensive description
of it. It was not particularly old, only two or three centuries;
and it had an air not so much of decay as of quiet discouragement,
as if it had rather missed its career. But its wide front, with a
stone balcony from end to end of the piano nobile or most important
floor, was architectural enough, with the aid of various pilasters
and arches; and the stucco with which in the intervals it had long
ago been endued was rosy in the April afternoon. It overlooked a
clean, melancholy, unfrequented canal, which had a narrow riva or
convenient footway on either side. “I don’t know why—there are no
brick gables,” said Mrs. Prest, “but this corner has seemed to me
before more Dutch than Italian, more like Amsterdam than like
Venice. It’s perversely clean, for reasons of its own; and though
you can pass on foot scarcely anyone ever thinks of doing so. It
has the air of a Protestant Sunday. Perhaps the people are afraid
of the Misses Bordereau. I daresay they have the reputation of
witches.”I forget what answer I made to this—I was given up to two
other reflections. The first of these was that if the old lady
lived in such a big, imposing house she could not be in any sort of
misery and therefore would not be tempted by a chance to let a
couple of rooms. I expressed this idea to Mrs. Prest, who gave me a
very logical reply. “If she didn’t live in a big house how could it
be a question of her having rooms to spare? If she were not amply
lodged herself you would lack ground to approach her. Besides, a
big house here, and especially in this quartier perdu, proves
nothing at all: it is perfectly compatible with a state of penury.
Dilapidated old palazzi, if you will go out of the way for them,
are to be had for five shillings a year. And as for the people who
live in them—no, until you have explored Venice socially as much as
I have you can form no idea of their domestic desolation. They live
on nothing, for they have nothing to live on.” The other idea that
had come into my head was connected with a high blank wall which
appeared to confine an expanse of ground on one side of the house.
Blank I call it, but it was figured over with the patches that
please a painter, repaired breaches, crumblings of plaster,
extrusions of brick that had turned pink with time; and a few thin
trees, with the poles of certain rickety trellises, were visible
over the top. The place was a garden, and apparently it belonged to
the house. It suddenly occurred to me that if it did belong to the
house I had my pretext.I sat looking out on all this with Mrs. Prest (it was covered
with the golden glow of Venice) from the shade of our felze, and
she asked me if I would go in then, while she waited for me, or
come back another time. At first I could not decide—it was
doubtless very weak of me. I wanted still to think I MIGHT get a
footing, and I was afraid to meet failure, for it would leave me,
as I remarked to my companion, without another arrow for my bow.
“Why not another?” she inquired as I sat there hesitating and
thinking it over; and she wished to know why even now and before
taking the trouble of becoming an inmate (which might be wretchedly
uncomfortable after all, even if it succeeded), I had not the
resource of simply offering them a sum of money down. In that way I
might obtain the documents without bad nights.
“Dearest lady,” I exclaimed, “excuse the impatience of my
tone when I suggest that you must have forgotten the very fact
(surely I communicated it to you) which pushed me to throw myself
upon your ingenuity. The old woman won’t have the documents spoken
of; they are personal, delicate, intimate, and she hasn’t modern
notions, God bless her! If I should sound that note first I should
certainly spoil the game. I can arrive at the papers only by
putting her off her guard, and I can put her off her guard only by
ingratiating diplomatic practices. Hypocrisy, duplicity are my only
chance. I am sorry for it, but for Jeffrey Aspern’s sake I would do
worse still. First I must take tea with her; then tackle the main
job.” And I told over what had happened to John Cumnor when he
wrote to her. No notice whatever had been taken of his first
letter, and the second had been answered very sharply, in six
lines, by the niece. “Miss Bordereau requested her to say that she
could not imagine what he meant by troubling them. They had none of
Mr. Aspern’s papers, and if they had should never think of showing
them to anyone on any account whatever. She didn’t know what he was
talking about and begged he would let her alone.” I certainly did
not want to be met that way.
“Well,” said Mrs. Prest after a moment, provokingly, “perhaps
after all they haven’t any of his things. If they deny it flat how
are you sure?”
“John Cumnor is sure, and it would take me long to tell you
how his conviction, or his very strong presumption—strong enough to
stand against the old lady’s not unnatural fib—has built itself up.
Besides, he makes much of the internal evidence of the niece’s
letter.”
“The internal evidence?”
“Her calling him ‘Mr. Aspern.’”
“I don’t see what that proves.”
“It proves familiarity, and familiarity implies the
possession of mementoes, or relics. I can’t tell you how that ‘Mr.’
touches me—how it bridges over the gulf of time and brings our hero
near to me—nor what an edge it gives to my desire to see Juliana.
You don’t say, ‘Mr.’ Shakespeare.”
“Would I, any more, if I had a box full of his
letters?”
“Yes, if he had been your lover and someone wanted them!” And
I added that John Cumnor was so convinced, and so all the more
convinced by Miss Bordereau’s tone, that he would have come himself
to Venice on the business were it not that for him there was the
obstacle that it would be difficult to disprove his identity with
the person who had written to them, which the old ladies would be
sure to suspect in spite of dissimulation and a change of name. If
they were to ask him point-blank if he were not their correspondent
it would be too awkward for him to lie; whereas I was fortunately
not tied in that way. I was a fresh hand and could say no without
lying.
“But you will have to change your name,” said Mrs. Prest.
“Juliana lives out of the world as much as it is possible to live,
but none the less she has probably heard of Mr. Aspern’s editors;
she perhaps possesses what you have published.”
“I have thought of that,” I returned; and I drew out of my
pocketbook a visiting card, neatly engraved with a name that was
not my own.
“You are very extravagant; you might have written it,” said
my companion.
“This looks more genuine.”
“Certainly, you are prepared to go far! But it will be
awkward about your letters; they won’t come to you in that
mask.”
“My banker will take them in, and I will go every day to
fetch them. It will give me a little walk.”
“Shall you only depend upon that?” asked Mrs. Prest. “Aren’t
you coming to see me?”
“Oh, you will have left Venice, for the hot months, long
before there are any results. I am prepared to roast all summer—as
well as hereafter, perhaps you’ll say! Meanwhile, John Cumnor will
bombard me with letters addressed, in my feigned name, to the care
of the padrona.”
“She will recognize his hand,” my companion
suggested.
“On the envelope he can disguise it.”
“Well, you’re a precious pair! Doesn’t it occur to you that
even if you are able to say you are not Mr. Cumnor in person they
may still suspect you of being his emissary?”
“Certainly, and I see only one way to parry
that.”
“And what may that be?”I hesitated a moment. “To make love to the
niece.”
“Ah,” cried Mrs. Prest, “wait till you see her!”