I
I
had taken Mrs. Prest into my confidence; in truth without her I
should have made but little advance, for the fruitful idea in the
whole business dropped from her friendly lips. It was she who
invented the short cut, who severed the Gordian knot. It is not
supposed to be the nature of women to rise as a general thing to the
largest and most liberal view—I mean of a practical scheme; but it
has struck me that they sometimes throw off a bold conception—such
as a man would not have risen to—with singular serenity. “Simply
ask them to take you in on the footing of a lodger”—I don’t
think that unaided I should have risen to that. I was beating about
the bush, trying to be ingenious, wondering by what combination of
arts I might become an acquaintance, when she offered this happy
suggestion that the way to become an acquaintance was first to become
an inmate. Her actual knowledge of the Misses Bordereau was scarcely
larger than mine, and indeed I had brought with me from England some
definite facts which were new to her. Their name had been mixed up
ages before with one of the greatest names of the century, and they
lived now in Venice in obscurity, on very small means, unvisited,
unapproachable, in a dilapidated old palace on an out-of-the-way
canal: this was the substance of my friend’s impression of them.
She herself had been established in Venice for fifteen years and had
done a great deal of good there; but the circle of her benevolence
did not include the two shy, mysterious and, as it was somehow
supposed, scarcely respectable Americans (they were believed to have
lost in their long exile all national quality, besides having had, as
their name implied, some French strain in their origin), who asked no
favors and desired no attention. In the early years of her residence
she had made an attempt to see them, but this had been successful
only as regards the little one, as Mrs. Prest called the niece;
though in reality as I afterward learned she was considerably the
bigger of the two. She had heard Miss Bordereau was ill and had a
suspicion that she was in want; and she had gone to the house to
offer assistance, so that if there were suffering (and American
suffering), she should at least not have it on her conscience. The
“little one” received her in the great cold, tarnished Venetian
sala, the central hall of the house, paved with marble and roofed
with dim crossbeams, and did not even ask her to sit down. This was
not encouraging for me, who wished to sit so fast, and I remarked as
much to Mrs. Prest. She however replied with profundity, “Ah, but
there’s all the difference: I went to confer a favor and you will
go to ask one. If they are proud you will be on the right side.”
And she offered to show me their house to begin with—to row me
thither in her gondola. I let her know that I had already been to
look at it half a dozen times; but I accepted her invitation, for it
charmed me to hover about the place. I had made my way to it the day
after my arrival in Venice (it had been described to me in advance by
the friend in England to whom I owed definite information as to their
possession of the papers), and I had besieged it with my eyes while I
considered my plan of campaign. Jeffrey Aspern had never been in it
that I knew of; but some note of his voice seemed to abide there by a
roundabout implication, a faint reverberation.Mrs.
Prest knew nothing about the papers, but she was interested in my
curiosity, as she was always interested in the joys and sorrows of
her friends. As we went, however, in her gondola, gliding there under
the sociable hood with the bright Venetian picture framed on either
side by the movable window, I could see that she was amused by my
infatuation, the way my interest in the papers had become a fixed
idea. “One would think you expected to find in them the answer to
the riddle of the universe,” she said; and I denied the impeachment
only by replying that if I had to choose between that precious
solution and a bundle of Jeffrey Aspern’s letters I knew indeed
which would appear to me the greater boon. She pretended to make
light of his genius, and I took no pains to defend him. One doesn’t
defend one’s god: one’s god is in himself a defense. Besides,
today, after his long comparative obscuration, he hangs high in the
heaven of our literature, for all the world to see; he is a part of
the light by which we walk. The most I said was that he was no doubt
not a woman’s poet: to which she rejoined aptly enough that he had
been at least Miss Bordereau’s. The strange thing had been for me
to discover in England that she was still alive: it was as if I had
been told Mrs. Siddons was, or Queen Caroline, or the famous Lady
Hamilton, for it seemed to me that she belonged to a generation as
extinct. “Why, she must be tremendously old—at least a hundred,”
I had said; but on coming to consider dates I saw that it was not
strictly necessary that she should have exceeded by very much the
common span. Nonetheless she was very far advanced in life, and her
relations with Jeffrey Aspern had occurred in her early womanhood.
“That is her excuse,” said Mrs. Prest, half-sententiously and yet
also somewhat as if she were ashamed of making a speech so little in
the real tone of Venice. As if a woman needed an excuse for having
loved the divine poet! He had been not only one of the most brilliant
minds of his day (and in those years, when the century was young,
there were, as everyone knows, many), but one of the most genial men
and one of the handsomest.The
niece, according to Mrs. Prest, was not so old, and she risked the
conjecture that she was only a grandniece. This was possible; I had
nothing but my share in the very limited knowledge of my English
fellow worshipper John Cumnor, who had never seen the couple. The
world, as I say, had recognized Jeffrey Aspern, but Cumnor and I had
recognized him most. The multitude, today, flocked to his temple, but
of that temple he and I regarded ourselves as the ministers. We held,
justly, as I think, that we had done more for his memory than anyone
else, and we had done it by opening lights into his life. He had
nothing to fear from us because he had nothing to fear from the
truth, which alone at such a distance of time we could be interested
in establishing. His early death had been the only dark spot in his
life, unless the papers in Miss Bordereau’s hands should perversely
bring out others. There had been an impression about 1825 that he had
“treated her badly,” just as there had been an impression that he
had “served,” as the London populace says, several other ladies
in the same way. Each of these cases Cumnor and I had been able to
investigate, and we had never failed to acquit him conscientiously of
shabby behavior. I judged him perhaps more indulgently than my
friend; certainly, at any rate, it appeared to me that no man could
have walked straighter in the given circumstances. These were almost
always awkward. Half the women of his time, to speak liberally, had
flung themselves at his head, and out of this pernicious fashion many
complications, some of them grave, had not failed to arise. He was
not a woman’s poet, as I had said to Mrs. Prest, in the modern
phase of his reputation; but the situation had been different when
the man’s own voice was mingled with his song. That voice, by every
testimony, was one of the sweetest ever heard. “Orpheus and the
Maenads!” was the exclamation that rose to my lips when I first
turned over his correspondence. Almost all the Maenads were
unreasonable, and many of them insupportable; it struck me in short
that he was kinder, more considerate than, in his place (if I could
imagine myself in such a place!) I should have been.It
was certainly strange beyond all strangeness, and I shall not take up
space with attempting to explain it, that whereas in all these other
lines of research we had to deal with phantoms and dust, the mere
echoes of echoes, the one living source of information that had
lingered on into our time had been unheeded by us. Every one of
Aspern’s contemporaries had, according to our belief, passed away;
we had not been able to look into a single pair of eyes into which
his had looked or to feel a transmitted contact in any aged hand that
his had touched. Most dead of all did poor Miss Bordereau appear, and
yet she alone had survived. We exhausted in the course of months our
wonder that we had not found her out sooner, and the substance of our
explanation was that she had kept so quiet. The poor lady on the
whole had had reason for doing so. But it was a revelation to us that
it was possible to keep so quiet as that in the latter half of the
nineteenth century—the age of newspapers and telegrams and
photographs and interviewers. And she had taken no great trouble
about it either: she had not hidden herself away in an undiscoverable
hole; she had boldly settled down in a city of exhibition. The only
secret of her safety that we could perceive was that Venice contained
so many curiosities that were greater than she. And then accident had
somehow favored her, as was shown for example in the fact that Mrs.
Prest had never happened to mention her to me, though I had spent
three weeks in Venice—under her nose, as it were—five years
before. Mrs. Prest had not mentioned this much to anyone; she
appeared almost to have forgotten she was there. Of course she had
not the responsibilities of an editor. It was no explanation of the
old woman’s having eluded us to say that she lived abroad, for our
researches had again and again taken us (not only by correspondence
but by personal inquiry) to France, to Germany, to Italy, in which
countries, not counting his important stay in England, so many of the
too few years of Aspern’s career were spent. We were glad to think
at least that in all our publishings (some people consider I believe
that we have overdone them), we had only touched in passing and in
the most discreet manner on Miss Bordereau’s connection. Oddly
enough, even if we had had the material (and we often wondered what
had become of it), it would have been the most difficult episode to
handle.The
gondola stopped, the old palace was there; it was a house of the
class which in Venice carries even in extreme dilapidation the
dignified name. “How charming! It’s gray and pink!” my
companion exclaimed; and that is the most comprehensive description
of it. It was not particularly old, only two or three centuries; and
it had an air not so much of decay as of quiet discouragement, as if
it had rather missed its career. But its wide front, with a stone
balcony from end to end of the piano nobile or most important floor,
was architectural enough, with the aid of various pilasters and
arches; and the stucco with which in the intervals it had long ago
been endued was rosy in the April afternoon. It overlooked a clean,
melancholy, unfrequented canal, which had a narrow riva or convenient
footway on either side. “I don’t know why—there are no brick
gables,” said Mrs. Prest, “but this corner has seemed to me
before more Dutch than Italian, more like Amsterdam than like Venice.
It’s perversely clean, for reasons of its own; and though you can
pass on foot scarcely anyone ever thinks of doing so. It has the air
of a Protestant Sunday. Perhaps the people are afraid of the Misses
Bordereau. I daresay they have the reputation of witches.”I
forget what answer I made to this—I was given up to two other
reflections. The first of these was that if the old lady lived in
such a big, imposing house she could not be in any sort of misery and
therefore would not be tempted by a chance to let a couple of rooms.
I expressed this idea to Mrs. Prest, who gave me a very logical
reply. “If she didn’t live in a big house how could it be a
question of her having rooms to spare? If she were not amply lodged
herself you would lack ground to approach her. Besides, a big house
here, and especially in this quartier perdu, proves nothing at all:
it is perfectly compatible with a state of penury. Dilapidated old
palazzi, if you will go out of the way for them, are to be had for
five shillings a year. And as for the people who live in them—no,
until you have explored Venice socially as much as I have you can
form no idea of their domestic desolation. They live on nothing, for
they have nothing to live on.” The other idea that had come into my
head was connected with a high blank wall which appeared to confine
an expanse of ground on one side of the house. Blank I call it, but
it was figured over with the patches that please a painter, repaired
breaches, crumblings of plaster, extrusions of brick that had turned
pink with time; and a few thin trees, with the poles of certain
rickety trellises, were visible over the top. The place was a garden,
and apparently it belonged to the house. It suddenly occurred to me
that if it did belong to the house I had my pretext.I
sat looking out on all this with Mrs. Prest (it was covered with the
golden glow of Venice) from the shade of our felze, and she asked me
if I would go in then, while she waited for me, or come back another
time. At first I could not decide—it was doubtless very weak of me.
I wanted still to think I MIGHT get a footing, and I was afraid to
meet failure, for it would leave me, as I remarked to my companion,
without another arrow for my bow. “Why not another?” she inquired
as I sat there hesitating and thinking it over; and she wished to
know why even now and before taking the trouble of becoming an inmate
(which might be wretchedly uncomfortable after all, even if it
succeeded), I had not the resource of simply offering them a sum of
money down. In that way I might obtain the documents without bad
nights.
“Dearest
lady,” I exclaimed, “excuse the impatience of my tone when I
suggest that you must have forgotten the very fact (surely I
communicated it to you) which pushed me to throw myself upon your
ingenuity. The old woman won’t have the documents spoken of; they
are personal, delicate, intimate, and she hasn’t modern notions,
God bless her! If I should sound that note first I should certainly
spoil the game. I can arrive at the papers only by putting her off
her guard, and I can put her off her guard only by ingratiating
diplomatic practices. Hypocrisy, duplicity are my only chance. I am
sorry for it, but for Jeffrey Aspern’s sake I would do worse still.
First I must take tea with her; then tackle the main job.” And I
told over what had happened to John Cumnor when he wrote to her. No
notice whatever had been taken of his first letter, and the second
had been answered very sharply, in six lines, by the niece. “Miss
Bordereau requested her to say that she could not imagine what he
meant by troubling them. They had none of Mr. Aspern’s papers, and
if they had should never think of showing them to anyone on any
account whatever. She didn’t know what he was talking about and
begged he would let her alone.” I certainly did not want to be met
that way.
“Well,”
said Mrs. Prest after a moment, provokingly, “perhaps after all
they haven’t any of his things. If they deny it flat how are you
sure?”
“John
Cumnor is sure, and it would take me long to tell you how his
conviction, or his very strong presumption—strong enough to stand
against the old lady’s not unnatural fib—has built itself up.
Besides, he makes much of the internal evidence of the niece’s
letter.”
“The
internal evidence?”
“Her
calling him ‘Mr. Aspern.’”
“I
don’t see what that proves.”
“It
proves familiarity, and familiarity implies the possession of
mementoes, or relics. I can’t tell you how that ‘Mr.’ touches
me—how it bridges over the gulf of time and brings our hero near to
me—nor what an edge it gives to my desire to see Juliana. You don’t
say, ‘Mr.’ Shakespeare.”
“Would
I, any more, if I had a box full of his letters?”
“Yes,
if he had been your lover and someone wanted them!” And I added
that John Cumnor was so convinced, and so all the more convinced by
Miss Bordereau’s tone, that he would have come himself to Venice on
the business were it not that for him there was the obstacle that it
would be difficult to disprove his identity with the person who had
written to them, which the old ladies would be sure to suspect in
spite of dissimulation and a change of name. If they were to ask him
point-blank if he were not their correspondent it would be too
awkward for him to lie; whereas I was fortunately not tied in that
way. I was a fresh hand and could say no without lying.
“But
you will have to change your name,” said Mrs. Prest. “Juliana
lives out of the world as much as it is possible to live, but none
the less she has probably heard of Mr. Aspern’s editors; she
perhaps possesses what you have published.”
“I
have thought of that,” I returned; and I drew out of my pocketbook
a visiting card, neatly engraved with a name that was not my own.
“You
are very extravagant; you might have written it,” said my
companion.
“This
looks more genuine.”
“Certainly,
you are prepared to go far! But it will be awkward about your
letters; they won’t come to you in that mask.”
“My
banker will take them in, and I will go every day to fetch them. It
will give me a little walk.”
“Shall
you only depend upon that?” asked Mrs. Prest. “Aren’t you
coming to see me?”
“Oh,
you will have left Venice, for the hot months, long before there are
any results. I am prepared to roast all summer—as well as
hereafter, perhaps you’ll say! Meanwhile, John Cumnor will bombard
me with letters addressed, in my feigned name, to the care of the
padrona.”
“She
will recognize his hand,” my companion suggested.
“On
the envelope he can disguise it.”
“Well,
you’re a precious pair! Doesn’t it occur to you that even if you
are able to say you are not Mr. Cumnor in person they may still
suspect you of being his emissary?”
“Certainly,
and I see only one way to parry that.”
“And
what may that be?”I
hesitated a moment. “To make love to the niece.”
“Ah,”
cried Mrs. Prest, “wait till you see her!”