POLARITIES IN THE EVOLUTION OF HUMANITY E-Book

Rudolf Steiner

• Herausgeber: Rudolf Steiner Press
• Kategorie: Religion und Spiritualität
• Sprache: Englisch
• Veröffentlichungsjahr: 2022

Beschreibung

'The present age needs to understand that human beings must hold the balance between the two extremes, between the ahrimanic and the luciferic poles. People always tend to go in one direction... The Christ stands in the middle, holding the balance.'– Rudolf Steiner These eleven lectures were given in post-war Stuttgart against a backdrop of struggle and uncertainty – not only within society at large but also within the anthroposophical movement. Rudolf Steiner and his supporters were working to introduce 'threefold' social ideas and – given Steiner's public profile – were coming under increasing personal and sometimes physical attack. Steiner responds to this turbulent situation by revealing the spiritual background to the forces of decline working in contemporary civilization. He speaks of retrogressive powers – spiritual beings referred to as luciferic or ahrimanic – that work directly into human culture, manifesting, for example, in what he refers to as the 'initiation streams' of Western secret societies, the Church-allied impulse of Jesuitism and the Bolshevik force of Leninism. The spiritual agents of adversity also encourage polarised thinking and false opposites such as East verses West, materialism and mysticism, or knowledge and belief. Only the threefold principle – represented by Christ – allows us to create a balance in the midst of these existential conflicts. This freshly-reworked translation is complemented with notes, an index and an introduction by Matthew Barton.

Leseprobe

POLARITIES IN THE EVOLUTION OF HUMANITY

WEST AND EAST—MATERIALISM AND MYSTICISM—KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF

Eleven lectures given to members of the Anthroposophical Society in Stuttgart between 5 March and 22 November 1920

INTRODUCTION BY MATTHEW BARTON

RUDOLF STEINER

RUDOLF STEINER PRESS

CW 197

Rudolf Steiner Press Hillside House, The Square Forest Row, RH18 5ES

www.rudolfsteinerpress.com

Published by Rudolf Steiner Press 2022

Originally published in German under the title Gegensätze in der Menschheitsentwickelung: West und Ost—Materialismus und Mystik—Wissen und Glauben (volume 197 in the Rudolf Steiner Gesamtausgabe or Collected Works) by Rudolf Steiner Verlag, Dornach. Based on shorthand notes that were not reviewed or revised by the speaker. This authorized translation is based on the third German edition (1996), edited by Robert Friedenthal and Paul G. Bellmann

Published by permission of the Rudolf Steiner Nachlassverwaltung, Dornach

Translation revised by Matthew Barton

© Rudolf Steiner Nachlassverwaltung, Dornach, Rudolf Steiner Verlag 1996

This translation © Rudolf Steiner Press 2022

All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying or otherwise, without the prior permission of the publishers

A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library

ISBN 978 1 85584 601 2 eISBN 978 1 85584 635 7

Cover by Morgan Creative Typeset by Symbiosys Technologies, Vishakapatnam, India Printed and bound by 4Edge Ltd., Essex

CONTENTS

Introduction, by Matthew Barton

LECTURE 1

STUTTGART, 5 MARCH 1920

The development of conscious awareness; luciferic and ahrimanic spirits. Early humanity’s thinking in images and dependent on higher spirits. Gradual separation from those spirits; intellectual thinking developing to school humans in freedom. Ahriman’s aims and purposes. Opposition in Norway.

Pages 1-15

LECTURE 2

STUTTGART, 7 MARCH 1920

Different potentials of Asians and Europeans. The need to understand Christ in a new way. Development of the intellect from beginning of post-Atlantean period. Intelligence developed in soul and spirit in the Orient and at the physical level in Europe. East accepted Christianity into the soul in a way incomprehensible to modern European scientists. The rational Western mind was bound to the physical body and could not understand the Mystery of Golgotha. Goetheanism. Theosophy of the Theosophical Society as pre-Christian wisdom. Initiation the precondition for social thinking.

Pages 16-27

LECTURE 3

STUTTGART, 9 MARCH 1920

Changing awareness in political life. Empires evolving in three stages on earth. Stage 1: Imperialism of partly prehistoric times; earthly and hierarchic order one. Present-day example—pastoral letter from a bishop. Stage 2: Ruler by the grace of God. Example: Holy Roman Empire. Stage 3: Substance lost from words and symbols. Phrase and convention instead. Need for new social impulses.

Pages 28-41

LECTURE 4

STUTTGART, 13 JUNE 1920

Powers of decline in modern civilization. Secret societies, Jesuitism and Leninism: three initiation streams today. Religious confessions opposing spiritual science. Their denial of pre-existence and dogma of eternal hell. Professor Traub’s smear campaign. Opposition from Roman Catholic Press in Switzerland.

Pages 42-55

LECTURE 5

STUTTGART, 24 JUNE 1920

Decline of human civilization as a consequence of materialism. Material world can only be truly understood in the spirit. Materialistic view of the human heart as a pump. Head as the fruit of previous life on earth. Materialistic view of history. Economic life as head organ of the social organism, the sphere of rights as its rhythmical organ and cultural life as its metabolic organ. Threefold social order, Waldorf School, Kommende Tag. The destructive quality of untruthfulness. Spiritual science and practical life.

Pages 56-73

LECTURE 6

STUTTGART, 25 JULY 1920

Materialism and mysticism. True perceptiveness as a deed of the human soul. Disguised materialism in theosophy and spiritualism. Materialism of modern science. Mysticism gives experience of physical matter by revealing material processes within the human organism. Mysticism as a disease. Need for transition from experience in space to one in time. Nature of force of gravity. Inner experience of force of gravity. Ahriman, Lucifer, Christ.

Pages 74-88

LECTURE 7

STUTTGART, 30 JULY 1920

Materialism and mysticism on the wrong road. Active perceptiveness in anthroposophy. Looking for the nature of matter in the phenomena of the outside world leads to feeble-mindedness; looking for the spirit by practising inner mysticism leads to childishness. Politics an illusion: conservative element ahrimanic, liberal element luciferic. Fight of Jesuits against anthroposophy. Rightness of materialism in its own sphere.

Pages 89-103

LECTURE 8

STUTTGART, 21 SEPTEMBER 1920

Distinction between knowledge and belief. Ancient wisdom had to fade to make freedom possible. As modern science evolved, knowledge reduced to mere belief. Jesuitism. Rome as the source of materialism. Inner experience no longer connecting with words. Need to speak of human existence before birth. The threefold social order and its opponents.

Pages 104-118

LECTURE 9

STUTTGART, 8 NOVEMBER 1920

East, Centre and West. The threefold social order. Sleeping and waking. The three-fold nature of the human being. In the East, life before birth was experienced in the spirit. This spirit has grown decadent. In the Centre, culture of material world and spirit, prominence given to thinking (Hegel). West: material culture, yet also preparation for future Imaginations; incipient awareness of principles that go beyond death. In the East: instinctive wisdom; in the Centre; dialectics, intellectual life; in the West: materialism, spirit of economics. East: end (example of Tolstoy); West: beginning (example of Keely). Mission of the Centre for the present.

Pages 119-136

LECTURE 10

STUTTGART, 14 NOVEMBER 1920

Transition from luciferic to ahrimanic age and the forthcoming Christ event. Technology; human beings and machines. Ahrimanic demons active in the present, luciferic elemental spirits in the past. Appearance of the etheric Christ in the present time. Ahrimanization of the world. Increasing stress in human souls. The need to prepare for the Christ event.

Pages 137-155

LECTURE 11

STUTTGART, 22 NOVEMBER 1920

The impersonal attitude of modern science. The Christ spirit which has to enter science. The threefold social order as twentieth-century Goetheanism. Spirit-self, life-spirit and spirit-man cannot evolve through forces provided by the earth but only through the Christ. Schiller’s letters on aesthetic education and Goethe’s Tale. The Mystery Play The Portal of Initiation as a metamorphosis of the creative potential in Goethe’s fairy tale. Golden, Silver and Bronze Kings representing the three aspects of the social organism.

Pages 156-174

Notes

Rudolf Steiner’s Collected Works

Significant Events in the Life of Rudolf Steiner

Index

INTRODUCTION

WE tend to think of polarities in binary terms: the either/or of mind and matter, say, which both easily satisfies yet ultimately perplexes the merely rational mind since it does not find a way to bridge this and so many other divides. In the lectures collected in this volume, given in a Germany crushed and fragmented by the Great War and still suffering its aftermath, Steiner develops and elaborates ideas which, because they originate in a complex and living picture of human and social realities, can broaden narrower ways of thinking and challenge any merely schematic or programmatic template we might impose upon our experience of the world.

As I write these words, just over a hundred years since Steiner gave the lectures collected here, a long unhealed East-West divide between nations has erupted once more, with the potential to provoke global catastrophe. A condition of cold war we might think had been overcome has, it now becomes apparent, never been radically addressed. Mutually antagonistic national and economic interests have merely, throughout, been seeking to strengthen themselves at each other’s expense, and Central Europe, instead of playing a dynamic, mediating role in the world, appears only as a co-opted satellite of these warring interests, seemingly unable to unfold an intrinsic power of its own. It is held, in Steiner’s words’—albeit a century ago—in an imprisoning ‘vice’. ‘Things fall apart, the centre cannot hold’, as W.B. Yeats wrote in his poem ‘The Second Coming’, published in the same year as these lectures were given.

One of the qualities that is so outstanding about Steiner, and vividly apparent here also, is his ability to connect socio-political realities with their source in human thinking, showing how the fixed divisions of our experience of the world become the sundered and warring social conditions we end up inhabiting. We make our own reality. And this reality, as he stresses here, is becoming ever less human, is succumbing increasingly to anti-human forces. Time and again he challenges the limitations of our hearts and minds, urging us to move beyond them into broader, more dynamic, truly human and therefore also healing perspectives.

Prophetically, Steiner identifies part of the (also self-inflicted) attack on human values and the less than human reality we are creating, in the rise of technology—which, as he says, embodies ‘forces independent of humanity’ that take hold of the unconscious human will, rising from there to impinge upon our conscious thinking and alienating us from a human evolution worthy of the name. ‘Human beings have wholly surrendered themselves to something that is no longer human.’ Yet with his always mobile and wide-ranging perspective, he does not seek to repudiate such ‘necessary’ developments, but urges us to find the sources of strength to ‘integrate’ them properly.

This inevitably involves us trying to become more conscious: ‘We will not manage our evolution properly’, he says, ‘unless we make efforts to develop … thoughts increasingly independent of mere feelings and emotions, of anything arising in us out of dreamlike inner experience even when we are fully awake. Theoretical principles will not help us achieve this, only life itself can do so… people are not prepared to listen to anything that does not arise from their own inner prejudices…’.

Holding fast to our own point of view, failing to attend empathically to the very different views of other people and nations, however misguided we may think them, or they may actually be, is to fan the flames of our own prejudices and lock us in to a divisive tribalism that runs counter to evolution; it is to sow discord and warfare within ourselves, firstly, and then by extension within the global reality we are creating. The antagonistic polarities of different extremes are one-sided ways of being and thinking that can ultimately be seen, in Steiner’s view, as forms of sickness. To stop this endless seesaw we need to seek and hold the balance between all the outlooks and viewpoints, a healing, mediating and ultimately loving embrace of differences. We can try to ‘speak with inner empathy about things we wish, nevertheless, to see overcome.’ Truth is here seen not as a static position or a fixed possession but as a continual, active and loving deed.

This returns us continually, also, from the stage of global conflict to the soul’s inner scenario and to our own responsibility for the world around us. Rather than passive victims of global forces, these forces issue from and can be transformed, albeit very slowly, by ourselves. In this evolutionary project nothing will be achieved either by a ‘limitless belief in authority’, in which we hand responsibility for our lives and wellbeing to ‘experts’, nor by a ‘mystical small-talk’ that gains no purchase on the current world situation. It becomes vividly apparent that only fluid and living concepts, not fixed terminologies or outlooks, can do justice to the dynamic flux of reality. Only an unwavering pursuit of the ‘spirit of truth’, embodied ultimately in the redemptive figure of Christ, will reach beyond all fixity and division, in ourselves and our thoughts and feelings firstly, and then also in society as a whole.

Yeats’s great poem ends: ‘And what rough beast, its hour come round at last, / Slouches towards Bethlehem to be born?’ In Steiner’s words, a spirit-numbing materialism is not untrue but is ‘unfortunately becoming true’. If we are to retain our humanity against the odds, it is high time for us to awaken our thoughts from their brain-bound enchantment and learn to think differently.

Matthew Barton March 2022

LECTURE 1

STUTTGART, 5 MARCH 1920

THE challenges presented by our age really have to be faced by every individual person today. I have made it quite clear on a number of occasions that to understand the way individuals need to face those challenges we must be aware of how human evolution progresses everywhere in the world. The whole course of human evolution can only be clearly understood if we gain profounder insight into the powers that intervene in the course of earth evolution as a whole and also in human lives.

I have used a number of different approaches to show that as human beings we are part of an ongoing evolution that may be said to be taking its normal course. Spiritual science enables us to follow its progress over extended periods of time. I have also pointed out that there are certain powers with different goals for mankind than those that desire to guide humankind’s normal course of evolution through the earth’s various embodiments, powers we have been obliged to call luciferic on the one hand, and ahrimanic on the other. I have spoken of this a number of times. It is necessary to take a very serious view of these things today, but our hearts and minds cannot really achieve this serious mood unless we pay proper attention to the way these luciferic and ahrimanic powers intervene directly in human lives.

As you know, a new era in human evolution started during the fifteenth century, very different from anything that went before. Thinking of this you will want to be aware of the many ways life in the present era—which had its beginning in the fifteenth century—is different from the era preceding it. We may say that one particular feature of the present age is the development of intellectual thinking since the middle of the fifteenth century. In the great process of schooling that humankind has undergone in the course of earth evolution, it needed also to pass through this schooling of the intellect. Human beings had, as it were, to find out how life can be lived when intellectual thinking is accentuated. They could never have grown into truly free individuals without incorporation of the intellectual principle. We have no clear idea today of the extent to which people differed from us before the middle of the fifteenth century, particularly in this respect. We tend to take the things we are given for granted, without giving them much thought. We are now generally dealing with the peoples of civilized countries who are inclined to think with the intellect, and we have come to believe that people have always thought like this. That is not the case, however. Before the middle of the fifteenth century people thought in a different way. They simply did not think in the abstract terms in which we think today. Their thinking was very much more vivid and concrete, immediately bound up with the objects of the world around them. They were much more bound up with the feelings and will impulses that can be experienced in the human soul. We are living to a great degree in our thoughts, though we are not sufficiently aware of this. We are not even aware of the source from which this way of thinking, the intellectual approach which we take so much for granted, has evolved. We shall have to go a long way back in human evolution to get a real understanding of the origins of this way of thinking, this intellectualism. Another question we must ask ourselves is whether anything still remains of the human faculty from which our thinking has evolved.

You know that older evolutionary forces persist into later ages and continue to be present side by side with those that are normal to the era in question. This also applies to our thinking. Reminders, echoes of thinking, of an activity similar to our thinking, are experienced in our dreams, when a whole world of images emerges from our night-time sleep. Experience teaches us to distinguish between the world of thoughts we develop between waking up and going to sleep and the world of dream images which we experience in an entirely passive way. If we go back to earlier times in human evolution we find that the further back we go the more the life of the soul during waking hours comes to resemble the kind of soul activity we know in our dreams today. Present-day thinking is the fruit of later stages of evolution. During earlier stages along this path the human soul developed activities more akin to dreaming. If we trace this dream-like activity of the human soul a long way back we find ourselves before earth evolution as we know it. We come to a time when the earth had taken a physical form in the cosmos that preceded the present one. We have become accustomed to calling this the stage of Old Moon evolution. Human beings were part of this as well, but in an entirely different form. During that Moon evolution, i.e. the time when the earth materialized in a form that preceded the present one, the human being, the true ancestor of modern humanity, was still completely etheric. His soul became active in a way that was definitely dreamlike, consisting of dream images. The peculiar thing about this was that it related to the outer world in a way that is quite different from the soul activity we know as thinking. I would say that when our soul is active in thought we find ourselves rather isolated within the world. The world is outside us, it has its own processes. We reflect on those processes in our minds, but precisely when we think we are reflecting most profoundly on these external processes, we actually feel ourselves entirely outside them. Indeed we often feel that we are best able to think about external phenomena if we keep ourselves well isolated from them, withdrawing into ourselves. The human ancestor who was dreamy in his thinking, if I may put it like this, did not have that feeling. Developing in his way in his dreams what we develop in our way when we are thinking, he knew himself to be intimately bound up with everything he experienced of the world. We see the clouds, we think about them, but we do not feel that the powers alive in the clouds are also alive in our thinking. Our human ancestor did have the feeling that the powers alive in a cloud were also alive in his thinking. This ancestor said—and I must translate what he said into our language, for his language was a silent one compared to ours: The powers that are alive and active in the cloud out there produce images in my mind. He saw himself no more isolated from the great universe in which the cloud revealed its essential nature than my little finger is able to think itself isolated from the rest of me. If I were to cut it off it would wither; it would no longer be my finger. The human ancestor felt that he could not exist apart from the universe that belonged to him. My little finger might well say: The blood which pulses through the whole of the body also pulses within me; the whole of my organic life is governed by the same laws as the organic life of the rest of the body. The human ancestor said: I am part of the universe; the power that pulses within me as I form images is the same as the power that is alive and active in the forming of clouds. That is how the human ancestor felt himself to be closely related, intimately bound up, with the whole world.

Because we must feel so isolated in our thinking from everything that goes on outside us, we are in a sense sundered and separate from the essential origins and causes of the existing world. In ordinary life we are not aware of the pulses beating throughout the universe. Our thinking has grown abstract. Our thinking tells us nothing, as it were, of what is alive and active within it. This actually provides the potential for human freedom, a freedom where we do not feel that something is thinking in us but that we ourselves do the thinking.

The ancestors of humanity were unable to form ideas independently of the universe as a whole. These forefathers of humanity felt themselves to be bound up with the existing world; they knew that this existing world contained more than just abstract forces of nature. They knew that beings, albeit ones different from human beings, held sway, beings that did not have a physical body such as the human body, though human beings might feel that they shared citizenry of the universe with them. These ancestors were not aware of the ‘forces of nature’; they felt themselves to be in communion with nature spirits. Today we may say that everything that happens in nature follows the laws of nature, and we are part of that nature. For the human ancestor living in a far distant past it was natural to say that everything that happened in nature outside himself arose from the will impulses of nature spirits. We say the earth attracts the bodies that are on it due to gravity, and according to the law of gravity the gravitational pull decreases at a rate that is proportional to the square of the distance between the two. We call this a special case of a law of nature. Such abstract notions are the basis for our understanding of nature. The ancestors of humanity knew that an essential spiritual element was present in the phenomenon we have made into an abstract gravitational force.

Certain spiritual powers who may be said to be involved in human evolution thus developed a relationship to human beings that would normally cease the moment earth evolution proper began for the human being. At that point human beings would be released from the tutelage of those spiritual powers, powers they had felt to be flowing into and buoyant within them during the Old Moon stage. So we must ask ourselves what it was that made human beings grow independent of the guidance of spirits with whom they had felt at one, however dimly. It happened when the mineral kingdom became part of human nature. In those far distant times of which I have just spoken, human beings did not yet have the mineral kingdom within them. Their organization would not have been perceptible to our present sense organs, for it did not yet include mineral elements.

To grasp this without getting caught up in preconceived notions, we need to consider what it truly means when an organism incorporates the mineral kingdom. People tend to be superficial in their thinking about such things. We look at a mineral, a stone, and quite rightly consider it to be the way it presents itself to our observation. Then, however, we look at a plant in exactly the same way we look at a stone. In reality it is not the actual plant we see. A plant is really something entirely beyond sensory perception. Consider a system of forces that in a sense has the qualities of an image. Its relationship to the mineral kingdom is that this otherwise invisible organization absorbs the mineral kingdom and the forces that are active between individual constitutive elements in that kingdom. I have a plant before me. It is an invisible system of forces that absorbs mineral principles from the mineral kingdom. The result is that the mineral aspect occupies the space also occupied by the invisible system of forces. I see this mineral aspect, though it is merely something the supersensible plant has absorbed. I first have to discover the supersensible plant in a way quite different from how it appears to me after absorbing substance. This is already the case with a plant. When we talk about plants today we are really talking only of the minerals contained within them and not about the plants themselves. It is important that we clearly understand this in the case of a plant, for it also applies to animals and humans, only more so.

During the Old Moon stage, then, human beings did not incorporate mineral in this way. Human beings living on the present earth are so constituted that they need the mineral kingdom, have absorbed the mineral kingdom and its forces into them, as it were. What significance does this have for human nature? Above all human beings acquired a mineral body for their earlier pictorial thinking. As evolution progressed the mineral human body provided the basis for intellectual thinking that developed at a relatively late stage, from the middle of the fifteenth century onwards, having been a long time in preparation.

Modern intellectual thinking is based on the fact that a mineral body has been incorporated into human beings. As human beings we need a mineral body first and foremost in order to think. The older form of pictorial thinking had developed through what we call the third elemental kingdom. The mineral kingdom had the function of transforming this pre-earthly form of thinking into our earthly way of thinking. But because of this, the spirits with whom human beings inevitably felt connected, in their pictorial thinking in the distant past, were then relieved of their function. We will have to picture those spirits rather differently from the way we are accustomed to picture beings other than human ones. People, even people of goodwill who may admit that there is more to life than is apparent to the senses, tend to stick too closely to the human form. This anthropomorphism takes over whenever people try to create an image in their minds of anything that is higher than the human sphere. It is easy to accuse Feuerbach and Buechner1 of anthropomorphism. We have seen more than enough of this kind of thing. We have seen the legal way of thinking evolve in the Western world, with earthly misdeeds and crimes judged by earthly judges who impose penalties, and so on. The supersensible realm has gradually come to be seen, in an imperfect form of Christianity, in terms of rewards and punishment meted out for sins, like the proceedings in an earthly court of law. The religious ideas of the West have a great deal of human jurisprudence in them. We let the gods mete out punishments of the kind we know earthly courts of law impose. If we truly wish to get beyond the merely human we must firmly decide not to think in entirely human terms. We must think beyond anything anthropomorphic, and that indeed is what really matters in human life. That is the approach we must use if we want to see clearly that the spirits who influenced human pictorial thinking during the Old Moon stage lost that function in the normal progress of human evolution but do not accept this with good grace. We might ask why they do not submit to the will of the gods who guide normal progress. They simply do not. We have to accept that as a fact. The original intention was that they should only influence dreams within the human sphere and everything related to dreaming. In the context of today’s lecture we refer to them as luciferic spirits. Their proper sphere would be everything that has to do with dreaming and anything related to this. They are not satisfied with this, however. They infiltrate the form of human thinking that has evolved out of their own sphere, human thinking now bound to the mineral sphere. When we allow anything that normally rules our dreams, the life of fantasy, to enter into our thinking, we fall prey in our thinking to luciferic nature, to the influence of spirits that should only have influenced the old form of pictorial thinking that belonged to the ancestors of humanity. They have retained their power and instead of limiting themselves to our dreaming, our life of visionary fantasies, our creative artistic work, they are constantly trying to influence our thoughts and make them dependent on impulses similar to those that existed in pre-earthly times. Our thinking is still greatly influenced by elements coming from this source, by the luciferic principle.

It is justifiable to ask in all seriousness what powers these are that have such an influence on our thinking? These influences arise from the sphere where we human beings are still rightfully dreaming and rightfully asleep above all else. They come from the sphere of our feelings and emotions. We experience our feelings, after all, in the way we normally experience dreams and we experience our will the way we experience sleep. There we are still rightly cocooned in a world which becomes a luciferic world as soon as it develops in our thinking. We therefore will not manage our evolution as human beings properly unless we make the effort to develop other thoughts as well, thoughts increasingly independent of mere feelings and emotions, of anything arising in us out of dreamlike inner experience even when we are fully awake. Theoretical principles will not help us achieve this, only life itself can do so. We find, however, that the inner habits humankind has acquired put up great resistance to the cultivation of mind and soul that is needed. We must be on the lookout for this resistance. We find in the present time, in particular, that people are not prepared to listen to anything that does not arise from their own inner prejudices, their feeling of how things should go, their personal preferences. They are not in the habit of listening to anything which in a way has been decided independently of human beings, requiring merely their consent. I should like to give you a brief example which I used on one occasion to explain to someone an important difference concerning human thinking.

Many years ago I gave a lecture in a town in southern Germany— today no longer in southern Germany—on the wisdom taught in the Christian faith.2 As you know, it is always necessary to limit the subject matter presented in a particular lecture and one can only speak within that context. When people hear just a single lecture, such a single lecture will impress one person in one way and another in a different way, particularly if you have been objective and dispassionate in presenting the subject. It certainly would not be possible for anyone to assume something about the overall outlook underlying a single lecture if they just listened to that one lecture. If the wisdom taught within the Christian faith is the subject for example, it will of course be impossible to conclude from the contents of the lecture what the speaker thinks about the connection between light and electricity, say. It is therefore possible for something to happen as it did on that occasion. I spoke about the tenets of Christian wisdom, and two Roman Catholic priests were in the audience. They came up to me afterwards and said: ‘No objection can be raised to what you have been saying’—this, by the way, was many years ago now—‘but we have to say that whilst it is true that we say the same thing, we say it in such a way that everybody can understand it.’ My reply was: ‘Reverend fathers, surely it is like this: You or I may have some kind of inner feeling that we are speaking for everybody, but that is not the point, for that is a subjective feeling. After all it is perfectly natural—if we go entirely by our feeling I, too, must believe that I am speaking for everybody, just as you think you do; that is self-evident; otherwise we would do it differently. But we are now living in an age when our belief that something is justifiable does not count. We need to let the facts speak for themselves. We must learn to look to the facts. Subjectively you believe you are speaking for everybody. But now let me ask you about the facts. Does everybody still come to your Church? That would show that you are speaking for everybody. You see, I speak to those who do not come to your Church to hear you speak. My words are for those who also have the right to hear of the wisdom taught in Christianity.’ In this way we must allow what the facts tell us to govern us.

It is necessary for us to tear ourselves away from our subjective feelings. If we do not do so, the luciferic element will enter our thinking. We would not have had to suffer the truly dreadful campaign of untruthfulness that has become ubiquitous in the last five years, the final consequence of something that has long been in preparation, if people had learned to pay rightful attention to what the facts have to tell us rather than to their emotions, with nationalists the worst in stirring up such emotions.

On the one hand there is the absolute necessity today of educating our thinking to comply even with things that do not come naturally to us. Militating against this is people’s dislike of a truthfulness that takes its lead from facts, from realities.

We shall not be able to attain higher worlds and the knowledge to be gained there if we do not strictly school ourselves through the realities of the external world. Having to some extent at least become accustomed to wanting to hear realities presented, you will often suffer tortures when people of the present age try to tell you something. Very often the kind of thing you hear people say is: ‘Oh, someone said something that was frightful, quite terrible!’ Terrible in what way? You say it was terrible but that only tells me how you felt about it. I really want to hear exactly what it was. ‘Well, it really was terrible what was said there…’ And these people simply do not understand. All the time they want to describe their subjective feelings concerning the matter, whilst you want to hear an objective report of what they actually witnessed. It is especially when people tell you something someone else has told them, that it is quite impossible to tell if they are simply passing on what they have heard or if they have actually investigated the matter they are talking about. This is an area where one has to remind people again and again that truthfulness concerning the knowledge to be found in supersensible spheres can only be achieved if we train ourselves as far as possible to adhere closely to facts in the sense-perceptible world. That is the only way in which human beings can overcome the luciferic elements that stream into their thoughts—by schooling themselves through perception of facts and realities.

On the one hand mankind is exposed to luciferic influences, on the other to ahrimanic influences. I said that thinking here on earth could only evolve from earlier stages of human soul life when human beings in a sense incorporated a mineral body. This mineral body is indeed the organ for the earthly way of thinking. It does however bring it predominantly into the sphere of the powers we call ahrimanic.

We can of course become aware of the need to school ourselves through a world of facts, so that we cease to be habitually swayed by our subjective emotions. We must not, however, fall prey to the kind of thinking that is nothing but an inner activity arising from the mineral body. Here we come upon a truth that many people find highly unpalatable.

You know how some are idealists or spiritualists and others are materialists. There is plenty of discussion in the world as to which is the right outlook, spiritualism or materialism. All these debates are of no value whatsoever for certain regions of the human organization. Human beings can develop in two ways. We can use the mineral body we have incorporated as the instrument for our thinking, and indeed we have to use it, otherwise we would merely be dreaming. But we can then also rise in our thinking beyond this instrument; we can develop a spiritual point of view, spiritual vision. If we do this we will of course have been thinking with the aid of our material organization, but we will have used this to reach a further stage of human development, ascending to the world of the spirit as a result. On the other hand we can stop at the point where as earth beings we let our mineral body do the thinking. It is perfectly able to do so. That in fact is the danger, and materialism cannot be said to be wrong in its views, particularly where thinking is concerned. This mineral body is no mere photographic print. It is able to think for itself, though its thinking is subject to the restraints of earthly life. We need to raise the experience our mineral body is able to give us into supersensible spheres.

It is therefore possible to say that it may indeed be true that human thoughts are merely something exuded by the human mineral organization. That may indeed be right, but human beings must do this in the right way.

Human beings have the freedom to develop on earth in such a way that they are merely the product of matter. Animals cannot do this; they do not get to the point where mineral incorporation leads to the development of thinking activity. Animals cannot choose to prove the truth of the materialistic point of view. Human beings are at liberty to prove the truth of the materialistic point of view; all it needs is the will to do so out of a materialistic attitude to life.

Human freedom is such that people are indeed free to make materialism come true for the human kingdom, that is, they can take a course that will lead to human beings on earth concerning themselves only with material things. Fundamentally speaking, therefore, it is a matter of choice if we become materialists. If people enact the materialistic attitude presented to humankind with enough insistence then they will make this outlook come true.

This influence on human beings comes from ahrimanic powers. They want to keep everything connected with earth evolution at the point now reached through the evolution of a mineral organization. They want to make human beings perfect, but only as far as their mineral organization is concerned. The luciferic powers want to keep human beings, who now have acquired a mineral organization, at the earlier stage that was right for them before they acquired a mineral organization. So we have two powers pulling at the traces, luciferic and ahrimanic powers. The luciferic spirits want to get human beings to a point where they finally cast off their mineralized bodies and go through an evolution that has no relevance in earth life and has merely been a stage within it. The luciferic spirits aim for the gradual elimination of everything relating to the earth from the whole evolution of mankind. The ahrimanic spirits aim to take firm hold of this earthly, mineral aspect of human beings, isolate it from progressive evolution and let it stand on its own. That is how luciferic and ahrimanic spirits are pulling in different directions.

It is absolutely vital that having presented the large outline we now come to apply this to ordinary everyday life. We do not consider a U-shaped bar of iron to be a horseshoe when it is in fact a magnet. In the same way we really should not consider human life to be entirely the way it may appear outwardly. If you shoe a horse with magnets you fail to realize that a magnet has more to it than a horseshoe. Yet it happens quite often nowadays that people speak of human life exactly like someone who shoes their horse with magnets rather than with horseshoes. People have no hesitation in speaking of positive and negative electricity in the inorganic sphere, or of positive and negative magnetism, yet they are embarrassed to speak of luciferic and ahrimanic elements in human life. These are just as active in human life as positive and negative magnetism are in the inorganic sphere. It is just that the idea of positive and negative magnetism is more easily understood. It does not take as much effort to grasp it as it does to grasp the idea that there are luciferic and ahrimanic elements. That is also the reason why we shall only learn to deal with the empty talk we hear today, empty talk that turns into lies, by knowing that it is luciferic by nature.

Similarly we shall only learn to deal with everything that shows itself here and there as the materialistic point of view by knowing that it is ahrimanic by nature. In future mere external characterization will not get us anywhere when we want to understand human life; all we would be doing is talking around the subject and committing the most foolish errors when we try to apply these external ideas to real life. One thing we would not be doing is deriving from our knowledge social impulses for social institutions established by human beings. This has very much to do with the utter seriousness required when looking at everything connected with evolutionary trends in humanity. We cannot gain understanding of the life we are now living unless we raise our vision from earthly concerns to spheres beyond this earth. Something singular is at work here.