The Communist Manifesto
The Communist ManifestoMANIFESTO OF THE COMMUNIST PARTYI. BOURGEOIS AND PROLETARIANSII. PROLETARIANS AND COMMUNISTSIII. SOCIALIST AND COMMUNIST LITERATUREIV. POSITION OF THE COMMUNISTS IN RELATION TO THE VARIOUS EXISTING OPPOSITION PARTIESCopyright
The Communist Manifesto
Friedrich Engels, Karl Marx
MANIFESTO OF THE COMMUNIST PARTY
A spectre is haunting Europe—the spectre of
Communism.
All the Powers of old Europe have entered into a holy alliance
to
exorcise this spectre: Pope and Czar, Metternich and Guizot,
French Radicals and German police-spies.Where is the party in opposition that has not been decried as
Communistic by its opponents in power? Where is the Opposition that
has not hurled back the branding reproach of Communism, against the
more advanced opposition parties, as well as against its
reactionary adversaries?Two things result from this fact.I. Communism is already acknowledged by all European Powers
to be itself a Power.II. It is high time that Communists should openly, in the
face of the whole world, publish their views, their aims, their
tendencies, and meet this nursery tale of the Spectre of Communism
with a Manifesto of the party itself.To this end, Communists of various nationalities have
assembled in London, and sketched the following Manifesto, to be
published in the English, French, German, Italian, Flemish and
Danish languages.
I. BOURGEOIS AND PROLETARIANS
The history of all hitherto existing societies is the history
of class struggles.Freeman and slave, patrician and plebeian, lord and serf,
guild-master and journeyman, in a word, oppressor and oppressed,
stood in constant opposition to one another, carried on an
uninterrupted, now hidden, now open fight, a fight that each time
ended, either in a revolutionary re-constitution of society at
large, or in the common ruin of the contending
classes.In the earlier epochs of history, we find almost everywhere a
complicated arrangement of society into various orders, a manifold
gradation of social rank. In ancient Rome we have patricians,
knights, plebeians, slaves; in the Middle Ages, feudal lords,
vassals, guild-masters, journeymen, apprentices, serfs; in almost
all of these classes, again, subordinate gradations.The modern bourgeois society that has sprouted from the ruins
of feudal society has not done away with class antagonisms. It has
but established new classes, new conditions of oppression, new
forms of struggle in place of the old ones. Our epoch, the epoch of
the bourgeoisie, possesses, however, this distinctive feature: it
has simplified the class antagonisms. Society as a whole is more
and more splitting up into two great hostile camps, into two great
classes, directly facing each other: Bourgeoisie and
Proletariat.From the serfs of the Middle Ages sprang the chartered
burghers of the earliest towns. From these burgesses the first
elements of the bourgeoisie were developed.The discovery of America, the rounding of the Cape, opened up
fresh ground for the rising bourgeoisie. The East-Indian and
Chinese markets, the colonisation of America, trade with the
colonies, the increase in the means of exchange and in commodities
generally, gave to commerce, to navigation, to industry, an impulse
never before known, and thereby, to the revolutionary element in
the tottering feudal society, a rapid development.The feudal system of industry, under which industrial
production was monopolised by closed guilds, now no longer sufficed
for the growing wants of the new markets. The manufacturing system
took its place. The guild-masters were pushed on one side by the
manufacturing middle class; division of labour between the
different corporate guilds vanished in the face of division of
labour in each single workshop.Meantime the markets kept ever growing, the demand ever
rising. Even manufacture no longer sufficed. Thereupon, steam and
machinery revolutionised industrial production. The place of
manufacture was taken by the giant, Modern Industry, the place of
the industrial middle class, by industrial millionaires, the
leaders of whole industrial armies, the modern
bourgeois.Modern industry has established the world-market, for which
the discovery of America paved the way. This market has given an
immense development to commerce, to navigation, to communication by
land. This development has, in its time, reacted on the extension
of industry; and in proportion as industry, commerce, navigation,
railways extended, in the same proportion the bourgeoisie
developed, increased its capital, and pushed into the background
every class handed down from the Middle Ages.We see, therefore, how the modern bourgeoisie is itself the
product of a long course of development, of a series of revolutions
in the modes of production and of exchange.Each step in the development of the bourgeoisie was
accompanied by a corresponding political advance of that class. An
oppressed class under the sway of the feudal nobility, an armed and
self-governing association in the mediaeval commune; here
independent urban republic (as in Italy and Germany), there taxable
"third estate" of the monarchy (as in France), afterwards, in the
period of manufacture proper, serving either the semi-feudal or the
absolute monarchy as a counterpoise against the nobility, and, in
fact, corner-stone of the great monarchies in general, the
bourgeoisie has at last, since the establishment of Modern Industry
and of the world-market, conquered for itself, in the modern
representative State, exclusive political sway. The executive of
the modern State is but a committee for managing the common affairs
of the whole bourgeoisie.The bourgeoisie, historically, has played a most
revolutionary part.The bourgeoisie, wherever it has got the upper hand, has put
an end to all feudal, patriarchal, idyllic relations. It has
pitilessly torn asunder the motley feudal ties that bound man to
his "natural superiors," and has left remaining no other nexus
between man and man than naked self-interest, than callous "cash
payment." It has drowned the most heavenly ecstasies of religious
fervour, of chivalrous enthusiasm, of philistine sentimentalism, in
the icy water of egotistical calculation. It has resolved personal
worth into exchange value, and in place of the numberless and
indefeasible chartered freedoms, has set up that single,
unconscionable freedom—Free Trade. In one word, for exploitation,
veiled by religious and political illusions, naked, shameless,
direct, brutal exploitation.The bourgeoisie has stripped of its halo every occupation
hitherto honoured and looked up to with reverent awe. It has
converted the physician, the lawyer, the priest, the poet, the man
of science, into its paid wage labourers.The bourgeoisie has torn away from the family its sentimental
veil, and has reduced the family relation to a mere money
relation.The bourgeoisie has disclosed how it came to pass that the
brutal display of vigour in the Middle Ages, which Reactionists so
much admire, found its fitting complement in the most slothful
indolence. It has been the first to show what man's activity can
bring about. It has accomplished wonders far surpassing Egyptian
pyramids, Roman aqueducts, and Gothic cathedrals; it has conducted
expeditions that put in the shade all former Exoduses of nations
and crusades.