The Crown of Wild Olive
The Crown of Wild OlivePREFACE.LECTURE I.LECTURE II.LECTURE III.MUNERA PULVERISPREFACE.CHAPTER I.CHAPTER II.CHAPTER III.CHAPTER IV.CHAPTER V.CHAPTER VI.APPENDICES.PRE-RAPHAELITISMPREFACE.ARATRA PENTELICIPREFACE.LECTURE I.LECTURE II.LECTURE III.LECTURE IV.LECTURE V.LECTURE VI.THE FUTURE OF ENGLAND.THE ETHICS OF THE DUSTPREFACE TO THE SECOND EDITION.PREFACE.LECTURE I.LECTURE II.LECTURE III.LECTURE IV.LECTURE V.LECTURE VI.LECTURE VII.LECTURE VIII.LECTURE IX.LECTURE X.THE ELEMENTS OF DRAWINGPREFACE.LETTER I.LETTER II.SKETCHING FROM NATURE.LETTER III.Copyright
The Crown of Wild Olive
John Ruskin
PREFACE.
Twenty years ago, there was no lovelier piece of lowland
scenery in South England, nor any more pathetic in the world, by
its expression of sweet human character and life, than that
immediately bordering on the sources of the Wandle, and including
the lower moors of Addington, and the villages of Beddington and
Carshalton, with all their pools and streams. No clearer or diviner
waters ever sang with constant lips of the hand which 'giveth rain
from heaven;' no pastures ever lightened in spring time with more
passionate blossoming; no sweeter homes ever hallowed the heart of
the passer-by with their pride of peaceful gladness—fain-hidden—yet
full-confessed. The place remains, or, until a few months ago,
remained, nearly unchanged in its larger features; but, with
deliberate mind I say, that I have never seen anything so ghastly
in its inner tragic meaning,—not in Pisan Maremma—not by Campagna
tomb,—not by the sand-isles of the Torcellan shore,—as the slow
stealing of aspects of reckless, indolent, animal neglect, over the
delicate sweetness of that English scene: nor is any blasphemy or
impiety—any frantic saying or godless thought—more appalling to me,
using the best power of judgment I have to discern its sense and
scope, than the insolent defilings of those springs by the human
herds that drink of them. Just where the welling of stainless
water, trembling and pure, like a body of light, enters the pool of
Carshalton, cutting itself a radiant channel down to the gravel,
through warp of feathery weeds, all waving, which it traverses with
its deep threads of clearness, like the chalcedony in moss-agate,
starred here and there with white grenouillette; just in the very
rush and murmur of the first spreading currents, the human wretches
of the place cast their street and house foulness; heaps of dust
and slime, and broken shreds of old metal, and rags of putrid
clothes; they having neither energy to cart it away, nor decency
enough to dig it into the ground, thus shed into the stream, to
diffuse what venom of it will float and melt, far away, in all
places where God meant those waters to bring joy and health. And,
in a little pool, behind some houses farther in the village, where
another spring rises, the shattered stones of the well, and of the
little fretted channel which was long ago built and traced for it
by gentler hands, lie scattered, each from each, under a ragged
bank of mortar, and scoria; and brick-layers' refuse, on one side,
which the clean water nevertheless chastises to purity; but it
cannot conquer the dead earth beyond; and there, circled and coiled
under festering scum, the stagnant edge of the pool effaces itself
into a slope of black slime, the accumulation of indolent years.
Half-a-dozen men, with one day's work, could cleanse those pools,
and trim the flowers about their banks, and make every breath of
summer air above them rich with cool balm; and every glittering
wave medicinal, as if it ran, troubled of angels, from the porch of
Bethesda. But that day's work is never given, nor will be; nor will
any joy be possible to heart of man, for evermore, about those
wells of English waters.When I last left them, I walked up slowly through the back
streets of Croydon, from the old church to the hospital; and, just
on the left, before coming up to the crossing of the High Street,
there was a new public-house built. And the front of it was built
in so wise manner, that a recess of two feet was left below its
front windows, between them and the street-pavement—a recess too
narrow for any possible use (for even if it had been occupied by a
seat, as in old time it might have been, everybody walking along
the street would have fallen over the legs of the reposing
wayfarers). But, by way of making this two feet depth of freehold
land more expressive of the dignity of an establishment for the
sale of spirituous liquors, it was fenced from the pavement by an
imposing iron railing, having four or five spearheads to the yard
of it, and six feet high; containing as much iron and iron-work,
indeed as could well be put into the space; and by this stately
arrangement, the little piece of dead ground within, between wall
and street, became a protective receptacle of refuse; cigar ends,
and oyster shells, and the like, such as an open-handed English
street-populace habitually scatters from its presence, and was thus
left, unsweepable by any ordinary methods. Now the iron bars which,
uselessly (or in great degree worse than uselessly), enclosed this
bit of ground, and made it pestilent, represented a quantity of
work which would have cleansed the Carshalton pools three times
over;—of work, partly cramped and deadly, in the mine; partly
fierce[1]and exhaustive, at
the furnace; partly foolish and sedentary, of ill-taught students
making bad designs: work from the beginning to the last fruits of
it, and in all the branches of it, venomous, deathful, and
miserable. Now, how did it come to pass that this work was done
instead of the other; that the strength and life of the English
operative were spent in defiling ground, instead of redeeming it;
and in producing an entirely (in that place) valueless piece of
metal, which can neither be eaten nor breathed, instead of
medicinal fresh air, and pure water?There is but one reason for it, and at present a conclusive
one,—that the capitalist can charge per-centage on the work in the
one case, and cannot in the other. If, having certain funds for
supporting labour at my disposal, I pay men merely to keep my
ground in order, my money is, in that function, spent once for all;
but if I pay them to dig iron out of my ground, and work it, and
sell it, I can charge rent for the ground, and per-centage both on
the manufacture and the sale, and make my capital profitable in
these three bye-ways. The greater part of the profitable investment
of capital, in the present day, is in operations of this kind, in
which the public is persuaded to buy something of no use to it, on
production, or sale, of which, the capitalist may charge
per-centage; the said public remaining all the while under the
persuasion that the per-centages thus obtained are real national
gains, whereas, they are merely filchings out of partially light
pockets, to swell heavy ones.Thus, the Croydon publican buys the iron railing, to make
himself more conspicuous to drunkards. The public-housekeeper on
the other side of the way presently buys another railing, to
out-rail him with. Both are, as to theirrelativeattractiveness to customers of
taste, just where they were before; but they have lost the price of
the railings; which they must either themselves finally lose, or
make their aforesaid customers of taste pay, by raising the price
of their beer, or adulterating it. Either the publicans, or their
customers, are thus poorer by precisely what the capitalist has
gained; and the value of the work itself, meantime, has been lost
to the nation; the iron bars in that form and place being wholly
useless. It is this mode of taxation of the poor by the rich which
is referred to in the text (page 31), in comparing the modern
acquisitive power of capital with that of the lance and sword; the
only difference being that the levy of black mail in old times was
by force, and is now by cozening. The old rider and reiver frankly
quartered himself on the publican for the night; the modern one
merely makes his lance into an iron spike, and persuades his host
to buy it. One comes as an open robber, the other as a cheating
pedlar; but the result, to the injured person's pocket, is
absolutely the same. Of course many useful industries mingle with,
and disguise the useless ones; and in the habits of energy aroused
by the struggle, there is a certain direct good. It is far better
to spend four thousand pounds in making a good gun, and then to
blow it to pieces, than to pass life in idleness. Only do not let
it be called 'political economy.' There is also a confused notion
in the minds of many persons, that the gathering of the property of
the poor into the hands of the rich does no ultimate harm; since,
in whosesoever hands it may be, it must be spent at last, and thus,
they think, return to the poor again. This fallacy has been again
and again exposed; but grant the plea true, and the same apology
may, of course, be made for black mail, or any other form of
robbery. It might be (though practically it never is) as
advantageous for the nation that the robber should have the
spending of the money he extorts, as that the person robbed should
have spent it. But this is no excuse for the theft. If I were to
put a turnpike on the road where it passes my own gate, and
endeavour to exact a shilling from every passenger, the public
would soon do away with my gate, without listening to any plea on
my part that 'it was as advantageous to them, in the end, that I
should spend their shillings, as that they themselves should.' But
if, instead of out-facing them with a turnpike, I can only persuade
them to come in and buy stones, or old iron, or any other useless
thing, out of my ground, I may rob them to the same extent, and be,
moreover, thanked as a public benefactor, and promoter of
commercial prosperity. And this main question for the poor of
England—for the poor of all countries—is wholly omitted in every
common treatise on the subject of wealth. Even by the labourers
themselves, the operation of capital is regarded only in its effect
on their immediate interests; never in the far more terrific power
of its appointment of the kind and the object of labour. It matters
little, ultimately, how much a labourer is paid for making
anything; but it matters fearfully what the thing is, which he is
compelled to make. If his labour is so ordered as to produce food,
and fresh air, and fresh water, no matter that his wages are
low;—the food and fresh air and water will be at last there; and he
will at last get them. But if he is paid to destroy food and fresh
air or to produce iron bars instead of them,—the food and air will
finallynotbe there, and he
willnotget them, to his great
and final inconvenience. So that, conclusively, in political as in
household economy, the great question is, not so much what money
you have in your pocket, as what you will buy with it, and do with
it.I have been long accustomed, as all men engaged in work of
investigation must be, to hear my statements laughed at for years,
before they are examined or believed; and I am generally content to
wait the public's time. But it has not been without displeased
surprise that I have found myself totally unable, as yet, by any
repetition, or illustration, to force this plain thought into my
readers' heads,—that the wealth of nations, as of men, consists in
substance, not in ciphers; and that the real good of all work, and
of all commerce, depends on the final worth of the thing you make,
or get by it. This is a practical enough statement, one would
think: but the English public has been so possessed by its modern
school of economists with the notion that Business is always good,
whether it be busy in mischief or in benefit; and that buying and
selling are always salutary, whatever the intrinsic worth of what
you buy or sell,—that it seems impossible to gain so much as a
patient hearing for any inquiry respecting the substantial result
of our eager modern labours. I have never felt more checked by the
sense of this impossibility than in arranging the heads of the
following three lectures, which, though delivered at considerable
intervals of time, and in different places, were not prepared
without reference to each other. Their connection would, however,
have been made far more distinct, if I had not been prevented, by
what I feel to be another great difficulty in addressing English
audiences, from enforcing, with any decision, the common, and to me
the most important, part of their subjects. I chiefly desired (as I
have just said) to question my hearers—operatives, merchants, and
soldiers, as to the ultimate meaning of thebusinessthey had in hand; and to know
from them what they expected or intended their manufacture to come
to, their selling to come to, and their killing to come to. That
appeared the first point needing determination before I could speak
to them with any real utility or effect. 'You
craftsmen—salesmen—swordsmen,—do but tell me clearly what you want,
then, if I can say anything to help you, I will; and if not, I will
account to you as I best may for my inability.' But in order to put
this question into any terms, one had first of all to face the
difficulty just spoken of—to me for the present insuperable,—the
difficulty of knowing whether to address one's audience as
believing, or not believing, in any other world than this. For if
you address any average modern English company as believing in an
Eternal life, and endeavour to draw any conclusions, from this
assumed belief, as to their present business, they will forthwith
tell you that what you say is very beautiful, but it is not
practical. If, on the contrary, you frankly address them as
unbelievers in Eternal life, and try to draw any consequences from
that unbelief,—they immediately hold you for an accursed person,
and shake off the dust from their feet at you. And the more I
thought over what I had got to say, the less I found I could say
it, without some reference to this intangible or intractable part
of the subject. It made all the difference, in asserting any
principle of war, whether one assumed that a discharge of artillery
would merely knead down a certain quantity of red clay into a level
line, as in a brick field; or whether, out of every separately
Christian-named portion of the ruinous heap, there went out, into
the smoke and dead-fallen air of battle, some astonished condition
of soul, unwillingly released. It made all the difference, in
speaking of the possible range of commerce, whether one assumed
that all bargains related only to visible property—or whether
property, for the present invisible, but nevertheless real, was
elsewhere purchasable on other terms. It made all the difference,
in addressing a body of men subject to considerable hardship, and
having to find some way out of it—whether one could confidentially
say to them, 'My friends,—you have only to die, and all will be
right;' or whether one had any secret misgiving that such advice
was more blessed to him that gave, than to him that took it. And
therefore the deliberate reader will find, throughout these
lectures, a hesitation in driving points home, and a pausing short
of conclusions which he will feel I would fain have come to;
hesitation which arises wholly from this uncertainty of my hearers'
temper. For I do not now speak, nor have I ever spoken, since the
time of my first forward youth, in any proselyting temper, as
desiring to persuade any one of what, in such matters, I thought
myself; but, whomsoever I venture to address, I take for the time
his creed as I find it; and endeavour to push it into such vital
fruit as it seems capable of. Thus, it is a creed with a great part
of the existing English people, that they are in possession of a
book which tells them, straight from the lips of God all they ought
to do, and need to know. I have read that book, with as much care
as most of them, for some forty years; and am thankful that, on
those who trust it, I can press its pleadings. My endeavour has
been uniformly to make them trust it more deeply than they do;
trust it, not in their own favourite verses only, but in the sum of
all; trust it not as a fetish or talisman, which they are to be
saved by daily repetitions of; but as a Captain's order, to be
heard and obeyed at their peril. I was always encouraged by
supposing my hearers to hold such belief. To these, if to any, I
once had hope of addressing, with acceptance, words which insisted
on the guilt of pride, and the futility of avarice; from these, if
from any, I once expected ratification of a political economy,
which asserted that the life was more than the meat, and the body
than raiment; and these, it once seemed to me, I might ask without
accusation or fanaticism, not merely in doctrine of the lips, but
in the bestowal of their heart's treasure, to separate themselves
from the crowd of whom it is written, 'After all these things do
the Gentiles seek.'It cannot, however, be assumed, with any semblance of reason,
that a general audience is now wholly, or even in majority,
composed of these religious persons. A large portion must always
consist of men who admit no such creed; or who, at least, are
inaccessible to appeals founded on it. And as, with the so-called
Christian, I desired to plead for honest declaration and fulfilment
of his belief in life,—with the so-called Infidel, I desired to
plead for an honest declaration and fulfilment of his belief in
death. The dilemma is inevitable. Men must either hereafter live,
or hereafter die; fate may be bravely met, and conduct wisely
ordered, on either expectation; but never in hesitation between
ungrasped hope, and unconfronted fear. We usually believe in
immortality, so far as to avoid preparation for death; and in
mortality, so far as to avoid preparation for anything after death.
Whereas, a wise man will at least hold himself prepared for one or
other of two events, of which one or other is inevitable; and will
have all things in order, for his sleep, or in readiness, for his
awakening.Nor have we any right to call it an ignoble judgment, if he
determine to put them in order, as for sleep. A brave belief in
life is indeed an enviable state of mind, but, as far as I can
discern, an unusual one. I know few Christians so convinced of the
splendour of the rooms in their Father's house, as to be happier
when their friends are called to those mansions, than they would
have been if the Queen had sent for them to live at Court: nor has
the Church's most ardent 'desire to depart, and be with Christ,'
ever cured it of the singular habit of putting on mourning for
every person summoned to such departure. On the contrary, a brave
belief in death has been assuredly held by many not ignoble
persons, and it is a sign of the last depravity in the Church
itself, when it assumes that such a belief is inconsistent with
either purity of character, or energy of hand. The shortness of
life is not, to any rational person, a conclusive reason for
wasting the space of it which may be granted him; nor does the
anticipation of death to-morrow suggest, to any one but a drunkard,
the expediency of drunkenness to-day. To teach that there is no
device in the grave, may indeed make the deviceless person more
contented in his dulness; but it will make the deviser only more
earnest in devising, nor is human conduct likely, in every case, to
be purer under the conviction that all its evil may in a moment be
pardoned, and all its wrong-doing in a moment redeemed; and that
the sigh of repentance, which purges the guilt of the past, will
waft the soul into a felicity which forgets its pain,—than it may
be under the sterner, and to many not unwise minds, more probable,
apprehension, that 'what a man soweth that shall he also reap'—or
others reap,—when he, the living seed of pestilence, walketh no
more in darkness, but lies down therein.But to men whose feebleness of sight, or bitterness of soul,
or the offence given by the conduct of those who claim higher hope,
may have rendered this painful creed the only possible one, there
is an appeal to be made, more secure in its ground than any which
can be addressed to happier persons. I would fain, if I might
offencelessly, have spoken to them as if none others heard; and
have said thus: Hear me, you dying men, who will soon be deaf for
ever. For these others, at your right hand and your left, who look
forward to a state of infinite existence, in which all their errors
will be overruled, and all their faults forgiven; for these, who,
stained and blackened in the battle smoke of mortality, have but to
dip themselves for an instant in the font of death, and to rise
renewed of plumage, as a dove that is covered with silver, and her
feathers like gold; for these, indeed, it may be permissible to
waste their numbered moments, through faith in a future of
innumerable hours; to these, in their weakness, it may be conceded
that they should tamper with sin which can only bring forth fruit
of righteousness, and profit by the iniquity which, one day, will
be remembered no more. In them, it may be no sign of hardness of
heart to neglect the poor, over whom they know their Master is
watching; and to leave those to perish temporarily, who cannot
perish eternally. But, for you, there is no such hope, and
therefore no such excuse. This fate, which you ordain for the
wretched, you believe to be all their inheritance; you may crush
them, before the moth, and they will never rise to rebuke
you;—their breath, which fails for lack of food, once expiring,
will never be recalled to whisper against you a word of
accusing;—they and you, as you think, shall lie down together in
the dust, and the worms cover you;—and for them there shall be no
consolation, and on you no vengeance,—only the question murmured
above your grave: 'Who shall repay him what he hath done?' Is it
therefore easier for you in your heart to inflict the sorrow for
which there is no remedy? Will you take, wantonly, this little all
of his life from your poor brother, and make his brief hours long
to him with pain? Will you be readier to the injustice which can
never be redressed; and niggardly of mercy which youcanbestow but once, and which,
refusing, you refuse for ever? I think better of you, even of the
most selfish, than that you would do this, well understood. And for
yourselves, it seems to me, the question becomes not less grave, in
these curt limits. If your life were but a fever fit,—the madness
of a night, whose follies were all to be forgotten in the dawn, it
might matter little how you fretted away the sickly hours,—what
toys you snatched at, or let fall,—what visions you followed
wistfully with the deceived eyes of sleepless phrenzy. Is the earth
only an hospital? Play, if you care to play, on the floor of the
hospital dens. Knit its straw into what crowns please you; gather
the dust of it for treasure, and die rich in that, clutching at the
black motes in the air with your dying hands;—and yet, it may be
well with you. But if this life be no dream, and the world no
hospital; if all the peace and power and joy you can ever win, must
be won now; and all fruit of victory gathered here, or never;—will
you still, throughout the puny totality of your life, weary
yourselves in the fire for vanity? If there is no rest which
remaineth for you, is there none you might presently take? was this
grass of the earth made green for your shroud only, not for your
bed? and can you never lie downuponit, but onlyunderit? The
heathen, to whose creed you have returned, thought not so. They
knew that life brought its contest, but they expected from it also
the crown of all contest: No proud one! no jewelled circlet flaming
through Heaven above the height of the unmerited throne; only some
few leaves of wild olive, cool to the tired brow, through a few
years of peace. It should have been of gold, they thought; but
Jupiter was poor; this was the best the god could give them.
Seeking a greater than this, they had known it a mockery. Not in
war, not in wealth, not in tyranny, was there any happiness to be
found for them—only in kindly peace, fruitful and free. The wreath
was to be ofwildolive, mark
you:—the tree that grows carelessly, tufting the rocks with no
vivid bloom, no verdure of branch; only with soft snow of blossom,
and scarcely fulfilled fruit, mixed with grey leaf and thornset
stem; no fastening of diadem for you but with such sharp
embroidery! But this, such as it is, you may win while yet you
live; type of grey honour and sweet rest.[2]Free-heartedness, and
graciousness, and undisturbed trust, and requited love, and the
sight of the peace of others, and the ministry to their
pain;—these, and the blue sky above you, and the sweet waters and
flowers of the earth beneath; and mysteries and presences,
innumerable, of living things,—these may yet be here your riches;
untormenting and divine: serviceable for the life that now is nor,
it may be, without promise of that which is to come.FOOTNOTES:[1]'A fearful occurrence took place a few days
since, near Wolverhampton. Thomas Snape, aged nineteen, was on duty
as the "keeper" of a blast furnace at Deepfield, assisted by John
Gardner, aged eighteen, and Joseph Swift, aged thirty-seven. The
furnace contained four tons of molten iron, and an equal amount of
cinders, and ought to have been run out at 7.30 p.m. But Snape and
his mates, engaged in talking and drinking, neglected their duty,
and in the meantime, the iron rose in the furnace until it reached
a pipe wherein water was contained. Just as the men had stripped,
and were proceeding to tap the furnace, the water in the pipe,
converted into steam, burst down its front and let loose on them
the molten metal, which instantaneously consumed Gardner; Snape,
terribly burnt, and mad with pain, leaped into the canal and then
ran home and fell dead on the threshold, Swift survived to reach
the hospital, where he died too.In further illustration of this matter, I beg the reader to
look at the article on the 'Decay of the English Race,' in the
'Pall-Mall Gazette' of April
17, of this year; and at the articles on the 'Report of the Thames
Commission,' in any journals of the same date.[2]μελιτεσσα, αεθλων γ' ενεκεν.
LECTURE I.
WORK.My Friends,—I have not come among you to-night to endeavour
to give you an entertaining lecture; but to tell you a few plain
facts, and ask you some plain, but necessary questions. I have seen
and known too much of the struggle for life among our labouring
population, to feel at ease, even under any circumstances, in
inviting them to dwell on the trivialities of my own studies; but,
much more, as I meet to-night, for the first time, the members of a
working Institute established in the district in which I have
passed the greater part of my life, I am desirous that we should at
once understand each other, on graver matters. I would fain tell
you, with what feelings, and with what hope, I regard this
Institution, as one of many such, now happily established
throughout England, as well as in other countries;—Institutions
which are preparing the way for a great change in all the
circumstances of industrial life; but of which the success must
wholly depend upon our clearly understanding the circumstances and
necessarylimitsof this change.
No teacher can truly promote the cause of education, until he knows
the conditions of the life for which that education is to prepare
his pupil. And the fact that he is called upon to address you
nominally, as a 'Working Class,' must compel him, if he is in any
wise earnest or thoughtful, to inquire in the outset, on what you
yourselves suppose this class distinction has been founded in the
past, and must be founded in the future. The manner of the
amusement, and the matter of the teaching, which any of us can
offer you, must depend wholly on our first understanding from you,
whether you think the distinction heretofore drawn between working
men and others, is truly or falsely founded. Do you accept it as it
stands? do you wish it to be modified? or do you think the object
of education is to efface it, and make us forget it for
ever?Let me make myself more distinctly understood. We call
this—you and I—a 'Working Men's' Institute, and our college in
London, a 'Working Men's' College. Now, how do you consider that
these several institutes differ, or ought to differ, from 'idle
men's' institutes and 'idle men's' colleges? Or by what other word
than 'idle' shall I distinguish those whom the happiest and wisest
of working men do not object to call the 'Upper Classes?' Are there
really upper classes,—are there lower? How much should they always
be elevated, how much always depressed? And, gentlemen and ladies—I
pray those of you who are here to forgive me the offence there may
be in what I am going to say. It is notIwho wish to say it. Bitter voices say
it; voices of battle and of famine through all the world, which
must be heard some day, whoever keeps silence. Neither is it
toyouspecially that I say it.
I am sure that most now present know their duties of kindness, and
fulfil them, better perhaps than I do mine. But I speak to you as
representing your whole class, which errs, I know, chiefly by
thoughtlessness, but not therefore the less terribly. Wilful error
is limited by the will, but what limit is there to that of which we
are unconscious?Bear with me, therefore, while I turn to these workmen, and
ask them, also as representing a great multitude, what they think
the 'upper classes' are, and ought to be, in relation to them.
Answer, you workmen who are here, as you would among yourselves,
frankly; and tell me how you would have me call those classes. Am I
to call them—wouldyouthink me
right in calling them—the idle classes? I think you would feel
somewhat uneasy, and as if I were not treating my subject honestly,
or speaking from my heart, if I went on under the supposition that
all rich people were idle. You would be both unjust and unwise if
you allowed me to say that;—not less unjust than the rich people
who say that all the poor are idle, and will never work if they can
help it, or more than they can help.For indeed the fact is, that there are idle poor and idle
rich; and there are busy poor and busy rich. Many a beggar is as
lazy as if he had ten thousand a year; and many a man of large
fortune is busier than his errand-boy, and never would think of
stopping in the street to play marbles. So that, in a large view,
the distinction between workers and idlers, as between knaves and
honest men, runs through the very heart and innermost economies of
men of all ranks and in all positions. There is a working
class—strong and happy—among both rich and poor; there is an idle
class—weak, wicked, and miserable—among both rich and poor. And the
worst of the misunderstandings arising between the two orders come
of the unlucky fact that the wise of one class habitually
contemplate the foolish of the other. If the busy rich people
watched and rebuked the idle rich people, all would be right; and
if the busy poor people watched and rebuked the idle poor people,
all would be right. But each class has a tendency to look for the
faults of the other. A hard-working man of property is particularly
offended by an idle beggar; and an orderly, but poor, workman is
naturally intolerant of the licentious luxury of the rich. And what
is severe judgment in the minds of the just men of either class,
becomes fierce enmity in the unjust—but among the unjustonly. None but the dissolute among the
poor look upon the rich as their natural enemies, or desire to
pillage their houses and divide their property. None but the
dissolute among the rich speak in opprobrious terms of the vices
and follies of the poor.There is, then, no class distinction between idle and
industrious people; and I am going to-night to speak only of the
industrious. The idle people we will put out of our thoughts at
once—they are mere nuisances—what ought to be done withthem, we'll talk of at another time.
But there are class distinctions, among the industrious themselves;
tremendous distinctions, which rise and fall to every degree in the
infinite thermometer of human pain and of human power—distinctions
of high and low, of lost and won, to the whole reach of man's soul
and body.These separations we will study, and the laws of them, among
energetic men only, who, whether they work or whether they play,
put their strength into the work, and their strength into the game;
being in the full sense of the word 'industrious,' one way or
another—with a purpose, or without. And these distinctions are
mainly four:I. Between those who work, and those who play.II. Between those who produce the means of life, and those
who consume them.III. Between those who work with the head, and those who work
with the hand.IV. Between those who work wisely, and who work
foolishly.For easier memory, let us say we are going to oppose, in our
examination.—I. Work to play;II. Production to consumption;III. Head to Hand; and,IV. Sense to nonsense.I. First, then, of the distinction between the classes who
work and the classes who play. Of course we must agree upon a
definition of these terms,—work and play,—before going farther.
Now, roughly, not with vain subtlety of definition, but for plain
use of the words, 'play' is an exertion of body or mind, made to
please ourselves, and with no determined end; and work is a thing
done because it ought to be done, and with a determined end. You
play, as you call it, at cricket, for instance. That is as hard
work as anything else; but it amuses you, and it has no result but
the amusement. If it were done as an ordered form of exercise, for
health's sake, it would become work directly. So, in like manner,
whatever we do to please ourselves, and only for the sake of the
pleasure, not for an ultimate object, is 'play,' the 'pleasing
thing,' not the useful thing. Play may be useful in a secondary
sense (nothing is indeed more useful or necessary); but the use of
it depends on its being spontaneous.Let us, then, enquire together what sort of games the playing
class in England spend their lives in playing at.The first of all English games is making money. That is an
all-absorbing game; and we knock each other down oftener in playing
at that than at foot-ball, or any other roughest sport; and it is
absolutely without purpose; no one who engages heartily in that
game ever knows why. Ask a great money-maker what he wants to do
with his money—he never knows. He doesn't make it to do anything
with it. He gets it only that hemayget it. 'What will you make of what you have got?' you ask.
'Well, I'll get more,' he says. Just as, at cricket, you get more
runs. There's no use in the runs, but to get more of them than
other people is the game. And there's no use in the money, but to
have more of it than other people is the game. So all that great
foul city of London there,—rattling, growling, smoking, stinking,—a
ghastly heap of fermenting brick-work, pouring out poison at every
pore,—you fancy it is a city of work? Not a street of it! It is a
great city of play; very nasty play, and very hard play, but still
play. It is only Lord's cricket ground without the turf,—a huge
billiard table without the cloth, and with pockets as deep as the
bottomless pit; but mainly a billiard table, after
all.Well, the first great English game is this playing at
counters. It differs from the rest in that it appears always to be
producing money, while every other game is expensive. But it does
not always produce money. There's a great difference between
'winning' money and 'making' it; a great difference between getting
it out of another man's pocket into ours, or filling both.
Collecting money is by no means the same thing as making it; the
tax-gatherer's house is not the Mint; and much of the apparent gain
(so called), in commerce, is only a form of taxation on carriage or
exchange.Our next great English game, however, hunting and shooting,
is costly altogether; and how much we are fined for it annually in
land, horses, gamekeepers, and game laws, and all else that
accompanies that beautiful and special English game, I will not
endeavour to count now: but note only that, except for exercise,
this is not merely a useless game, but a deadly one, to all
connected with it. For through horse-racing, you get every form of
what the higher classes everywhere call 'Play,' in distinction from
all other plays; that is—gambling; by no means a beneficial or
recreative game: and, through game-preserving, you get also some
curious laying out of ground; that beautiful arrangement of
dwelling-house for man and beast, by which we have grouse and
black-cock—so many brace to the acre, and men and women—so many
brace to the garret. I often wonder what the angelic builders and
surveyors—the angelic builders who build the 'many mansions' up
above there; and the angelic surveyors, who measured that
four-square city with their measuring reeds—I wonder what they
think, or are supposed to think, of the laying out of ground by
this nation, which has set itself, as it seems, literally to
accomplish, word for word, or rather fact for word, in the persons
of those poor whom its Master left to represent him, what that
Master said of himself—that foxes and birds had homes, but He
none.Then, next to the gentlemen's game of hunting, we must put
the ladies' game of dressing. It is not the cheapest of games. I
saw a brooch at a jeweller's in Bond Street a fortnight ago, not an
inch wide, and without any singular jewel in it, yet worth
3,000l.And I wish I could tell
you what this 'play' costs, altogether, in England, France, and
Russia annually. But it is a pretty game, and on certain terms, I
like it; nay, I don't see it played quite as much as I would fain
have it. You ladies like to lead the fashion:—by all means lead
it—lead it thoroughly, lead it far enough. Dress yourselves nicely,
and dress everybody else nicely. Lead thefashions
for the poorfirst; makethemlook well, and you yourselves will
look, in ways of which you have now no conception, all the better.
The fashions you have set for some time among your peasantry are
not pretty ones; their doublets are too irregularly slashed, and
the wind blows too frankly through them.Then there are other games, wild enough, as I could show you
if I had time.There's playing at literature, and playing at art—very
different, both, from working at literature, or working at art, but
I've no time to speak of these. I pass to the greatest of all—the
play of plays, the great gentlemen's game, which ladies like them
best to play at,—the game of War. It is entrancingly pleasant to
the imagination; the facts of it, not always so pleasant. We dress
for it, however, more finely than for any other sport; and go out
to it, not merely in scarlet, as to hunt, but in scarlet and gold,
and all manner of fine colours: of course we could fight better in
grey, and without feathers; but all nations have agreed that it is
good to be well dressed at this play. Then the bats and balls are
very costly; our English and French bats, with the balls and
wickets, even those which we don't make any use of, costing, I
suppose, now about fifteen millions of money annually to each
nation; all of which, you know is paid for by hard labourer's work
in the furrow and furnace. A costly game!—not to speak of its
consequences; I will say at present nothing of these. The mere
immediate cost of all these plays is what I want you to consider;
they all cost deadly work somewhere, as many of us know too well.
The jewel-cutter, whose sight fails over the diamonds; the weaver,
whose arm fails over the web; the iron-forger, whose breath fails
before the furnace—theyknow
what work is—they, who have all the work, and none of the play,
except a kind they have named for themselves down in the black
north country, where 'play' means being laid up by sickness. It is
a pretty example for philologists, of varying dialect, this change
in the sense of the word 'play,' as used in the black country of
Birmingham, and the red and black country of Baden Baden. Yes,
gentlemen, and gentlewomen, of England, who think 'one moment
unamused a misery, not made for feeble man,' this is what you have
brought the word 'play' to mean, in the heart of merry England! You
may have your fluting and piping; but there are sad children
sitting in the market-place, who indeed cannot say to you, 'We have
piped unto you, and ye have not danced:' but eternally shall say to
you, 'We have mourned unto you, and ye have not
lamented.'This, then, is the first distinction between the 'upper and
lower' classes. And this is one which is by no means necessary;
which indeed must, in process of good time, be by all honest men's
consent abolished. Men will be taught that an existence of play,
sustained by the blood of other creatures, is a good existence for
gnats and sucking fish; but not for men: that neither days, nor
lives, can be made holy by doing nothing in them: that the best
prayer at the beginning of a day is that we may not lose its
moments; and the best grace before meat, the consciousness that we
have justly earned our dinner. And when we have this much of plain
Christianity preached to us again, and enough respect for what we
regard as inspiration, as not to think that 'Son, go work to-day in
my vineyard,' means 'Fool, go play to-day in my vineyard,' we shall
all be workers, in one way or another; and this much at least of
the distinction between 'upper' and 'lower' forgotten.II. I pass then to our second distinction; between the rich
and poor, between Dives and Lazarus,—distinction which exists more
sternly, I suppose, in this day, than ever in the world, Pagan or
Christian, till now. I will put it sharply before you, to begin
with, merely by reading two paragraphs which I cut from two papers
that lay on my breakfast table on the same morning, the 25th of
November, 1864. The piece about the rich Russian at Paris is
commonplace enough, and stupid besides (for fifteen
francs,—12s.6d.,—is nothing for a rich man to give
for a couple of peaches, out of season). Still, the two paragraphs
printed on the same day are worth putting side by
side.'Such a man is now here. He is a Russian, and, with your
permission, we will call him Count Teufelskine. In dress he is
sublime; art is considered in that toilet, the harmony of colour
respected, thechiar' oscuroevident in well-selected contrast. In manners he is
dignified—nay, perhaps apathetic; nothing disturbs the placid
serenity of that calm exterior. One day our friend
breakfastedchezBignon. When
the bill came he read, "Two peaches, 15f." He paid. "Peaches
scarce, I presume?" was his sole remark. "No, sir," replied the
waiter, "but Teufelskines are."'Telegraph, November 25,
1864.'Yesterday morning, at eight o'clock, a woman, passing a dung
heap in the stone yard near the recently-erected alms-houses in
Shadwell Gap, High Street, Shadwell, called the attention of a
Thames police-constable to a man in a sitting position on the dung
heap, and said she was afraid he was dead. Her fears proved to be
true. The wretched creature appeared to have been dead several
hours. He had perished of cold and wet, and the rain had been
beating down on him all night. The deceased was a bone-picker. He
was in the lowest stage of poverty, poorly clad, and half-starved.
The police had frequently driven him away from the stone yard,
between sunset and sunrise, and told him to go home. He selected a
most desolate spot for his wretched death. A penny and some bones
were found in his pockets. The deceased was between fifty and sixty
years of age. Inspector Roberts, of the K division, has given
directions for inquiries to be made at the lodging-houses
respecting the deceased, to ascertain his identity if
possible.'—Morning Post,
November 25, 1864.You have the separation thus in brief compass; and I want you
to take notice of the 'a penny and some bones were found in his
pockets,' and to compare it with this third statement, from
theTelegraphof January 16th of
this year:—'Again, the dietary scale for adult and juvenile paupers was
drawn up by the most conspicuous political economists in England.
It is low in quantity, but it is sufficient to support nature; yet
within ten years of the passing of the Poor Law Act, we heard of
the paupers in the Andover Union gnawing the scraps of putrid flesh
and sucking the marrow from the bones of horses which they were
employed to crush.'You see my reason for thinking that our Lazarus of
Christianity has some advantage over the Jewish one. Jewish Lazarus
expected, or at least prayed, to be fed with crumbs from the rich
man's table; butourLazarus is
fed with crumbs from the dog's table.Now this distinction between rich and poor rests on two
bases. Within its proper limits, on a basis which is lawful and
everlastingly necessary; beyond them, on a basis unlawful, and
everlastingly corrupting the framework of society. The lawful basis
of wealth is, that a man who works should be paid the fair value of
his work; and that if he does not choose to spend it to-day, he
should have free leave to keep it, and spend it to-morrow. Thus, an
industrious man working daily, and laying by daily, attains at last
the possession of an accumulated sum of wealth, to which he has
absolute right. The idle person who will not work, and the wasteful
person who lays nothing by, at the end of the same time will be
doubly poor—poor in possession, and dissolute in moral habit; and
he will then naturally covet the money which the other has saved.
And if he is then allowed to attack the other, and rob him of his
well-earned wealth, there is no more any motive for saving, or any
reward for good conduct; and all society is thereupon dissolved, or
exists only in systems of rapine. Therefore the first necessity of
social life is the clearness of national conscience in enforcing
the law—that he should keep who has justly earned.That law, I say, is the proper basis of distinction between
rich and poor. But there is also a false basis of distinction;
namely, the power held over those who earn wealth by those who levy
or exact it. There will be always a number of men who would fain
set themselves to the accumulation of wealth as the sole object of
their lives. Necessarily, that class of men is an uneducated class,
inferior in intellect, and more or less cowardly. It is physically
impossible for a well-educated, intellectual, or brave man to make
money the chief object of his thoughts; as physically impossible as
it is for him to make his dinner the principal object of them. All
healthy people like their dinners, but their dinner is not the main
object of their lives. So all healthily minded people like making
money—ought to like it, and to enjoy the sensation of winning it;
but the main object of their life is not money; it is something
better than money. A good soldier, for instance, mainly wishes to
do his fighting well. He is glad of his pay—very properly so, and
justly grumbles when you keep him ten years without it—still, his
main notion of life is to win battles, not to be paid for winning
them. So of clergymen. They like pew-rents, and baptismal fees, of
course; but yet, if they are brave and well educated, the pew-rent
is not the sole object of their lives, and the baptismal fee is not
the sole purpose of the baptism; the clergyman's object is
essentially to baptize and preach, not to be paid for preaching. So
of doctors. They like fees no doubt,—ought to like them; yet if
they are brave and well educated, the entire object of their lives
is not fees. They, on the whole, desire to cure the sick; and,—if
they are good doctors, and the choice were fairly put to
them,—would rather cure their patient, and lose their fee, than
kill him, and get it. And so with all other brave and rightly
trained men; their work is first, their fee second—very important
always, but stillsecond. But
in every nation, as I said, there are a vast class who are
ill-educated, cowardly, and more or less stupid. And with these
people, just as certainly the fee is first, and the work second, as
with brave people the work is first and the fee second. And this is
no small distinction. It is the whole distinction in a man;
distinction between life and deathinhim, between heaven and hellforhim. You cannot serve two masters;—youmustserve one or other. If your work
is first with you, and your fee second, work is your master, and
the lord of work, who is God. But if your fee is first with you,
and your work second, fee is your master, and the lord of fee, who
is the Devil; and not only the Devil, but the lowest of devils—the
'least erected fiend that fell.' So there you have it in brief
terms; Work first—you are God's servants; Fee first—you are the
Fiend's. And it makes a difference, now and ever, believe me,
whether you serve Him who has on His vesture and thigh written,
'King of Kings,' and whose service is perfect freedom; or him on
whose vesture and thigh the name is written, 'Slave of Slaves,' and
whose service is perfect slavery.However, in every nation there are, and must always be, a
certain number of these Fiend's servants, who have it principally
for the object of their lives to make money. They are always, as I
said, more or less stupid, and cannot conceive of anything else so
nice as money. Stupidity is always the basis of the Judas bargain.
We do great injustice to Iscariot, in thinking him wicked above all
common wickedness. He was only a common money-lover, and, like all
money-lovers, didn't understand Christ;—couldn't make out the worth
of Him, or meaning of Him. He didn't want Him to be killed. He was
horror-struck when he found that Christ would be killed; threw his
money away instantly, and hanged himself. How many of our present
money-seekers, think you, would have the grace to hang themselves,
whoever was killed? But Judas was a common, selfish, muddle-headed,
pilfering fellow; his hand always in the bag of the poor, not
caring for them. He didn't understand Christ;—yet believed in Him,
much more than most of us do; had seen Him do miracles, thought He
was quite strong enough to shift for Himself, and he, Judas, might
as well make his own little bye-perquisites out of the affair.
Christ would come out of it well enough, and he have his thirty
pieces. Now, that is the money-seeker's idea, all over the world.
He doesn't hate Christ, but can't understand Him—doesn't care for
him—sees no good in that benevolent business; makes his own little
job out of it at all events, come what will. And thus, out of every
mass of men, you have a certain number of bag-men—your 'fee-first'
men, whose main object is to make money. And they do make it—make
it in all sorts of unfair ways, chiefly by the weight and force of
money itself, or what is called the power of capital; that is to
say, the power which money, once obtained, has over the labour of
the poor, so that the capitalist can take all its produce to
himself, except the labourer's food. That is the modern Judas's way
of 'carrying the bag,' and 'bearing what is put
therein.'Nay, but (it is asked) how is that an unfair advantage? Has
not the man who has worked for the money a right to use it as he
best can? No; in this respect, money is now exactly what mountain
promontories over public roads were in old times. The barons fought
for them fairly:—the strongest and cunningest got them; then
fortified them, and made everyone who passed below pay toll. Well,
capital now is exactly what crags were then. Men fight fairly (we
will, at least, grant so much, though it is more than we ought) for
their money; but, once having got it, the fortified millionaire can
make everybody who passes below pay toll to his million, and build
another tower of his money castle. And I can tell you, the poor
vagrants by the roadside suffer now quite as much from the
bag-baron, as ever they did from the crag-baron. Bags and crags
have just the same result on rags. I have not time, however,
to-night to show you in how many ways the power of capital is
unjust; but this one great principle I have to assert—you will find
it quite indisputably true—that whenever money is the principal
object of life with either man or nation, it is both got ill, and
spent ill; and does harm both in the getting and spending; but when
it is not the principal object, it and all other things will be
well got, and well spent. And here is the test, with every man, of
whether money is the principal object with him, or not. If in
mid-life he could pause and say, "Now I have enough to live upon,
I'll live upon it; and having well earned it, I will also well
spend it, and go out of the world poor, as I came into it," then
money is not principal with him; but if, having enough to live upon
in the manner befitting his character and rank, he still wants to
make more, and todierich, then
money is the principal object with him, and it becomes a curse to
himself, and generally to those who spend it after him. For you
know itmustbe spent some day;
the only question is whether the man who makes it shall spend it,
or some one else. And generally it is better for the maker to spend
it, for he will know best its value and use. This is the true law
of life. And if a man does not choose thus to spend his money, he
must either hoard it or lend it, and the worst thing he can
generally do is to lend it; for borrowers are nearly always
ill-spenders, and it is with lent money that all evil is mainly
done, and all unjust war protracted.For observe what the real fact is, respecting loans to
foreign military governments, and how strange it is. If your little
boy came to you to ask for money to spend in squibs and crackers,
you would think twice before you gave it him; and you would have
some idea that it was wasted, when you saw it fly off in fireworks,
even though he did no mischief with it. But the Russian children,
and Austrian children, come to you, borrowing money, not to spend
in innocent squibs, but in cartridges and bayonets to attack you in
India with, and to keep down all noble life in Italy with, and to
murder Polish women and children with; andthatyou will give at once, because
they pay you interest for it. Now, in order to pay you that
interest, they must tax every working peasant in their dominions;
and on that work you live. You therefore at once rob the Austrian
peasant, assassinate or banish the Polish peasant, and you live on
the produce of the theft, and the bribe for the assassination! That
is the broad fact—that is the practical meaning of your foreign
loans, and of most large interest of money; and then you quarrel
with Bishop Colenso, forsooth, as ifhedenied the Bible, and you believed
it! though, wretches as you are, every deliberate act of your lives
is a new defiance of its primary orders; and as if, for most of the
rich men of England at this moment, it were not indeed to be
desired, as the best thing at least forthem, that the Bible shouldnotbe true, since against them these
words are written in it: 'The rust of your gold and silver shall be
a witness against you, and shall eat your flesh, as it were
fire.'III. I pass now to our third condition of separation, between
the men who work with the hand, and those who work with the
head.And here we have at last an inevitable distinction.
Theremustbe work done by the
arms, or none of us could live. Theremustbe work done by the brains, or the
life we get would not be worth having. And the same men cannot do
both. There is rough work to be done, and rough men must do it;
there is gentle work to be done, and gentlemen must do it; and it
is physically impossible that one class should do, or divide, the
work of the other. And it is of no use to try to conceal this
sorrowful fact by fine words, and to talk to the workman about the
honourableness of manual labour and the dignity of humanity. That
is a grand old proverb of Sancho Panza's, 'Fine words butter no
parsnips;' and I can tell you that, all over England just now, you
workmen are buying a great deal too much butter at that dairy.
Rough work, honourable or not, takes the life out of us; and the
man who has been heaving clay out of a ditch all day, or driving an
express train against the north wind all night, or holding a
collier's helm in a gale on a lee-shore, or whirling white hot iron
at a furnace mouth, that man is not the same at the end of his day,
or night, as one who has been sitting in a quiet room, with
everything comfortable about him, reading books, or classing
butterflies, or painting pictures. If it is any comfort to you to
be told that the rough work is the more honourable of the two, I
should be sorry to take that much of consolation from you; and in
some sense I need not. The rough work is at all events real,
honest, and, generally, though not always, useful; while the fine
work is, a great deal of it, foolish and false as well as fine, and
therefore dishonourable; but when both kinds are equally well and
worthily done, the head's is the noble work, and the hand's the
ignoble; and of all hand work whatsoever, necessary for the
maintenance of life, those old words, 'In the sweat of thy face
thou shalt eat bread,' indicate that the inherent nature of it is
one of calamity; and that the ground, cursed for our sake, casts
also some shadow of degradation into our contest with its thorn and
its thistle; so that all nations have held their days honourable,
or 'holy,' and constituted them 'holydays' or 'holidays,' by making
them days of rest; and the promise, which, among all our distant
hopes, seems to cast the chief brightness over death, is that
blessing of the dead who die in the Lord, that 'they rest from
their labours, and their works do follow them.'And thus the perpetual question and contest must arise, who
is to do this rough work? and how is the worker of it to be
comforted, redeemed, and rewarded? and what kind of play should he
have, and what rest, in this world, sometimes, as well as in the
next? Well, my good working friends, these questions will take a
little time to answer yet. They must be answered: all good men are
occupied with them, and all honest thinkers. There's grand head
work doing about them; but much must be discovered, and much
attempted in vain, before anything decisive can be told you. Only
note these few particulars, which are already sure.As to the distribution of the hard work. None of us, or very
few of us, do either hard or soft work because we think we ought;
but because we have chanced to fall into the way of it, and cannot
help ourselves. Now, nobody does anything well that they cannot
help doing: work is only done well when it is done with a will; and
no man has a thoroughly sound will unless he knows he is doing what
he should, and is in his place. And, depend upon it, all work must
be done at last, not in a disorderly, scrambling, doggish way, but
in an ordered, soldierly, human way—a lawful way. Men are enlisted
for the labour that kills—the labour of war: they are counted,
trained, fed, dressed, and praised for that. Let them be enlisted
also for the labour that feeds: let them be counted, trained, fed,
dressed, praised for that. Teach the plough exercise as carefully
as you do the sword exercise, and let the officers of troops of
life be held as much gentlemen as the officers of troops of death;
and all is done: but neither this, nor any other right thing, can
be accomplished—you can't even see your way to it—unless, first of
all, both servant and master are resolved that, come what will of
it, they will do each other justice. People are perpetually
squabbling about what will be best to do, or easiest to do, or
adviseablest to do, or profitablest to do; but they never, so far
as I hear them talk, ever ask what it isjust