My days and strength have lately been much broken; and I
never more felt the insufficiency of both than in preparing for the
press the following desultory memoranda on a most noble subject.
But I leave them now as they stand, for no time nor labor would be
enough to complete them to my contentment; and I believe that they
contain suggestions which may be followed with safety, by persons
who are beginning to take interest in the aspects of mythology,
which only recent investigation has removed from the region of
conjecture into that of rational inquiry. I have some advantage,
also, from my field work, in the interpretation of myths relating
to natural phenomena; and I have had always near me, since we were
at college together, a sure, and unweariedly kind, guide, in my
friend Charles Newton, to whom we owe the finding of more treasure
in mines of marble than, were it rightly estimated, all California
could buy. I must not, however, permit the chance of his name being
in any wise associated with my errors. Much of my work as been done
obstinately in my own way; and he is never responsible for me,
though he has often kept me right, or at least enabled me to
advance in a new direction. Absolutely right no one can be in such
matters; nor does a day pass without convincing every honest
student of antiquity of some partial error, and showing him better
how to think, and where to look. But I knew that there was no hope
of my being able to enter with advantage on the fields of history
opened by the splendid investigation of recent philologists, though
I could qualify myself, by attention and sympathy, to understand,
here and there, a verse of Homer's or Hesiod's, as the simple
people did for whom they sang.Even while I correct these sheets for press, a lecture by
Professor Tyndall has been put into my hands, which I ought to have
heard last 16th January, but was hindered by mischance; and which,
I now find, completes, in two important particulars, the evidence
of an instinctive truth in ancient symbolism; showing, first, that
the Greek conception of an ætherial element pervading space is
justified by the closest reasoning of modern physicists; and,
secondly, that the blue of the sky, hitherto thought to be caused
by watery vapour, is, indeed, reflected from the divided air
itself; so that the bright blue of the eyes of Athena, and the deep
blue of her ægis, prove to be accurate mythic expressions of
natural phenomena which it is an uttermost triumph of recent
science to have revealed.Indeed, it would be difficult to imagine triumph more
complete. To form, "within an experimental tube, a bit of more
perfect sky than the sky itself!" here is magic of the finest sort!
singularly reversed from that of old time, which only asserted its
competency to enclose in bottles elemental forces that were—not of
the sky.Let me, in thanking Professor Tyndall for the true wonder of
this piece of work, ask his pardon, and that of all masters in
physical science, for any words of mine, either in the following
pages or elsewhere, that may ever seem to fail in the respect due
to their great powers of thought, or in the admiration due to the
far scope of their discovery. But I will be judged by themselves,
if I have not bitter reason to ask them to teach us more than yet
they have taught.This first day of May, 1869, I am writing where my work was
begun thirty-five years ago, within sight of the snows of the
higher Alps. In that half of the permitted life of man, I have seen
strange evil brought upon every scene that I best loved, or tried
to make beloved by others. The light which once flushed those pale
summits with its rose at dawn, and purple at sunset, is now umbered
and faint; the air which once inlaid the clefts of all their golden
crags with azure is now defiled with languid coils of smoke,
belched from worse than volcanic fires; their very glacier waves
are ebbing, and their snows fading, as if hell had breathed on
them; the waters that once sank at their feet into crystalline rest
are now dimmed and foul, from deep to deep, and shore to shore.
These are no careless words—they are accurately, horribly, true. I
know what the Swiss lakes were; no pool of Alpine fountain at its
source was clearer. This morning, on the Lake of Geneva, at half a
mile from the beach, I could scarcely see my oar-blade a fathom
deep.The light, the air, the waters, all defiled! How of the earth
itself? Take this one fact for type of honour done by the modern
Swiss to the earth of his native land. There used to be a little
rock at the end of the avenue by the port of Neuchâtel; there, the
last marble of the foot of Jura, sloping to the blue water, and (at
this time of year) covered with bright pink tufts of Saponaria. I
went, three days since, to gather a blossom at the place. The
goodly native rock and its flowers were covered with the dust and
refuse of the town; but, in the middle of the avenue, was a
newly-constructed artificial rockery, with a fountain twisted
through a spinning spout, and an inscription on one of its
loose-tumbled stones,—"Aux
Botanistes, Le club
Jurassique,"Ah, masters of modern science, give me back my Athena out of
your vials, and seal, if it may be, once more, Asmodeus therein.
You have divided the elements, and united them; enslaved them upon
the earth, and discerned them in the stars. Teach us now, but this
of them, which is all that man need know,—that the Air is given to
him for his life; and the Rain to his thirst, and for his baptism;
and the Fire for warmth; and the Sun for sight; and the Earth for
his Meat—and his Rest.
I.
ATHENA CHALINITIS.*(Athena in the Heavens.)* "Athena the Restrainer." The name is given to her as having
helpedBellerophon to bridle Pegasus, the flying cloud.LECTURE ON THE GREEK MYTHS OF STORM, GIVEN (PARTLY)
IN UNIVERSITY COLLEGE, LONDON, MARCH 9, 1869.1. I will not ask your pardon for endeavoring to interest you
in the subject of Greek Mythology; but I must ask your permission
to approach it in a temper differing from that in which it is
frequently treated. We cannot justly interpret the religion of any
people, unless we are prepared to admit that we ourselves, as well
as they, are liable to error in matters of faith; and that the
convictions of others, however singular, may in some points have
been well founded, while our own, however reasonable, may be in
some particulars mistaken. You must forgive me, therefore, for not
always distinctively calling the creeds of the past "superstition,"
and the creeds of the present day "religion;" as well as for
assuming that a faith now confessed may sometimes be superficial,
and that a faith long forgotten may once have been sincere. It is
the task of the Divine to condemn the errors of antiquity, and of
the philologists to account for them; I will only pray you to read,
with patience, and human sympathy, the thoughts of men who lived
without blame in a darkness they could not dispel; and to remember
that, whatever charge of folly may justly attach to the saying,
"There is no God," the folly is prouder, deeper, and less
pardonable, in saying, "There is no God but for me."2. A myth, in its simplest definition, is a story with a
meaning attached to it other than it seems to have at first; and
the fact that it has such a meaning is generally marked by some of
its circumstances being extraordinary, or, in the common use of the
word, unnatural. Thus if I tell you that Hercules killed a
water-serpent in the lake of Lerna, and if I mean, and you
understand, nothing more than that fact, the story, whether true or
false, is not a myth. But if by telling you this, I mean that
Hercules purified the stagnation of many streams from deadly
miasmata, my story, however simple, is a true myth; only, as, if I
leftit in that simplicity, you would probably look for nothing
beyond, it will be wise in me to surprise your attention by adding
some singular circumstance; for instance, that the water-snake had
several heads, which revived as fast as they were killed, and which
poisoned even the foot that trod upon them as they slept. And in
proportion to the fulness of intended meaning I shall probably
multiply and refine upon these improbabilities; as, suppose, if,
instead of desiring only to tell you that Hercules purified a
marsh, I wished you to understand that he contended with the venom
and vapor of envy and evil ambition, whether in other men's souls
or in his own, and choked that malaria only by supreme toil,—I
might tell you that this serpent was formed by the goddess whose
pride was in the trial of Hercules; and that its place of abode as
by a palm-tree; and that for every head of it that was cut off, two
rose up with renewed life; and that the hero found at last that he
could not kill the creature at all by cutting its heads off or
crushing them, but only by burning them down; and that the midmost
of them could not be killed even that way, but had to be buried
alive. Only in proportion as I mean more, I shall certainly appear
more absurd in my statement; and at last when I get unendurably
significant, all practical persons will agree that I was talking
mere nonsense from the beginning, and never meant anything at
all.3. It is just possible, however, also, that the story-teller
may all along have meant nothing but what he said; and that,
incredible as the events may appear, he himself literally
believed—and expected you also to believe—all this about Hercules,
without any latent moral or history whatever. And it is very
necessary, in reading traditions of this kind, to determine, first
of all, whether you are listening to a simple person, who is
relating what, at all events, he believes to be true, (and may,
therefore, possibly have been so to some extent), or to a reserved
philosopher, who is veiling a theory of the universe under the
grotesque of a fairy tale. It is, in general, more likely that the
first supposition should be the right one: simple and credulous
persons are, perhaps fortunately, more common than philosophers;
and it is of the highest importance that you should take their
innocent testimony as it was meant, and not efface, under the
graceful explanation which your cultivated ingenuity may suggest,
either the evidence their story may contain (such as it is worth)
of an extraordinary event having really taken place, or the
unquestionable light which it will cast upon the character of the
person by whom it was frankly believed. And to deal with Greek
religion honestly, you must at once understand that this literal
belief was, in the mind of the general people, as deeply rooted as
ours in the legends of our own sacred book; and that a basis of
unmiraculous event was as little suspected, and an explanatory
symbolism as rarely traced, by them, as by us.You must, therefore, observe that I deeply degrade the
position which such a myth as that just referred to occupied in the
Greek mind, by comparing it (for fear of offending you) to our
story of St. George and the Dragon. Still, the analogy is perfect
in minor respects; and though it fails to give you any notion of
the Greek faith, it will exactly illustrate the manner in which
faith laid hold of its objects.4. This story of Hercules and the Hydra, then, was to the
general Greek mind, in its best days, a tale about a real hero and
a real monster. Not one in a thousand knew anything of the way in
which the story had arisen, any more than the English peasant
generally is aware of the plebeian original of St. George; or
supposes that there were once alive in the world, with sharp teeth
and claws, real, and very ugly, flying dragons. On the other hand,
few persons traced any moral or symbolical meaning in the story,
and the average Greek was as far from imagining any interpretation
like that I have just given you, as an average Englishman is from
seeing is St. George the Red Cross Knight of Spenser, or in the
Dragon the Spirit of Infidelity. But, for all that, there was a
certain undercurrent of consciousness in all minds that the figures
meant more than they at first showed; and, according to each man's
own faculties of sentiment, he judged and read them; just as a
Knight of the Garter reads more in the jewel on his collar than the
George and Dragon of a public-house expresses to the host or to his
customers. Thus, to the mean person the myth always meant little;
to the noble person, much; and the greater their familiarity with
it, the more contemptible it became to one, and the more sacred to
the other; until vulgar commentators explained it entirely away,
while Virgil made the crowning glory of his choral hymn to
Hercules."Around thee, powerless
to infect thy soul, Rose, in his crested
crowd, the Lerna worm.""Non
te rationis egentem Lernæus turbâ capitum
circumstetit anguis."And although, in any special toil of the hero's life, the
moral interpretation was rarely with definiteness attached to the
event, yet in the whole course of the life, not only for a
symbolical meaning, but the warrant for the existence of a real
spiritual power, was apprehended of all men. Hercules was no dead
hero, to be remembered only as a victor over monsters of the
past—harmless now as slain. He was the perpetual type and mirror of
heroism, and its present and living aid against every ravenous form
of human trial and pain.5. But, if we seek to know more than this and to ascertain
the manner in which the story first crystallized into its shape, we
shall find ourselves led back generally to one or other of two
sources—either to actual historical events, represented by the
fancy under figures personifying them; or else to natural phenomena
similarly endowed with life by the imaginative power usually more
or less under the influence of terror. The historical myths we must
leave the masters of history to follow; they, and the events they
record, being yet involved in great, though attractive and
penetrable, mystery. But the stars, and hills, and storms are with
us now, as they were with others of old; and it only needs that we
look at them with the earnestness of those childish eyes to
understand the first words spoken of them by the children of men,
and then, in all the most beautiful and enduring myths, we shall
find, not only a literal story of a real person, not only a
parallel imagery of moral principle, but an underlying worship of
natural phenomena, out of which both have sprung, and in which both
forever remain rooted. Thus, from the real sun, rising and
setting,—from the real atmosphere, calm in its dominion of unfading
blue, and fierce in its descent of tempest,—the Greek forms first
the idea of two entirely personal and corporal gods, whose limbs
are clothes in divine flesh, and whose brows are crowned with
divine beauty; yet so real that the quiver rattles at their
shoulder, and the chariot bends beneath their weight. And, on the
other hand, collaterally with these corporeal images, and never for
one instant separated from them, he conceives also two omnipresent
spiritual influences, as the sun, with a constant fire, whatever in
humanity is skilful and wise; and the other, like the living air,
breathes the calm of heavenly fortitude, and strength of righteous
anger, into every human breast that is pure and brave.6. Now, therefore, in nearly every myth of importance, and
certainly in every one of those which I shall speak to-night, you
have to discern these three structural parts,—the root and the two
branches: the root, in physical existence, sun, or sky, or cloud,
or sea; then the personal incarnation of that, becoming a trusted
and companionable deity, with whom you may walk hand in hand, as a
child with its brother or its sister; and, lastly, the moral
significance of the image, which is in all the great myths
eternally and beneficently true.7. The great myths; that is to say, myths made by great
people. For the first plain fact about myth-making is one which has
been most strangely lost sight of,—that you cannot make a myth
unless you have something to make it of. You cannot tell a secret
which you don't know. If the myth is about the sky, it must have
been made by somebody who has looked at the sky. If the myth is
about justice and fortitude, it must have been made by someone who
knew what it was to be just or patient. According to the quantity
of understanding in the person will be the quantity of significance
in his fable; and the myth of a simple and ignorant race must
necessarily mean little, because a simple and ignorant race have
little to mean. So the great question in reading a story is always,
not what wild hunter dreamed, or what childish race first dreaded
it; but what wise man first perfectly told, and what strong people
first perfectly lived by it. And the real meaning of any myth is
that which it has at the noblest age of the nation among whom it is
current. The farther back you pierce, the less significance you
will find, until you come to the first narrow thought, which,
indeed, contains the germ of the accomplished tradition; but only
as the seed contains the flower. As the intelligence and passion of
the race develop, they cling to and nourish their beloved and
sacred legend; leaf by leaf it expands under the touch of more pure
affections, and more delicate imagination, until at last the
perfect fable burgeons out into symmetry of milky stem and honied
bell.8. But through whatever changes it may pass, remember that
our right reading of it is wholly dependent on the materials we
have in our own minds for an intelligent answering sympathy. If it
first arose among a people who dwelt under stainless skies, and
measures their journeys by ascending and declining stars, we
certainly cannot read their story, if we have never seen anything
above us in the day but smoke, nor anything around us in the night
but candles. If the tale goes on to change clouds or planets into
living creatures,—to invest them with fair forms and inflame them
with mighty passions,—we can only understand the story of the
human-hearted things, in so far as we ourselves take pleasure in
the perfectness of visible form, or can sympathize, by an effort of
imagination, with the strange people who had other loves than those
of wealth, and other interests than those of commerce. And, lastly,
if the myth complete itself to the fulfilled thoughts of the
nation, by attributing to the gods, whom they have carved out of
their fantasy, continual presence with their own souls; and their
every effort for good is finally guided by the sense of the
companionship, the praise, and the pure will of immortals, we shall
be able to follow them into this last circle of their faith only in
the degree in which the better parts of our own beings have been
also stirred by the aspects of nature, or strengthened by her laws.
It may be easy to prove that the ascent of Apollo in his chariot
signifies nothing but the rising of the sun. But what does the
sunrise itself signify to us? If only languid return to frivolous
amusement, or fruitless labor, it will, indeed, not be easy for us
to conceive the power, over a Greek, of the name of Apollo. But if,
fir us also, as for the Greek, the sunrise means daily restoration
to the sense of passionate gladness and of perfect life—if it means
the thrilling of new strength through every nerve,—the shedding
over us of a better peace than the peace of night, in the power of
the dawn,—and the purging of evil vision and fear by the baptism of
its dew;—if the sun itself is an influence, to us also, of
spiritual good—and becomes thus in reality, not in imagination, to
us also, a spiritual power,—we may then soon over-pass the narrow
limit of conception which kept that power impersonal, and rise with
the Greek to the thought of an angel who rejoiced as a strong man
to run his course, whose voice calling to life and to labor rang
round the earth, and whose going forth was to the ends of
heaven.9. The time, then, at which I shall take up for you, as well
as I can decipher it, the traditions of the gods of Greece, shall
be near the beginning of its central and formed faith,—about 500
B.C.,—a faith of which the character is perfectly represented by
Pindar and Æschylus, who are both of them outspokenly religious,
and entirely sincere men; while we may always look back to find the
less developed thought of the preceding epoch given by Homer, in a
more occult, subtle, half-instinctive, and involuntary
way.10. Now, at that culminating period of the Greek religion, we
find, under one governing Lord of all things, four subordinate
elemental forces, and four spiritual powers living in them and
commanding them. The elements are of course the well-known four of
the ancient world,— the earth, the waters, the fire, and the air;
and the living powers of them are Demeter, the Latin Ceres;
Poseidon, the Latin Neptune; Apollo, who has retained always his
Greek name; and Athena, the Latin Minerva. Each of these are
descended from, or changed from, more ancient, and therefore more
mystic, deities of the earth and heaven, and of a finer element of
æther supposed to be beyond the heavens;* but at this time we find
the four quite definite, both in their kingdoms and in their
personalities. They are the rulers of the earth that we tread upon,
and the air that we breathe; and are with us closely, in their
vivid humanity, as the dust that they animate, and the winds that
they bridle. I shall briefly define for you the range of their
separate dominions, and then follow, as far as we have time, the
most interesting of the legends which relate to the queen of the
air.* And by modern science now also asserted, and with
probability argued, to exist.11. The rule of the first spirit, Demeter, the earth mother,
is over the earth, first, as the origin of all life,—the dust from
whence we were taken; secondly, as the receiver of all things back
at last into silence —"Dust thou art, and unto dust shalt thou
return." And, therefore, as the most tender image of this appearing
and fading life, in the birth and fall of flowers, her daughter
Proserpine plays in the fields of Sicily, and thence is torn away
into darkness, and becomes the Queen of Fate—not merely of death,
but of the gloom which closes over and ends, not beauty only, but
sin, and chiefly of sins the sin against the life she gave; so that
she is, in her highest power, Persephone, the avenger and purifier
of blood—"The voice of thy brother's blood cries to me out of the
ground." Then, side by side with this queen of the earth, we find a
demigod of agriculture by the plough—the lord of grain, or of the
thing ground by the mill. And it is a singular proof of the
simplicity of Greek character at this noble time, that of all
representations left to us of their deities by their art, few are
so frequent, and none perhaps so beautiful, as the symbol of this
spirit of agriculture.12. Then the dominant spirit of the element water is Neptune,
but subordinate to him are myriads of other water spirits, of whom
Nereus is the chief, with Palæmon, and Leucothea, the "white lady"
of the sea; and Thetis, and nymphs innumerable who, like her, could
"suffer a sea change," while the river deities had each independent
power, according to the preciousness of their streams to the cities
fed by them,—the "fountain Arethuse, and thou, honoured flood,
smooth sliding Mincius, crowned with vocal reeds." And,
spiritually, this king of the waters is lord of the strength and
daily flow of human life—he gives it material force and victory;
which as the meaning of the dedication of the hair, as the sign of
the strength of life, to the river or the native land.13. Demeter, then, over the earth, and its giving and
receiving of life. Neptune over the waters, and the flow and force
of life,—always among the Greeks typified by the horse, which was
to them as a crested sea-wave, animated and bridled. Then the third
element, fire, has set over it two powers: over earthly fire, the
assistant of human labor, is set Hephæstus, lord of all labor in
which is the flush and the sweat of the brow; and over heavenly
fire, the source of day, is set Apollo, the spirit of all kindling,
purifying, and illuminating intellectual wisdom, each of these gods
having also their subordinate or associated powers,— servant, or
sister, or companion muse.14. Then, lastly, we come to the myth which is to be our
subject of closer inquiry,—the story of Athena and of the deities
subordinate to her. This great goddess, the Neith of the Egyptians,
the Athena or Athenaia of the Greeks, and, with broken power, half
usurped by Mars, the Minerva of the Latins, is, physically, the
queen of the air; having supreme power both over its blessing of
calm, and wrath of storm; and, spiritually, she is the queen of the
breath of man, first of the bodily breathing which is life to his
blood, and strength to his arm in battle; and then of the mental
breathing, or inspiration, which is his moral health and habitual
wisdom; wisdom of conduct and of the heart, as opposed to the
wisdom of imagination and the brain; moral, as distinct from
intellectual; inspired, as distinct from illuminated.15. By a singular and fortunate, though I believe wholly
accidental, coincidence, the heart-virtue, of which she is the
spirit, was separated by the ancients into four divisions, which
have since obtained acceptance from all men as rightly discerned,
and have received, as if from the quarters of the four winds of
which Athena is the natural queen, the name of "Cardinal" virtues:
namely, Prudence (the right seeing, and foreseeing, of events
through darkness); Justice (the righteous bestowal of favor and of
indignation); Fortitude (patience under trial by pain); and
Temperance (patience under trial by pleasure). With respect to
these four virtues, the attributes of Athena are all distinct. In
her prudence, or sight in darkness, she is "Glaukopis,"
"owl-eyed."* In her justice, which is the dominant virtue, she
wears two robes, one of light, and one of darkness; the robe of
light, saffron color, or the color of the daybreak, falls to her
feet, covering her wholly with favor and love,—the calm of the sky
in blessing; it is embroidered along its edge with her victory over
the giants (the troublous powers of the earth), and the likeness of
it was woven yearly by the Athenian maidens and carried to the
temple of their own Athena, not to the Parthenon, that was the
temple of all the world's Athena,—but this they carried to the
temple of their own only one who loved them, and stayed with them
always. Then her robe of indignation is worn on her breast and left
arm only, fringed with fatal serpents, and fastened with Gorgonian
cold, turning men to stone; physically, the lightning and hail of
chastisement by storm. Then in her fortitude she wears the crested
and unstooping hemlet;** and lastly, in her temperance, she is the
queen of maidenhood—stainless as the air of heaven.* There are many other meanings in the epithet; see farther
on, §91, pp. 133, 134. ** I am compelled, for clearness' sake, to
mark only one meaning at a time. Athena's helmet is sometimes a
mask, sometimes a sign of anger, sometimes of the highest light of
æther; but I cannot speak of all this at once.