A. H. Sayce
The Egypt of the Hebrews and Herodotos
UUID: cba2606e-bbac-11e5-8942-119a1b5d0361
This ebook was created with StreetLib Write (http://write.streetlib.com)by Simplicissimus Book Farm
Table of contents
Preface
Chapter I. The Patriarchal Age.
Chapter II. The Age Of Moses.
Chapter III. The Exodus And The Hebrew Settlement In Canaan.
Chapter IV. The Age Of The Israelitish Monarchies.
Chapter V. The Age Of The Ptolemies.
Chapter VI. Herodotos In Egypt.
Chapter VII. In The Steps Of Herodotos.
Chapter VIII. Memphis And The Fayyûm.
Appendices.
Footnotes
Preface
A
few words of preface are needful to justify the addition of another
contribution to the over-abundant mass of literature of which Egypt
is the subject. It is intended to supplement the books already in the
hands of tourists and students, and to put before them just that
information which either is not readily accessible or else forms part
of larger and cumbrous works. The travels of Herodotos in Egypt are
followed for the first time in the light of recent discoveries, and
the history of the intercourse between the Egyptians and the Jews is
brought down to the age of the Roman Empire. As the ordinary
histories of Egypt used by travellers end with the extinction of the
native Pharaohs, I have further given a sketch of the Ptolemaic
period. I have moreover specially noted the results of the recent
excavations and discoveries made by the Egypt Exploration
Fund and by Professor Flinders Petrie, at all events where they bear
upon the subject-matter of the book. Those who have not the
publications of the Fund or of Professor Petrie, or who do not care
to carry them into Egypt, will, I believe, be glad to have the
essence of them thus extracted in a convenient shape. Lastly, in the
Appendices I have put together information which the visitor to the
Nile often wishes to obtain, but which he can find in none of his
guide-books. The Appendix on the nomes embodies the results of the
latest researches, and the list will therefore be found to differ
here and there from the lists which have been published elsewhere.
Those who desire the assistance of maps should procure the very handy
and complete Atlas
of Ancient Egypt,
published by the Egypt Exploration Fund (price 3s. 6d.). It makes the
addition of maps to this or any future work on Ancient Egypt
superfluous.Discoveries
follow so thickly one upon the other in these days of active
exploration that it is impossible for an author to keep pace
with them. Since my manuscript was ready for the press Dr. Naville,
on behalf of the Egypt Exploration Fund, has practically cleared the
magnificent temple of Queen Hatshepsu at Dêr el-Bâhari, and has
discovered beneath it the unfinished sepulchre in which the queen
fondly hoped that her body would be laid; Professor Petrie has
excavated in the desert behind Zawêdeh and opposite Qoft the tombs
of barbarous tribes, probably of Libyan origin, who settled in the
valley of the Nile between the fall of the sixth and the rise of the
eleventh dynasty; Mr. de Morgan has disinterred more jewellery of
exquisite workmanship from the tombs of the princesses of the twelfth
dynasty at Dahshûr; and Dr. Botti has discovered the site of the
Serapeum at Alexandria, thus obtaining for the first time a point of
importance for determining the topography of the ancient city.The
people whose remains have been found by Professor Petrie buried their
dead in open situated in the central court. But his most
interesting discovery is that of long subterranean passages, once
faced with masonry, and furnished with niches for lamps, where the
mysteries of Serapis were celebrated. At the entrance of one of them
pious visitors to the shrine have scratched their vows on the wall of
rock. Those who are interested in the discovery should consult Dr.
Botti's memoir on
L'Acropole d'Alexandrie et le Sérapeum,
presented to the Archæological Society of Alexandria, 17th August
1895.Two
or three other recent discoveries may also find mention here. A
Babylonian seal-cylinder now in the Metropolitan Museum of Art at New
York has at last given me a clue to the native home of the Hyksos
leaders. This was in the mountains of Elam, on the eastern frontier
of Chaldæa. It was from these mountains that the Kassi descended
upon Babylonia and founded a dynasty there which lasted for nearly
600 years, and the same movement which brought them into Babylonia
may have sent other bands of them across Western Asia into
Egypt. At all events, the inscription upon the seal shows that it
belonged to a certain Uzi-Sutakh, “the son of the Kassite,” and
“the servant of Burna-buryas,” who was the Kassite king of
Babylonia in the age of the Tel el-Amarna correspondence. As the name
of Sutakh is preceded by the determinative of divinity, it is clear
that we have in it the name of the Hyksos deity Sutekh.In
a hieroglyphic stela lately discovered at Saqqârah, and now in the
Gizeh Museum, we read of an earlier parallel to the Tyrian Camp at
Memphis seen by Herodotos. We learn from the stela that, in the time
of King Ai, in the closing days of the eighteenth dynasty, there was
already a similar “Camp” or quarter at Memphis which was assigned
to the Hittites. The inscription is further interesting as showing
that the authority of Ai was acknowledged at Memphis, the capital of
Northern Egypt, as well as in the Thebaid.Lastly,
Professor Hommel seems to have found the name of the Zakkur
or Zakkal, the kinsfolk and associates of the Philistines, in a
broken cuneiform text which relates to one of the Kassite kings of
Babylonia not long before the epoch of Khu-n-Aten. Here mention is
made not only of the city of Arka in Phœnicia, but also of the city
of Zaqqalû. In Zaqqalû we must recognise the Zakkur of Egyptian
history. I may add that Khar or Khal, the name given by the Egyptians
to the southern portion of Palestine, is identified by Professor
Maspero with the Horites of the Old Testament.By
way of conclusion, I have only to say that those who wish to read a
detailed account of the manner in which the great colossus of Ramses
ii. at Memphis was raised and its companion statue disinterred must
refer to the Paper published by Major Arthur H. Bagnold himself in
the Proceedings
of the Society of Biblical Archæology for June 1888.
Chapter I. The Patriarchal Age.
“Abram
went down into Egypt to sojourn there.” When he entered the country
the civilisation and monarchy of Egypt were already very old. The
pyramids had been built hundreds of years before, and the origin of
the Sphinx was already a mystery. Even the great obelisk of
Heliopolis, which is still the object of an afternoon drive to the
tourist at Cairo, had long been standing in front of the temple of
the Sun-god.The
monuments of Babylonia enable us to fix the age to which Abraham
belongs. Arioch of Ellasar has left memorials of himself on the
bricks of Chaldæa, and we now know when he and his Elamite allies
were driven out of Babylonia and the Babylonian states were
united into a single monarchy. This was 2350 b.c.The
united monarchy of Egypt went back to a far earlier date. Menes, its
founder, had been king of This (or Girgeh) in Upper Egypt, and
starting from his ancestral dominions had succeeded in bringing all
Egypt under his rule. But the memory of an earlier time, when the
valley of the Nile was divided into two separate sovereignties,
survived to the latest age of the monarchy. Up to the last the
Pharaohs of Egypt called themselves “kings of the two lands,” and
wore on their heads the crowns of Upper and Lower Egypt. The crown of
Upper Egypt was a tiara of white linen, that of Lower Egypt a
throne-like head-dress of red. The double crown was a symbol of the
imperial power.To
Menes is ascribed the building of Memphis, the capital of the united
kingdom. He is said to have raised the great dyke which Linant de
Bellefonds identifies with that of Kosheish near Kafr el-Ayyât, and
thereby to have diverted the Nile from its ancient channel under the
Libyan plain. On the ground that he thus added to the western bank of
the river his new capital was erected.Memphis
is the Greek form of the old Egyptian Men-nefer or “Good Place.”
The final r
was dropped in Egyptian pronunciation at an early date, and thus arose the Hebrew forms of the name, Moph and Noph, which we find
in the Old Testament,1
while “Memphis” itself—Mimpi in the cuneiform inscriptions of
Assyria—has the same origin. Another name by which it went in old
Egyptian times was Anbu-hez, “the white wall,” from the great
wall of brick, covered with white stucco, which surrounded it, and of
which traces still remain on the northern side of the old site. Here
a fragment of the ancient fortification still rises above the mounds
of the city; the wall is many feet thick, and the sun-dried bricks of
which it is formed are bonded together with the stems of palms.
“
“
Lesen Sie weiter in der vollständigen Ausgabe!
Lesen Sie weiter in der vollständigen Ausgabe!
Lesen Sie weiter in der vollständigen Ausgabe!
Lesen Sie weiter in der vollständigen Ausgabe!
Lesen Sie weiter in der vollständigen Ausgabe!
Lesen Sie weiter in der vollständigen Ausgabe!
Lesen Sie weiter in der vollständigen Ausgabe!
Lesen Sie weiter in der vollständigen Ausgabe!
Lesen Sie weiter in der vollständigen Ausgabe!