Preface
"The
Eighteenth Brumaire of Louis Bonaparte" is one of Karl Marx'
most profound and most brilliant monographs. It may be considered the
best work extant on the philosophy of history, with an eye especially
upon the history of the Movement of the Proletariat, together with
the bourgeois and other manifestations that accompany the same, and
the tactics that such conditions dictate.The
recent populist uprising; the more recent "Debs Movement";
the thousand and one utopian and chimerical notions that are flaring
up; the capitalist maneuvers; the hopeless, helpless grasping after
straws, that characterize the conduct of the bulk of the working
class; all of these, together with the empty-headed, ominous figures
that are springing into notoriety for a time and have their day, mark
the present period of the Labor Movement in the nation a critical
one. The best information acquirable, the best mental training
obtainable are requisite to steer through the existing chaos that the
death-tainted social system of today creates all around us. To aid in
this needed information and mental training, this instructive work is
now made accessible to English readers, and is commended to the
serious study of the serious.The
teachings contained in this work are hung on an episode in recent
French history. With some this fact may detract of its value. A
pedantic, supercilious notion is extensively abroad among us that we
are an "Anglo Saxon" nation; and an equally pedantic,
supercilious habit causes many to look to England for inspiration, as
from a racial birthplace Nevertheless, for weal or for woe, there is
no such thing extant as "Anglo-Saxon"—of all nations,
said to be "Anglo-Saxon," in the United States least. What
we still have from England, much as appearances may seem to point the
other way, is not of our bone-and-marrow, so to speak, but rather
partakes of the nature of "importations." We are no more
English on account of them than we are Chinese because we all drink
tea.Of
all European nations, France is the on to which we come nearest.
Besides its republican form of government—the directness of its
history, the unity of its actions, the sharpness that marks its
internal development, are all characteristics that find their
parallel her best, and vice versa. In all essentials the study of
modern French history, particularly when sketched by such a master
hand as Marx', is the most valuable one for the acquisition of that
historic, social and biologic insight that our country stands
particularly in need of, and that will be inestimable during the
approaching critical days.For
the assistance of those who, unfamiliar with the history of France,
may be confused by some of the terms used by Marx, the following
explanations may prove aidful:On
the 18th Brumaire (Nov. 9th), the post-revolutionary development of
affairs in France enabled the first Napoleon to take a step that led
with inevitable certainty to the imperial throne. The circumstance
that fifty and odd years later similar events aided his nephew, Louis
Bonaparte, to take a similar step with a similar result, gives the
name to this work—"The Eighteenth Brumaire of Louis
Bonaparte."As
to the other terms and allusions that occur, the following sketch
will suffice:Upon
the overthrow of the first Napoleon came the restoration of the
Bourbon throne (Louis XVIII, succeeded by Charles X). In July, 1830,
an uprising of the upper tier of the bourgeoisie, or capitalist
class—the aristocracy of finance—overthrew the Bourbon throne, or
landed aristocracy, and set up the throne of Orleans, a younger
branch of the house of Bourbon, with Louis Philippe as king. From the
month in which this revolution occurred, Louis Philippe's monarchy is
called the "July Monarchy." In February, 1848, a revolt of
a lower tier of the capitalist class—the industrial
bourgeoisie—against the aristocracy of finance, in turn dethroned
Louis Philippe. The affair, also named from the month in which it
took place, is the "February Revolution". "The
Eighteenth Brumaire" starts with that event.Despite
the inapplicableness to our affairs of the political names and
political leadership herein described, both these names and
leaderships are to such an extent the products of an economic-social
development that has here too taken place with even greater sharpens,
and they have their present or threatened counterparts here so
completely, that, by the light of this work of Marx', we are best
enabled to understand our own history, to know whence we came, and
whither we are going and how to conduct ourselves.
I
Hegel
says somewhere that that great historic facts and personages recur
twice. He forgot to add: "Once as tragedy, and again as farce."
Caussidiere for Danton, Louis Blanc for Robespierre, the "Mountain"
of 1848-51 for the "Mountain" of 1793-05, the Nephew for
the Uncle. The identical caricature marks also the conditions under
which the second edition of the eighteenth Brumaire is issued.
Man
makes his own history, but he does not make it out of the whole
cloth; he does not make it out of conditions chosen by himself, but
out of such as he finds close at hand. The tradition of all past
generations weighs like an alp upon the brain of the living. At the
very time when men appear engaged in revolutionizing things and
themselves, in bringing about what never was before, at such very
epochs of revolutionary crisis do they anxiously conjure up into
their service the spirits of the past, assume their names, their
battle cries, their costumes to enact a new historic scene in such
time-honored disguise and with such borrowed language Thus did Luther
masquerade as the Apostle Paul; thus did the revolution of 1789-1814
drape itself alternately as Roman Republic and as Roman Empire; nor
did the revolution of 1818 know what better to do than to parody at
one time the year 1789, at another the revolutionary traditions of
1793-95 Thus does the beginner, who has acquired a new language, keep
on translating it back into his own mother tongue; only then has he
grasped the spirit of the new language and is able freely to express
himself therewith when he moves in it without recollections of the
old, and has forgotten in its use his own hereditary tongue.