15,49 €
Summer 1860, an elegant country house, a young boy is found dead in an outside privy. All clues point towards the murderer being a member of the grieving household. Called to the scene is the most celebrated detective of his day, Jonathan Whicher from Scotland Yard. But this case challenges him in ways he's never been challenged before. Over twenty years later, still haunted by the case, Whicher visits the murderer. As they replay the past, they start to question the nature of truth, the desire for certainty, and the possibility of redemption. This compelling stage adaptation of Kate Summerscale's gripping bestseller opened at The Watermill Theatre, Newbury, in May 2023. This ensemble piece provides rich opportunities for companies looking to intrigue their audiences with a fresh take on a dark Victorian mystery. 'A true crime classic turned into a tense drama... ingeniously plotted… Kate Summerscale's Victorian potboiler is deftly condensed in a production that brings out the misogyny and class snobbery of the era' - Guardian 'Taut and magnetic… Alexandra Wood's bold adaptation turns the book's structure on its head… electric' - The Times 'An utterly transporting piece of storytelling that will keep you gripped as it carefully carries you towards its conclusion' - Broadway World 'Powerful… a wonderfully concise retelling and reexamination of the facts… The story unfolds with pleasing clarity' - WhatsOnStage 'Alexandra Wood's dramatisation for the stage intuitively captures the atmosphere of Summerscale's book… keeps the audience on its toes, piecing together fragments of the case and steering toward a remarkable conclusion… exposes the deep-seated, class-ridden misogyny of the Victorian era' - The Stage
Das E-Book können Sie in Legimi-Apps oder einer beliebigen App lesen, die das folgende Format unterstützen:
Seitenzahl: 67
Kate Summerscale
THE SUSPICIONS OF MR WHICHER
Adapted for the stage by
Alexandra Wood
NICK HERN BOOKS
London
www.nickhernbooks.co.uk
Contents
Original Production Details
Characters
Note on the Text
The Suspicions of Mr Whicher
About the Author
Copyright and Performing Rights Information
This adaptation of The Suspicions of Mr Whicher was first performed at the Watermill Theatre, Newbury, on 5 May 2023. The cast was as follows:
MR KENT and Others
Jim Creighton
JONATHAN WHICHER
Christopher Naylor
WILLIAM and Others
Sam Liu
MISS GOUGH and Others
Robyn Sinclair
MRS KENT (NÉE MISS PRATT) and Others
Connie Walker
CONSTANCE KENT
Eleanor Wyld
BOY / DENIS
Hector Philpott
Clara Tame
Samuel Wall
Director
Kate Budgen
Designer
Amy Jane Cook
Lighting Designer
Katy Morison
Sound Designer and Composer
Beth Duke
Video Projection Designer
Rachel Sampley
Movement and Intimacy Director
Angela Gasparetto
Production Manager
Nick Flintoff
Assistant Production Manager
Alice Reddick
Costume Supervisor
Emily Barratt
Deputy Costume Supervisor
Beth Rose
Costume Maker
Ros Kitson
Company Stage Manager
Cat Pewsey
Deputy Stage Manager
Emily Stedman
Assistant Stage Manager
Natalie Toney
Placement Assistant Stage Manager
Phoebe Butcher
Head of Technical
Thom Townsend
Theatre Technician
Izzy Moore
Production Electricians
Keith Anker
Ryan Tate
Audio Description
Lixi Chivas
Set Construction
DSH Carpentry
Characters
JONATHAN WHICHER, forty-five to sixty-six
CONSTANCE KENT, five to thirty-six
MISS PRATT, twenty-eight, who becomes MRS KENT, thirty-six to forty
MR KENT, forty-seven to sixty-four
JOHN FOLEY, sixty-four
ELIZABETH GOUGH, twenty-two
WILLIAM KENT, eleven to eighteen
EDWARD KENT, eighteen
DR PARSONS, forty-five
LOUISA HATHERILL, fifteen
SARAH COX, twenty-two
PETER EDLIN, forty
GUARD BOY, three
CROWD DENIS, four
REVEREND WAGNER
KATHARINE GREAM
PASSENGER
SIR THOMAS HENRY
EMILIE, fifty-one
OLDER WILLIAM, fifty
NURSE
ARTHUR
Notes on the Text
Whicher and Constance should be played by the same two performers throughout. The other parts may be played by members of an ensemble.
The scenes should flow into one another. Constance and Whicher remain in Fulham Prison, even when they recall scenes from the past.
The sections in bold are Constance’s memories, distinct from memories of the investigation and trial. Whicher doesn’t experience these.
A forward slash ( / ) indicates a point of interruption.
A lack of punctuation at the end of a line indicates that the character cannot, or does not wish to, continue.
A line space in between sections indicates a shift in time.
This text went to press before the end of rehearsals and so may differ slightly from the play as performed.
ACT ONE
Fulham Prison, early 1881. WHICHER is sixty-six, CONSTANCE is thirty-six.
WHICHER. You’ve applied for early release three times.
CONSTANCE. I intend to apply again.
WHICHER. You believe you should be free?
CONSTANCE. I don’t believe I’m a threat.
Reverend Wagner has written on my behalf. Others have, too. They moved me here from Millbank, which was a small concession, I suppose.
WHICHER. You murdered your three-year-old brother.
CONSTANCE. I’ll never forgive myself.
But I believe I could do some good, be of some use to society now.
WHICHER. I moved to Battersea last year but before that I lived just beyond the walls of Millbank Prison.
I thought of you in there.
CONSTANCE. Do you often think about past cases?
Pause.
WHICHER. This case haunts me.
I don’t doubt your guilt, but it’s not the full truth, is it?
I don’t want to die without knowing that.
CONSTANCE. Are you dying?
WHICHER. I’m not in my prime.
Pause.
I’ve spent most of my life pursuing the Truth and it’s often felt like a game. I’ve prided myself on being able to read people, on sparring and outsmarting them, and on knowing, on knowing I’m right, on certainty, on offering people an answer and on the comfort that brings.
Certainty.
But I don’t have that here, and it makes me question whether it’s even possible, or whether I spent my life in pursuit of an illusion, in fact, whether I’ve wasted my time, whether I’ve wasted my time on this earth.
CONSTANCE. I’ve spent sixteen years in prison. My youth. I know about wasted time.
Pause.
WHICHER. I could help you.
CONSTANCE. How?
WHICHER. I could write a letter in support of your early release, like Reverend Wagner.
CONSTANCE. Why would you do that?
WHICHER. If you tell me the full truth of what happened. Just me. Just for my own
Pause.
Do you have many visitors?
Pause.
CONSTANCE. I don’t know what else I can tell you.
WHICHER. If we’re thorough, if we go through it all / with absolute
CONSTANCE. Again?
WHICHER. One last time. If we tread carefully, pay attention to the details, if we are meticulous and uncompromising, / that missing
CONSTANCE. You were all those things before.
WHICHER. that missing piece, that fullness, must be revealed.
CONSTANCE. And what if it isn’t?
WHICHER. I believe it will be.
CONSTANCE. How much is a letter from you worth now, Mr Whicher? It’s a long time since you’ve been considered the prince of detectives.
WHICHER. You’ve had three failed attempts, isn’t it worth a try?
CONSTANCE. I’ve been through it all too many times.
WHICHER. Might not a letter from the detective responsible for your case carry some weight?
You’re right, I don’t have the influence I once had. But without some new advocacy in your next appeal, how much hope can you really have?
A clap of thunder. The sounds of a storm.
The library. MISS PRATT (twenty-eight)rushes onto the stage towards MR KENT (forty-seven), who pulls her down onto his knee and kisses her. She sees CONSTANCE.
MISS PRATT. Not before the child!
MR KENT. It’s only human nature, Mary.
He kisses her again and she responds.
CONSTANCE. Where would you want to begin?
WHICHER. Monday the sixteenth of July, 1860.
CONSTANCE. Saville was already dead by then.
WHICHER. A full two weeks after the murder. But it’s only then that the local constabulary request assistance from the Metropolitan detective force.
Superintendent Foley shows me the drawing room.
FOLEY. The housemaid found the door unlocked and this window slightly open. The shutters are fastened with that bar, no one could have come in from outside, so as horrifying as it is, the murder must’ve been committed by someone in the house.
WHICHER. That’s eleven people?
FOLEY. Yes, but four of those are children, who wouldn’t be capable.
WHICHER. William is fifteen, Constance sixteen. I frequently come across children as young as eight capable of theft and deceit.
FOLEY. But murder?
WHICHER. In certain circumstances.
FOLEY. Perhaps where you’re from, detective, children are more disturbed.
In my opinion, the number of people within the house capable of carrying out such a murder is no more than six.
WHICHER. And who are they, in your opinion?
FOLEY. Samuel Kent, the boy’s father.
Mary Ann and Elizabeth, the two eldest daughters from his first marriage, although I highly doubt either of them have it in them.
Miss Gough, the nursemaid.
Miss Cox, the housemaid.
And Miss Kerslake, the cook.
WHICHER. And Mrs Kent?
FOLEY. She’s eight months pregnant. She could barely lift the boy, let alone carry him from the nursery, down the stairs, through the window, to the privy. And besides the practical impossibility, she was his devoted mother.
WHICHER. I’ve dealt with more than one case of a mother murdering her child, but at such a late stage of pregnancy, it does seem unlikely she could manage it alone.
It’s possible the window wasn’t used in the crime at all. Perhaps the murderer only opened the window so we’d think the child had been stolen away across the fields.
FOLEY. That doesn’t help us, does it? Since the child was in fact stabbed and thrown into the privy.
WHICHER. It could offer us a glimpse into the murderer’s state of mind though. If it was meant to deceive us, it suggests he or she
FOLEY. Or they.