INTRODUCTION.
CHAPTER I.
CHAPTER II.
CHAPTER III.
CHAPTER IV.
INTRODUCTION.
In
these pages I shall speak of
The Wisdom of Life
in the common meaning of the term, as the art, namely, of ordering
our lives so as to obtain the greatest possible amount of pleasure
and success; an art the theory of which may be called
Eudaemonology, for
it teaches us how to lead a happy existence. Such an existence might
perhaps be defined as one which, looked at from a purely objective
point of view, or, rather, after cool and mature reflection—for the
question necessarily involves subjective considerations,—would be
decidedly preferable to non-existence; implying that we should cling
to it for its own sake, and not merely from the fear of death; and
further, that we should never like it to come to an end.Now
whether human life corresponds, or could possibly correspond, to this
conception of existence, is a question to which, as is well-known, my
philosophical system returns a negative answer. On the eudaemonistic
hypothesis, however, the question must be answered in the
affirmative; and I have shown, in the second volume of my chief work
(ch. 49), that this hypothesis is based upon a fundamental mistake.
Accordingly, in elaborating the scheme of a happy existence, I have
had to make a complete surrender of the higher metaphysical and
ethical standpoint to which my own theories lead; and everything I
shall say here will to some extent rest upon a compromise; in so far,
that is, as I take the common standpoint of every day, and embrace
the error which is at the bottom of it. My remarks, therefore, will
possess only a qualified value, for the very word
eudaemonology is a
euphemism. Further, I make no claims to completeness; partly because
the subject is inexhaustible, and partly because I should otherwise
have to say over again what has been already said by others.The
only book composed, as far as I remember, with a like purpose to that
which animates this collection of aphorisms, is Cardan's
De utilitate ex adversis capienda,
which is well worth reading, and may be used to supplement the
present work. Aristotle, it is true, has a few words on eudaemonology
in the fifth chapter of the first book of his
Rhetoric; but what
he says does not come to very much. As compilation is not my
business, I have made no use of these predecessors; more especially
because in the process of compiling, individuality of view is lost,
and individuality of view is the kernel of works of this kind. In
general, indeed, the wise in all ages have always said the same
thing, and the fools, who at all times form the immense majority,
have in their way too acted alike, and done just the opposite; and so
it will continue. For, as Voltaire says,
we shall leave this world as foolish and as wicked as we found it on
our arrival.
CHAPTER I.
DIVISION
OF THE SUBJECT.
Aristotle[1]
divides the blessings of life into three classes—those which come
to us from without, those of the soul, and those of the body. Keeping
nothing of this division but the number, I observe that the
fundamental differences in human lot may be reduced to three distinct
classes:
[Footnote
1: Eth. Nichom.,
I. 8.]
(1)
What a man is: that is to say, personality, in the widest sense of
the word; under which are included health, strength, beauty,
temperament, moral character, intelligence, and education.