The Angel of the West Window - Gustav Meyrink - E-Book

The Angel of the West Window E-Book

Gustav Meyrink

0,0

Beschreibung

Occult historical novel about the Elizabethan magus John Dee. A complex and ambitious novel which centres on the life of the Elizabethan magus, John Dee, in England, Poland and Prague, as it intertwines past and present, dreams and visions, myth and reality in a world of the occult, culminating in the transmutation of physical reality into a higher spiritual existence. it was awarded The Occult Book of the Year and it will appeal to anyone interested in the occult, John Dee and Elizabethan era.

Sie lesen das E-Book in den Legimi-Apps auf:

Android
iOS
von Legimi
zertifizierten E-Readern
Kindle™-E-Readern
(für ausgewählte Pakete)

Seitenzahl: 702

Veröffentlichungsjahr: 2012

Das E-Book (TTS) können Sie hören im Abo „Legimi Premium” in Legimi-Apps auf:

Android
iOS
Bewertungen
0,0
0
0
0
0
0
Mehr Informationen
Mehr Informationen
Legimi prüft nicht, ob Rezensionen von Nutzern stammen, die den betreffenden Titel tatsächlich gekauft oder gelesen/gehört haben. Wir entfernen aber gefälschte Rezensionen.



THE TRANSLATOR

For many years an academic with a special interest in Austrian literature and culture, Mike Mitchell has been a freelance literary translator since 1995.

He is one of Dedalus’s editorial directors and is responsible for the Dedalus translation programme.

He has published over fifty translations from German and French, including Gustav Meyrink’s five novels and The Dedalus Book of Austrian Fantasy.

His translation of Rosendorfer’s Letters Back to Ancient China won the 1998 Schlegel-Tieck Translation Prize after he had been shortlisted in previous years for his translations of Stephanie by Herbert Rosendorfer and The Golem by Gustav Meyrink.

His translations have been shortlisted three times for The Oxford Weidenfeld Translation Prize: Simplicissimus by Johann Grimmelshausen in 1999, The Other Side by Alfred Kubin in 2000 and The Bells of Bruges by Georges Rodenbach in 2008.

His biography of Gustav Meyrink: Vivo: The Life of Gustav Meyrink was published by Dedalus in November 2008.

His website can be visited at homepages.phonecoop.coop/mjmitchell

CONTENTS

Title

The Translator

Introduction

My New Novel

The Angel of the West Window

Assja Shotokalungin

Private Diary

The First Vision

The Second Vision

By the Same Author

Copyright

INTRODUCTION

Gustav Meyrink (1868-1932) came relatively late to literature. He began his first story in a sanatorium, where he was convalescing from tuberculosis, in 1901. It was published that year in the famous satirical magazine, Simplicissimus, and was the first of many short stories in which he combined fantasy and humour with biting satire of the complacency of the pre-war bourgeoisie. His first – and best-known – novel, Der Golem, appeared in a magazine in 1913; in its book form published in 1915 it was an immediate success. Three more novels followed in the next few years: Das grüne Gesicht (The Green Face) 1916, Walpurgisnacht 1917 and Der Weiße Dominikaner (The White Dominican) 1921. In the 1920s he largely abandoned his own creative work to edit mystical and occult writings, an activity which was the product of his profound personal interest in the occult. Like his hero, John Dee, Meyrink in his own life experienced the suspicions and rumours which preoccupation with the occult engenders; indeed, he may well have encouraged them in his early years. During the war he was attacked both by the pen and by stones thrown at his house, though these attacks were probably directed more at his satire than at his occult tendencies. Der Engel vom westlichen Fenster was his last novel and appeared in 1927 when he was already beginning to be plagued by both health and financial problems. It, too, derives from his studies of the occult and is his longest and most complex work.

It is said that Meyrink’s first story was thrown into the waste paper basket at the Simplicissimus offices, whence it was retrieved by the editor, Ludwig Thoma. This is probably a legend, but so many of the real facts of Meyrink’s own life were fantastic that he is the type of person around whom legends gather. He was born in Vienna, the illegitimate son of an actress, Maria Meyer, and an aristocrat in the service of the King of Württemberg, Karl Freiherr von Varnbüler. Later rumours that he had royal blood in his veins were not discouraged by Meyrink. (Meyrink was originally a pseudonym; in 1917 he adopted it as his real name.)

Although the difference in status made a marriage out of the question, his father paid for his education. Most of his schooling took place in Munich but was completed in Prague, where his mother had moved in 1883. In the twenty-three years he lived there, until he moved to Bavaria in 1906, he became a well-known figure, above all as a dandy and man-about-town capable of outrageous behaviour. He followed the principle of épater le bourgeois in practice long before it became the dominant tone of his writing. Although he only settled in Prague as an adult, the city and, above all, the atmosphere of mystery about its old streets was a determining factor behind his writing, even after he had moved away. Meyrink was probably the author who more than any other created the romantic image of Prague which played an important role in the German literature and cinema of the first decades of this century. (Others were the young Rilke and Kafka, with whom this image of Prague is now mostly associated.)

In 1889 he founded a bank (was it mere chance that his partner was the nephew of the German poet, Christian Morgenstern, who mingled nonsense humour with mysticism?). He married in 1892 but later had an affair with Philomena Bernt, whom he eventually married (in Dover, a kind of continental Gretna) after he had finally managed to get a divorce in 1905. This affair caused one of the many scandals he was involved in. Meyrink challenged two officers to a duel but they, afraid of his reputation as an outstanding swordsman, refused on the grounds that he was illegitimate and therefore not satisfaktionsfähig, whereupon Meyrink challenged the whole officers’ corps. In the same year, 1902, came the events that led to the ruin of his business. Meyrink was accused, by an official he had attacked in the press, of using spiritualism to influence his clients, especially female ones. He spent almost three months in goal before his name was cleared, by which time the bank had collapsed. His blossoming career as a writer was an important source of income, though he did find other work at times, most congenially, perhaps, as a representative for a champagne producer.

Meyrink’s interest in the occult was aroused by another of those incidents which are almost too good to be true and in which his life was so rich. In 1891 he suffered a nervous breakdown; his decision to commit suicide was overturned by an occultist leaflet which was pushed under his door. Whether this is fact or part of the self-created legend, what is certainly true is that from that time onward he showed an active interest in all aspects of the occult. Some of that interest was scientific and scholarly: he exposed tricksters and false mediums, carried out alchemical experiments and published critical editions of mystical texts. But he was also interested in mysticism as a practical art and as a counter to the prevailing materialism and positivism. He took hallucinatory drugs, practised yoga and studied Eastern philosophy. In the same year as the publication of his final novel he became a Buddhist.

*

The Angel of the West Window is a fictional summation of Meyrink’s preoccupation with the occult, but not in any simple, direct way. The reader should not look to it for a message, for, say, Meyrink’s final distillation of the wisdom of the mystics. Many of the theories and ideas he would have come across in his researches are there, it is true. But none is presented as the sole key to knowledge. They all contribute to his portrayal of the search which is all we can know of the ultimate goal. Through the fictional world he has created, Meyrink is trying to convey to the reader the sense of a reality where, as one commentator puts it, “everything is different from outward appearances, but only the outward appearances are accessible” (Marianne Wünsch). It is a comment that is also frequently made about the world of Meyrink’s contemporary, Franz Kafka.

The two main characters of The Angel of the West Window, the historical figure from the age of Queen Elizabeth, John Dee, and his fictional modern descendant, the narrator, both pursue a tightrope course between normally distinct categories which merge and separate in varying constellations. Male and female, for example, are on one level distinct: the symbol of the male blood line of the Dees is the suitably phallic spear of Hywel Dda, whilst at the end Jane “takes the woman’s road of sacrifice”; and in the transcendental sphere where the novel ends there are separate male and female realms. On another level, however, they intermingle: the narrator’s mystical marriage with “Elisabeth” is a union with the female element dormant within himself which produces the self-enclosed whole which has echoes of both incest and hermaphroditism; “the Queen is within me, I am within the Queen: child, husband and father from the very beginning. ... Woman no more! Man no more!” This ambiguity – in which opposites can be distinct and at the same time merge, can be external to the hero and at the same time are situated within him – appears in the theme of sex which is an undercurrent running through much of the novel. The woman who is the eternal temptress of man appears in different guises with different names which are all variants of the same basic form: Isaïs, Sissy, Assja. Jane/Johanna appears to be a counter-figure embodying self-sacrificing love. But it is the erotic that attracts Kelley to Johanna, and when the narrator calls on Jane his cry is intercepted by Assja because, Lipotin tells him, ‘Jane’ represents his “vital erotic energy”. The distinctions are further blurred by the fact that ‘love’ and ‘hate’ are also closely related; the succubus, Assja, feeds on the hatred that the narrator thinks will protect him from her. He succumbs to the succubus and yet is saved. In another reversal of expectation, what looks like the road to destruction turns out to be a detour that leads to his goal.

The conclusion is not explicable in neatly rational terms, in terms of good v. evil and the ultimate triumph of the former confirming a one-dimensional moral universe. Rather, Meyrink’s universe is multi-layered and different ‘worlds’ exist alongside, interlinked with, each other. The hero’s triumph is not that he overcomes evil, but that he recognises himself and fulfils his destiny within his own allotted sphere. Instead of being “erased from the Book of Life”, which was the threat posed by Isaïs, the entelechy that is both the narrator and John Dee becomes a link in the great chain of being.

*

If Meyrink’s own life was full of fantastic episodes, then this was even more the case with the person he chose as the central figure of his last novel: the life of John Dee was so remarkable that Meyrink had to invent little. John Dee was one of the outstanding scholars of the Elizabethan age, especially in the field of mathematics and related disciplines. Meyrink even makes him less of a prodigy than he was: born in 1527, he went up to Cambridge in 1542 and in 1550 was lecturing to the assembled scholars of the Sorbonne on geometry and was offered a permanent post there. At that time the occult and the natural sciences were not as rigidly separated as today. Dee was an astrologer and hermeticist and gradually became more and more involved in alchemy and crystallomancy. He fell under the influence of an obviously very plausible rogue called Kelley, travelled the continent looking for noble and regal patrons – they included Count Lasky, the Emperor Rudolf, the King of Poland and Count Rosenberg – and finally returned to England where he died in poverty in 1608.

Beside his scientific works, Dee published a self-justificatory pamphlet which included a biography; he also kept minutes of the séances (which he called “actions”) in which he called up various spirits. Meyrink has used a wealth of this material, from the main events of Dee’s life down to minute details. Thus the historical Dee was imprisoned by Bishop Bonner (on suspicion of using magic to assassinate Queen Mary – in the novel Dee is imprisoned under King Edward); in prison he shared a cell with a certain “Barthlett Grene” whom Meyrink builds up into an important character. The first protestant martyr under Mary was John Rogers – is that where Meyrink took the name for the narrator’s cousin?. Dee briefly mentions a “Moschovite” he encountered – whom Meyrink turns into the figure of Mascee. The biography also briefly mentions someone called Gardner who “declared to me a certayn great philosophicall secret of a spirituall creature”; in the séance minutes one of the many mysterious statements from the spirits is “The Tree is sprung of a graft” and another, “He that is before is a Gardener”. From this kind of material Meyrink builds up the mysterious figure of Gärtner/Gardner, the imagery of the rose-trees and grafting and the whole mystic brotherhood into which the hero is taken up after his death. The real Kelley had had his ears cut off (for counterfeiting) before he met Dee, he was knighted by the Emperor Rudolf and he did die when he fell while attempting to escape from prison. He did also lust after Dee’s young (second) wife, but the details of that episode are stranger than Meyrink’s version: Kelley transmitted (invented?) orders from the Angel that they were to have all things in common, including their wives (Kelley was also married). When Dee demurred, he refused to take part in any more séances and left. After a while he returned and Dee had become so desperate for Kelley’s clairvoyant skills that he agreed to the wife-swapping arrangement; they even drew up a contract for a mariage à quatre which Meric Casaubon included in his edition of Dee’s records of his séances, A True and Faithful Relation of What passed for many Yeers Between Dr John Dee ... and Some Spirits published in 1659.

*

In The Angel of the West Window there is a great difference between those parts of Dee’s life that take place in England and those that are set in Prague. The Castle of Mortlake could be a castle anywhere, it is merely the indistinct background to Dee’s experiments in alchemy and spirit-raising. Prague, on the other hand, is so vivid – both visually and in atmosphere – that is it almost a protagonist in the story. The castles of Hradcany and Karlštejn have a physical presence lacking in any of the English settings, a presence as powerful and as brooding as anything in Der Golem. The same is true of the two monarchs: both have an incalculable capriciousness, both rule in an atmosphere of suspicion, but whilst we see this in Elizabeth merely through Dee’s complaints about the way he is treated, in Rudolf it is there in the detailed physical description (including the famous Habsburg lip) and the repeated image of the bird of prey. Even today one can follow Dee and Kelley round those of the streets of old Prague that still survive, along the Street of the Alchemists, say, or through the Old Town Square. The Ghetto, where he goes to visit Rabbi Löw (who is also one of the main figures in Der Golem) has disappeared, but lives on in the imagination through its recreation by writers such as Meyrink. In spite of the figure of John Dee, The Angel of the West Window belongs to Prague, not to Prague the Czech capital. but to that Prague of the mind where the “other” world seems to make its presence tangible and in the creation of which Meyrink’s stories and novels played the most important role.

My New Novel

Sir John Dee of Gladhill! A name that few people will ever have heard of! It was about 25 years ago that I first read the story of his life – a life so adventurous, so fantastic, so moving and terrible that I have never found anything to compare with it. The account so etched itself on my soul that as a romantic young man I used to wander up to the Street of the Alchemists on the castle hill in Prague and daydream of John Dee coming out of one of the dilapidated doors of the crooked little houses and speaking to me of the mysteries of alchemy; not of the alchemy by which man seeks to solve the riddle of how to make gold from base metals, but of the occult art by which he strives to transform himself from mortal clay into a being that will never lose its self-awareness. There were months on end when the figure of John Dee seemed to have been purged from my memory, but then, often in dreams, it would reappear, distinct, clear and ineradicable. These dreams were rare but regular, not unlike the 29 February in a leap year that you have to imagine composed of four separate quarters before you can call it a whole day. We are all the slaves of our ideas, not their creators, and later, when I became a writer, I knew for certain that John Dee would not leave me in peace until I had resolved to record his life-story in a novel. It is now two years since I made the “resolve” to start the novel. But whenever I sat down at my desk I would hear an inner voice mocking me, “You’re going to write a historical novel?! Don’t you realise that all historical material gives off the stench of the grave, a sickening smell of mouldy feathers with nothing of the freshness of the living present?!”

But as often as I decided to give up the plan, “John Dee” would call me back to the work, however much I tried to resist. Finally I solved the problem by hitting on the idea of interweaving the story of a living, contemporary figure with that of the “dead” John Dee, of making the work a double novel, so to speak. – – Am I that living, contemporary figure? The answer could be yes or no. They say an artist painting a portrait always involuntarily puts something of his own face into the picture. It is probably the same with writers.

Who was John Dee? That is what the book is about. Suffice it to say he was a favourite of Queen Elizabeth of England. He advised her to make Greenland – and North America – subject to the English crown. The plan had been approved, the military were waiting for orders, but at the last minute the capricious Queen changed her mind. The map of the world would look different today if she had followed Dee’s advice! At the failure of the plan on which he had set his whole life, Dee decided to conquer a different country from the terrestrial “Greenland”, a country beyond the imagination of most people today, a “country” whose existence is mocked today just as much as “America” was at the time of Columbus. John Dee set off for this country, as unwavering in his determination as Columbus. But his journey took him farther, much farther than Columbus, and was more wearisome, more gruesome, more gruelling. The bare recorded facts of Dee’s life are harrowing enough, how much more harrowing must the experiences have been of which we know nothing? Leibnitz mentions him, but history has decided to ignore him: it prefers to categorise anything it cannot understand as “mad”. But I take the liberty of believing that John Dee was quite the opposite of “mad”.

One thing is certain: John Dee was one of the greatest scholars of his age; there was no monarch in Europe who would not have welcomed him at his court. Emperor Rudolph brought him to Prague where, according to legend, he made gold from lead. But, as I have already indicated, his most fervent endeavours were not directed towards the transmutation of metals but towards another kind of transmutation. What that is I have tried to demonstrate in my novel.

(Gustav Meyrink, printed in Der Bücherwurm, Leipzig, 1927, no. 8, p. 236-238.)

THE ANGEL OF THE WEST WINDOW

A strange feeling: this packet I am holding in my hand was all neatly tied up and sealed by a dead man! It is as if fine, invisible threads, delicate as a spider’s web, lead out from it into a dark realm.

The complex pattern of the string, the care with which the blue wrapping paper has been folded – it all bears silent witness to the purposeful designs of a living man sensing the approach of death: he gathers together letters, notes, caskets filled with once vital matters that already belong to the past, suffused with memories that have long since faded, and he arranges them and wraps them up with half a thought for his future heir, for that distant, almost unknown person – me – who will know of his death and who will hear of it at the moment when this sealed packet, left to find its way in the realm of the living, reaches the hand it is destined for.

It is sealed with the massive red seals of my cousin, John Roger, bearing the arms of my mother’s family. For years this son of my mother’s brother had always been referred to by aged kinswomen as ‘the last of his line’. To my ears this description sounded like a solemn title, especially when added to his foreign-sounding name with the strange, somewhat ridiculous pride of those thin, wrinkled lips which coughed out the last breath of a dying line.

This family tree – in my brooding imagination the heraldic image grows to monstrous proportions – has stretched its grotesquely gnarled branches over distant lands. Its roots were in Scotland and it sprouted all over England; it is said to be blood-kin to one of the oldest houses in Wales. Vigorous shoots established themselves in Sweden, in America and, finally, in Germany and Styria. Everywhere the branches have withered; in Britain the trunk rotted. Here alone, in southern Austria, one last shoot sprouted – my cousin John Roger. And this last shoot was strangled by England.

How my grandfather on my mother’s side – ‘His Lordship’, as he liked to be called – had clung to the name and tradition of his ancestors! He, who was nothing but a dairy farmer in Styria! My cousin, John Roger, had followed other paths, had studied science, become a doctor and dabbled in psychopathology, travelling far and wide, to Vienna and Zurich, to Aleppo and Madras, to Alexandria and Turin, to learn from the foremost authorities about the depths of the human psyche. He visited them all, the licensed and the licentious, caring not whether their shirts were stiff with western starch or oriental grime.

He had moved to England a few years before the outbreak of the war. There he is said to have pursued his researches into the origin and fate of our line. The reason is unknown to me, but a persistent rumour had it that he was on the trail of some strange, deep secret. He was surprised there by the war. As an Austrian reserve lieutentant he was interned. When he came out of the camps five years later he was a broken man; he never crossed the Channel again and died somewhere in London, leaving a few meagre possessions which are now scattered amongst various members of the family.

My portion, besides a few mementos, is the parcel which arrived today; it bears, in angular handwriting, my name.

The family tree is withered, the escutcheon shattered.

That was just an idle thought. There was no King of Arms to perform this sombre ceremony over the family vault.

The escutcheon is shattered – the words I said softly to myself as I broke the red wax. No more will anyone use that seal.

It is a magnificent coat of arms that I am breaking. Breaking? Strange, I suddenly feel as if that word is a lie.

It is true that I am breaking up the coat of arms, but, who knows: perhaps I am just waking it from a long sleep! The shield is split at the foot; in the right-hand, azure field is a silver sword thrust vertically into a green hill, representing the ancestral manor of Gladhill in Worcestershire; on the left in a field of argent is a tree in leaf with a silver spring gushing forth from between its roots, representing Mortlake in Middlesex; and on the forked field – vert – above the foot there is a light in the shape of an early Christian lamp. The last is an unusual heraldic device, which has always puzzled the experts.

I hesitate before breaking off the last, beautifully clear seal; it is such a pleasure to look at! But what is this?! That is not the burning lamp above the foot of the escutcheon! It’s a crystal! A regular dodecahedron surrounded by a sunburst of rays? No dull oil-lamp, then, but a radiant jewel!

And again I am gripped by a strange sensation: I feel as if some memory is trying to force its way up into consciousness, a memory that has been sleeping for ... centuries, yes, for centuries.

How did this precious stone come to be in the coat of arms? And look, a tiny inscription around it? I take my magnifying glass and read, “Lapis sacer sanctificatus et praecipuus manifestationis.”

With a shake of the head I examine this incomprehensible modification of the familiar coat of arms. That is a stamp that I have certainly never seen! Either my cousin, John Roger, had a second signet in his possession or – – now it’s clear: the sharp cut is unmistakably modern. John Roger must have had a new ring made in London. But, why? The oil-lamp! It suddenly seems so obvious it’s almost ridiculous. The oil-lamp was never anything other than a late, baroque corruption, the escutcheon was always meant to bear a shining rock crystal! But what can the inscription around mean? Curious how the crystal seems so well-known to me, inwardly familiar, so to speak. Rock crystal! I know there is an old tale of a lustrous jewel shining from above, but I have forgotten the tale.

Hesitantly I break the last seal and untie the parcel. Out tumble ancient letters, documents, deeds, excerpts, yellowing parchments covered with Rosicrucian cyphers, pictures with hermetic pandects, some half-decayed, a few volumes bound in pigskin with old copper engravings, all kinds of notebooks tied up together; then there are some ivory caskets full of marvellous antiques: coins, pieces of wood mounted like relics in silver and gold leaf, pieces of bone and specimens of the best Devon coal, iridescent and cut into facets like a gem-stone, and more of the like. On top, a note in the stiff, angular handwriting of John Roger:

Read or read not! Burn or preserve! Ashes to ashes and dust to dust! We of the line of Hywel Dda, Princes of Wales, are dead. – – Mascee.

I spent many hours yesterday musing on the fate of my cousin John Roger and on the transience of human hopes and of things material. It was well on into the night when I rose from my desk; I decided to leave a detailed inventory of the legacy until the next day. I went to bed and was soon asleep.

The thought of the crystal must have pursued me into my sleep; I cannot recall ever having had such a strange dream as visited me that night.

The crystal was hovering somewhere in the darkness above me. A dull ray emanating from it struck my forehead and I had a clear sensation that this established some significant relationship between my head and the stone. I felt afraid, and tried to withdraw by turning my head from side to side, but I could not escape the ray of light. And as I twisted and turned my head I had a disconcerting sensation: it seemed to me that the ray from the crystal was playing on my forehead even when I buried my face in the pillows. And I clearly felt the back of my head take on the form of the front – a second face was growing out of the crown of my head. – I felt no terror; it was merely a nuisance because it meant I could not avoid the ray of light any more.

The head of Janus, I thought. Even in my dream I knew that was merely a half-remembered scrap of knowledge from the Latin classes at school, yet I hoped that would be the end of it. But it would not leave me in peace. Janus? Nonsense, it wasn’t Janus. But what was it, then? With irritating obstinacy that “What then?” kept running through my dream, even though I could not seem to remember who I was. Instead, something else happened: slowly, slowly the crystal floated down from the heights above me and came close to the top of my head. And I had the feeling that the stone was something alien to me, so utterly alien that I could not put it into words. Some object from a distant galaxy could not have been more alien. – I don’t know why, when I think of the dream now, I think of the dove that descended from heaven when Jesus was baptised by John.

– – The nearer the crystal came, the more it shone directly down onto my head; that is: onto the line where my two heads met. And gradually I started to feel an icy burning there. And this feeling – which was not even unpleasant – woke me up. – – –

I spent the whole of the following morning pondering over the dream.

Hesitantly and with great difficulty I prised a fragment of memory loose from the rock face of the past: a recollection of a conversation, of a story, of something I had thought up or read – or whatever – in which a crystal occurred and a face – but it was not called “Janus”. A half faded vision rose before my mind’s eye:

When I was still a child my grandfather – the noble Lord who was, in fact, only a Styrian farmer – used to take me on his knee to play ride-a-cock-horse, and at the same time he would tell me all sorts of stories in a hushed voice.

All my childhood memories of fairy-tales are set on my Grandfather’s knee – he was almost a fairy-tale figure himself. And Grandfather told me of a dream. “Dreams”, he said, “are a stronger legal title than any parchment or fee simple. Always remember that. If you are to be a real heir, then, one day perhaps, I will bequeath our dream to you: the dream of the son of Hywel Dda.” And then, in a low, mysterious voice, as if he were afraid the very air in the room might be listening, close to my ear and yet still jogging me up and down on his knee, he told me of a jewel in a land where no living man could go, unless he were accompanied by one who had overcome death; and of a crown of gold and crystal on the double head of, of – – –? I think I remember him talking of this double-headed dream creature as of an ancestor or a family spirit, but then my memory fails entirely. Everything is blurred in a misty light.

I never had a dream of that kind until – until last night! – Was that the dream of the sons of Hywel Dda?

There was no point in going on brooding about it. Anyway, I was interrupted by a visit from my friend Sergei Lipotin, the old art dealer from the Werrengasse.

Lipotin – in the city he is known by his nickname of “Nitchevo” – was formerly Antiquary to the Czar, and is still an impressive old gentleman, in spite of the dismal fate that has befallen him. Once a millionaire, a connoisseur, an expert in Asiatic art with a world-wide reputation – now a back-street dealer in junk chinoiserie, marked by death and hardly able to make ends meet, he is still a czarist to the core. I owe a number of rare pieces in my possession to his infallible judgement. And, strange to say, whenever I am gripped by the desire for some special objet which seems inaccessible, Lipotin appears and brings me something in that line.

Today, as I had nothing more remarkable to hand, I showed him my cousin’s consignment from London. He was full of praise for some of the old prints; “Rarissima” he called them, using a favourite phrase of his. There were also a few objects in the manner of medallions which aroused his interest: “Solid German Renaissance work, above average quality.” Finally he examined John Roger’s coat of arms, gave a gasp of surprise and gazed at it abstractedly. I asked him what it was that had excited him. He shrugged his shoulders, lit a cigarette and said nothing.

We chatted about unimportant matters. Just before he left he casually remarked, “Did you know that our old friend, Michael Arangelovitch Stroganoff, is unlikely to survive the last packet of cigarettes he bought. It is for the best. What has he left to pawn? No matter. It is an end we shall all come to. We Russians are like the sun – we rise in the East and go down in the West. Farewell!”

Lipotin went. I mused on what he had told me. Michael Stroganoff, the old Baron I had first met in the coffee house, was about to cross over into the green realm of the dead, into the green land of Persephone. Since I have known him he has lived on tea and cigarettes. He arrived here after his flight from Russia with nothing but what he could carry on his person, half a dozen diamond rings and about the same number of gold pocket watches – all that he had been able to stuff into his pockets when he broke through the Bolshevik picket line. From the proceeds of these jewels he lived a carefree life in the grand manner. He smoked only the most expensive cigarettes, specially imported from the East; who knows what hands they passed through before reaching him. “To let the things of this earth go up in smoke,” he used to say, “is perhaps the only favour we can do God.” At the same time he was slowly starving to death; and whenever he was not sitting in Lipotin’s little shop he was freezing in his tiny attic somewhere in the suburbs.

So Baron Stroganoff, former Imperial ambassador to Teheran, is on his deathbed. “No matter. It is all for the best,” Lipotin had said. With a mindless sigh to the empty air, I turn to the books and manuscripts of John Roger.

I pick out this and that at random and start to read. – – –

I have spent the whole day rummaging through the documents John Roger has left me and the outcome is that it seems pointless to try to arrange these scraps of ancient records and antiquarian studies into any kind of ordered whole – it is rubble and no effort can reconstruct the building it came from! I seem to hear a voice whispering, “Read and burn. Ashes to ashes, dust to dust!”

Why should I care about this story of a certain John Dee, Lord of the Manor of Gladhill? Just because he was an old Englishman with an idée fixe who may have been one of my mother’s ancestors?

But I cannot bring myself to throw the rubbish away. There are times when things have greater power over us than we over them; perhaps they are more alive than we and are just shamming lifelessness? I cannot even bring myself to stop reading. I do not know why, but the musty pages tighten their grip on me with every hour. The jumble of fragments begins to sort itself into a picture which emerges, sad yet splendid, from the mists of time: the portrait of a man, high-minded and fearfully betrayed; radiant in the morning of life, dimmed by the gathering clouds at midday, mocked and persecuted, nailed to the cross, refreshed with vinegar mingled with gall, cast down into hell and yet one of the elect, called to delight in the mysteries of heaven with all noble souls, a steadfast witness to his faith, a loving spirit.

No! The story of John Dee, a late descendant of one of the oldest houses of these Islands, of the old Welsh Princes, an ancestor of my mother’s line – that story shall not be lost for ever!

But I realise that I cannot write it as I would wish. I lack almost all the necessary background, especially the great knowledge my cousin enjoyed in those sciences which some call the occult and others think they can brush aside with the word “parapsychology”. In such matters I lack experience and judgement. The best I can do is to sort these scattered fragments and order them according to some clear plan: in the words of my cousin, John Roger, “to preserve and pass them on”.

The result will surely be a mosaic with pieces missing. But does not the fragment often exert a stronger attraction than the complete picture? The way the curve of a smile breaks off to continue in the crease of a tormented brow – an enigma; the eye still staring out when the forehead is missing – an enigma; the sudden blaze of crimson from the crumbling wall – enigmas, enigmas ...

It will take weeks, if not months, of meticulous work to bring some order to this tangle of already half-decaying documents. I hesitate: should I undertake it? If I felt certain that some inner spirit was compelling me to it, I would refuse out of pure contrariness and send up the whole bundle in smoke to ... “to do the good Lord a favour”.

I keep on thinking of poor Baron Michael Arangelovich Stroganoff, who will not even finish his packet of cigarettes – perhaps because God has scruples about allowing one man to do him too many favours. Today the dream with the jewel returned. Everything followed the same pattern except that the icy feeling as the crystal came down over my double head caused me no pain, so that I did not wake up this time. I’m not sure whether it had anything to do with the fact that it finally touched the top of my head, but, at the very moment when the beam of light illuminated both faces equally, I saw that I was the double-headed man and yet, at the same time, was another person: I saw myself – that is, the “Janus” – move both lips of the face on one side of the head whilst those on the other side remained motionless. It was the silent one that was the “real” me. For a long time the “other” made great efforts to produce a sound. It was as if he was struggling to find some word from the depths of sleep.

Finally a breath came from the lips, wafting the words through the air towards me:

“Order not! Do not presume! Where reason imposes its order it dams up the fountainhead and opens the way to ruin. Let me guide your hand as you read so you bring not destruction. – Let – me – guide – –”

I could feel the torment that the effort of speaking caused my “other” head; it was probably that that woke me up.

I don’t know what to think. What is going on? Is there a ghost somewhere inside me? Does some phantom from a dream want to come into my life? Is my consciousness about to split, am I becoming ... “ill”? For the moment I am sure I am perfectly healthy and whilst awake I do not feel the least temptation to grow a second face; even less do I feel under some “compulsion” to act or think in a certain way. I am completely master of my emotions and of my will: I am free!

Another fragment of memory from the ride-a-cock-horse conversations with my grandfather surfaces: he told me that the family spirit in the dream was mute but that one day it would speak. That would mean the end of time for our bloodline; the crown would no longer hover above the head but shine forth from the double brow.

Is the “Janus” about to speak? Has the end of time come for our line? Am I the last heir of Hywel Dda?

No matter; the words that are lodged in my memory are clear:

“Let me guide as you read!” And: “Reason dams up the fountainhead.” – – – So be it; I shall obey. But no, no, it cannot be an order, otherwise I would refuse; I will not submit to orders. It must be advice, yes, yes, advice – merely advice! And why should I not follow the advice? I will not order the material. I will record whatever comes to hand.

So at random I picked up a sheet bearing the angular handwriting of my cousin, John Roger, and read:

It is all long past. All the figures whose desires and passions mark these fateful records and in whose dust and decay I, John Roger, now venture to delve are long since dead. They too disturbed the ashes of others who were then long dead.

What is dead? What is past? All that once was thought or moved is still thought and motion – might and power live on! Not one of us, though, has found what he sought – the true key to the treasure-house of life, the secret key, the search for which makes all life meaningful and worthwhile. Who has seen the crown with the crystal above it? What have we found, we that sought – only misfortune and the sight of death: yet we were promised death should be overcome! The key must lie deep beneath the waters. Who dares not dive down will never recover it. Was not the end of time prophesied to our bloodline? None of us has seen the last day. Was that our joy? It was also our guilt.

Often as I tried to conjure them up, I have never seen the twin faces. My eyes have never beheld the crystal. So be it: as we make our inexorable journey to the land of the dead we will never more see the light as it rises – unless the Devil himself twist our heads round on our necks. Whoever would rise, must first descend, for only then can the bottom-most rise to the top. But to which of us of John Dee’s blood came the voice of the Baphomet?

John Roger.

The name “Baphomet” hit me like a hammer blow.

By all the saints – the Baphomet! – Yes, that was the name I could not remember! That is the head with the crown and twin faces, that is my grandfather’s family dream god! That was the name he had whispered in my ear, with rhythmic emphasis, as if he wanted to hammer something into my soul whilst the child I had been was riding a cock horse on his knee:

Baphomet? Baphomet!

But who is Baphomet?

He is the arcane symbol of the ancient and secret Order of the Knights Templar. He is the essence of that otherness which is closer to the Templars than the immediate physical world; he is and remains an unknown deity.

Were the Lords of the Manor of Gladhill Templars? That could well be. One or other of them might have been, why not? What can be gleaned from encyclopaedias, rumours and traditions is the abstruse description of the Baphomet as the “lower demiurge”. What a pedantic obsession with hierarchies! And why then should Baphomet be double-headed? And why should it be I who sprouts these two heads in my dreams? There is one thing that is true in all this: I, the last heir of the English house of the Dees of Gladhill, I stand at “the end of the days of the bloodline”.

And I have a vague feeling that I shall be ready to obey if the Baphomet should ever deign to speak.

– – – Here I was interrupted by Lipotin who brought me news of Stroganoff. As he coolly rolled himself a cigarette he told me the Baron had coughed up blood until he was exhausted. Perhaps one should not rule out a doctor, even if only to make the end easier. “But...” with a languid shrug of the shoulders Lipotin made the gesture of counting money.

I understood at once and opened the drawer in my desk where I keep my cash.

Lipotin put his hand on my arm, and, clenching his cigarette between his teeth, raised his thick eyebrows in his inimitable way as if to say, “No charity, please”.

“A moment, my dear sir”. He went to his fur coat, took out a small box and said gruffly:

“The last possession of Michael Arangelovitch Stroganoff. If you will be so kind as to accept it, it is yours.”

Gingerly I took the object in my hand: a plain box in heavy silver, secured with bands and trick locks patterned after the manner of old silverware from Tula in Russia, at once solid and decorative. All in all, it was a not uninteresting objet d’art.

I gave Lipotin what seemed to me a decent sum. He crumpled up the notes without counting them and shoved them into his waistcoat pocket. “Michael Arangelovitch can die in decency” was all he said about the matter.

Soon after that he left.

I am still holding the heavy silver box in my hand and I still can’t find how to open the locks. I have been trying for hours – it will not open. It would take a saw or shears to cut through the heavy bands, but that would ruin the beautiful box. Better leave it as it is.

Obedient to the command from my dream, I have just taken out the first fascicle of papers and started to make excerpts from it to record the history of my ancestor, John Dee. The excerpts follow the order in which the papers happen to fall into my hands.

Baphomet only knows what the result will be. But I have suddenly become curious to see a life unfold before me – even if it is only the fate of someone long departed – without the interference of my ordering hand, without my mind trying to cheat destiny.

The very first “catch” brought up by my obedient hand should have made me suspicious. It is a fragment of a document, a letter, which on the surface seems to have nothing to do with John Dee and his story. It deals with the exploits of a troop of the “Ravenheads”, who seem to have played some role in the religious conflicts of 1549 in England.

Confidential report to his Grace, Bishop Bonner, in London; from his agent under the sign

In the year of our Lord, 1550.

“– – – and as Yr. Lordship can well testify, it is no mean feat, as you have commanded me, to keep under observation a gentleman such as Sir John Dee, one so justly suspected of most satanical heresy, a strumpet apostate – Yr. Lordship knows well that even the Governor daily exposes himself to that same infamous suspicion; notwithstanding I venture to send this secret report to Yr. Lordship from my make-shift headquarters by a trusty messenger so that Yr. Lordship may see how keen is my ardour to serve him and that Heaven may look graciously on my labours. I well know that failure to discover the ringleaders of the most recent outrages of the mob against our holy Church will be rewarded with Yr. Lordship’s anger, torture and excommunication. I do beseech Yr. Lordship to hold back your terrible judgement on your faithfull servant a little while yet, in consideration that I have today matter to report that does most clearly prove the guilt of two evil-doers.

Yr. Lordship is well acquainted with the scandalous conduct of the present council under the Lord Protector who in his sloth – to call it nothing worse – has allowed the poisonous hydra of disobedience, rebellion and the desecration of the holy Sacrament, of the churches and monasteries to raise its dark head in England. Now at the end of the month of December in this year of grace, 1549, there have appeared in Wales bands of seditious rabble, as if spewed up from the bowels of the earth. They are vagabonds and men escaped from the galleys, but there are also some peasants amongst them and ranting artisans, a motley undisciplined crew who have made themselves a banner whereon is the form of a hideous black raven’s head, like unto an alchymical sign, for which they give themselves the name of the “Ravenheads”.

Foremost among them is a cruel ruffian, a master butcher from Welshpool by trade, Bartlett Greene by name, having made himself the captain of the band. He curses and rails against God and the Saviour but chiefly he utters the most vile blasphemies against the Blessed Virgin; item, he says the holy Queen of Heaven is nought but the creature of their highest deity or, rather, demon and arch-fiend, that he calls “Black Isaïs”.

This same Bartlett Greene does also maintain with bold effrontery that his Princess of Darkness, that devil’s whore Isaïs, has made him wholly invulnerable and that as a token of this she has made him a gift of a silver shoe that he may march from victory to victory wherever he will. And truth to tell, this Bartlett Greene and his band do seem everywhere to enjoy the protection of Beelzebub and his Captains, for to this day no bullet nor poison, no ambush nor direct assault has done the least harm to his power.

A second matter there is to report, though until now precise details have eluded me: namely that the guiding hand behind the raids and pillage of the Ravenheads, and even behind treaties with the blackest scoundrels in the land, is not that of the cruel and monstrous Bartlett Greene but of some secret commander who does provide them with all manner of goods, gold, letters and secret counsels; such a one must surely be an emissary of Satan.

Such a one that does pull the strings and direct the mob where he will must be a gentleman of rank: indeed, we must seek him among the rich and powerful. And is not Sir John Dee such a one?

Most recently, that they might bring the common people over to the devil’s side, they have carried out an attack on that holy place of miracles, the grave of Saint Dunstan at Brederock, the which they have plundered and utterly destroyed, casting the sacred relics to the four winds, that to report it makes my heart bleed. This they did because it was said among the people that Saint Dunstan’s grave was inviolable and that a thunderbolt from heaven would instantly strike any wretch who dared to desecrate it. Now that the said Greene has exposed the holy shrine to his scorn and mockery, many of the simple folk are deceived and flock to his standard.

Further to report, it has just come to my ears that Bartlett Greene has several times been in secret conference with a Muscovite, who is travelling through the land, a curious fellow about whom the strangest rumours run.

The name of this same Muscovite is Mascee, a nickname, though what it might mean, I cannot tell. People call him the Tutor to the Czar of Muscovy; he is gaunt and grey, well over fifty years of age and has the look, almost, of one of Tartary. He is said to have entered the country as a merchant with many kinds of strange and curious articles from Russia and China, and that he still peddles these same wares. A dubious cur, there is none that knows whence he comes.

Until now all my attempts to lay hold of Master Mascee have met with failure, he vanishes into the air like smoke.

There is one more thing concerning this Mascee, and one that may serve to trap him: there are children at Bangor who say they saw how, after the worst of the tumult was over, this Muscovite went to the desecrated grave of St. Dunstan, reached in between the broken stones with his hand and took out two fair, smooth globes, the one red and the other white, of the size of a ball such as they might play with and made, so it seemed, of precious ivory. The children report that this Mascee did look mightily pleased with his work, hid the globes in his pocket and hurried away. It seems to me a reasonable thing to suppose that this Muscovite coveted the globes for their rarity and that, as a dealer in suchlike trifles, he will try to sell them for a good price as soon as he may. I have therefore sent out word to report to me any such ivory globes, the more since there has been no trace of the Muscovite himself since then.

On one matter I have some scruples which I will not conceal from your Lordship, being appointed by God my Father Confessor. Namely there has fallen into my hands a package of documents from my secular master, the Lord Protector. It seemed a sign from heaven and so I secretly concealed it about my body. In it I found a report from a learned Doctor, at present tutor to her Royal Highness, the Princess Elizabeth, and right strange was that report. Enclosed within was a strip of parchment which I am sure I can extract from the package without fear of suspicion and I therefore enclose it in originali with my report. In brief summary, the tutor’s report to the Lord Protector is as follows:

“The Lady Elizabeth having just completed her fourteenth year, so her tutor writes, all things seem to be turning out for the best. Marvellous to relate, the Princess had abandoned her former excess and turned to occupations more fitting for a lady. Suchlike habits as boxing, climbing, pinching and otherwise maltreating her maids and companions, as well as tormenting and cutting up mice and frogs, seem to have lost most of their attraction for the Princess, who has turned her mind to prayer and the study of holy books ...” – to which the Devil and his followers must have seduced her.

That notwithstanding, I have heard rumours that there have been complaints from Lady Ellinor, the daughter of Lord Huntingdon who is scarce sixteen, that in their play the Princess does sometimes take hold of her with such a hot hand that her private parts are bruised green and blue. On St. Gertrude’s Day past the Lady Elizabeth commanded a pleasure ride in the Forest of Uxbridge and the company streamed without escort over the hills in a wild gallop like a pack of demons, forgetting womanly modestly as if they were accursed heathenish Amazons.

This Lady Ellinor did one day secretly report that the Lady Elizabeth had visited a witch in the said Forest of Uxbridge and had sworn by the blood of Our Lord she would ask the old hag to show her the future, as her ancestor, King Macbeth, had done.

The witch mumbled prophecies and adages to Lady Elizabeth, but she also gave her some foul drink, such as one would imagine a fiendish love potion, which, not regarding the peril to her immortal soul, tis said she drank it. Afterwards the witch gave her the prophecy written down on a parchment; the corpus delicti enclosed will be the witch’s scrawl – of which I can understand not a word, the whole seems to me mere devilish prattle. The parchment is affixed hereto.

All this I have undertaken most humbly in Yr. Lordship’s service and I remain etc”

Signed: ) + ( Secret Agent.

The precise wording of the strip of parchment which the secret agent had attached to his letter to the infamous “Bloody Bishop Bonner” in 1550 was as follows – my cousin, John Roger, added in explanation that it clearly must be a prophecy by the witch of Uxbridge to Elizabeth, Princess, later Queen, of England –:

Parchment Strip

To Gaia, the Black Mother, I put my question; Into the chasm I plunge: full fifty fathoms I fall. Thus saith the Mother: “Thou hast drunk of Thy salvation!”

“Be of good cheer, Elizabeth, Queen,” I hear the Guardian call.

“My potion has the power to loose and to bind:

It sets woman from man apart again.

The body alone is sick, sound is the mind:

The whole will see, if the half be blind;

I shield – I command – I ordain.

The groom I lead to Thy bridal couch:

Become one in the night! Be one to the end of days!

No more divided by the lie of I and Thou!

One body, one blood united in praise!

My draught is a sacrament, making of two the One

That looketh before and behind in the night,

That never shall sleep, eye eternally bright,

In which aeons are but as a day alone.

Be comforted Elizabeth, Queen, be of good cheer:

The Black Crystal is freed from the Mother!

Take this as a token for England’s broken crown, saith the seer:

Soon shall its sundered halves conjoin with one another.

For Thee, and for the Lord of the silver spring

Gushing from the roots of the blossoming tree,

The furnace awaits, and wedlock’s ring:

‘When ancient worth’s renewed, and gold to gold doth cling,

Then shall the riven crown again united be.’ ”

The following postscript from the secret agent was attached to the witch’s parchment strip. It briefly reports the capture and imprisonment of the ringleader of the Ravenheads, the “Bartlett Greene” mentioned in the letter to Bishop Bonner. Its text runs as follows:

Postscriptum: the Monday following the Feast of the Resurrection of Our Lord, 1550.

“Bartlett Greene’s band of outlaws has been cut down and he himself captured; he was unwounded, which seemed a sheer miracle, the skirmish was fought with such ferocity. Now lies this rogue, brigand and arch-heretic in strong chains, tied over and over, guarded day and night that none of the demons that do look on him, not even his Mistress, Black Isaïs, may free him from them. Thrice the Apage Satanas has been said over the locks that bind him and most liberally has holy water been sprinkled on them. – –

I do now most fervently pray to the Lord that the prophecy of Saint Dunstan may be fulfilled and that he that instigated the desecration – perchance the said John Dee? – shall be pursued with torments until he meets his deserved end. Amen!”

Signed ) + ( Secret Agent

Once more I take a bundle of papers at random from the legacy of my cousin, John Roger, and I can see immediately that it is a diary of our common ancestor, Sir John Dee. It is related to the letter of the secret agent, that is obvious, and comes from almost the same year. The text runs as follows:

Fragments from the diary of Sir John Dee of Gladhill, beginning with the day of the celebration following the award of the degree of Master of Arts.

The Feast of St. Anthony, 1549.

... of Arts we shall sup mightily like good Christian gentlemen. The brightest spirits of Old England will shine – at least their foreheads and noses will! But I will show them all who is the master!

... o cursed day! O accursed night! – – – No! – o blessed night, I trust. – The quill does scratch most miserably, my hand is still drunk, yes, drunk! – But my mind? As clear as clear! Yet again: take thee to thy bed, thou cur, and do not presume! – One thing is clearer than the light of day: I am the Lord of posterity. I see them one after the other in an endless line: Kings! Kings sitting on the throne of England.

My head is clear again, but I feel it is about to burst whenever I think of last night and of what happened! It needs cool reflection and a precise account. A servant led me home from the carousal with which Guilford Talbot had celebrated my elevation to the degree of Master of Arts, though God knows how he managed to bring me here. If that was not the noblest quaffing since England began ... Enough, it is enough that I was drunk as never before in my life. Noah himself cannot have been worse drunk.

The night was mild and damp. That added spice to the wine. I must have crawled home on all fours, my filthy garments bear eloquent witness to that.

When I was back in my chamber I sent my servant about his business, for I do not care to be coddled like a child when I wrestle with the wine demon, nor do I suffer another to cover my nakedness as did Father Noah.

I tried to undress myself and succeeded. It was with pride that I stood before my mirror.