The Egyptian Conception of Immortality
The Egyptian Conception of ImmortalityI. INTRODUCTIONII. SOURCES OF THE MATERIALIII. THE IDEAS OF THE PRIMITIVE RACEIV. THE EARLY DYNASTIC PERIODV. THE OLD EMPIREVI. THE MIDDLE EMPIREVII. THE NEW EMPIREVIII. THE PTOLEMAIC-ROMAN PERIODIX. SUMMARYCopyright
The Egyptian Conception of Immortality
George Andrew Reisner
I. INTRODUCTION
Of the nations which have contributed to the direct stream of
civilization, Egypt and Mesopotamia are at present believed to be
the oldest. The chronological dispute as to the relative antiquity
of the two countries is of minor importance; for while in Babylonia
the historical material is almost entirely inscriptional, in Egypt
we know the handicrafts, the weapons, the arts, and, to a certain
extent, the religious beliefs of the race up to a period when it
was just emerging from the Stone Age. In a word, Egypt presents the
most ancient race whose manner of life is known to man. From the
beginning of its history—that is, from about 4500 B.C.—we can trace
the development of a religion one of whose most prominent elements
was a promise of a life after death. It was still a great religion
when the Christian doctrine of immortality was enunciated. In the
early centuries of the Christian era, it seemed almost possible
that the worship of Osiris and Isis might become the religion of
the classical world; and the last stand made by civilized paganism
against Christianity was in the temple of Isis at Philae in the
sixth century after Christ.It is clear that a religion of such duration must have
offered some of those consolations to man that have marked all
great religions, chief of which is the faith in a spirit, in
something that preserves the personality of the man and does not
perish with the body. This faith was, in fact, one of the chief
elements in the Egyptian religion—the element best known to us
through the endless cemeteries which fill the desert from one end
of Egypt to the other, and through the funerary
inscriptions.It is necessary, however, to correct the prevailing
impression that religion played the greatest part in Egyptian life
or even a greater part than it does in Moslem Egypt. The mistaken
belief that death and the well-being of the dead overshadowed the
existence of the living, is due to the fact that the physical
character of the country has preserved for us the cemeteries and
the funerary temples better than all the other monuments. The
narrow strip of fat black land along the Nile produces generally
its three crops a year. It is much too valuable to use as a
cemetery. But more than that, it is subject to periodic saturation
with water during the inundation, and is, therefore, unsuitable for
the burials of a nation which wished to preserve the contents of
the graves. On the other hand, the desert, which bounds this
fertile strip so closely that a dozen steps will usually carry one
from the black land to the gray,—the desert offers a dry preserving
soil with absolutely no value to the living. Thus all the funerary
monuments were erected on the desert, and except where
intentionally destroyed they are preserved to the present day. The
palaces, the towns, the farms, and many of the great temples which
were erected on the black soil, have been pulled down for building
material or buried deep under the steadily rising deposits of the
Nile. The tombs of six thousand years of dead have accumulated on
the desert edge.Moreover, our impression of these tombs has been formed from
the monuments erected by kings, princes, priests, and the great and
wealthy men of the kingdom. The multitude of plain unadorned
burial-places which the scientific excavator records by the
thousands have escaped the attention of scholars interested in
Egypt from the point of view of a comparison of religions. It has
also been overlooked that the strikingly colored mummies and the
glaring burial apparatus of the late period cost very little to
prepare. The manufacture of mummies was a regular trade in the
Ptolemaic period at least. Mummy cases were prepared in advance
with blank spaces for the names. I do not think that any more
expense was incurred in Egyptian funerals in the dynastic period
than is the case among the modern Egyptians. The importance of the
funerary rites to the living must, therefore, not be
exaggerated.
II. SOURCES OF THE MATERIAL
With the exception of certain mythological explanations
supplied by the inscriptions and reliefs in the temples, our
knowledge of Egyptian ideas in regard to the future life is based
on funerary customs as revealed by excavations and on the funerary
texts found in the tombs. These tombs always show the same
essential functions through all changes of form,—the protection of
the burial against decay and spoliation, and the provision of a
meeting-place where the living may bring offerings to the dead.
Correspondingly, there are two sets of customs,—burial customs and
offering customs. The texts follow the same division. For the
offering place, the texts are magical formulas which, properly
recited by the living, provide material benefit for the dead. For
the burial place, the texts are magical formulas to be used by the
spirit for its own benefit in the difficulties of the spirit life.
These texts from the burial chambers are found in only a few
graves,—those of the very great,—and their contents show us that
they were intended only for people whose earthly position was
exceptional.