CHAPTER I.
CHAPTER II.
CHAPTER III.
CHAPTER IV.
APPENDIX.
CHAPTER I.
EARLY
RENAISSANCE.§
I. I trust that the reader has been enabled, by the preceding
chapters, to form some conception of the magnificence of the streets
of Venice during the course of the thirteenth and fourteenth
centuries. Yet by all this magnificence she was not supremely
distinguished above the other cities of the middle ages. Her early
edifices have been preserved to our times by the circuit of her
waves; while continual recurrences of ruin have defaced the glory of
her sister cities. But such fragments as are still left in their
lonely squares, and in the corners of their streets, so far from
being inferior to the buildings of Venice, are even more rich, more
finished, more admirable in invention, more exuberant in beauty. And
although, in the North of Europe, civilization was less advanced, and
the knowledge of the arts was more confined to the ecclesiastical
orders, so that, for domestic architecture, the period of perfection
must be there placed much later than in Italy, and considered as
extending to the middle of the fifteenth century; yet, as each city
reached a certain point in civilization, its streets became decorated
with the same magnificence, varied only in style according to the
materials at hand, and temper of the people. And I am not aware of
any town of wealth and importance in the middle ages, in which some
proof does not exist, that, at its period of greatest energy and
prosperity, its streets were inwrought with rich sculpture, and even
(though in this, as before noticed, Venice always stood supreme)
glowing with color and with gold. Now, therefore, let the reader,—
forming for himself as vivid and real a conception as he is able,
either of a group of Venetian palaces in the fourteenth century, or,
if he likes better, of one of the more fantastic but even richer
street scenes of Rouen, Antwerp, Cologne, or Nuremberg, and keeping
this gorgeous image before him,—go out into any thoroughfare,
representative, in a general and characteristic way, of the feeling
for domestic architecture in modern times; let him, for instance, if
in London, walk once up and down Harley Street, or Baker Street, or
Gower Street; and then, looking upon this picture and on this, set
himself to consider (for this is to be the subject of our following
and final inquiry) what have been the causes which have induced so
vast a change in the European mind.§
II. Renaissance architecture is the school which has conducted men’s
inventive and constructive faculties from the Grand Canal to Gower
Street; from the marble shaft, and the lancet arch, and the wreathed
leafage, and the glowing and melting harmony of gold and azure, to
the square cavity in the brick wall. We have now to consider the
causes and the steps of this change; and, as we endeavored above to
investigate the nature of Gothic, here to investigate also the nature
of Renaissance.§
III. Although Renaissance architecture assumes very different forms
among different nations, it may be conveniently referred to three
heads:—Early Renaissance, consisting of the first corruptions
introduced into the Gothic schools: Central or Roman Renaissance,
which is the perfectly formed style: and Grotesque Renaissance, which
is the corruption of the Renaissance itself.§
IV. Now, in order to do full justice to the adverse cause, we will
consider the abstract
nature of the
school with reference only to its best or central examples. The forms
of building which must be classed generally under the term
early Renaissance
are, in many cases, only the extravagances and corruptions of the
languid Gothic, for whose errors the classical principle is in no
wise answerable. It was stated in the second chapter of the “Seven
Lamps,” that, unless luxury had enervated and subtlety falsified
the Gothic forms, Roman traditions could not have prevailed against
them; and, although these enervated and false conditions are almost
instantly colored by the classical influence, it would be utterly
unfair to lay to the charge of that influence the first debasement of
the earlier schools, which had lost the strength of their system
before they could be struck by the plague.§
V. The manner, however, of the debasement of all schools of art, so
far as it is natural, is in all ages the same; luxuriance of
ornament, refinement of execution, and idle subtleties of fancy,
taking the place of true thought and firm handling: and I do not
intend to delay the reader long by the Gothic sick-bed, for our task
is not so much to watch the wasting of fever in the features of the
expiring king, as to trace the character of that Hazael who dipped
the cloth in water, and laid it upon his face, Nevertheless, it is
necessary to the completeness of our view of the architecture of
Venice, as well as to our understanding of the manner in which the
Central Renaissance obtained its universal dominion, that we glance
briefly at the principal forms into which Venetian Gothic first
declined. They are two in number: one the corruption of the Gothic
itself; the other a partial return to Byzantine forms; for the
Venetian mind having carried the Gothic to a point at which it was
dissatisfied, tried to retrace its steps, fell back first upon
Byzantine types, and through them passed to the first Roman. But in
thus retracing its steps, it does not recover its own lost energy. It
revisits the places through which it had passed in the morning light,
but it is now with wearied limbs, and under the gloomy shadows of
evening.