Jesus, the Last Great Initiate
Jesus, the Last Great InitiatePREFACECHAPTER I CONDITION OF THE WORLD AT THE BIRTH OF JESUSCHAPTER II MARY—FIRST DEVELOPMENT OF JESUSCHAPTER III THE ESSENES—JOHN THE BAPTIST—THE TEMPTATIONCHAPTER IV THE PUBLIC LIFE OF JESUS—POPULAR AND ESOTERIC INSTRUCTION—MIRACLES—APOSTLES—WOMENCHAPTER V STRUGGLE WITH THE PHARISEES—FLIGHT TO CÆSAREA—THE TRANSFIGURATIONCHAPTER VI FINAL JOURNEY TO JERUSALEM—THE PROMISE—THE SUPPER—TRIAL OF JESUS—DEATH AND RESURRECTIONCHAPTER VII THE PROMISE AND ITS FULFILMENT—THE TEMPLECopyright
Jesus, the Last Great Initiate
Edouard Schuré
PREFACE
Criticism on the life of Jesus during the past century has been
greatly to the fore. A complete account of this criticism will be
found in the luminous sketch made by M. Sabatier, 1 in which the
entire history and present state of this investigation are given.
Sufficient for the moment to refer to the two principal phases
supplied by Strauss and Renan, with the object of determining the
new point of view I now wish to offer.
Departing from the philosophical school of Hegel to ally himself
with the critical and historical one of Bauer, Strauss, without
denying the existence of Jesus, endeavored to prove that his life,
as related in the Gospels, is a myth, a legend created by popular
imagination, to meet the necessities of a rising Christianity, and
in accordance with Old Testament prophecy. His position, a purely
negative one, but which he defended with great skill and erudition,
has been found true in certain details, but quite untenable in its
entirety and essential elements. It has, in addition, the grave
defect of explaining neither the character of Jesus nor the origin
of Christianity. The life of Jesus, according to Strauss, is a
planetary system without a sun. One merit, however, must be granted
this work, that of having transferred the problem from the ground
of dogmatic theology to that of textual and historical
criticism.
M. Renan's Vie de Jesus owes its brilliant success to its lofty,
æsthetic, and literary qualities, as well as to the boldness of the
writer, the first who dared make the life of the Christ a problem
of human psychology. Has he solved the problem? After the dazzling
success of the book, the general opinion of all serious critics has
been in the negative. The Jesus of M. Renan begins his career as a
gentle dreamer, an enthusiastic but simpleminded moralist; he ends
it as a violent thaumaturgist, devoid of all idea of reality. "In
spite of all the precautions of the historian," says M. Sabatier,
"it is the march of a healthy mind in the direction of madness. The
Christ of M. Renan hovers between the calculations of ambition and
the dreams of a seer." The fact is that he becomes the Messiah
without wishing—almost without knowing—it. He permits himself to be
given this name merely to please the apostles and to fulfil the
popular wish. It is not with so feeble a faith that a true prophet
creates a new religion and changes the soul of the earth. The life
of Jesus, according to M. Renan, is a planetary system illumined by
a pallid sun devoid of vivifying magnetism or creative heat.
How did Jesus become the Messiah? That is the primordial question,
the solution of which is essential to the right understanding of
the Christ; it is also that before which M. Renan hesitated and
turned aside. M. Théodore Kein saw that this question must be
boldly faced (Das Leben Jesu, Zürich, 1875, 3rd edition). His life
of Jesus is the most remarkable that has appeared since M. Renan's.
It throws on the question all the light given by texts and history
esoterically interpreted. But the problem is not one capable of
being solved without the aid of intuition and esoteric
tradition.
It is by means of this esoteric light, the inner flame of all
religions, the central truth of all fruitful philosophy, that I
have attempted to reconstruct along its main lines, the life of
Jesus, taking into account whatever previous historical criticism
has hitherto cleared and prepared the ground. No need to define
what I mean by the esoteric point of view, the synthesis of
Religion and Science. Concerning the historical and relative value
of the Gospels, I have taken the three synoptical Gospels (those of
Matthew, Mark, and Luke) as a basis, and that of John as the
arcanum of the esoteric teaching of the Christ, at the same time
acknowledging the subsequent language and form, and the symbolical
tendency of this Gospel.
All four Gospels, which should be mutually examined and verified,
are equally authentic, though from different claims. Those of
Matthew and Mark are precious gospels of letter and fact; therein
are to be found the public deeds and words of the Christ. The
gentle Luke affords a glimpse of the mystery-meaning beneath the
poetical legend-veil; it is the Gospel of the Soul, of Woman, and
of Love. Saint John unfolds these mysteries; in his Gospel are to
be found the inner depths of the doctrine, the secret teaching, the
meaning of the promise, the esoteric reserve. Clement of
Alexandria, one of the few Christian bishops who held the key to
universal esoterism, rightly named it the Gospel of the Spirit.
John has a profound insight of the transcendent truths revealed by
the Master, and a great facility in presenting them. Accordingly,
his symbol is the Eagle, whose wing cleaves the firmament, and
whose flaming eye encompasses the depths of space.Footnotes7:1 Dictionnaire des Sciences Réligieuses, par Lichtenberger,
tome 7, article "Jesus."
CHAPTER I CONDITION OF THE WORLD AT THE BIRTH OF JESUS
A solemn period of the world's destiny was approaching; the sky was
overshadowed with darkness and filled with sinister omens.
In spite of the efforts of the initiates, polytheism, throughout
Asia, Africa, and Europe, had terminated only in the downfall of
civilization. The sublime cosmogony of Orpheus, so gloriously
chanted by Homer, had not been attained, and the only explanation
possible is that human nature found great difficulty in maintaining
a certain intellectual altitude. For the great spirits of
antiquity, the gods were never anything more than a poetical
expression of the subordinated forces of Nature, a speaking image
of its inner organism; it is as symbols of cosmic and animic forces
that these gods live indestructible in the consciousness of
humanity. This diversity of gods and forces, the initiates thought,
was dominated and penetrated by the supreme God or pure Spirit. The
principal aim of the sanctuaries of Memphis, Delphi, and Eleusis
had been precisely the teaching of this unity of God with the
theosophical ideas and moral discipline resulting therefrom.
But the disciples of Orpheus, Pythagoras, and Plato failed before
the egoism of the politicians, the sordidness of the sophists, and
the passions of the mob. The social and political decomposition of
Greece was the consequence of its religious, moral, and
intellectual decomposition. Apollo, the Solar Word, the
manifestation of the supreme God and the supra-terrestrial world,
is silent. No more oracles, no more inspired poets are to be heard!
Minerva, Wisdom, and Foresight, veils her countenance in presence
of her people converted into Satyrs, profaning the mysteries, and
insulting the gods in Aristophanic farces on the stage of Bacchus.
The very mysteries themselves are corrupted, for sycophants and
courtesans are admitted to the Eleusinian rites. … When soul
becomes blunted, religion falls into idolatry; when thought becomes
materialized, philosophy degenerates into scepticism. Thus we see
Lucian, poor microbe born from the corpse of paganism, turn the
myths into ridicule, when once Carneades had denied their
scientific origin.
Superstitious in religion, agnostic in philosophy, egoistical and
divided in politics, reeling under anarchy and fatally abandoned to
despotism. Greece had become sadly changed from the time when she
transmitted the science of Egypt and the mysteries of Asia in
immortal forms of beauty.
If there was one who understood what the world needed, and who
endeavored to restore this need by an effort of heroic genius, that
one was Alexander the Great. This legendary conqueror, initiated,
as was also his father, Philip, into the mysteries of
Samothrace, proved himself even more of an intellectual son of
Orpheus than a disciple of Aristotle. Doubtless, the Achilles of
Macedonia, who, accompanied by a mere handful of Greeks, crossed
Asia as far as India, dreamed of universal empire, but not after
the fashion of the Cæsars, by oppression of the people, and the
destruction of religion and unfettered science. His grand idea was
to reconcile Asia and Europe by a synthesis of religions, supported
by scientific authority. Impelled by this thought, he paid homage
to the science of Aristotle, as he did to Minerva of Athens, the
Jehovah of Jerusalem, the Egyptian Osiris, and the Hindu Brahma,
recognizing, as would a veritable initiate, an identical divinity
and wisdom beneath these differing symbols. This new Dionysus
possessed a broad sympathy and mighty prophetic insight.
Alexander's sword typified the last flash of the Greece of Orpheus,
illumining both East and West. The son of Philip died in the
intoxication of victory and the glorious accomplishment of his
dream, leaving the shreds of his empire to selfish and rapacious
generals. But his thought did not die with him; he had founded
Alexandria, where Oriental Philosophy, Judaism, and Hellenism were
to be fused in the crucible of Egyptian esoterism, until the time
might be ripe for the resurrection word of the Christ.
In proportion as Apollo and Minerva, the twin constellations of
Greece, paled away on the horizon, the people saw a menacing sign,
the Roman She-Wolf, rise in the troubled sky.
What is the origin of Rome? The conspiracy of a greedy oligarchy,
in the name of brute force; the oppression of the human intellect,
of religion, science, and art, by deified political power: in other
words, the contrary of truth, by which a government receives
its justification, according to the supreme principles of science,
justice and economy. 1
The whole of Roman history is merely the consequence of the
iniquitous pact by which the Conscript Fathers declared war, first,
against Italy, and afterwards against the whole Roman race. They
chose a fitting symbol; for the brazen She-Wolf, with tawny hair
erect, and hyena's head turned in the direction of the Capitol, is
the image of this government, the demon which will take possession
of the Roman soul to the very end.
In Greece, at least, the sanctuaries of Delphi and Eleusis were
long respected; at Rome, from the very outset, science and art were
rejected. The attempt of the sage Numa, the Etruscan initiate,
failed before the suspicious ambition of the Conscript Fathers. He
brought with him the Sibylline books, which contained part of the
science of Hermes, appointed magistrates elected by the people,
distributed territory, and submitted the right of declaring war to
the Fecial priests. Accordingly, King Numa, long cherished in the
memory of the people, who regarded him as inspired by divine
genius, seems to be a historical intervention of sacred science in
the government. He does not represent the genius of Rome, but
rather that of the Etruscan initiation, which followed the same
principles as the school of Memphis and Delphi.
After Numa, the Roman Senate burnt the Sibylline Books, ruined the
authority of the flamens, destroyed arbitral institutions, and
returned to its old systems in which religion was nothing more than
an instrument of public domination. Rome became the hydra which
engulfed the peoples and their gods with them. The nations of the
earth were gradually reduced to subjection and pillage. The
Mamertine prison became filled with kings from North and South.
Rome, bent on having no other kings than slaves and charlatans,
destroys the final possessors of esoteric tradition in Gaul, Egypt,
Judea, and Persia. She pretends to worship the gods, but the only
object of her adoration is the She-Wolf. And now, away on the
blood-stained dawn, there appears the final offspring of this
ravenous creature, the embodiment of the genius of Rome—Cæsar! Rome
has conquered all the nations of the earth, Cæsar, her incarnation,
arrogates to himself universal power. He aspires not merely to
become the ruler of mankind, for, uniting the tiara with the
diadem, he causes himself to be proclaimed Chief Pontiff. After the
Battle of Thapsus, deification as a hero is voted him, after that
of Munda, divine apotheosis is granted by the Senate; his statue is
erected in the temple of Quirinus, and a college of officiating
priests appointed, bearing his name. To crown all in irony and
logic, this very Cæsar who deifies himself, denies in the presence
of the Senate the immortality of the soul! Would it be possible to
proclaim more openly that there is no longer any other God than
Cæsar.
Under the Cæsars, Rome, inheritor of Babylon, extends her power
over the whole world. What has become of the Roman State? It is
engaged in destroying all collective life outside of governors and
tax-collectors in the provinces. Conquering Rome feeds like a
vampire on the corpse of a worn-out system.
And now the Roman orgies are freely and publicly paraded with all
their bacchanalia of vice and crime. They begin with the voluptuous
meeting of Mark Antony and Cleopatra, and will be brought to an end
with the debaucheries of Messalina and the mad frenzy of Nero. They
signalize their presence by a lascivious and public parody of the
mysteries, and are destined to close in the Roman Circus, where
nude virgins, martyrs to their faith, are torn to pieces and
devoured by savage beasts, amid the plaudits of thousands of
spectators.
And yet, among the nations conquered by Rome, there was one which
called itself the people of God, whose genius was the very opposite
to that of Rome. How conies it that Israel, worn out by intestine
strife, crushed by three centuries of slavery, had preserved its
indomitable faith? Why did this conquered people rise,
prophet-like, to oppose Greek decadence and Roman orgies? Whence
did they derive the courage to predict the fall of the masters who
had their feet on the throat of the nation, and speak of some vague
final triumph, when they themselves were drawing to an irremediable
ruin? The reason was, that a great idea, inspired by Moses, lived
in the nation. Under Joshua, the twelve tribes had erected a
commemorative pillar with the inscription, "This is a testimony
between us that Jehovah is God alone."
The law-maker of Israel had made monotheism the corner-stone of his
science and social law, as well as of a universal religious idea.
He had had the genius to understand that on the triumph of this
idea the future of mankind would depend. To preserve it, he had
written a hieroglyphic book, constructed a golden ark, and raised
up a people from the nomad dust of the wilderness. On these
witnesses of the spiritualistic idea Moses brought down the
lightning flash and the thunderbolt from heaven. Against them
conspired not only the Moabites, the Philistines, the Amalekites,
and all the tribes of Palestine, but even the frailties and
passions of the Jewish people itself. The Book ceased to be
understood by the priesthood; the ark was captured by enemies,
numerous were the times when the people almost forgot their
mission. Why then, in spite of all, did they remain faithful to
this mission? Why had the idea of Moses remained graven on the brow
and heart of Israel in letters of fire? To whom is due this
exclusive perseverance, this magnificent fidelity amid the
vicissitudes of a troubled history, such a fidelity as gave Israel
a unique character among the nations? It may boldly be attributed
to the prophets and the institution of prophecy; by oral tradition
it may be traced back to Moses. The Hebrew people has had Nabi at
all periods of its history, right to its dispersion. But the
institution of prophecy appears first under an organic form at the
time of Samuel. He it was who founded the confraternities of
Nebiim, those schools of prophets, in the face of a rising royalty
and an already degenerate priesthood. He made them austere
guardians of the esoteric tradition and the universal religious
thought of Moses against the kings, in whom the political idea and
national aim was to predominate. In these confraternities were
preserved the relics of the science of Moses, the sacred music, the
occult art of healing, and finally, the art of divination,
exercised by the great prophets with masterly force and
abnegation.
Divination has existed under the most diverse forms among all the
peoples of the ancient cycle; but prophecy in Israel possesses an
amplitude, a loftiness and authority, belonging to the intellectual
and spiritual nature in which monotheism keeps the human soul. The
prophecy offered by the theologians, literally, as the direct
communication of a personal God, denied by naturalistic philosophy
as pure superstition, is in reality nothing but the superior
manifestation of the universal laws of the Spirit. "The general
truths which govern the world," says Ewald, in his fine work on the
prophets, "in other terms, the thoughts of God, are immutable and
incapable of attack, quite independent of the fluctuations of
things, or of the will and action of men. Man is originally
intended to participate in them, and translate them freely into
acts. But for the Word of the Spirit to enter into carnal man, he
must be fundamentally influenced by the great commotion of history.
Then the Eternal Truth springs forth like a flash of light. This is
why we so often read in the Old Testament that Jehovah is a living
God. When man listens to the divine call, a new life is created in
him; now he no longer feels himself alone, but in communion with
God and all truth, ready to proceed eternally from one verity to
another. In this new life, his thought becomes one with the
universal will. He possesses a clear grasp of the present, and
entire faith in the final success of the divine idea. The man who
experiences this is a prophet, i. e., he feels himself irresistibly
impelled to manifest himself before others as a representative of
God. His thought becomes vision, and this superior might which
forces the truth from his soul, at times with heart-breaking
anguish, constitutes the prophetic element.
The prophetic manifestations, throughout history, have been the
thunderbolts and lightning flashes of truth." 1
From this spring, those giants, Elijah, Isaiah, Ezekiel, and
Jeremiah, drew their might. Deep in their caves or in the palaces
of the kings, they were indeed sentinels of Jehovah, and, as Elisha
said to his master Elijah, "the chariots of Israel, and the
horsemen thereof." Often do they foretell with prophetic vision the
death of kings, the fall of kingdoms, and the punishments to be
visited on Israel. At times they are mistaken. The prophetic torch,
though lit by the sun of divine truth, will vacillate and darken in
their hands under the influence of national passion. But never do
they waver concerning moral truths, the real mission of Israel, the
final triumph of justice to mankind. As true initiates, they preach
their scorn of outer worship, the abolition of sacrifices of blood,
the purification of the soul, and the practice of love. It is with
regard to the final triumph of monotheism, its liberating and
peace-bringing rôle to all nations, that their vision is truly
remarkable. The most frightful misfortunes that can strike a
nation, foreign invasion, captivity in Babylon, cannot shake their
faith. Listen to what Isaiah said during the invasion of
Sennacherib:
“Rejoice ye with Jerusalem, and be glad with her, all ye that love
her: rejoice for joy with her, all ye that mourn for her.