Summary of Vax-Unvax by Robert F. Kennedy Jr.: Let the Science Speak (Children’s Health Defense) E-Book

SUMMARY GP

• Herausgeber: BookRix
• Kategorie: Geisteswissenschaft
• Sprache: Englisch

Veröffentlichungsjahr: 2023

Beschreibung

DISCLAIMER

This book does not in any capacity mean to replace the original book but to serve as a vast summary of the original book.

Summary of Vax-Unvax by Robert F. Kennedy Jr.: Let the Science Speak (Children’s Health Defense)

IN THIS SUMMARIZED BOOK, YOU WILL GET:

• Chapter astute outline of the main contents.
• Fast & simple understanding of the content analysis.
• Exceptionally summarized content that you may skip in the original book

The book analyzes over 100 peer-reviewed studies on vaccinated and unvaccinated populations, presenting health differences among vaccinated and unvaccinated populations. It covers topics like infant/child vaccination schedules, vaccines, and their impact on health. It is crucial for individuals to make informed decisions about vaccination.

Leseprobe

GP SUMMARY

Summary of Vax-Unvax by Robert F. Kennedy Jr.: Let the Science Speak (Children’s Health Defense)

The book examines over 100 peer-reviewed studies on vaccinated and unvaccinated populations, discussing health differences, vaccination schedules, and vaccine impact, emphasizing the importance of informed vaccination decisions.BookRix GmbH & Co. KG81371 Munich

Title page

Summary of

Vax-Unvax

A

Summary of Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s book

Let the Science Speak

(Children’s Health Defense)

GP SUMMARY

Summary of Vax-Unvax by Robert F. Kennedy Jr.: Let the Science Speak (Children’s Health Defense)

By GP SUMMARY© 2023, GP SUMMARY.

All rights reserved.

Author: GP SUMMARY

Contact: [email protected]

Cover, illustration: GP SUMMARY

Editing, proofreading: GP SUMMARY

Other collaborators: GP SUMMARY

NOTE TO READERS

This is an unofficial summary & analysis of Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s “Vax-Unvax: Let the Science Speak (Children’s Health Defense)” designed to enrich your reading experience.

DISCLAIMER

The contents of the summary are not intended to replace the original book. It is meant as a supplement to enhance the reader's understanding. The contents within can neither be stored electronically, transferred, nor kept in a database. Neither part nor full can the document be copied, scanned, faxed, or retained without the approval from the publisher or creator.

Limit of Liability

This eBook is licensed for your personal enjoyment only. This eBook may not be resold or given away to other people. If you are reading this book and did not purchase it, or it was not purchased for your use only, then please purchase your own copy. You agree to accept all risks of using the information presented inside this book.

Copyright 2023. All rights reserved.

Foreword by Del Bigtree

In May 2017, Bobby Kennedy and others met with Dr. Anthony Fauci, Dr. Francis Collins, and other public health officials at the National Institutes of Health (NIH). They argued that the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) had undermined its duty to ensure the safety of childhood vaccines by allowing vaccine manufacturers to avoid long-term, placebo-controlled trials prior to licensure. By the time they met, sixteen vaccines had been added to the CDC's recommended childhood schedule without these proper safety trials. The CDC recommends that many of the vaccines on its schedule be given multiple times to increase effectiveness. Most of America's children following the CDC's schedule were receiving seventy-one doses by the time they were eighteen years old.

The lack of pre-licensure safety trials led to the creation of the Vaccine Safety Commission, which was later shot down by President-elect Donald Trump. Bobby and his group, Informed Consent Action Network (ICAN) and Bobby's Children's Health Defense (CHD), sent a legal demand to HHS demanding copies of the long-term, placebo-controlled clinical trial relied upon to license each childhood vaccine. HHS admitted in writing that the lack of HHS documents was further affirmed in a Federal Court order on July 6, 2018.

Bobby and Brian Hooker worked with Dr. Brian Hooker to search through tens of thousands of vaccine studies in the NIH official archive in PubMed, finding studies that either deliberately or inadvertently made these comparisons. They published these studies on Bobby's Instagram and CHD's website, confirming that vaccinated children were unhealthier than their unvaccinated peers. In February 2021, Instagram evicted Bobby from its platform, and CHD was kicked off as well. They agreed to make the studies accessible to the public, and this book is the result of their efforts.

Vaccinated versus Unvaccinated— Why Have the Proper Studies Not Been Conducted?

Since Dr. Edward Jenner developed the smallpox vaccine in 1796, practitioners have routinely given vaccines to children and adults. Since the 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act, the vaccination schedule has increased significantly, with children following the CDC-recommended schedule receiving a minimum of seventy-three shots for seventeen different diseases. However, long-term vaccine safety studies are lacking, as researchers have done little to study the health of these children, either in the short term or the long term. Clinical trials for vaccine approval by the FDA exclusively evaluate single-vaccine products, even though infants following the CDC schedule receive up to six vaccines at the same time.

Many vaccines have long-term health impacts that do not become evident for years. FDA clinical safety studies generally last for a relatively short duration, precluding the detection of long-term health effects. The Institute of Medicine (IOM) commissioned a committee to evaluate 158 vaccine adverse events that injury reports linked to eight different vaccines in 2011, finding that for eighteen adverse events, evidence "convincingly supported" or "favored acceptance" of a causal relationship with administration of the vaccine. However, for 135 out of the 158 adverse events/vaccine relationships considered, the IOM committee deemed the evidence "inadequate to accept or reject" the causal relationship, including the relationship between the DTaP vaccine and autism.