The Napoleon of Notting Hill
The Napoleon of Notting HillBOOK II. — INTRODUCTORY REMARKS ON THE ART OF PROPHECYII. — THE MAN IN GREENIII. — THE HILL OF HUMOURBOOK III. — THE CHARTER OF THE CITIESII. — THE COUNCIL OF THE PROVOSTSIII. — ENTER A LUNATICBOOK IIII. — THE MENTAL CONDITION OF ADAM WAYNEII. — THE REMARKABLE MR. TURNBULLIII. — THE EXPERIMENT OF MR. BUCKBOOK IVI. — THE BATTLE OF THE LAMPSII. — THE CORRESPONDENT OF THE "COURT JOURNAL"III. — THE GREAT ARMY OF SOUTH KENSINGTONBOOK VI. — THE EMPIRE OF NOTTING HILLII. — THE LAST BATTLEIII. — TWO VOICESCopyright
The Napoleon of Notting Hill
G.K. Chesterton
BOOK I
I. — INTRODUCTORY REMARKS ON THE ART OF PROPHECY
THE human race, to which so many of my readers belong, has been
playing at children's games from the beginning, and will probably
do it till the end, which is a nuisance for the few people who grow
up. And one of the games to which it is most attached is called,
"Keep tomorrow dark," and which is also named (by the rustics in
Shropshire, I have no doubt) "Cheat the Prophet." The players
listen very carefully and respectfully to all that the clever men
have to say about what is to happen in the next generation. The
players then wait until all the clever men are dead, and bury them
nicely. They then go and do something else. That is all. For a race
of simple tastes, however, it is great fun.
For human beings, being children, have the childish wilfulness and
the childish secrecy. And they never have from the beginning of the
world done what the wise men have seen to be inevitable. They
stoned the false prophets, it is said; but they could have stoned
true prophets with a greater and juster enjoyment. Individually,
men may present a more or less rational appearance, eating,
sleeping, and scheming. But humanity as a whole is changeful,
mystical, fickle, delightful. Men are men, but Man is a
woman.
But in the beginning of the twentieth century the game of Cheat the
Prophet was made far more difficult than it had ever been before.
The reason was, that there were so many prophets and so many
prophecies, that it was difficult to elude all their ingenuities.
When a man did something free and frantic and entirely his own, a
horrible thought struck him afterwards; it might have been
predicted. Whenever a duke climbed a lamp-post, when a dean got
drunk, he could not be really happy, he could not be certain that
he was not fulfilling some prophecy. In the beginning of the
twentieth century you could not see the ground for clever men. They
were so common that a stupid man was quite exceptional, and when
they found him, they followed him in crowds down the street and
treasured him up and gave him some high post in the State. And all
these clever men were at work giving accounts of what would happen
in the next age, all quite clear, all quite keen-sighted and
ruthless, and all quite different. And it seemed that the good old
game of hoodwinking your ancestors could not really be managed this
time, because the ancestors neglected meat and sleep and practical
politics, so that they might meditate day and night on what their
descendants would be likely to do.
But the way the prophets of the twentieth century went to work was
this. They took something or other that was certainly going on in
their time, and then said that it would go on more and more until
something extraordinary happened. And very often they added that in
some odd place that extraordinary thing had happened, and that it
showed the signs of the times.
Thus, for instance, there were Mr. H. G. Wells and others, who
thought that science would take charge of the future; and just as
the motor-car was quicker than the coach, so some lovely thing
would be quicker than the motorcar; and so on for ever. And there
arose from their ashes Dr. Quilp, who said that a man could be sent
on his machine so fast round the world that he could keep up a long
chatty conversation in some old-world village by saying a word of a
sentence each time he came round. And it was said that the
experiment had been tried on an apoplectic old major, who was sent
round the world so fast that there seemed to be (to the inhabitants
of some other star) a continuous band round the earth of white
whiskers, red complexion and tweeds...a thing like the ring of
Saturn.
Then there was the opposite school. There was Mr. Edward Carpenter,
who thought we should in a very short time return to Nature, and
live simply and slowly as the animals do. And Edward Carpenter was
followed by James Pickie, D.D. (of Pocahontas College), who said
that men were immensely improved by grazing, or taking their food
slowly and continuously, alter the manner of cows. And he said that
he had, with the most encouraging results, turned city men out on
all fours in a field covered with veal cutlets. Then Tolstoy and
the Humanitarians said that the world was growing more merciful,
and therefore no one would ever desire to kill. And Mr. Mick not
only became a vegetarian, but at length declared vegetarianism
doomed ("shedding," as he called it finely, "the green blood of the
silent animals"), and predicted that men in a better age would live
on nothing but salt. And then came the pamphlet from Oregon (where
the thing was tried), the pamphlet called "Why should Salt suffer?"
and there was more trouble.
And on the other hand, some people were predicting that the lines
of kinship would become narrower and sterner. There was Mr. Cecil
Rhodes, who thought that the one thing of the future was the
British Empire, and that there would be a gulf between those who
were of the Empire and those who were not, between the Chinaman in
Hong-Kong and the Chinaman outside, between the Spaniard on the
Rock of Gibraltar and the Spaniard off it, similar to the gulf
between man and the lower animals. And in the same way his
impetuous friend, Dr. Zoppi ("the Paul of Anglo-Saxonism"), carried
it yet further, and held that, as a result of this view,
cannibalism should be held to mean eating a member of the Empire,
not eating one of the subject peoples, who should, he said, be
killed without needless pain. His horror at the idea of eating a
man in British Guiana showed how they misunderstood his stoicism
who thought him devoid of feeling. He was, however, in a hard
position; as it was said that he had attempted the experiment, and,
living in London, had to subsist entirely on Italian
organ-grinders. And his end was terrible, for just when he had
begun, Sir Paul Swiller read his great paper at the Royal Society,
proving that the savages were not only quite right in eating their
enemies, but right on moral and hygienic grounds, since it was true
that the qualities of the enemy, when eaten, passed into the eater.
The notion that the nature of an Italian organ-man was irrevocably
growing and burgeoning inside him was almost more than the kindly
old professor could bear.
There was Mr. Benjamin Kidd, who said that the growing note of our
race would be the care for and knowledge of the future. His idea
was developed more powerfully by William Borker, who wrote that
passage which every schoolboy knows by heart, about men in future
ages weeping by the graves of their descendants, and tourists being
shown over the scene of the historic battle which was to take place
some centuries afterwards.
And Mr. Stead, too, was prominent, who thought that England would
in the twentieth century be united to America; and his young
lieutenant, Graham Podge, who included the states of France,
Germany, and Russia in the American Union, the State of Russia
being abbreviated to Ra.
There was Mr. Sidney Webb, also, who said that the future would see
a continuously increasing order and neatness in the life of the
people, and his poor friend Fipps, who went mad and ran about the
country with an axe, hacking branches off the trees whenever there
were not the same number on both sides.
All these clever men were prophesying with every variety of
ingenuity what would happen soon, and they all did it in the same
way, by taking something they saw 'going strong,' as the saying is,
and carrying it as far as ever their imagination could stretch.
This, they said, was the true and simple way of anticipating the
future. "Just as," said Dr. Pellkins, in a fine passage, "...just
as when we see a pig in a litter larger than the other pigs, we
know that by an unalterable law of the Inscrutable it will some day
be larger than an elephant, just as we know, when we see weeds and
dandelions growing more and more thickly in a garden, that they
must, in spite of all our efforts, grow taller than the
chimney-pots and swallow the house from sight, so we know and
reverently acknowledge, that when any power in human politics has
shown for any period of time any considerable activity, it will go
on until it reaches to the sky."
And it did certainly appear that the prophets had put the people
(engaged in the old game of Cheat the Prophet) in a quite
unprecedented difficulty. It seemed really hard to do anything
without fulfilling some of their prophecies.
But there was, nevertheless, in the eyes of labourers in the
streets, of peasants in the fields, of sailors and children, and
especially women, a strange look that kept the wise men in a
perfect fever of doubt. They could not fathom the motionless mirth
in their eyes. They still had something up their sleeve; they were
still playing the game of Cheat the Prophet.
Then the wise men grew like wild things, and swayed hither and
thither, crying, "What can it be? What can it be? What will London
be like a century hence? Is there anything we have not thought of?
Houses upside down...more hygienic, perhaps? Men walking on
hands...make feet flexible, don't you know? Moon... motor-cars...
no heads..." And so they swayed and wondered until they died and
were buried nicely.
Then the people went and did what they liked. Let me no longer
conceal the painful truth. The people had cheated the prophets of
the twentieth century. When the curtain goes up on this story,
eighty years after the present date, London is almost exactly like
what it is now.
II. — THE MAN IN GREEN
VERY few words are needed to explain why London, a hundred years
hence, will be very like it is now, or rather, since I must slip
into a prophetic past, why London, when my story opens, was very
like it was in those enviable days when I was still alive.
The reason can be stated in one sentence. The people had absolutely
lost faith in revolutions. All revolutions are doctrinal...such as
the French one, or the one that introduced Christianity. For it
stands to common sense that you cannot upset all existing things,
customs, and compromises, unless you believe in something outside
them, something positive and divine. Now, England, during this
century, lost all belief in this. It believed in a thing called
Evolution. And it said, "All theoretic changes have ended in blood
and ennui. If we change, we must change slowly and safely, as the
animals do. Nature's revolutions are the only successful ones.
There has been no conservative reaction in favour of tails."
And some things did change. Things that were not much thought of
dropped out of sight. Things that had not often happened did not
happen at all. Thus, for instance, the actual physical force ruling
the country, the soldiers and police, grew smaller and smaller, and
at last vanished almost to a point. The people combined could have
swept the few policemen away in ten minutes: they did not, because
they did not believe it would do them the least good. They had lost
faith in revolutions.
Democracy was dead; for no one minded the governing class
governing. England was now practically a despotism, but not an
hereditary one. Some one in the official class was made King. No
one cared how; no one cared who. He was merely an universal
secretary.
In this manner it happened that everything in London was very
quiet. That vague and somewhat depressed reliance upon things
happening as they have always happened, which is with all Londoners
a mood, had become an assumed condition. There was really no reason
for any man doing anything but the thing he had done the day
before.
There was therefore no reason whatever why the three young men who
had always walked up to their Government office together should not
walk up to it together on this particular wintry and cloudy
morning. Everything in that age had become mechanical, and
Government clerks especially. All those clerks assembled regularly
at their posts. Three of those clerks always walked into town
together. All the neighbourhood knew them: two of them were tall
and one short. And on this particular morning the short clerk was
only a few seconds late to join the other two as they passed his
gate: he could have overtaken them in three strides; he could have
called after them easily. But he did not.
For some reason that will never be understood until all souls are
judged (if they are ever judged; the idea was at this time classed
with fetish worship) he did not join his two companions, but walked
steadily behind them. The day was dull, their dress was dull,
everything was dull; but in some odd impulse he walked through
street after street, through district after district, looking at
the backs of the two men, who would have swung round at the sound
of his voice. Now, there is a law written in the darkest of the
Books of Life, and it is this: If you look at a thing nine hundred
and ninety-nine times, you are perfectly safe; if you look at it
the thousandth time, you are in frightful danger of seeing it for
the first time.
So the short Government official looked at the coat-tails of the
tall Government officials, and through street after street, and
round corner after corner, saw only coat-tails, coat-tails, and
again coat-tails...when, he did not in the least know why,
something happened to his eyes.
Two black dragons were walking backwards in front of him. Two black
dragons were looking at him with evil eyes. The dragons were
walking backwards it was true, but they kept their eyes fixed on
him none the less. The eyes which he saw were, in truth, only the
two buttons at the back of a frock-coat: perhaps some traditional
memory of their meaningless character gave this half-witted
prominence to their gaze. The slit between the tails was the
nose-line of the monster: whenever the tails flapped in the winter
wind the dragons licked their lips. It was only a momentary fancy,
but the small clerk found it imbedded in his soul ever afterwards.
He never could again think of men in frock-coats except as dragons
walking backwards. He explained afterwards, quite tactfully and
nicely, to his two official friends, that while feeling an
inexpressible regard for each of them he could not seriously regard
the face of either of them as anything but a kind of tail. It was,
he admitted, a handsome tail...a tail elevated in the air. But if,
he said, any true friend of theirs wished to see their faces, to
look into the eyes of their soul, that friend must be allowed to
walk reverently round behind them, so as to see them from the rear.
There he would see the two black dragons with the blind eyes.
But when first the two black dragons sprang out of the fog upon the
small clerk, they had merely the effect of all miracles...they
changed the universe. He discovered the fact that all romantics
know...that adventures happen on dull days, and not on sunny ones.
When the chord of monotony is stretched most tight, then it breaks
with a sound like song. He had scarcely noticed the weather before,
but with the four dead eyes glaring at him he looked round and
realized the strange dead day.
The morning was wintry and dim, not misty, but darkened with that
shadow of cloud or snow which steeps everything in a green or
copper twilight. The light there is on such a day seems not so much
to come from the clear heavens as to be a phosphorescence clinging
to the shapes themselves. The load of heaven and the clouds is like
a load of waters, and the men move like fishes, feeling that they
are on the floor of a sea. Everything in a London street completes
the fantasy; the carriages and cabs themselves resemble deep-sea
creatures with eyes of flame. He had been startled at first to meet
two dragons. Now he found he was among deep-sea dragons possessing
the deep sea.
The two young men in front were like the small young man himself,
well-dressed. The lines of their frock-coats and silk hats had that
luxuriant severity which makes the modern fop, hideous as he is, a
favourite exercise of the modern draughtsman; that element which
Mr. Max Beerbohm has admirably expressed in speaking of "certain
congruities of dark cloth and the rigid perfection of linen."
They walked with the gait of an affected snail, and they spoke at
the longest intervals, dropping a sentence at about every sixth
lamp-post.
They crawled on past the lamp-posts; their mien was so immovable
that a fanciful description might almost say, that the lamp-posts
crawled past the men, as in a dream. Then the small man suddenly
ran after them and said:
"I want to get my hair cut. I say, do you know a little shop
anywhere where they cut your hair properly? I keep on having my
hair cut, but it keeps on growing again."
One of the tall men looked at him with the air of a pained
naturalist.
"Why, here is a little place," cried the small man, with a sort of
imbecile cheerfulness, as the bright bulging window of a
fashionable toilet-saloon glowed abruptly out of the foggy
twilight. "Do you know, I often find hairdressers when I walk about
London. I'll lunch with you at Cicconani's. You know, I'm awfully
fond of hairdressers' shops. They're miles better than those nasty
butchers'." And he disappeared into the doorway.
The man called James continued to gaze after him, a monocle screwed
into his eye.
"What the devil do you make of that fellow?" he asked his
companion, a pale young man with a high nose.
The pale young man reflected conscientiously for some minutes, and
then said:
"Had a knock on his head when he was a kid, I should think."
"No, I don't think it's that," replied the Honourable James Barker.
"I've sometimes fancied he was a sort of artist, Lambert."
"Bosh!" cried Mr. Lambert, briefly.
"I admit I can't make him out," resumed Barker, abstractedly; "he
never opens his mouth without saying something so indescribably
half-witted that to call him a fool seems the very feeblest attempt
at characterization. But there's another thing about him that's
rather funny. Do you know that he has the one collection of
Japanese lacquer in Europe? Have you ever seen his books? All Greek
poets and mediaeval French and that sort of thing. Have you ever
been in his rooms? It's like being inside an amethyst. And he moves
about in all that and talks like...like a turnip."
"Well, damn all books. Your blue books as well," said the ingenuous
Mr. Lambert, with a friendly simplicity. "You ought to understand
such things. What do you make of him?"
"He's beyond me," returned Barker. "But if you asked me for my
opinion, I should say he was a man with a taste for nonsense, as
they call it...artistic fooling, and all that kind of thing. And I
seriously believe that he has talked nonsense so much that he has
half bewildered his own mind and doesn't know the difference
between sanity and insanity. He has gone round the mental world, so
to speak, and found the place where the East and the West are one,
and extreme idiocy is as good as sense. But I can't explain these
psychological games."
"You can't explain them to me," replied Mr. Wilfrid Lambert, with
candour.
As they passed up the long streets towards their restaurant the
copper twilight cleared slowly to a pale yellow, and by the time
they reached it they stood discernible in a tolerable winter
daylight. The Honourable James Barker, one of the most powerful
officials in the English Government (by this time a rigidly
official one), was a lean and elegant young man, with a blank
handsome face and bleak blue eyes. He had a great amount of
intellectual capacity, of that peculiar kind which raises a man
from throne to throne and lets him die loaded with honours without
having either amused or enlightened the mind of a single man.
Wilfrid Lambert, the youth with the nose which appeared to
impoverish the rest of his face, had also contributed little to the
enlargement of the human spirit, but he had the honourable excuse
of being a fool.
Lambert would have been called a silly man; Barker, with all his
cleverness, might have been called a stupid man. But mere silliness
and stupidity sank into insignificance in the presence of the awful
and mysterious treasures of foolishness apparently stored up in the
small figure that stood waiting for them outside Cicconani's. The
little man, whose name was Auberon Quin, had an appearance
compounded of a baby and an owl. His round head, round eyes, seemed
to have been designed by nature playfully with a pair of compasses.
His flat dark hair and preposterously long frock-coat gave him
something of the look of a child's "Noah." When he entered a room
of strangers, they mistook him for a small boy, and wanted to take
him on their knees, until he spoke, when they perceived that a boy
would have been more intelligent.
"I have been waiting quite a long time," said Quin, mildly. "It's
awfully funny I should see you coming up the street at last."
"Why?" asked Lambert, staring. "You told us to come here
yourself."
"My mother used to tell people to come to places," said the
sage.
They were about to turn into the restaurant with a resigned air,
when their eyes were caught by something in the street. The
weather, though cold and blank, was now quite clear, and across the
dull brown of the wood pavement and between the dull grey terraces
was moving something not to be seen for miles around...not to be
seen perhaps at that time in England...a man dressed in bright
colours. A small crowd hung on the man's heels.
He was a tall stately man, clad in a military uniform of brilliant
green, splashed with great silver facings. From the shoulder swung
a short green furred cloak, somewhat like that of a Hussar, the
lining of which gleamed every now and then with a kind of tawny
crimson. His breast glittered with medals; round his neck was the
red ribbon and star of some foreign order; and a long straight
sword, with a blazing hilt, trailed and clattered along the
pavement. At this time the pacific and utilitarian development of
Europe had relegated all such customs to the Museums. The only
remaining force, the small but well-organized police, were attired
in a sombre and hygienic manner. But even those who remembered the
last Life Guards and Lancers who disappeared in 1912 must have
known at a glance that this was not, and never had been, an English
uniform; and this conviction would have been heightened by the
yellow aquiline face, like Dante carved in bronze, which rose,
crowned with white hair, out of the green military collar, a keen
and distinguished, but not an English face.
The magnificence with which the green-clad gentleman walked down
the centre of the road would be something difficult to express in
human language. For it was an ingrained simplicity and arrogance,
something in the mere carriage of the head and body, which made
ordinary moderns in the street stare after him; but it had
comparatively little to do with actual conscious gestures or
expression. In the matter of these merely temporary movements, the
man appeared to be rather worried and inquisitive, but he was
inquisitive with the inquisitiveness of a despot and worried as
with the responsibilities of a god. The men who lounged and
wondered behind him followed partly with an astonishment at his
brilliant uniform, that is to say, partly because of that instinct
which makes us all follow one who looks like a madman, but far more
because of that instinct which makes all men follow (and worship)
any one who chooses to behave like a king. He had to so sublime an
extent that great quality of royalty...an almost imbecile
unconsciousness of everybody, that people went after him as they do
after kings...to see what would be the first thing or person he
would take notice of. And all the time, as we have said, in spite
of his quiet splendour, there was an air about him as if he were
looking for somebody; an expression of inquiry.
Suddenly that expression of inquiry vanished, none could tell why,
and was replaced by an expression of contentment. Amid the rapt
attention of the mob of idlers, the magnificent green gentleman
deflected himself from his direct course down the centre of the
road and walked to one side of it. He came to a halt opposite to a
large poster of Colman's Mustard erected on a wooden hoarding. His
spectators almost held their breath.
He took from a small pocket in his uniform a little penknife; with
this he made a slash at the stretched paper. Completing the rest of
the operation with his fingers, he tore off a strip or rag of
paper, yellow in colour and wholly irregular in outline. Then for
the first time the great being addressed his adoring
onlookers:
"Can any one," he said, with a pleasing foreign accent, "lend me a
pin?"
Mr. Lambert, who happened to be nearest, and who carried
innumerable pins for the purpose of attaching innumerable
buttonholes, lent him one, which was received with extravagant but
dignified bows, and hyperboles of thanks.
The gentleman in green, then, with every appearance of being
gratified, and even puffed up, pinned the piece of yellow paper to
the green silk and silver-lace adornments of his breast. Then he
turned his eyes round again, searching and unsatisfied.
"Anything else I can do, sir?" asked Lambert, with the absurd
politeness of the Englishman when once embarrassed.
"Red," said the stranger, vaguely, "red."
"I beg your pardon?"
"I beg yours also, Senor," said the stranger, bowing. "I was
wondering whether any of you had any red about you."
"Any red about us?...well, really...no, I don't think I have...I
used to carry a red bandanna once, but..."
"Barker," asked Auberon Quin, suddenly, "where's your red cockatoo?
Where's your red cockatoo?"
"What do you mean?" asked Barker, desperately. "What cockatoo?
You've never seen me with any cockatoo."
"I know," said Auberon, vaguely mollified. "Where's it been all the
time?"
Barker swung round, not without resentment.
"I am sorry, sir," he said, shortly but civilly, "none of us seem
to have anything red to lend you. But why, if one may ask..."
"I thank you, Senor, it is nothing. I can, since there is nothing
else, fulfil my own requirements."
And standing for a second of thought with the penknife in his hand,
he stabbed his left palm. The blood fell with so full a stream that
it struck the stones without dripping. The foreigner pulled out his
handkerchief and tore a piece from it with his teeth. The rag was
immediately soaked in scarlet.
"Since you are so generous, Senor," he said, "another pin,
perhaps."
Lambert held one out, with eyes protruding like a frog's.
The red linen was pinned beside the yellow paper, and the foreigner
took off his hat.
"I have to thank you all, gentlemen," he said; and wrapping the
remainder of the handkerchief round his bleeding hand, he resumed
his walk with an overwhelming stateliness.
While all the rest paused, in some disorder, little Mr. Auberon
Quin ran after the stranger and stopped him, with hat in hand.
Considerably to everybody's astonishment, he addressed him in the
purest Spanish:
"Senor," he said in that language, "pardon a hospitality, perhaps
indiscreet, towards one who appears to be a distinguished, but a
solitary guest in London. Will you do me and my friends, with whom
you have held some conversation, the honour of lunching with us at
the adjoining restaurant?"
The man in the green uniform had turned a fiery colour of pleasure
at the mere sound of his own language, and he accepted the
invitation with that profusion of bows which so often shows, in the
case of the Southern races, the falsehood of the notion that
ceremony has nothing to do with feeling.
"Senor," he said, "your language is my own; but all my love for my
people shall not lead me to deny to yours the possession of so
chivalrous an entertainer. Let me say that the tongue is Spanish
but the heart English." And he passed with the rest into
Cicconani's.
"Now, perhaps," said Barker, over the fish and sherry, intensely
polite, but burning with curiosity, "perhaps it would be rude of me
to ask why you did that?"
"Did what, Senor?" asked the guest, who spoke English quite well,
though in a manner indefinably American.
"Well," said the Englishman, in some confusion, "I mean tore a
strip off a hoarding and... er... cut yourself... and..."
"To tell you that, Senor," answered the other, with a certain sad
pride, "involves merely telling you who I am. I am Juan del Fuego,
President of Nicaragua."
The manner with which the President of Nicaragua leant back and
drank his sherry showed that to him this explanation covered all
the facts observed and a great deal more. Barker's brow, however,
was still a little clouded.
"And the yellow paper," he began, with anxious friendliness, "and
the red rag..."
"The yellow paper and the red rag," said Fuego, with indescribable
grandeur, "are the colours of Nicaragua."
"But Nicaragua..." began Barker, with great hesitation, "Nicaragua
is no longer a..."
"Nicaragua has been conquered like Athens. Nicaragua has been
annexed like Jerusalem," cried the old man, with amazing fire. "The
Yankee and the German and the brute powers of modernity have
trampled it with the hoofs of oxen. But Nicaragua is not dead.
Nicaragua is an idea."
Auberon Quin suggested timidly, "A brilliant idea."
"Yes," said the foreigner, snatching at the word. "You are right,
generous Englishman. An idea brilliant, a burning thought. Senor,
you asked me why, in my desire to see the colours of my country, I
snatched at paper and blood. Can you not understand the ancient
sanctity of colours? The Church has her symbolic colours. And think
of what colours mean to us...think of the position of one like
myself, who can see nothing but those two colours, nothing but the
red and the yellow. To me all shapes are equal, all common and
noble things are in a democracy of combination. Wherever there is a
field of marigolds and the red cloak of an old woman, there is
Nicaragua. Wherever there is a field of poppies and a yellow patch
of sand, there is Nicaragua, Wherever there is a lemon and a red
sunset, there is my country. Wherever I see a red pillar-box and a
yellow sunset, there my heart beats. Blood and a splash of mustard
can be my heraldry. If there be yellow mud and red mud in the same
ditch, it is better to me than white stars."
"And if," said Quin, with equal enthusiasm, "there should happen to
be yellow wine and red wine at the same lunch, you could not
confine yourself to sherry. Let me order some Burgundy, and
complete, as it were, a sort of Nicaraguan heraldry in your
inside."
Barker was fiddling with his knife, and was evidently making up his
mind to say something, with the intense nervousness of the amiable
Englishman.
"I am to understand, then," he said at last, with a cough, "that
you, ahem, were the President of Nicaragua when it made
its...er...one must, of course, agree...its quite heroic resistance
to...er..."
The ex-President of Nicaragua waved his hand.