Erhalten Sie Zugang zu diesem und mehr als 300000 Büchern ab EUR 5,99 monatlich.
What is feminism? Why are we still talking about it, and what can it tell us about ourselves, our societies and prejudices? In this unique, illustrated introduction, we'll explore the early history of conscious struggle against sexist oppression, through the modern "waves" of feminism, up to present-day conversations about MeToo, intersectional feminism, and women's rights in the Middle East. We'll look at critical theory, popular action and the social and cultural forces that affect attitudes toward gender, women's lives and the struggle for equality. And we'll hear about the contributions of pioneers like Mary Wollstonecraft, Simone de Beauvoir and Kimberlé Crenshaw. As we'll see, feminism is at once global, local and individual. Written by Cathia Jenainati with illustrations from Judy Groves and Jem Milton, Feminism: A Graphic Guide engages with the heated debates taking place in our homes, workplaces and public spaces -- and the work still to be done.
Sie lesen das E-Book in den Legimi-Apps auf:
Seitenzahl: 134
Veröffentlichungsjahr: 2019
Das E-Book (TTS) können Sie hören im Abo „Legimi Premium” in Legimi-Apps auf:
Cover
Title Page
Copyright
What is Feminism?
Is Feminism Still Relevant?
What is Patriarchy?
Biology is Destiny
Logic or Emotion?
Early Modern Feminist Activity
Reinterpreting the Bible
First Political Action
“To the Ladies”
Early Perspectives
The Age of Reason
Social Planners
Competing Perspectives
The Rise of Individualism
First Wave Feminism
Remembering the Ladies
Mary Wollstonecraft
An Unconventional Life
Against Rousseau
Sense and Sensibility
The Divine Right of Husbands
The Grimké Sisters
The “Cult of Domesticity”, 1820–80
Rules of Conduct for Men and Women
Harriet Taylor Mill
Theory and Practice
A Panoply of Servants
“Man” or “Person”?
Caroline Norton
Coverture
The Infant Custody Act
The Matrimonial Causes Act
Women’s Suffrage in Australia
Early Feminist Activity in Canada
Seneca Falls Convention, New York 1848
A Declaration of Independence
The Advent of the Bloomers
The 1850s in the USA
The International Council of Women
The 1850s in Britain
Barbara Bodichon
Langham Place
Emmeline Pankhurst
The Woman’s Social and Political Union
Militant Suffragettes
Suffrage Gains Momentum
Against Suffrage
The First Backlash
Educated but Under-employed
The Lost Sex
Virginia Woolf
A Room of One’s Own
Guineas and Locks
“I have no country …”
Simone de Beauvoir
Existence Precedes Essence
Second Wave Feminism: Milestones
The Women’s Liberation Movement
The Personal is Political
Betty Friedan
The Feminine Mystique
Motherhood Before Career?
Consciousness-raising
Critiques of Consciousness-raising
Varieties of Feminisms
Socialist Feminism
Traditional Marxist Feminism
Radical Feminism
Ecofeminism
Psychoanalytic Feminism
Postfeminism
Protest and Revolt: Beauty Pageants
Germaine Greer
Shulamith Firestone
Reproduction, not Production
Consuming for Capitalism
Kate Millett
The Sex/Gender Hierarchy
Misogyny in Literature
Ann Oakley
Subject Women
Gynocriticism
Psychoanalysis and Feminist Thought
“The Reproduction of Mothering”
Mermaids and Minotaurs
Separation from the Mother
Adrienne Rich
Gyn/Ecology
The 1980s
Black Women’s Experience of Feminism
Early Expressions of Black Feminism
A’n’t I a Woman?
Frances Harper
The Combahee River Collective
Black Feminist Activity in Britain
Gynocentricism and Black Feminism
bell hooks
Alice Walker
Popular Fiction in the 1980s
The Power of Romance
Feminism and Pornography
Feminism and the Body
The Third Wave
A Crisis of Victimization?
Deconstructive Feminism
Girl Power
Third Wave Feminism and Pop Culture
Emerging Concerns
Feminism and Transgender Identity
Feminism and Media Activism
Intersectionality
Neoliberal Feminism
Feminist Activity in Developing Countries
The Subaltern
Challenging Rituals
Arab Feminism and Social Media
The Girl in the Blue Bra
What is Feminism?
Milestones
Further Reading
About the Author and Artists
Author’s Acknowledgements
Index
Published by Icon Books Ltd, Omnibus Business Centre, 39–41 North Road, London N7 9DPEmail: [email protected]
ISBN: 978-178578-491-0
Text and Illustrations copyright © 2019 Icon Books Ltd
The author and illustrator have asserted their moral rights
Originating editor: Richard Appignanesi and Kiera Jamison
No part of this book may be reproduced in any form, or by any means, without prior permission in writing from the publisher.
Any attempt to address this question invariably faces numerous challenges. Where to start, who to include, what to leave out and when to stop are all important considerations. This book provides an overview of the development of feminist activism in the Anglo-speaking world. It specifically outlines feminist thought in Britain, the Commonwealth and the US, and it refers to international contexts where relevant.
The book acknowledges and intends to celebrate the variety of feminist perspectives which have developed throughout women’s history, taking as its premise bell hooks’ famous definition.
FEMINISM IS THE STRUGGLE TO END SEXIST OPPRESSION.
Feminism: A Graphic Guide traces some of the historical and social developments of this struggle.
From 1970–78 the UK-based Women’s Liberation Movement conference had campaigned for:
Equal pay
Equal educational and job opportunities
Free contraception and abortion on demand
Free 24-hour nurseries
Legal and financial independence for all women
The right to self-defined sexuality and an end to discrimination against lesbians
Freedom from intimidation by the threat or use of violence or sexual coercion; and an end to the laws, assumptions and institutions which perpetuate male dominance and aggression to women.
In the years since the WLM disbanded:
THE #ME TOO MOVEMENT EXPOSED WIDESPREAD AND HISTORIC SEXUAL ABUSE IN THE ENTERTAINMENT SECTOR, FOLLOWED BY REVELATIONS IN OTHER SECTORS.
ONE IN FIVE LGBT PEOPLE HAVE EXPERIENCED A HATE CRIME OR INCIDENT BECAUSE OF THEIR SEXUAL ORIENTATION AND / OR GENDER IDENTITY IN THE LAST 12 MONTHS.
Feminism enables concerted collective efforts to address discriminatory practices that pervade our personal and professional lives. Feminism in the 21st century is no longer a marginal activity but a way of life that men and women subscribe to.
One starting point for thinking about feminist activity is coming to a consensus about what the term “patriarchy” means. A useful definition is provided by Chris Weedon.
“PATRIARCHAL REFERS TO POWER RELATIONS IN WHICH WOMEN’S INTERESTS ARE SUBORDINATED TO THE INTERESTS OF MEN.”
“THESE POWER RELATIONS TAKE ON MANY FORMS, FROM THE SEXUAL DIVISION OF LABOUR AND THE SOCIAL ORGANIZATION OF PROCREATION TO THE INTERNALIZED NORMS OF FEMININITY BY WHICH WE LIVE.”
“PATRIARCHAL POWER RESTS ON SOCIAL GIVEN TO BIOLOGICAL SEXUAL DIFFERENCE.”
IT IS A GREAT GLORY IN A WOMAN TO SHOW NO MORE WEAKNESS THAN IS NATURAL TO HER SEX, AND NOT BE TALKED OF, EITHER FOR GOOD OR EVIL BY MEN.
Patriarchy is an ideology that is manifested in practice by the subordination of the interests of women to those of men, especially when it comes to biological reproduction, labour politics and legal rights.
The term “feminism” came into English usage around the 1890s, but women’s conscious struggle to resist discrimination and sexist oppression goes much further back.
As early as the 4th century BC, Aristotle (384–322 BC) declared that “women were women by virtue of a certain lack of qualities”. His predecessor the Greek historian and army general Thucydides (c. 460–400 BC) had some advice for women.
Early thinking about the difference between women and men was based on essentialist ideas about gender which maintained that women’s and men’s differences are a result of biology. The belief that biology is destiny suggests that, in comparable situations, men exhibit “masculine” psychological traits such as aggressiveness, rationality and assertiveness, whereas women will exhibit “feminine” traits such as gentleness, intuitiveness and sensitivity. These differences, it was believed, translated into particular patterns of thought, feeling and behaviour specific to each gender.
Essentialism sees men as able to think logically, abstractly and analytically, while women are mainly emotional, compassionate and nurturing creatures.
IT IS IMPORTANT TO MAINTAIN DISTINCTIONS BETWEEN THE SEXES IN ORDER TO PRESERVE THE NATURAL ORDER.
Essentialist thinking had repercussions on women’s private and public lives. In private, essentialist ideas were translated into rules of conduct for the woman as wife, mother and daughter. In public, it was believed that women’s participation should be limited and strictly controlled by a masculine representative of authority such as husband, father, the clergy, the law.
Essentialist ideas about women permeated Western thought for centuries and proposed that there is a natural, biologically determined essence of the feminine that is universal and unchangeable.
“WOMAN IS FICKLE AND ALWAYS CHANGING.” VIRGIL (70–19 BC)
“WOMAN IS AN IMPERFECT MAN.” THOMAS AQUINAS (1225–74)
“FRAILTY, THY NAME IS WOMAN!”
Feminists have long fought to dispel such myths about gender.
Early Modern (1550–1700) English society was founded on the rule of the father.
MAN IS THE HEAD OF THE HOUSEHOLD …
… JUST AS THE MONARCH IS THE HEAD OF STATE AND JESUS HEAD OF THE CHURCH.
Women had no formal rights and were not represented in the law. Even if some women were able to receive a higher education, they were not allowed to receive the degree for which they studied. In marriage, the woman’s body belonged to her husband, who was also the only legal guardian of the children.
Early Modern feminist activity aimed at challenging the prevalent social view that women are weak and irrational creatures who should be controlled by men. There were a number of political events which supported such efforts, in particular Queen Elizabeth I’s accession to the throne in 1558 and her long and successful reign as a single female.
THEN THERE WAS THE ENGLISH CIVIL WAR AND THE INTERREGNUM PERIOD OF 1642–60 AND THE GLORIOUS REVOLUTION OF 1688 …
THESE EVENTS QUESTIONED THE SUPREME POWER OF THE KING AND DEMONSTRATED THAT IT WAS POSSIBLE TO CHALLENGE PATRIARCHAL RULE.
Writings on women’s issues in the late 16th century began to proliferate, with a number of essays questioning the ideal of the female as “chaste, silent and obedient”. In 1589, Jane Anger’sHer Protection for Women reinterpreted Genesis.
IF GOD CREATED MAN FROM DUST, THEN HE MADE WOMAN FROM THE MAN’S BODY …
CONSEQUENTLY WOMEN ARE PURER AND MORE EXCELLENT BEINGS THAN MEN.
Rachel Speght’s A Muzzle for Melastomus (1617) interrogated the story of Adam’s fall from the Garden of Eden, taking issue with the underlying assumption that Adam had been seduced by Eve to eat the apple: “If Adam has not approved of that deed which Eve has done, and been willing to tread the steps which she had gone, he being her head would have reproved her.”
The gender of authors such as Jane Anger, Rachel Speght, Esther Sowernam and Sarah Egerton remains debatable. Some critics believe them to be pseudonyms used to engage in literary debates rather than political reform. Nonetheless, their writings reflect the contemporaneous concerns with traditional perceptions of woman’s nature and her role.
Independent Churchwomen
Lawrence Stone, writing about the political and socio-economic status of women in 17th-century England, suggests that even as far back as the Civil War of the 1640s, women played an important role in religious interpretation by participating in independent churches where they were allowed to engage in debate, to vote and even prophesy. These women sought to re-invent their roles by claiming a prominent position in society and religion.
WE WILL NOT BE WIVES AND TIE UP OUR LIVES TO VILLAINOUS SLAVERY.
In 1642, impoverished women working in a variety of trades collectively rebelled and marched into London to petition the Houses of Lords and Commons. They wanted the law to take into account their status of working individuals and to improve the conditions of the working class. Upon seeing them, the Duke of Richmond allegedly ordered (sarcastically) …
AWAY WITH THESE WOMEN, WE WERE BEST HAVE A PARLIAMENT OF WOMEN.
At this point, it is believed that the mob of nearly 400 women attacked him physically and broke his staff of office.
English working women continued to protest whenever political decisions discriminated against them or their class. Although these early efforts cannot be termed “feminist” in the contemporary sense of the word, yet these women’s collective sentiment of injustice and their determination to fight unjust laws testifies to a feminine consciousness which united them.
In 1688, the “Glorious Revolution” saw the rejection of monarchical patriarchy with the overthrow of James II, initiating a fierce wave of publications by literary women such as Aphra Behn (1640–89) and Lady Chudleigh (1656–1710), whose 1703 poem “To the Ladies” expresses the feelings of the era:
To the LadiesWife and servant are the same,But only differ in the name.
When the word “obey” has said,And man by law supreme has made,
Fierce as an Eastern Prince he growsAnd all his innate rigor shows.
Then shun, oh shun that wretched stateAnd all the fawning flatterers hate.Value yourselves and men despise:You must be proud if you’ll be wise.
The Society of Friends
In 1652, the Society of Friends was founded in England by Quakers. Quakers do not accept any form of hierarchy between people. They do not take their hat off to anyone, as was demonstrated in the meeting of the prominent Quaker William Penn and the French King Charles II.
I REFUSED TO REMOVE MY HAT AND EXPLAINED TO THE KING THAT QUAKERS UNCOVER THEMSELVES ONLY TO THE LORD.
This belief in social equality was unique for its time, and was translated into a series of original attitudes towards race and gender. Between 1755 and 1776, Quakers became active in fighting the institution of slavery by creating abolition societies to promote emancipation.
Within the family, Quakers did not differentiate between the social roles of men and women. As a result, many female Friends were highly educated and played prominent roles in politics and education. Quaker women would travel unaccompanied, contribute to Church administration and preach to mixed audiences.
Consequently it is believed that in the 19th century “Quaker women comprised 40 per cent of female abolitionists, 19 per cent of feminists born before 1830, and 15 per cent of suffragists born before 1830”. (Mary Maples)
FOR MANY YEARS, WOMEN’S STRUGGLE FOR EQUAL RIGHTS AND FOR FAIR REPRESENTATION IN SOCIETY WAS EQUATED WITH THE ABOLITIONIST CAUSE.
During the 18th and 19th centuries, many notable female figures were outspoken about the need to challenge women’s subordinate social position. Their writings express, to a great extent, the legacy of the Age of Enlightenment by insisting that we must use reason as opposed to faith to discover any truth about our existence. Finding things out individually rather than unquestioningly following tradition was the Enlightenment’s practice of free enquiry.
REASON CAN FREE US FROM SUPERSTITION.
“FREE ENQUIRY” IS THE SIMPLE PATH TO TRUTH.
REASON AND “FREE ENQUIRY CAN BE CULTIVATED THROUGH EDUCATION.
“REASONABLE” FREE ENQUIRY DICTATES THAT WOMEN NEED MORE OPPORTUNITIES.
One consequence of the Enlightenment’s emphasis on the rational is the impulse towards social planning. The social planners believed it to be their duty to plan and order the world around them. The Anglo-American social reformer Frances Wright (1795–1852) attempted to model this belief when she set up her own experimental community, Nashoba, dedicated to ensuring the emancipation of slaves.
I SET UP NASHOBA IN 1824 NEAR MEMPHIS, TENNESSEE.
ITS AIM WAS TO PROVIDE EDUCATION FOR SLAVES IN ORDER TO PREPARE THEM FOR EMANCIPATION.
Wright believed that for women as for slaves, more schooling and less churchgoing would ensure independence and guarantee happiness. Several factors contributed to the failure of this ambitious experiment …
SWAMP FEVER …
NEGATIVE PUBLICITY …
AND ANTAGONISM FROM THE GENERAL PUBLIC.
As a social planner, Wright stands apart from many of her contemporaries for being particularly concerned with the plight of the working class. She advocated abolition, universal education, birth control and equal rights for women.
The ideas of the Enlightenment translated into yet another perspective. Harriet Martineau and John Stuart Mill (see here and here) are two thinkers who put great emphasis on the power of thought and education to release the individual from the ghost of tradition. But they spoke mainly to an elite social audience in spite of their attempts to put their theories into action.
In the Anglo-American tradition, early thinking about women followed broadly two strategies:
The relational perspective proposed a vision of an egalitarian society based on non-hierarchical gender difference with the male-female couple as its basic unit.
IT DEFINED WOMEN’S RIGHTS IN RELATION TO WOMEN’S UNIQUE CONTRIBUTION TO THE COMMONWEALTH AND THEIR CHILDBEARING AND NURTURING CAPACITIES.
IT EMPHASIZED THE INDIVIDUAL’S NEED FOR PERSONAL FULFILMENT AND AUTONOMY WHILE DOWNPLAYING ALL SOCIALLY CONSTRUCTED NOTIONS OF GENDER IDENTITY.
The individualist perspective posited the individual as the basic unit of society.
Social activity and philosophical writing on women was founded on either of these ways of thinking, although many writers often used a combination of both. Between 1890 and 1920, both perspectives seemed complementary. But by 1920, their goals had diverged, reflecting women’s varied needs and experiences.
IN BRITAIN AND THE US, INDIVIDUALIST FEMINISM DOMINATED AS EDUCATED AND FINANCIALLY INDEPENDENT SINGLE WOMEN BECAME OUTSPOKEN AND PROMOTED A NON-FAMILY-BASED EXISTENCE.
AT THE SAME TIME, MARRIED WOMEN’S PARTICIPATION IN THE LABOUR FORCE BECAME A POLITICAL ISSUE, AS DID FALLING BIRTH RATES.
Individualism’s respect for human rights and its dismissive attitude towards sex-linked qualities was the representative way of thinking for the post-Second World War generation of women.
IN THE RELATIONAL PERSPECTIVE, THE HETEROSEXUAL COUPLE IS THE BASIC UNIT OF SOCIETY; WOMEN CONTRIBUTE EQUALLY TO MEN THROUGH CHILDBEARING.
IN THE INDIVIDUALIST PERSPECTIVE, THE INDIVIDUAL IS THE BASIC UNIT OF SOCIETY; OUR SOCIAL ROLES SHOULD NOT BE DEFINED BY OUR GENDER.