3,99 €
Mehr erfahren.
- Herausgeber: BookRix
- Kategorie: Fachliteratur
- Sprache: Englisch
No AI, No AI translated by Eduard Wagner
What is happening today is very surprising. Is it because people are only out to enrich themselves and to oppress others. It should also be a peaceful coexistence and not always just wars and other conflicts. Having been in IT for decades, I got around to writing my own books about 2 years ago and this has shown its success.
Das E-Book können Sie in Legimi-Apps oder einer beliebigen App lesen, die das folgende Format unterstützen:
Veröffentlichungsjahr: 2023
Ähnliche
New World Order 2 May 2023
What is happening today is very surprising. Is it because people are only out to enrich themselves and to oppress others. It should also be a peaceful coexistence and not always just wars and other conflicts. Having been in IT for decades, I got around to writing my own books about 2 years ago and this has shown its success.BookRix GmbH & Co. KG81371 MunichNew World Order 2 May 2023 Eduard Wagner
Start
Foreword
Far be it from me to attack or condemn anyone here. Rather, it is my view of things as I interpret them below. It may well be that one or the other thinks that this is a radical view of things. But sometimes it seems to me like burying your head in the sand. Not reacting resolves itself. I believe this common thread runs through the entire written work. As I said, this is not paternalism of anyone, but my opinion on various things at home and abroad.
Asylum, Immigration and Immigration
What do all three terms have in common?
Isn't this happening under the wrong conditions? Many foreign citizens from all over the world come to the European Union thinking that they have a better life here than in their countries of birth. But if a statistic says that 7 out of 10 foreigners can neither read nor write, then we need to reconsider whether we need such an influx. Of course, we lack many skilled workers that we absolutely need, but what do you do with people who only think that they can live better with us. Such people are almost impossible to integrate, provided that they strive for it. Now, however, the whole system has come apart at the seams and soon we no longer know how to deal with such refugee flows. However, it is always the case that the domestic citizen has to support such tendencies. Politicians should finally start to rethink and not burden the citizen even more with the taxes he pays. If you don't soon come to a preference for the national, you will certainly soon rebel against it. Those responsible should think more about their own citizens before quoting the saying: "We can do it". And how much longer will we be able to do this if the burden on the citizen is not already enough?
How far is the understanding of politics?
If you listen to the statements and explanations of the politicians, you have to realize that there are always only vague hints and plans. There is talk about the future in 2030 and beyond, only the problems at hand are pushed aside. It is true that the current problems are not easy to solve, only the citizen wants to see facts and reactions from the people he elects, and not just announcements that have little to do with the present. If you then look at the individual representatives of the people, it is the case that they do not have time to deal with pending problems. People are sought to lead the respective party and in other parties individual opinions are concretized in order to distinguish themselves from other groups. As far as proposed solutions to current problems are concerned, hardly anything is heard from politicians. However, the public expects that there will be proposals and decisions on the crises that exist now, but as I said, they are little or sparse.
Asylum centers at the EU's external borders
It is always just discussed and there are almost no results. The idea of setting up asylum centers at the European Union's external borders may be a step in the right direction, but how far can we control the borders that stretch over 1,000 kilometers? Once a refugee is on European territory, it is difficult to find him. Think, for example, of the subsidies for migrants that the local citizen has to shell out. Once again, we are thinking about how long such an asylum procedure should take, and there is again talk of weeks and months. There are human rights laws and conventions that state that one should, for example, support war refugees. But it doesn't mean that this has to take months and years. That's right, we need a certain influx of skilled workers into the EU, but they are also qualified for it. It has just been discovered that only a small proportion of these people can read and write. How are we supposed to integrate such people into our society, where the question also arises as to whether they want and want to do the same?
Does there have to be a gender delusion?
One hears the statement of a high-ranking politician who thinks that "pregnant women" should be renamed "women giving birth". As far as they were taught in school, this privilege is actually reserved only for the female sex. Yes, there are other statements that mean, for example, that the individual national anthems should also be reconsidered lyrically and musically. If you look at the first statement, every person knew what was meant by "pregnant women" and had done so for thousands of years. As far as the hymen is concerned, they have also proven themselves over decades. Why, then, do we need to start such discussions if they only lead to the anger of the population?
