Erhalten Sie Zugang zu diesem und mehr als 300000 Büchern ab EUR 5,99 monatlich.
Events happen every day that can be seen from a different perspective. Here I try to document such views. Whether they can agree or not is up to their point of view.
Sie lesen das E-Book in den Legimi-Apps auf:
Seitenzahl: 78
Veröffentlichungsjahr: 2024
Das E-Book (TTS) können Sie hören im Abo „Legimi Premium” in Legimi-Apps auf:
Foreword
October 2023
Is a former president a dictator?
McCarthy's ouster and the US Republicans
Fatal attack by an American Staffordshire terrier on a 60-year-old jogger
Slovenia: Krsko nuclear power plant to be shut down as a preventive measure
Too few armed conflicts?
100 years later
Rebellion our planet
Closure by Israel
Robert Fico likely to become head of government in Slovakia
War critics are not welcome in Russia
International law not applicable?
Integration and dual citizenship
Price of gas rises by 50 percent within a week
Terror back again or was it never gone?
Aid to the Population of the Gaza Strip
US President Joe Biden plans to ask the US Congress on Friday for a comprehensive aid package for Ukraine and Israel, among others
Arrogance and terrorism
Erdogan and NATO (North Atlantic Defence Alliance)
Split fungi also in Austria?
UN Secretary-General António Guterres and his statements
Another 385,000 soldiers as cannon fodder
2 states in the Middle East – a pipe dream?
Statements by the President of the Jewish Community of Israel
Storm on airport in Dagestan
279 Israeli settlements. Only about half of them are approved by the Israeli government
Wars and are there results?
November 2023
According to the government, around four million Afghans live in Pakistan
Closure of the Gaza Strip
Budget levy for public service broadcasters
To govern or just to maintain power
Trump and his figures on 3.35 billion euros
Criticism of Benjamin Netanyahu grows
Accession of Ukraine to the European Union
Amnesty for Catalan separatists
Journalism and Secret Service
Just under 88 percent enough?
Trump and his sayings
Making war and destroying money
U.S. Emergency Budget and President XI
UN Secretary-General António Guterres and his statements
Eva Kaili Member of the European Parliament
Glyphosate for another 10 years
No high school diploma and no grades
Argentine populist Javier Milei is the new president
North Korea launched the first spy satellite into Earth orbit
Right-wing populist Geert Wilders in first place
Last generation classified as a criminal organization
Asylum status for refugees from Turkey and Syria
LGBTQ: Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Queer and Russian
The French nuclear company EDF wants to build at least one large nuclear power plant per year in the 2030s
Head of an oil company as president of the climate conference
Tyrolean real estate investor René Benko has filed for insolvency
December 2023
Germany and Emirates pledge 200 million dollars for climate damage
New parties in the German parliament?
30 billion funds for climate damage
Restructuring proceedings on one's own responsibility
Markus Söder and Gendering
75 years of human rights
Crisis in Ukraine
EU and AI (Artificial Intelligence)
Rwanda already costs 280 million
COP 28 climate summit and outcomes?
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky has appealed in Washington for a continuation of US military aid
Victory or just wear and tear of materials and people
Is Viktor Orbán a blackmailer?
Power Expand or Bloodlust?
"Tsar" Putin and the consequences
Negotiations, Support and Weapons
Victory in the Greatest Democracy
The pro-Iranian Houthi militia in Yemen wants to continue its attacks on merchant ships in the Red Sea
14 people killed in shooting rampage in Prague
UN Security Council meets
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and reality
Attack on the Capitol on January 6, 2021
Is Trump a better citizen?
So that was the year 2023
Far be it from me to attack or judge anyone here. Rather, it is my view of things, as I interpret it below. It may well be that one or the other thinks that this is a radical view of things. But sometimes it seems to me that you bury your head in the sand. Not reacting will resolve itself. I think this thread runs through the whole of the Scriptures. As I said, this is not paternalism of anyone, but my opinion on various things at home and abroad.
You're already used to a lot from this person. Only the fact that he, because he has to appear before an independent court, insults the judge and the prosecutor in the worst possible way, is an intensification of this person's choice of words. Of course, like every other citizen of this country, the presumption of innocence applies to him. The judiciary, as far as Europe can be seen, is independent in America, and when accusations are made, these organs must also have facts and evidence in order to articulate such an accusation. We had already heard from him in the last election that he had been disadvantaged in this vote. However, close investigations have revealed exactly the opposite, namely that this election was carried out in accordance with the relevant laws. How far does this man's sense of democracy go? It is highly questionable whether he will be able to win the next presidential elections. However, if this is true, then the image of the largest democracy is already very damaged as far as the rest of the world is concerned. After all, American legislation also makes it possible to govern from prison, whether this is in the interest of the citizen is hardly to be assumed.
It's interesting how people in America deal with people who don't agree with other politicians. Said McCarthys was speaker of the House of Representatives and had probably with a lot of effort brought about a majority that prevented a financial collapse in one of the largest economies. For this, he was rewarded with impeachment. Just imagine the impact it would have had if he hadn't brought about this vote. Not only would payments from the American budget be frozen, but this would also have catastrophic consequences for the global economy. How far do individual politicians go in their thinking, what they achieve with such obstructions? It is only a stopgap solution to the economic problems of this country and will apparently have to be dealt with again in mid-November, but at least the state of the USA can carry on again. The extent to which savings in expenditure are thought of is probably of secondary importance. However, rethinking spending from the financial budget will certainly not be a major issue there, as it is in other countries around the world. Only it is not always possible to spend, but should also think about whether these are justified or not.
Does something have to happen again and again in order to create appropriate laws and regulations, or is it also possible with "common sense"? The background is that in Austria we have 9 federal states, but also in each of these countries we have different regulations regarding leashes and muzzles. This is probably due to federalism, which is the only way to ensure the safety of the citizen, who, as in this particular case, died. If, in this context, one hears the statement that such list or fighting dogs are "weapons", one can hardly deny this. In addition, there is also the question of whether such animals are also bred. It should be possible to pass a uniform law for 9 federal states, which, for example, stipulates a muzzle as well as the obligation to keep dogs on a leash in public before people are killed again.
This is how it can work if there are always such outdated nuclear reactors. Not only is the production of energy one of the most expensive, but it is also not exactly squeamish about safety. If, however, a member of the Union also relies on this type of electricity generation, then there is the question of how this country intends to regulate the disposal of fuel rods, because this is not a problem of the next generation, but rather one that will occupy this planet for millennia to come. To date, no solution has been found, but attention is still being paid to the expansion of nuclear reactors. If alternative energies were to be pushed forward, this would be beneficial to global warming and also an opportunity for the future of the earth. As is the case again and again, individual lobbies will probably have to push through their interests in order to push their own profits. Do such groups not think at all about the continued existence of this planet?