INTRODUCTION
The importance of Remy de Gourmont
to the universal world of thought is now beginning to be recognized
among thinkers of every continent. During his own life he was a
figure apart and aloof even from his confrères; his reputation was
a matter more of intensity than of extensive acclaim, although
subtly it made its way, as did that of the Symbolist school in
general, to many nations. Now, however, he is beginning to receive
that wider recognition which during his life he actually shunned.
He belongs with the notable few who have devised and lived a
philosophy of continuous adaptation to the new knowledge that the
new day brings forth; he is a daring, independent, unostentatious,
extremely personal neo-Epicurean, too individualistic to have been
held long within the circle of a school, too sensitive not to have
responded to the multifarious influences of a complex age. Yet just
as his individualism was not the ignorant self-proclamation of
blatant mediocrity, so was his response to the contemporary world
far more than an aimless dashing about hither and thither in a
snobbish attempt to be ahead of the times. The man's essentially
dynamic personality has a genuine strain of the classic in it; he
possesses a rare repose, an intellectual poise, that serves as a
most admirable complement to his vibrant ideas. Few writers have
ever so well combined matter and manner, which to Gourmont were but
two aspects of one and the same thing,—the original thought. He is
not, and never will be, a writer for the crowd; he was, by heredity
and by choice, an aristocratic spirit, yet as he lived grew to
recognize and to admit the importance of true democracy.His chief importance, historically, was as the recognized
interpreter of the Symbolistic movement in French poetry; but
behind that movement lay a genealogy of ideas which ramified into
such seemingly divergent directions as the pre-Raphaelites in
England, the Hegelian idealists in Germany, and thus formed a
modern manifestation of primary significance. De Gourmont, like
more than one of the Symbolists, outgrew the movement, which from
the first was composed of personalities too strong to form a mere
school. He was, in the words of one of his commentators, "among the
first, if not the first, to realize the insufficiency of Symbolism,
in all that did not confine itself amidst the proud ivory walls of
an uncompromising lyricism. If he did not combat it, because he had
too complaisantly exalted it, he none the less abandoned it more
and more, to surrender himself,—with no other discipline than his
personal taste and his keen sense of the French genius,—to the
fecundity of his nature, retaining of the old verbal magic only
that which might contribute to his personal expansion,—notably that
precious gift of image and analogies which imparts such poetry,
such flexibility, variety and charm to his style. But henceforth
the idea (i.e., rather than the word) assumed in him a preponderant
importance, and now he was to play with ideas.... as he had
previously played with words and images."IIGourmont's literary career was particularly identified with
the notable French Review, theMercure de
France. How he came to join the staff of that
organ is interestingly recounted by Louis Dumur, in the same
obituary note from which the above quotation was translated.
Incidentally we obtain a glimpse of the young man just as he was
emerging into note."The great writer whom we have just lost," wrote M. Dumur,
"was to us more than a friend, better than a master: he seemed to
us the most complete representative, the very expression,—in all
its aspects and in all its complexity,—of our literary
generation."When, in the autumn of 1889, the small group which proposed
to found theMercure de Francethought first of adding several collaborators to its number,"
while one went off in search of Jules Renard, another invited
Julien Leclercq and a third promised the assistance of Albert
Samain,—the late lamented Louis Denise, who was at that time
cataloguer of the Bibliothèque Nationale, said to us:"There is at the Library an extraordinary man who knows
everything. He has already published ten volumes and a hundred
articles upon every conceivable subject.""We don't need a scholar, nor a polygraph, but rather a
writer who'll be one of us.""'All he asks is to be one of us,'" declared Denise. "'He is
filled with admiration for Mallarmé and swears only by Villiers de
l'Isle Adam. At the present moment he's writing a novel that will
be a revelation.'"'Bring along your prodigy."That prodigy was Remy de Gourmont."We did not know him, not even by name, despite his vast
literary labors. He lived in seclusion. He did not frequent any of
our literary rendezvous. He was never seen at the François Ier, nor
at the Vachette, nor at the Voltaire, nor at the Chat-Noir, nor at
the Nouvelle-Athènes. He had not written for any of our little
reviews, of which he was later to become the well-informed
historian. His signature had not appeared in the columns ofLutèce, la Vogue, theDecadent, theSymboliste, theScapin, theEcrits
pour l'Art, nor in laPléiade."But if we did not know him, he knew us all, together with
the Acadiens, the Lapons, the Italian verists, the English
novelists, the American humorists, the Jesuits, balloons, volcanos,
the thousand subjects upon which his learning and his curiosity had
exercised themselves. In publishing houses whose existence we did
not suspect or in papers we were hardly familiar with, we, too, in
conjunction with the still obscure and mysterious esthetic movement
which we aspired to represent, formed the object of his labors and
his meditations. This newcomer knew more about our interests than
we did ourselves. He had read our most insignificant essays. He
shared our enthusiasms, our antipathies, participated in our
intellectual research, discerned our tendencies, penetrated into
our intentions, which already he was arranging to formulate, and to
formulate for us with as keen a perspicuity and clarity as were
permitted by the concerted imprecision of our thought and the hazy,
delicately shaded, sublimated art that we had just
established."From his very first pages in theMercure de
France,"—thoseProses
moroseswhich were so perfect in form, so rare in
expression and of such singular subtlety,"—he revealed himself as
an expert artist in the new coloring, and produced exquisite models
of the refined genre which charmed us. In that same year, 1890, he
published through the firm of Savine the novel that Denise had
spoken about to us," thatSixtinewhich at once consecrated him as a coming master in the
exacting eyes of our cenacles. 'A novel of cerebral life,'—a
precious subtitle,—and one could find nothing better to suggest the
full significance of this book, which is of disturbing originality.
Nothing took place in it which the regular public calls by the name
of 'action'; everything in it, was, indeed, 'cerebral.' It was
filled with a minute, probing analysis. The hero did not love so
much as he observed himself in the process of loving. It was
charming, complicated, and marvellously written."At the times of its appearance the reaction against
naturalism and the so-called 'psychological' school of Bourget was
at its height.... Symbolism had been born,—musical, suggestive,
indirect. But if symbolism had produced its work, it had not yet
found its formulas. There was interminable and indefatigable
discussion as to just what symbolism was. And it was Remy de
Gourmont who undertook to define it. He himself brought to it
perfect and delicate products. Among these, in poetry and prose,
wereles Litanies de la Rose, Lilith, le Fantôme,
Fleurs de Jadis, Hieroglyphesand the dramatic
poemThéodat, which was given
at the Théâtre d'Art at the same time as Maeterlinck's les
Aveugles, Laforgue'sle Concile
féeriqueand thatCantique des
Cantiquesby Renaird, which was accompanied by a
luminous, fragrant musical score so that, by an appropriate harmony
of sounds, voices, colors and perfumes, all the senses might be
conjointly struck by the same symbol."Of Gourmont's services to the movement into which he was thus
introduced Camille Mauclair, one of Mallarmé's intimate friends,
has written:"The theories of the Symbolists were presented and condensed
in excellent fashion in the numerous books and critical articles by
Remy de Gourmont, who was not only a most original novelist and a
perfect artist in prose, but also one of the most remarkable
essayists of the nineteenth century, characterized by an
astonishing wealth of ideas, a rare erudition, and an intellectual
flexibility that assured him philosophical as well as esthetic
culture. Moralist, logician, poet, intuitive as well as deductive,
passionate lover of ideas, Remy de Gourmont possessed also the
merit of being a voluntary recluse, exceedingly proud, clinging
tenaciously to his liberty, disdaining all fame, living as a
solitary spirit and as a man truly above all social prejudices. His
irony, which excluded neither emotion nor faith, was but the effect
of a deep scorn of mediocracy.... His whole life was a model of
independence.... Remy de Gourmont, better than any other,
formulated the idealism which was at the bottom of the Symbolist
doctrine."Among these services to the new movement were Gourmont's
penetrating studies of such figures as Mallarmé and Verlaine,
Huysmans and the de Goncourts, Rimbaud, Corbière, Villiers de
l'Isle Adam, Barbey d'Aurevilly, Stendhal, Baudelaire, Maurice de
Guerin, Gerard de Nerval, Aloysius Bertrand. Were it not for
Gourmont, some of these would perhaps never have been known, and it
does little credit to our own poetic advancement that some of them
are still but names to American readers. His twoLivres des Masquesare regarded as the
beginnings of a history of the Symbolist period, which he never
found time to complete. Although many of the writers were, at the
time Gourmont considered them here, at the beginning of their
careers, he seized upon their distinguishing traits with a rare
insight, and revealed such coming celebrities as Maeterlinck,
Verhaeren, Régnier, Samain, Vielé-Griffin, Tailhade, Paul Adam,
Gide, Laforgue, Moréas, Merril, Rachilde, Kahn, Jammes, Paul Fort,
Mauclair, Claudel, Bataille, Ghil. He had a discerning eye for the
painters, too, and revealed as well as defended Whistler, Van Gogh,
Gauguin, and others.Despite their modest titles, thePromenades
philosophiquesand thePromenades littéraireshave been called
"without doubt the most important critical works of our epoch." It
is from the former that the essays contained in this book are
taken; they reveal, in striking degree, the thought and the
attitude of their famous author, and may suggest, "though within
the limits that all translation connotes, particularly when dealing
with so remarkable a stylist," the charm, the simplicity, and the
clarity of his writing.IIIDespite the fact that his funeral services occurred during
the height of the war—he was born on April 4, 1858 and died on
September 27, 1915—they were attended by a numerous gathering of
mourners who, in their very cosmopolitan nature seemed to symbolize
the universal influence of the departed genius. Tributes were paid
by M. Henri de Régnier, of the French Academy, who spoke for
theMercure de France, by M.
Georges Lecomte, President of the Société des Gens de Lettres, who
spoke in the name of that society, by M. Maurice Ajam, for the
newspaper La France, by M. Fernand Mazade, in the name of laDepêche de Toulouse, to which Remy de
Gourmont was a contributor, by Xavier Carvalho, in the name of the
Portuguese and Brazilian press, and by M. Juliot Piquet, in the
name of the great Buenos Aires dailyLa
Naciónfor which Gourmont wrote.Régnier paid particular attention to the critical labors of
the deceased. Gourmont, he said, "was an incomparable critic, in
turn a scholar untainted by pedantry, deep without obscurity,
ingenious to the point of paradox, sincere to the point of
contradiction, but ever mindful of the truth,—a critic in the
manner of Montaigne, of inexhaustible variety of means, of the most
candid independence,—a critic who is polemist, dilettante,
imaginative spirit and poet, and above all, a man, exceedingly
human in his alternations of skepticism and faith." Lecomte pointed
out the nobility of the man's origin, and the significance of his
ancestral connection with François Malherbe, the great stylist of a
former age. Ajam, like most who have commented on the man at all,
was struck with his paradoxical nature. "A democrat of aristocratic
cast, an atheist filled with devotion, an anarchist characterized
by order, an agitated spirit infused with calm, he was a human and
a divine paradox."The tributes by Carvalho and Piquet are of particular
significance. At a rime when even Spain, the mother country, was
indifferent to and ignorant of the literary accomplishments of its
American colonies, Remy de Gourmont had lent himself to the
interpretation and the revelation of the new literary world across
th [...]