The Astrologer
The Astrologer VOLUME IINTRODUCTIONADDITIONAL NOTEEDITOR'S INTRODUCTIONCHAPTER ICHAPTER IICHAPTER IIICHAPTER IVCHAPTER VCHAPTER VICHAPTER VIICHAPTER VIIICHAPTER IXCHAPTER XCHAPTER XICHAPTER XIICHAPTER XIIICHAPTER XIVCHAPTER XVCHAPTER XVICHAPTER XVIICHAPTER XVIIICHAPTER XIXCHAPTER XXCHAPTER XXICHAPTER XXIICHAPTER XXIIICHAPTER XXIVCHAPTER XXVCHAPTER XXVICHAPTER XXVIICHAPTER XXVIIICHAPTER XXIXVOLUME IICHAPTER ICHAPTER IICHAPTER IIICHAPTER IVCHAPTER VCHAPTER VICHAPTER VIICHAPTER VIIICHAPTER IXCHAPTER XCHAPTER XICHAPTER XIICHAPTER XIIICHAPTER XIVCHAPTER XVCHAPTER XVICHAPTER XVIICHAPTER XVIIICHAPTER XIXCHAPTER XXCHAPTER XXICHAPTER XXIICHAPTER XXIIICHAPTER XXIVCHAPTER XXVCHAPTER XXVICHAPTER XXVIICHAPTER XXVIIICHAPTER XXIXNOTES TO VOLUME INOTES TO VOLUME 2GLOSSARYCopyright
The Astrologer
Walter Scott
VOLUME I
'Tis said that words and signs
have power O'er sprites in planetary
hour; But scarce I praise their
venturous part Who tamper with such dangerous
art.
INTRODUCTION
The Novel or Romance of Waverley made its way to the
public slowly, of course, at first, but afterwards with such
accumulating popularity as to encourage the Author to a second
attempt. He looked about for a name and a subject; and the manner
in which the novels were composed cannot be better illustrated than
by reciting the simple narrative on which Guy Mannering was
originally founded; but to which, in the progress of the work, the
production ceased to bear any, even the most distant resemblance.
The tale was originally told me by an old servant of my father's,
an excellent old Highlander, without a fault, unless a preference
to mountain dew over less potent liquors be accounted one. He
believed as firmly in the story as in any part of his
creed.A grave and elderly person, according to old John MacKinlay's
account, while travelling in the wilder parts of Galloway, was
benighted. With difficulty he found his way to a country seat,
where, with the hospitality of the time and country, he was readily
admitted. The owner of the house, a gentleman of good fortune, was
much struck by the reverend appearance of his guest, and apologised
to him for a certain degree of confusion which must unavoidably
attend his reception, and could not escape his eye. The lady of the
house was, he said, confined to her apartment, and on the point of
making her husband a father for the first time, though they had
been ten years married. At such an emergency, the laird said, he
feared his guest might meet with some apparent
neglect.'Not so, sir,' said the stranger; 'my wants are few, and
easily supplied, and I trust the present circumstances may even
afford an opportunity of showing my gratitude for your hospitality.
Let me only request that I may be informed of the exact minute of
the birth; and I hope to be able to put you in possession of some
particulars which may influence in an important manner the future
prospects of the child now about to come into this busy and
changeful world. I will not conceal from you that I am skilful in
understanding and interpreting the movements of those planetary
bodies which exert their influences on the destiny of mortals. It
is a science which I do not practise, like others who call
themselves astrologers, for hire or reward; for I have a competent
estate, and only use the knowledge I possess for the benefit of
those in whom I feel an interest.' The laird bowed in respect and
gratitude, and the stranger was accommodated with an apartment
which commanded an ample view of the astral regions.The guest spent a part of the night in ascertaining the
position of the heavenly bodies, and calculating their probable
influence; until at length the result of his observations induced
him to send for the father and conjure him in the most solemn
manner to cause the assistants to retard the birth if practicable,
were it but for five minutes. The answer declared this to be
impossible; and almost in the instant that the message was returned
the father and his guest were made acquainted with the birth of a
boy.The Astrologer on the morrow met the party who gathered
around the breakfast table with looks so grave and ominous as to
alarm the fears of the father, who had hitherto exulted in the
prospects held out by the birth of an heir to his ancient property,
failing which event it must have passed to a distant branch of the
family. He hastened to draw the stranger into a private
room.'I fear from your looks,' said the father, 'that you have bad
tidings to tell me of my young stranger; perhaps God will resume
the blessing He has bestowed ere he attains the age of manhood, or
perhaps he is destined to be unworthy of the affection which we are
naturally disposed to devote to our offspring?''Neither the one nor the other,' answered the stranger;
'unless my judgment greatly err, the infant will survive the years
of minority, and in temper and disposition will prove all that his
parents can wish. But with much in his horoscope which promises
many blessings, there is one evil influence strongly predominant,
which threatens to subject him to an unhallowed and unhappy
temptation about the time when he shall attain the age of
twenty-one, which period, the constellations intimate, will be the
crisis of his fate. In what shape, or with what peculiar urgency,
this temptation may beset him, my art cannot
discover.''Your knowledge, then, can afford us no defence,' said the
anxious father, 'against the threatened evil?''Pardon me,' answered the stranger, 'it can. The influence of
the constellations is powerful; but He who made the heavens is more
powerful than all, if His aid be invoked in sincerity and truth.
You ought to dedicate this boy to the immediate service of his
Maker, with as much sincerity as Samuel was devoted to the worship
in the Temple by his parents. You must regard him as a being
separated from the rest of the world. In childhood, in boyhood, you
must surround him with the pious and virtuous, and protect him to
the utmost of your power from the sight or hearing of any crime, in
word or action. He must be educated in religious and moral
principles of the strictest description. Let him not enter the
world, lest he learn to partake of its follies, or perhaps of its
vices. In short, preserve him as far as possible from all sin, save
that of which too great a portion belongs to all the fallen race of
Adam. With the approach of his twenty-first birthday comes the
crisis of his fate. If he survive it, he will be happy and
prosperous on earth, and a chosen vessel among those elected for
heaven. But if it be otherwise--' The Astrologer stopped, and
sighed deeply.'Sir,' replied the parent, still more alarmed than before,
'your words are so kind, your advice so serious, that I will pay
the deepest attention to your behests; but can you not aid me
farther in this most important concern? Believe me, I will not be
ungrateful.''I require and deserve no gratitude for doing a good action,'
said the stranger, 'in especial for contributing all that lies in
my power to save from an abhorred fate the harmless infant to whom,
under a singular conjunction of planets, last night gave life.
There is my address; you may write to me from time to time
concerning the progress of the boy in religious knowledge. If he be
bred up as I advise, I think it will be best that he come to my
house at the time when the fatal and decisive period approaches,
that is, before he has attained his twenty-first year complete. If
you send him such as I desire, I humbly trust that God will protect
His own through whatever strong temptation his fate may subject him
to.' He then gave his host his address, which was a country seat
near a post town in the south of England, and bid him an
affectionate farewell.The mysterious stranger departed, but his words remained
impressed upon the mind of the anxious parent. He lost his lady
while his boy was still in infancy. This calamity, I think, had
been predicted by the Astrologer; and thus his confidence, which,
like most people of the period, he had freely given to the science,
was riveted and confirmed. The utmost care, therefore, was taken to
carry into effect the severe and almost ascetic plan of education
which the sage had enjoined. A tutor of the strictest principles
was employed to superintend the youth's education; he was
surrounded by domestics of the most established character, and
closely watched and looked after by the anxious father
himself.The years of infancy, childhood, and boyhood passed as the
father could have wished. A young Nazarene could not have been bred
up with more rigour. All that was evil was withheld from his
observation: he only heard what was pure in precept, he only
witnessed what was worthy in practice.But when the boy began to be lost in the youth, the attentive
father saw cause for alarm. Shades of sadness, which gradually
assumed a darker character, began to over-cloud the young man's
temper. Tears, which seemed involuntary, broken sleep, moonlight
wanderings, and a melancholy for which he could assign no reason,
seemed to threaten at once his bodily health and the stability of
his mind. The Astrologer was consulted by letter, and returned for
answer that this fitful state of mind was but the commencement of
his trial, and that the poor youth must undergo more and more
desperate struggles with the evil that assailed him. There was no
hope of remedy, save that he showed steadiness of mind in the study
of the Scriptures. 'He suffers, continued the letter of the sage,'
from the awakening of those harpies the passions, which have slept
with him, as with others, till the period of life which he has now
attained. Better, far better, that they torment him by ungrateful
cravings than that he should have to repent having satiated them by
criminal indulgence.'The dispositions of the young man were so excellent that he
combated, by reason and religion, the fits of gloom which at times
overcast his mind, and it was not till he attained the commencement
of his twenty-first year that they assumed a character which made
his father tremble for the consequences. It seemed as if the
gloomiest and most hideous of mental maladies was taking the form
of religious despair. Still the youth was gentle, courteous,
affectionate, and submissive to his father's will, and resisted
with all his power the dark suggestions which were breathed into
his mind, as it seemed by some emanation of the Evil Principle,
exhorting him, like the wicked wife of Job, to curse God and
die.The time at length arrived when he was to perform what was
then thought a long and somewhat perilous journey, to the mansion
of the early friend who had calculated his nativity. His road lay
through several places of interest, and he enjoyed the amusement of
travelling more than he himself thought would have been possible.
Thus he did not reach the place of his destination till noon on the
day preceding his birthday. It seemed as if he had been carried
away with an unwonted tide of pleasurable sensation, so as to
forget in some degree what his father had communicated concerning
the purpose of his journey. He halted at length before a
respectable but solitary old mansion, to which he was directed as
the abode of his father's friend.The servants who came to take his horse told him he had been
expected for two days. He was led into a study, where the stranger,
now a venerable old man, who had been his father's guest, met him
with a shade of displeasure, as well as gravity, on his brow.
'Young man,' he said, 'wherefore so slow on a journey of such
importance?' 'I thought,' replied the guest, blushing and looking
downward,' that there was no harm in travelling slowly and
satisfying my curiosity, providing I could reach your residence by
this day; for such was my father's charge.' 'You were to blame,'
replied the sage, 'in lingering, considering that the avenger of
blood was pressing on your footsteps. But you are come at last, and
we will hope for the best, though the conflict in which you are to
be engaged will be found more dreadful the longer it is postponed.
But first accept of such refreshments as nature requires to
satisfy, but not to pamper, the appetite.'The old man led the way into a summer parlour, where a frugal
meal was placed on the table. As they sat down to the board they
were joined by a young lady about eighteen years of age, and so
lovely that the sight of her carried off the feelings of the young
stranger from the peculiarity and mystery of his own lot, and
riveted his attention to everything she did or said. She spoke
little and it was on the most serious subjects. She played on the
harpsichord at her father's command, but it was hymns with which
she accompanied the instrument. At length, on a sign from the sage,
she left the room, turning on the young stranger as she departed a
look of inexpressible anxiety and interest.The old man then conducted the youth to his study, and
conversed with him upon the most important points of religion, to
satisfy himself that he could render a reason for the faith that
was in him. During the examination the youth, in spite of himself,
felt his mind occasionally wander, and his recollections go in
quest of the beautiful vision who had shared their meal at noon. On
such occasions the Astrologer looked grave, and shook his head at
this relaxation of attention; yet, on the whole, he was pleased
with the youth's replies.At sunset the young man was made to take the bath; and,
having done so, he was directed to attire himself in a robe
somewhat like that worn by Armenians, having his long hair combed
down on his shoulders, and his neck, hands, and feet bare. In this
guise he was conducted into a remote chamber totally devoid of
furniture, excepting a lamp, a chair, and a table, on which lay a
Bible. 'Here,' said the Astrologer, 'I must leave you alone to pass
the most critical period of your life. If you can, by recollection
of the great truths of which we have spoken, repel the attacks
which will be made on your courage and your principles, you have
nothing to apprehend. But the trial will be severe and arduous.'
His features then assumed a pathetic solemnity, the tears stood in
his eyes, and his voice faltered with emotion as he said, 'Dear
child, at whose coming into the world I foresaw this fatal trial,
may God give thee grace to support it with firmness!'The young man was left alone; and hardly did he find himself
so, when, like a swarm of demons, the recollection of all his sins
of omission and commission, rendered even more terrible by the
scrupulousness with which he had been educated, rushed on his mind,
and, like furies armed with fiery scourges, seemed determined to
drive him to despair. As he combated these horrible recollections
with distracted feelings, but with a resolved mind, he became aware
that his arguments were answered by the sophistry of another, and
that the dispute was no longer confined to his own thoughts. The
Author of Evil was present in the room with him in bodily shape,
and, potent with spirits of a melancholy cast, was impressing upon
him the desperation of his state, and urging suicide as the
readiest mode to put an end to his sinful career. Amid his errors,
the pleasure he had taken in prolonging his journey unnecessarily,
and the attention which he had bestowed on the beauty of the fair
female when his thoughts ought to have been dedicated to the
religious discourse of her father, were set before him in the
darkest colours; and he was treated as one who, having sinned
against light, was therefore deservedly left a prey to the Prince
of Darkness.As the fated and influential hour rolled on, the terrors of
the hateful Presence grew more confounding to the mortal senses of
the victim, and the knot of the accursed sophistry became more
inextricable in appearance, at least to the prey whom its meshes
surrounded. He had not power to explain the assurance of pardon
which he continued to assert, or to name the victorious name in
which he trusted. But his faith did not abandon him, though he
lacked for a time the power of expressing it. 'Say what you will,'
was his answer to the Tempter; 'I know there is as much betwixt the
two boards of this Book as can ensure me forgiveness for my
transgressions and safety for my soul.' As he spoke, the clock,
which announced the lapse of the fatal hour, was heard to strike.
The speech and intellectual powers of the youth were instantly and
fully restored; he burst forth into prayer, and expressed in the
most glowing terms his reliance on the truth and on the Author of
the Gospel. The Demon retired, yelling and discomfited, and the old
man, entering the apartment, with tears congratulated his guest on
his victory in the fated struggle.The young man was afterwards married to the beautiful maiden,
the first sight of whom had made such an impression on him, and
they were consigned over at the close of the story to domestic
happiness. So ended John MacKinlay's legend.The Author of Waverley had imagined a possibility of framing
an interesting, and perhaps not an unedifying, tale out of the
incidents of the life of a doomed individual, whose efforts at good
and virtuous conduct were to be for ever disappointed by the
intervention, as it were, of some malevolent being, and who was at
last to come off victorious from the fearful struggle. In short,
something was meditated upon a plan resembling the imaginative tale
of Sintram and his Companions, by Mons. le Baron de la Motte
Fouque, although, if it then existed, the author had not seen
it.The scheme projected may be traced in the three or four first
chapters of the work; but farther consideration induced the author
to lay his purpose aside. It appeared, on mature consideration,
that astrology, though its influence was once received and admitted
by Bacon himself, does not now retain influence over the general
mind sufficient even to constitute the mainspring of a romance.
Besides, it occurred that to do justice to such a subject would
have required not only more talent than the Author could be
conscious of possessing, but also involved doctrines and
discussions of a nature too serious for his purpose and for the
character of the narrative. In changing his plan, however, which
was done in the course of printing, the early sheets retained the
vestiges of the original tenor of the story, although they now hang
upon it as an unnecessary and unnatural incumbrance. The cause of
such vestiges occurring is now explained and apologised
for.It is here worthy of observation that, while the astrological
doctrines have fallen into general contempt, and been supplanted by
superstitions of a more gross and far less beautiful character,
they have, even in modern days, retained some
votaries.One of the most remarkable believers in that forgotten and
despised science was a late eminent professor of the art of
legerdemain. One would have thought that a person of this
description ought, from his knowledge of the thousand ways in which
human eyes could be deceived, to have been less than others subject
to the fantasies of superstition. Perhaps the habitual use of those
abstruse calculations by which, in a manner surprising to the
artist himself, many tricks upon cards, etc., are performed,
induced this gentleman to study the combination of the stars and
planets, with the expectation of obtaining prophetic
communications.He constructed a scheme of his own nativity, calculated
according to such rules of art as he could collect from the best
astrological authors. The result of the past he found agreeable to
what had hitherto befallen him, but in the important prospect of
the future a singular difficulty occurred. There were two years
during the course of which he could by no means obtain any exact
knowledge whether the subject of the scheme would be dead or alive.
Anxious concerning so remarkable a circumstance, he gave the scheme
to a brother astrologer, who was also baffled in the same manner.
At one period he found the native, or subject, was certainly alive;
at another that he was unquestionably dead; but a space of two
years extended between these two terms, during which he could find
no certainty as to his death or existence.The astrologer marked the remarkable circumstance in his
diary, and continued his exhibitions in various parts of the empire
until the period was about to expire during which his existence had
been warranted as actually ascertained. At last, while he was
exhibiting to a numerous audience his usual tricks of legerdemain,
the hands whose activity had so often baffled the closest observer
suddenly lost their power, the cards dropped from them, and he sunk
down a disabled paralytic. In this state the artist languished for
two years, when he was at length removed by death. It is said that
the diary of this modern astrologer will soon be given to the
public.The fact, if truly reported, is one of those singular
coincidences which occasionally appear, differing so widely from
ordinary calculation, yet without which irregularities human life
would not present to mortals, looking into futurity, the abyss of
impenetrable darkness which it is the pleasure of the Creator it
should offer to them. Were everything to happen in the ordinary
train of events, the future would be subject to the rules of
arithmetic, like the chances of gaming. But extraordinary events
and wonderful runs of luck defy the calculations of mankind and
throw impenetrable darkness on future contingencies.To the above anecdote, another, still more recent, may be
here added. The author was lately honoured with a letter from a
gentleman deeply skilled in these mysteries, who kindly undertook
to calculate the nativity of the writer of Guy Mannering, who might
be supposed to be friendly to the divine art which he professed.
But it was impossible to supply data for the construction of a
horoscope, had the native been otherwise desirous of it, since all
those who could supply the minutiae of day, hour, and minute have
been long removed from the mortal sphere.Having thus given some account of the first idea, or rude
sketch, of the story, which was soon departed from, the Author, in
following out the plan of the present edition, has to mention the
prototypes of the principal characters in Guy
Mannering.Some circumstances of local situation gave the Author in his
youth an opportunity of seeing a little, and hearing a great deal,
about that degraded class who are called gipsies; who are in most
cases a mixed race between the ancient Egyptians who arrived in
Europe about the beginning of the fifteenth century and vagrants of
European descent.The individual gipsy upon whom the character of Meg Merrilies
was founded was well known about the middle of the last century by
the name of Jean Gordon, an inhabitant of the village of Kirk
Yetholm, in the Cheviot Hills, adjoining to the English Border. The
Author gave the public some account of this remarkable person in
one of the early numbers of Blackwood's Magazine, to the following
purpose:--'My father remembered old Jean Gordon of Yetholm, who had
great sway among her tribe. She was quite a Meg Merrilies, and
possessed the savage virtue of fidelity in the same perfection.
Having been often hospitably received at the farmhouse of Lochside,
near Yetholm, she had carefully abstained from committing any
depredations on the farmer's property. But her sons (nine in
number) had not, it seems, the same delicacy, and stole a brood-sow
from their kind entertainer. Jean was mortified at this ungrateful
conduct, and so much ashamed of it that she absented herself from
Lochside for several years.'It happened in course of time that, in consequence of some
temporary pecuniary necessity, the goodman of Lochside was obliged
to go to Newcastle to raise some money to pay his rent. He
succeeded in his purpose, but, returning through the mountains of
Cheviot, he was benighted and lost his way.'A light glimmering through the window of a large waste barn,
which had survived the farm-house to which it had once belonged,
guided him to a place of shelter; and when he knocked at the door
it was opened by Jean Gordon. Her very remarkable figure, for she
was nearly six feet high, and her equally remarkable features and
dress, rendered it impossible to mistake her for a moment, though
he had not seen her for years; and to meet with such a character in
so solitary a place, and probably at no great distance from her
clan, was a grievous surprise to the poor man, whose rent (to lose
which would have been ruin) was about his person.'Jean set up a loud shout of joyful
recognition--"Eh, sirs! the winsome gudeman of Lochside! Light down, light
down; for ye maunna gang farther the night, and a friend's house
sae near." The farmer was obliged to dismount and accept of the
gipsy's offer of supper and a bed. There was plenty of meat in the
barn, however it might be come by, and preparations were going on
for a plentiful repast, which the farmer, to the great increase of
his anxiety, observed was calculated for ten or twelve guests, of
the same description, probably, with his landlady.'Jean left him in no doubt on the subject. She brought to his
recollection the story of the stolen sow, and mentioned how much
pain and vexation it had given her. Like other philosophers, she
remarked that the world grew worse daily; and, like other parents,
that the bairns got out of her guiding, and neglected the old gipsy
regulations, which commanded them to respect in their depredations
the property of their benefactors. The end of all this was an
inquiry what money the farmer had about him; and an urgent request,
or command, that he would make her his purse-keeper, since the
bairns, as she called her sons, would be soon home. The poor farmer
made a virtue of necessity, told his story, and surrendered his
gold to Jean's custody. She made him put a few shillings in his
pocket, observing, it would excite suspicion should he be found
travelling altogether penniless.'This arrangement being made, the farmer lay down on a sort
of shake-down, as the Scotch call it, or bed-clothes disposed upon
some straw, but, as will easily be believed, slept
not.'About midnight the gang returned, with various articles of
plunder, and talked over their exploits in language which made the
farmer tremble. They were not long in discovering they had a guest,
and demanded of Jean whom she had got there.'"E'en the winsome gudeman of Lochside, poor body," replied
Jean; "he's been at Newcastle seeking for siller to pay his rent,
honest man, but deil-be-lickit he's been able to gather in, and sae
he's gaun e'en hame wi' a toom purse and a sair
heart.""'That may be, Jean," replied one of the banditti, "but we
maun ripe his pouches a bit, and see if the tale be true or no."
Jean set up her throat in exclamations against this breach of
hospitality, but without producing any change in their
determination. The farmer soon heard their stifled whispers and
light steps by his bedside, and understood they were rummaging his
clothes. When they found the money which the providence of Jean
Gordon had made him retain, they held a consultation if they should
take it or no; but the smallness of the booty, and the vehemence of
Jean's remonstrances, determined them in the negative. They
caroused and went to rest. As soon as day dawned Jean roused her
guest, produced his horse, which she had accommodated behind the
hallan, and guided him for some miles, till he was on the highroad
to Lochside. She then restored his whole property; nor could his
earnest entreaties prevail on her to accept so much as a single
guinea.'I have heard the old people at Jedburgh say, that all Jean's
sons were condemned to die there on the same day. It is said the
jury were equally divided, but that a friend to justice, who had
slept during the whole discussion, waked suddenly and gave his vote
for condemnation in the emphatic words, "Hang them a'!" Unanimity
is not required in a Scottish jury, so the verdict of guilty was
returned. Jean was present, and only said, "The Lord help the
innocent in a day like this!" Her own death was accompanied with
circumstances of brutal outrage, of which poor Jean was in many
respects wholly undeserving. She had, among other demerits, or
merits, as the reader may choose to rank it, that of being a stanch
Jacobite. She chanced to be at Carlisle upon a fair or market-day,
soon after the year 1746, where she gave vent to her political
partiality, to the great offence of the rabble of that city. Being
zealous in their loyalty when there was no danger, in proportion to
the tameness with which they had surrendered to the Highlanders in
1745, the mob inflicted upon poor Jean Gordon no slighter penalty
than that of ducking her to death in the Eden. It was an operation
of some time, for Jean was a stout woman, and, struggling with her
murderers, often got her head above water; and, while she had voice
left, continued to exclaim at such intervals, "Charlie yet! Charlie
yet!" When a child, and among the scenes which she frequented, I
have often heard these stories, and cried piteously for poor Jean
Gordon.'Before quitting the Border gipsies, I may mention that my
grandfather, while riding over Charterhouse Moor, then a very
extensive common, fell suddenly among a large band of them, who
were carousing in a hollow of the moor, surrounded by bushes. They
instantly seized on his horse's bridle with many shouts of welcome,
exclaiming (for he was well known to most of them) that they had
often dined at his expense, and he must now stay and share their
good cheer. My ancestor was, a little alarmed, for, like the
goodman of Lochside, he had more money about his person than he
cared to risk in such society. However, being naturally a bold,
lively-spirited man, he entered into the humour of the thing and
sate down to the feast, which consisted of all the varieties of
game, poultry, pigs, and so forth that could be collected by a wide
and indiscriminate system of plunder. The dinner was a very merry
one; but my relative got a hint from some of the older gipsies to
retire just when--The mirth and fun grew fast and
furious,and, mounting his horse accordingly, he took a French leave
of his entertainers, but without experiencing the least breach of
hospitality. I believe Jean Gordon was at this festival.'[Footnote:
Blackwood's Magazine, vol. I, p. 54]Notwithstanding the failure of Jean's issue, for
whichWeary fa' the waefu'
wuddie,a granddaughter survived her, whom I remember to have seen.
That is, as Dr. Johnson had a shadowy recollection of Queen Anne as
a stately lady in black, adorned with diamonds, so my memory is
haunted by a solemn remembrance of a woman of more than female
height, dressed in a long red cloak, who commenced acquaintance by
giving me an apple, but whom, nevertheless, I looked on with as
much awe as the future Doctor, High Church and Tory as he was
doomed to be, could look upon the Queen. I conceive this woman to
have been Madge Gordon, of whom an impressive account is given in
the same article in which her mother Jean is mentioned, but not by
the present writer:--'The late Madge Gordon was at this time accounted the Queen
of the Yetholm clans. She was, we believe, a granddaughter of the
celebrated Jean Gordon, and was said to have much resembled her in
appearance. The following account of her is extracted from the
letter of a friend, who for many years enjoyed frequent and
favourable opportunities of observing the characteristic
peculiarities of the Yetholm tribes:--"Madge Gordon was descended
from the Faas by the mother's side, and was married to a Young. She
was a remarkable personage--of a very commanding presence and high
stature, being nearly six feet high. She had a large aquiline nose,
penetrating eyes, even in her old age, bushy hair, that hung around
her shoulders from beneath a gipsy bonnet of straw, a short cloak
of a peculiar fashion, and a long staff nearly as tall as herself.
I remember her well; every week she paid my father a visit for her
awmous when I was a little boy, and I looked upon Madge with no
common degree of awe and terror. When she spoke vehemently (for she
made loud complaints) she used to strike her staff upon the floor
and throw herself into an attitude which it was impossible to
regard with indifference. She used to say that she could bring from
the remotest parts of the island friends to revenge her quarrel
while she sat motionless in her cottage; and she frequently boasted
that there was a time when she was of still more considerable
importance, for there were at her wedding fifty saddled asses, and
unsaddled asses without number. If Jean Gordon was the prototype of
the CHARACTER of Meg Merrilies, I imagine Madge must have sat to
the unknown author as the representative of her PERSON."'[Footnote:
Blackwood's Magazine, vol. I, p. 56.]How far Blackwood's ingenious correspondent was right, how
far mistaken, in his conjecture the reader has been
informed.To pass to a character of a very different description,
Dominie Sampson,--the reader may easily suppose that a poor modest
humble scholar who has won his way through the classics, yet has
fallen to leeward in the voyage of life, is no uncommon personage
in a country where a certain portion of learning is easily attained
by those who are willing to suffer hunger and thirst in exchange
for acquiring Greek and Latin. But there is a far more exact
prototype of the worthy Dominie, upon which is founded the part
which he performs in the romance, and which, for certain particular
reasons, must be expressed very generally.Such a preceptor as Mr. Sampson is supposed to have been was
actually tutor in the family of a gentleman of considerable
property. The young lads, his pupils, grew up and went out in the
world, but the tutor continued to reside in the family, no uncommon
circumstance in Scotland in former days, where food and shelter
were readily afforded to humble friends and dependents. The laird's
predecessors had been imprudent, he himself was passive and
unfortunate. Death swept away his sons, whose success in life might
have balanced his own bad luck and incapacity. Debts increased and
funds diminished, until ruin came. The estate was sold; and the old
man was about to remove from the house of his fathers to go he knew
not whither, when, like an old piece of furniture, which, left
alone in its wonted corner, may hold together for a long while, but
breaks to pieces on an attempt to move it, he fell down on his own
threshold under a paralytic affection.The tutor awakened as from a dream. He saw his patron dead,
and that his patron's only remaining child, an elderly woman, now
neither graceful nor beautiful, if she ever had been either the one
or the other, had by this calamity become a homeless and penniless
orphan. He addressed her nearly in the words which Dominie Sampson
uses to Miss Bertram, and professed his determination not to leave
her. Accordingly, roused to the exercise of talents which had long
slumbered, he opened a little school and supported his patron's
child for the rest of her life, treating her with the same humble
observance and devoted attention which he had used towards her in
the days of her prosperity.Such is the outline of Dominie Sampson's real story, in which
there is neither romantic incident nor sentimental passion; but
which, perhaps, from the rectitude and simplicity of character
which it displays, may interest the heart and fill the eye of the
reader as irresistibly as if it respected distresses of a more
dignified or refined character.These preliminary notices concerning the tale of Guy
Mannering and some of the characters introduced may save the author
and reader in the present instance the trouble of writing and
perusing a long string of detached notes.
ADDITIONAL NOTE
An old English proverb says, that more know Tom Fool than Tom
Fool knows; and the influence of the adage seems to extend to works
composed under the influence of an idle or foolish planet. Many
corresponding circumstances are detected by readers of which the
Author did not suspect the existence. He must, however, regard it
as a great compliment that, in detailing incidents purely
imaginary, he has been so fortunate in approximating reality as to
remind his readers of actual occurrences. It is therefore with
pleasure he notices some pieces of local history and tradition
which have been supposed to coincide with the fictitious persons,
incidents, and scenery of Guy Mannering.The prototype of Dirk Hatteraick is considered as having been
a Dutch skipper called Yawkins. This man was well known on the
coast of Galloway and Dumfriesshire, as sole proprietor and master
of a buckkar, or smuggling lugger, called the 'Black Prince.' Being
distinguished by his nautical skill and intrepidity, his vessel was
frequently freighted, and his own services employed, by French,
Dutch, Manx, and Scottish smuggling companies.A person well known by the name of Buckkar-tea, from having
been a noted smuggler of that article, and also by that of Bogle
Bush, the place of his residence, assured my kind informant Mr.
Train, that he had frequently seen upwards of two hundred Lingtow
men assemble at one time, and go off into the interior of the
country, fully laden with contraband goods.In those halcyon days of the free trade, the fixed price for
carrying a box of tea or bale of tobacco from the coast of Galloway
to Edinburgh was fifteen shillings, and a man with two horses
carried four such packages. The trade was entirely destroyed by Mr.
Pitt's celebrated commutation law, which, by reducing the duties
upon excisable articles, enabled the lawful dealer to compete with
the smuggler. The statute was called in Galloway and
Dumfries-shire, by those who had thriven upon the contraband trade,
'the burning and starving act.'Sure of such active assistance on shore, Yawkins demeaned
himself so boldly that his mere name was a terror to the officers
of the revenue. He availed himself of the fears which his presence
inspired on one particular night, when, happening to be ashore with
a considerable quantity of goods in his sole custody, a strong
party of excisemen came down on him. Far from shunning the attack,
Yawkins sprung forward, shouting, 'Come on, my lads; Yawkins is
before you.' The revenue officers were intimidated and relinquished
their prize, though defended only by the courage and address of a
single man. On his proper element Yawkins was equally successful.
On one occasion he was landing his cargo at the Manxman's Lake near
Kirkcudbright, when two revenue cutters (the 'Pigmy' and the
'Dwarf') hove in sight at once on different tacks, the one coming
round by the Isles of Fleet, the other between the point of
Rueberry and the Muckle Ron. The dauntless freetrader instantly
weighed anchor and bore down right between the luggers, so close
that he tossed his hat on the deck of the one and his wig on that
of the other, hoisted a cask to his maintop, to show his
occupation, and bore away under an extraordinary pressure of
canvass, without receiving injury. To account for these and other
hairbreadth escapes, popular superstition alleged that Yawkins
insured his celebrated buckkar by compounding with the devil for
one-tenth of his crew every voyage. How they arranged the
separation of the stock and tithes is left to our conjecture. The
buckkar was perhaps called the 'Black Prince' in honour of the
formidable insurer.The 'Black Prince' used to discharge her cargo at Luce,
Balcarry, and elsewhere on the coast; but her owner's favourite
landing-places were at the entrance of the Dee and the Cree, near
the old Castle of Rueberry, about six miles below Kirkcudbright.
There is a cave of large dimensions in the vicinity of Rueberry,
which, from its being frequently used by Yawkins and his supposed
connexion with the smugglers on the shore, is now called Dirk
Hatteraick's Cave. Strangers who visit this place, the scenery of
which is highly romantic, are also shown, under the name of the
Gauger's Loup, a tremendous precipice, being the same, it is
asserted, from which Kennedy was precipitated.Meg Merrilies is in Galloway considered as having had her
origin in the traditions concerning the celebrated Flora Marshal,
one of the royal consorts of Willie Marshal, more commonly called
the Caird of Barullion, King of the Gipsies of the Western
Lowlands. That potentate was himself deserving of notice from the
following peculiarities:--He was born in the parish of Kirkmichael
about the year 1671; and, as he died at Kirkcudbright 23d November
1792, he must then have been in the one hundred and twentieth year
of his age. It cannot be said that this unusually long lease of
existence was noted by any peculiar excellence of conduct or habits
of life. Willie had been pressed or enlisted in the army seven
times, and had deserted as often; besides three times running away
from the naval service. He had been seventeen times lawfully
married; and, besides, such a reasonably large share of matrimonial
comforts, was, after his hundredth year, the avowed father of four
children by less legitimate affections. He subsisted in his extreme
old age by a pension from the present Earl of Selkirk's
grandfather. Will Marshal is buried in Kirkcudbright church, where
his monument is still shown, decorated with a scutcheon suitably
blazoned with two tups' horns and two cutty spoons.In his youth he occasionally took an evening walk on the
highway, with the purpose of assisting travellers by relieving them
of the weight of their purses. On one occasion the Caird of
Barullion robbed the Laird of Bargally at a place between
Carsphairn and Dalmellington. His purpose was not achieved without
a severe struggle, in which the gipsy lost his bonnet, and was
obliged to escape, leaving it on the road. A respectable farmer
happened to be the next passenger, and, seeing the bonnet,
alighted, took it up, and rather imprudently put it on his own
head. At this instant Bargally came up with some assistants, and,
recognising the bonnet, charged the farmer of Bantoberick with
having robbed him, and took him into custody. There being some
likeness between the parties, Bargally persisted in his charge,
and, though the respectability of the farmer's character was proved
or admitted, his trial before the Circuit Court came on
accordingly. The fatal bonnet lay on the table of the court.
Bargally swore that it was the identical article worn by the man
who robbed him; and he and others likewise deponed that they had
found the accused on the spot where the crime was committed, with
the bonnet on his head. The case looked gloomily for the prisoner,
and the opinion of the judge seemed unfavourable. But there was a
person in court who knew well both who did and who did not commit
the crime. This was the Caird of Barullion, who, thrusting himself
up to the bar near the place where Bargally was standing, suddenly
seized on the bonnet, put it on his head, and, looking the Laird
full in the face, asked him, with a voice which attracted the
attention of the court and crowded audience--'Look at me, sir, and
tell me, by the oath you have sworn--Am not _I_ the man who robbed
you between Carsphairn and Dalmellington?' Bargally replied, in
great astonishment, 'By Heaven! you are the very man.' 'You see
what sort of memory this gentleman has,' said the volunteer
pleader; 'he swears to the bonnet whatever features are under it.
If you yourself, my Lord, will put it on your head, he will be
willing to swear that your Lordship was the party who robbed him
between Carsphairn and Dalmellington.' The tenant of Bantoberick
was unanimously acquitted; and thus Willie Marshal ingeniously
contrived to save an innocent man from danger, without incurring
any himself, since Bargally's evidence must have seemed to every
one too fluctuating to be relied upon.While the King of the Gipsies was thus laudably occupied, his
royal consort, Flora, contrived, it is said, to steal the hood from
the judge's gown; for which offence, combined with her presumptive
guilt as a gipsy, she was banished to New England, whence she never
returned.Now, I cannot grant that the idea of Meg Merrilies was, in
the first concoction of the character, derived from Flora Marshal,
seeing I have already said she was identified with Jean Gordon, and
as I have not the Laird of Bargally's apology for charging the same
fact on two several individuals. Yet I am quite content that Meg
should be considered as a representative of her sect and class in
general, Flora as well as others.The other instances in which my Gallovidian readers have
obliged me by assigning toAiry nothing A local habitation and a
name,shall also be sanctioned so far as the Author
may be entitled to do so. I think the facetious Joe Miller records
a case pretty much in point; where the keeper of a museum, while
showing, as he said, the very sword with which Balaam was about to
kill his ass, was interrupted by one of the visitors, who reminded
him that Balaam was not possessed of a sword, but only wished for
one. 'True, sir,' replied the ready-witted cicerone; 'but this is
the very sword he wished for.' The Author, in application of this
story, has only to add that, though ignorant of the coincidence
between the fictions of the tale and some real circumstances, he is
contented to believe he must unconsciously have thought or dreamed
of the last while engaged in the composition of Guy
Mannering.
EDITOR'S INTRODUCTION
The second essay in fiction of an author who has triumphed in
his first romance is a doubtful and perilous adventure. The writer
is apt to become self-conscious, to remember the advice of his
critics,--a fatal error,--and to tremble before the shadow of his
own success. He knows that he will have many enemies, that hundreds
of people will be ready to find fault and to vow that he is
"written out." Scott was not unacquainted with these apprehensions.
After publishing "Marmion" he wrote thus to Lady
Abercorn:--"No one acquires a certain degree of popularity without
exciting an equal degree of malevolence among those who, either
from rivalship or from the mere wish to pull down what others have
set up, are always ready to catch the first occasion to lower the
favoured individual to what they call his 'real standard.' Of this
I have enough of experience, and my political interferences,
however useless to my friends, have not failed to make me more than
the usual number of enemies. I am therefore bound, in justice to
myself and to those whose good opinion has hitherto protected me,
not to peril myself too frequently. The naturalists tell us that if
you destroy the web which the spider has just made, the insect must
spend many days in inactivity till he has assembled within his
person the materials necessary to weave another. Now, after writing
a work of imagination one feels in nearly the same exhausted state
as the spider. I believe no man now alive writes more rapidly than
I do (no great recommendation); but I never think of making verses
till I have a sufficient stock of poetical ideas to supply them,--I
would as soon join the Israelites in Egypt in their heavy task of
making bricks without clay. Besides, I know, as a small farmer,
that good husbandry consists in not taking the same crop too
frequently from the same soil; and as turnips come after wheat,
according to the best rules of agriculture, I take it that an
edition of Swift will do well after such a scourging crop as
'Marmiou.'"[March 13, 1808. Copied from the Collection of Lady
Napier and Ettrick.]These fears of the brave, then, were not unfamiliar to Scott;
but he audaciously disregarded all of them in the composition of
"Guy Mannering." He had just spun his web, like the spider of his
simile, he had just taken off his intellectual fields the
"scourging crop" of "The Lord of the Isles," he had just received
the discouraging news of its comparative failure, when he "buckled
to," achieved "Guy Mannering" in six weeks, and published it.
Moliere tells us that he wrote "Les Facheux" in a fortnight; and a
French critic adds that it reads indeed as if it had been written
in, a fortnight. Perhaps a self-confident censor might venture a
similar opinion about "Guy Mannering." It assuredly shows traces of
haste; the plot wanders at its own will; and we may believe that
the Author often--did not see his own way out of the wood. But
there is little harm in that. "If I do not know what is coming
next," a modern novelist has remarked, "how can the public know?"
Curiosity, at least, is likely to be excited by this happy-go-lucky
manner of Scott's. "The worst of it is;" as he wrote to Lady
Abercorn about his poems (June 9,1808), "that I am not very good or
patient in slow and careful composition; and sometimes I remind
myself of the drunken man, who could run long after he could not
walk." Scott could certainly run very well, though averse to a
plodding motion.[He was probably thinking of a famous Edinburgh
character, "Singing Jamie Balfour." Jamie was found very drunk and
adhering to the pavement one night. He could not raise himself; but
when helped to his feet, ran his preserver a race to the tavern,
and won!]The account of the year's work which preceded "Guy Mannering"
is given by Lockhart, and is astounding. In 1814 Scott had written,
Lockhart believes, the greater part of the "Life of Swift," most of
"Waverley" and the "Lord of the Isles;" he had furnished essays to
the "Encyclopaedia," and had edited "The Memorie of the
Somervilles." The spider might well seem spun out, the tilth
exhausted. But Scott had a fertility, a spontaneity, of fancy
equalled only, if equalled at all, by Alexandre Dumas.On November 7 of this laborious year, 1814, Scott was writing
to Mr. Joseph Train, thanking him for a parcel of legendary lore,
including the Galloway tale of the wandering astrologer and a
budget of gypsy traditions. Falling in the rich soil of Scott's
imagination, the tale of the astrologer yielded a name and an
opening to "Guy Mannering," while the gypsy lore blossomed into the
legend of Meg Merrilies. The seed of the novel was now sown. But
between November 11 and December 25 Scott was writing the three
last cantos of the "Lord of the Isles." Yet before the "Lord of the
Isles" was published (Jan. 18, 1815), two volumes of "Guy
Mannering" were in print (Letter to Morritt, Jan. 17, 1815.) The
novel was issued on Feb. 14, 1815. Scott, as he says somewhere, was
like the turnspit dog, into whose wheel a hot cinder is dropped to
encourage his activity. Scott needed hot cinders in the shape of
proof-sheets fresh from the press, and he worked most busily when
the printer's devil was waiting. In this case, not only the
printer's devil, but the wolf was at the door. The affairs of the
Ballantynes clamoured for moneys In their necessity and his own,
Scott wrote at the rate of a volume in ten days, and for some
financial reason published "Guy Mannering" with Messrs. Longmans,
not with Constable. Scott was at this moment facing creditors and
difficulties as Napoleon faced the armies of the Allies,--present
everywhere, everywhere daring and successful. True, his "Lord of
the Isles" was a disappointment, as James Ballantyne informed him.
"'Well, James, so be it; but you know we must not droop, for we
cannot afford to give over. Since one line has failed, we must just
stick to something else.' And so he dismissed me, and resumed his
novel."In these circumstances, far from inspiring, was "Guy
Mannering" written and hurried through the press. The story has its
own history: one can watch the various reminiscences and
experiences of life that crystallized together in Scott's mind, and
grouped themselves fantastically into his unpremeditated plot. Sir
Walter gives, in the preface of 1829, the legend which he heard
from John MacKinlay, his father's Highland servant, and on which he
meant to found a tale more in Hawthorn's manner than in his own.
That plan he changed in the course of printing, "leaving only just
enough of astrology to annoy pedantic reviewers and foolish
Puritans." Whence came the rest of the plot,--the tale of the
long-lost heir, and so on? The true heir, "kept out of his own,"
and returning in disguise, has been a favourite character ever
since Homer sang of Odysseus, and probably long before that. But it
is just possible that Scott had a certain modern instance in his
mind. In turning over the old manuscript diary at Branxholme Park
(mentioned in a note to "Waverley"), the Editor lighted on a
singular tale, which, in the diarist's opinion, might have
suggested "Guy Mannering" to Sir Walter. The resemblance between
the story of Vanbeest Brown and the hero of the diarist was scanty;
but in a long letter of Scott's to Lady Abercorn (May 21, 1813), a
the Editor finds Sir Walter telling his correspondent the very
narrative recorded in the Branxholme Park diary. Singular things
happen, Sir Walter says; and he goes on to describe a case just
heard in the court where he is sitting as Clerk of Sessions.
Briefly, the anecdote is this: A certain Mr. Carruthers of Dormont
had reason to suspect his wife's fidelity. While proceedings for a
divorce were pending, Mrs. Carruthers bore a daughter, of whom her
husband, of course, was legally the father. But he did not believe
in the relationship, and sent the infant girl to be brought up, in
ignorance of her origin and in seclusion, among the Cheviot Hills.
Here she somehow learned the facts of her own story. She married a
Mr. Routledge, the son of a yeoman, and "compounded" her rights
(but not those of her issue) for a small sung of ready money, paid
by old Dormont. She bears a boy; then she and her husband died in
poverty. Their son was sent by a friend to the East Indies, and was
presented with a packet of papers, which he left unopened at a
lawyer's. The young man made a fortune in India, returned to
Scotland, and took a shooting in Dumfriesshire, near bormont, his
ancestral home. He lodged at a small inn hard by, and the landlady,
struck by his name, began to gossip with him about his family
history. He knew nothing of the facts which the landlady disclosed,
but, impressed by her story, sent for and examined his neglected
packet of papers. Then he sought legal opinion, and was advised, by
President Blair, that he had a claim worth presenting on the estate
of Dormont. "The first decision of the cause," writes Scott, "was
favourable." The true heir celebrated his legal victory by a
dinner-party, and his friends saluted him as "Dormont." Next
morning he was found dead. Such is the true tale. As it occupied
Scott's mind in 1813, and as he wrote "Guy Mannering" in 1814-15,
it is not impossible that he may have borrowed his wandering heir,
who returns by pure accident to his paternal domains, and there
learns his origin at a woman's lips, from the Dormont case. The
resemblance of the stories, at least, was close enough to strike a
shrewd observer some seventy years ago.Another possible source of the plot--a more romantic origin,
certainly--is suggested by Mr. Robert Chambers in "Illustrations of
the Author of 'Waverley.'" A Maxwell of Glenormiston, "a religious
and bigoted recluse," sent his only son and heir to a Jesuit
College in Flanders, left his estate in his brother's management,
and died. The wicked uncle alleged that the heir was also dead. The
child, ignorant of his birth, grew up, ran away from the Jesuits at
the age of sixteen, enlisted in the French army, fought at
Fontenoy, got his colours, and, later, landed in the Moray Firth as
a French officer in 1745. He went through the campaign, was in
hiding in Lochaber after Drumossie, and in making for a Galloway
port, was seized, and imprisoned in Dumfries. Here an old woman of
his father's household recognized him by "a mark which she
remembered on his body." His cause was taken up by friends; but the
usurping uncle died, and Sir Robert Maxwell recovered his estates
without a lawsuit. This anecdote is quoted from the "New Monthly
Magazine," June, 1819. There is nothing to prove that Scott was
acquainted with this adventure. Scott's own experience, as usual,
supplied him with hints for his characters. The phrase of Dominie
Sampson's father, "Please God, my bairn may live to wag his pow in
a pulpit," was uttered in his own hearing. There was a Bluegown, or
Bedesman, like Edie Ochiltree, who had a son at Edinburgh College.
Scott was kind to the son, the Bluegown asked him to dinner, and at
this meal the old man made the remark about the pulpit and the
pow.' A similar tale is told by Scott in the Introduction to "The
Antiquary" (1830). As for the good Dominie, Scott remarks that, for
"certain particular reasons," he must say what he has to say about
his prototype "very generally." Mr. Chambers' finds the prototype
in a Mr. James Sanson, tutor in the house of Mr. Thomas Scott, Sir
Walter's uncle. It seems very unlike Sir Walter to mention this
excellent man almost by his name, and the tale about his devotion
to his patron's daughter cannot, apparently, be true of Mr. James
Sanson. The prototype of Pleydell, according to Sir Walter himself
(Journal, June 19, 1830), was "my old friend Adam Rolland, Esq., in
external circumstances, but not in frolic or fancy." Mr. Chambers,
however, finds the original in Mr. Andrew Crosbie, an advocate of
great talents, who frolicked to ruin, and died in 1785. Scott may
have heard tales of this patron of "High Jinks," but cannot have
known him much personally. Dandie Dinmont is simply the typical
Border farmer. Mr. Shortreed, Scott's companion in his Liddesdale
raids, thought that Willie Elliot, in Millburnholm, was the great
original. Scott did not meet Mr. James Davidson in Hindlee, owner
of all the Mustards and Peppers, till some years after the novel
was written. "Guy Mannering," when read to him, sent Mr. Davidson
to sleep. "The kind and manly character of Dandie, the gentle and
delicious one of his wife," and the circumstances of their home,
were suggested, Lockhart thinks, by Scott's friend, steward, and
amanuensis, Mr. William Laidlaw, by Mrs. Laidlaw, and by their farm
among the braes of Yarrow. In truth, the Border was peopled then by
Dandies and Ailies: nor is the race even now extinct in Liddesdale
and Teviotdale, in Ettrick and Yarrow. As for Mustard and Pepper,
their offspring too is powerful in the land, and is the deadly foe
of vermin. The curious may consult Mr. Cook's work on "The Dandie
Dinmont Terrier." The Duke of Buccleugh's breed still resembles the
fine example painted by Gainsborough in his portrait of the duke
(of Scott's time). "Tod Gabbie," again, as Lockhart says, was
studied from Tod Willie, the huntsman of the hills above Loch
Skene. As for the Galloway scenery, Scott did not know it well,
having only visited "the Kingdom" in 1793, when he was defending
the too frolicsome Mr. McNaught, Minister of Girthon. The beautiful
and lonely wilds of the Glenkens, in central Galloway, where
traditions yet linger, were, unluckily, terra incognita to Scott. A
Galloway story of a murder and its detection by the prints of the
assassin's boots inspired the scene where Dirk Hatteraick is traced
by similar means. In Colonel Mannering, by the way, the Ettrick
Shepherd recognized "Walter Scott, painted by
himself."The reception of "Guy Mannering" was all that could be
wished. William Erskine and Ballantyne were "of opinion that it is
much more interesting than 'Waverley.'" Mr. Morritt (March, 1815)
pronounced himself to be "quite charmed with Dandie, Meg Merrilies,
and Dirk Hatteraick,--characters as original as true to nature, and
as forcibly conceived as, I had almost said, could have been drawn
by Shakspeare himself." The public were not less appreciative. Two
thousand copies, at a guinea, were sold the day after publication,
and three thousand more were disposed of in three months. The
professional critics acted just as Scott, speaking in general
terms, had prophesied that they would. Let us quote the "British
Critic" (1815)."There are few spectacles in the literary world more
lamentable than to view a successful author, in his second
appearance before the public, limping lamely after himself, and
treading tediously and awkwardly in the very same round, which, in
his first effort, he had traced with vivacity and applause. We
would not be harsh enough to say that the Author of 'Waverley' is
in this predicament, but we are most unwillingly compelled to
assert that the second effort falls far below the standard of the
first. In 'Waverley' there was brilliancy of genius.... In 'Guy
Mannering' there is little else beyond the wild sallies of an
original genius, the bold and irregular efforts of a powerful but
an exhausted mind. Time enough has not been allowed him to recruit
his resources, both of anecdote and wit; but, encouraged by the
credit so justly, bestowed upon one of then most finished portraits
ever presented to the world, he has followed up the exhibition with
a careless and hurried sketch, which betrays at once the weakness
and the strength of its author."The character of Dirk Hatteraick is a faithful copy from
nature,--it is one of those moral monsters which make us almost
ashamed of our kind. Still, amidst the ruffian and murderous
brutality of the smuggler, some few feelings of our common nature
are thrown in with no less ingenuity than truth. . . . The
remainder of the personages are very little above the cast of a
common lively novel. . . . The Edinburgh lawyer is perhaps the most
original portrait; nor are the saturnalia of the Saturday evenings
described without humour. The Dominie is overdrawn and
inconsistent; while the young ladies present nothing above par. . .
."There are parts of this novel which none but one endowed
with the sublimity of genius could have dictated; there are others
which any ordinary character cobbler might as easily have stitched
together. There are sparks both of pathos and of humour, even in
the dullest parts, which could be elicited from none but the Author
of 'Waverley.' . . . If, indeed, we have spoken in a manner
derogatory to this, his later effort, our censure arises only from
its comparison with the former. . .