INTRODUCTORY EPISTLE FROM CAPTAIN CLUTTERBUCK, LATE OF HIS MAJESTY'S —— REGIMENT OF INFANTRY, TO THE AUTHOR OF WAVERLEY.
ANSWER BY "THE AUTHOR OF WAVERLEY," TO THE FOREGOING LETTER FROM CAPTAIN CLUTTERBUCK.
Chapter the First.
Chapter the Second.
Chapter the Third.
Chapter the Fourth.
Chapter the Fifth.
Chapter the Sixth.
Chapter the Seventh.
Chapter the Eighth.
Chapter the Ninth.
Chapter the Tenth.
Chapter the Eleventh.
Chapter the Twelfth.
Chapter the Thirteenth.
Chapter the Fourteenth.
Chapter the Fifteenth.
Chapter the Sixteenth.
Chapter the Seventeenth.
Chapter the Eighteenth.
Chapter the Nineteenth.
Chapter the Twentieth.
Chapter the Twenty-First.
Chapter the Twenty-Second.
Chapter the Twenty-Third.
Chapter the Twenty-Fourth.
Chapter the Twenty-Fifth.
Chapter the Twenty-Sixth.
Chapter the Twenty-Seventh.
Chapter the Twenty-Eighth.
Chapter the Twenty-Ninth.
Chapter the Thirtieth.
Chapter the Thirty-First.
Chapter the Thirty-Second.
Chapter the Thirty-Third.
Chapter the Thirty-Fourth.
Chapter the Thirty-Fifth.
Chapter the Thirty-Sixth.
Chapter the Thirty-Seventh.
INTRODUCTION
It
would be difficult to assign any good reason why the author of
Ivanhoe, after using, in that work, all the art he possessed to
remove the personages, action, and manners of the tale, to a distance
from his own country, should choose for the scene of his next attempt
the celebrated ruins of Melrose, in the immediate neighbourhood of
his own residence. But the reason, or caprice, which dictated his
change of system, has entirely escaped his recollection, nor is it
worth while to attempt recalling what must be a matter of very little
consequence.The
general plan of the story was, to conjoin two characters in that
bustling and contentious age, who, thrown into situations which gave
them different views on the subject of the Reformation, should, with
the same sincerity and purity of intention, dedicate themselves, the
one to the support of the sinking fabric of the Catholic Church, the
other to the establishment of the Reformed doctrines. It was supposed
that some interesting subjects for narrative might be derived from
opposing two such enthusiasts to each other in the path of life, and
contrasting the real worth of both with their passions and
prejudices. The localities of Melrose suited well the scenery of the
proposed story; the ruins themselves form a splendid theatre for any
tragic incident which might be brought forward; joined to the
vicinity of the fine river, with all its tributary streams, flowing
through a country which has been the scene of so much fierce
fighting, and is rich with so many recollections of former times, and
lying almost under the immediate eye of the author, by whom they were
to be used in composition.The
situation possessed farther recommendations. On the opposite bank of
the Tweed might be seen the remains of ancient enclosures, surrounded
by sycamores and ash-trees of considerable size. These had once
formed the crofts or arable ground of a village, now reduced to a
single hut, the abode of a fisherman, who also manages a ferry. The
cottages, even the church which once existed there, have sunk into
vestiges hardly to be traced without visiting the spot, the
inhabitants having gradually withdrawn to the more prosperous town of
Galashiels, which has risen into consideration, within two miles of
their neighbourhood. Superstitious eld, however, has tenanted the
deserted groves with aerial beings, to supply the want of the mortal
tenants who have deserted it. The ruined and abandoned churchyard of
Boldside has been long believed to be haunted by the Fairies, and the
deep broad current of the Tweed, wheeling in moonlight round the foot
of the steep bank, with the number of trees originally planted for
shelter round the fields of the cottagers, but now presenting the
effect of scattered and detached groves, fill up the idea which one
would form in imagination for a scene that Oberon and Queen Mab might
love to revel in. There are evenings when the spectator might
believe, with Father Chaucer, that the
—Queen
of Faery,
With harp, and pipe, and symphony,
Were dwelling in the place.Another,
and even a more familiar refuge of the elfin race, (if tradition is
to be trusted,) is the glen of the river, or rather brook, named the
Allen, which falls into the Tweed from the northward, about a quarter
of a mile above the present bridge. As the streamlet finds its way
behind Lord Sommerville's hunting-seat, called the Pavilion, its
valley has been popularly termed the Fairy Dean, or rather the
Nameless Dean, because of the supposed ill luck attached by the
popular faith of ancient times, to any one who might name or allude
to the race, whom our fathers distinguished as the Good Neighbours,
and the Highlanders called Daoine Shie, or Men of Peace; rather by
way of compliment, than on account of any particular idea of
friendship or pacific relation which either Highlander or Borderer
entertained towards the irritable beings whom they thus
distinguished, or supposed them to bear to humanity. {Footnote: See
Rob Roy, Note, p. 202.}In
evidence of the actual operations of the fairy people even at this
time, little pieces of calcareous matter are found in the glen after
a flood, which either the labours of those tiny artists, or the
eddies of the brook among the stones, have formed into a fantastic
resemblance of cups, saucers, basins, and the like, in which children
who gather them pretend to discern fairy utensils.Besides
these circumstances of romantic locality,
mea paupera regna
(as Captain Dalgetty denominates his territory of Drumthwacket) are
bounded by a small but deep lake, from which eyes that yet look on
the light are said to have seen the waterbull ascend, and shake the
hills with his roar.Indeed,
the country around Melrose, if possessing less of romantic beauty
than some other scenes in Scotland, is connected with so many
associations of a fanciful nature, in which the imagination takes
delight, as might well induce one even less attached to the spot than
the author, to accommodate, after a general manner, the imaginary
scenes he was framing to the localities to which he was partial. But
it would be a misapprehension to suppose, that, because Melrose may
in general pass for Kennaquhair, or because it agrees with scenes of
the Monastery in the circumstances of the drawbridge, the milldam,
and other points of resemblance, that therefore an accurate or
perfect local similitude is to be found in all the particulars of the
picture. It was not the purpose of the author to present a landscape
copied from nature, but a piece of composition, in which a real
scene, with which he is familiar, had afforded him some leading
outlines. Thus the resemblance of the imaginary Glendearg with the
real vale of the Allen, is far from being minute, nor did the author
aim at identifying them. This must appear plain to all who know the
actual character of the Glen of Allen, and have taken the trouble to
read the account of the imaginary Glendearg. The stream in the latter
case is described as wandering down a romantic little valley,
shifting itself, after the fashion of such a brook, from one side to
the other, as it can most easily find its passage, and touching
nothing in its progress that gives token of cultivation. It rises
near a solitary tower, the abode of a supposed church vassal, and the
scene of several incidents in the Romance.The
real Allen, on the contrary, after traversing the romantic ravine
called the Nameless Dean, thrown off from side to side alternately,
like a billiard ball repelled by the sides of the table on which it
has been played, and in that part of its course resembling the stream
which pours down Glendearg, may be traced upwards into a more open
country, where the banks retreat farther from each other, and the
vale exhibits a good deal of dry ground, which has not been neglected
by the active cultivators of the district. It arrives, too, at a sort
of termination, striking in itself, but totally irreconcilable with
the narrative of the Romance. Instead of a single peel-house, or
border tower of defence, such as Dame Glendinning is supposed to have
inhabited, the head of the Allen, about five miles above its junction
with the Tweed, shows three ruins of Border houses, belonging to
different proprietors, and each, from the desire of mutual support so
natural to troublesome times, situated at the extremity of the
property of which it is the principal messuage. One of these is the
ruinous mansion-house of Hillslap, formerly the property of the
Cairncrosses, and now of Mr. Innes of Stow; a second the tower of
Colmslie, an ancient inheritance of the Borthwick family, as is
testified by their crest, the Goat's Head, which exists on the ruin;
{Footnote: It appears that Sir Walter Scott's memory was not quite
accurate on these points. John Borthwick, Esq. in a note to the
publisher, (June 11, 1813.) says that
Colmslie belonged
to Mr. Innes of Stow, while
Hillslap forms part
of the estate of Crookston. He adds—"In proof that the tower
of Hillslap, which I have taken measures to preserve from injury, was
chiefly in his head, as the tower of
Glendearg, when
writing the Monastery, I may mention that, on one of the occasions
when I had the honour of being a visiter at Abbotsford, the stables
then being full, I sent a pony to be put up at our tenant's at
Hillslap:—'Well.' said Sir Walter, 'if you do that, you must trust
for its not being
lifted before
to-morrow, to the protection of Halbert Glendinning: against Christie
of the Clintshill.' At page 58, vol. iii., the first edition, the
'winding
stair' which the monk ascended is described. The winding stone stair
is still to be seen in Hillslap, but not in either of the other two
towers" It is however, probable, from the Goat's-Head crest on
Colmslie, that that tower also had been of old a possession of the
Borthwicks.} a third, the house of Langshaw, also ruinous, but near
which the proprietor, Mr. Baillie of Jerviswood and Mellerstain, has
built a small shooting box.All
these ruins, so strangely huddled together in a very solitary spot,
have recollections and traditions of their own, but none of them bear
the most distant resemblance to the descriptions in the Romance of
the Monastery; and as the author could hardly have erred so grossly
regarding a spot within a morning's ride of his own house, the
inference is, that no resemblance was intended. Hillslap is
remembered by the humours of the last inhabitants, two or three
elderly ladies, of the class of Miss Raynalds, in the Old Manor
House, though less important by birth and fortune. Colmslie is
commemorated in song:—Colmslie
stands on Colmslie hill.
The water it flows round Colmslie mill;
The mill and the kiln gang bonnily.
And it's up with the whippers of Colmslie.Langshaw,
although larger than the other mansions assembled at the head of the
supposed Glendearg, has nothing about it more remarkable than the
inscription of the present proprietor over his shooting lodge—Utinam
hane eliam viris impleam amicis—a
modest wish, which I know no one more capable of attaining upon an
extended scale, than the gentleman who has expressed it upon a
limited one.Having
thus shown that I could say something of these desolated towers,
which the desire of social intercourse, or the facility of mutual
defence, had drawn together at the head of this Glen, I need not add
any farther reason to show, that there is no resemblance between them
and the solitary habitation of Dame Elspeth Glendinning. Beyond these
dwellings are some remains of natural wood, and a considerable
portion of morass and bog; but I would not advise any who may be
curious in localities, to spend time in looking for the fountain and
holly-tree of the White Lady.While
I am on the subject I may add, that Captain Clutterbuck, the
imaginary editor of the Monastery, has no real prototype in the
village of Melrose or neighbourhood, that ever I saw or heard of. To
give some individuality to this personage, he is described as a
character which sometimes occurs in actual society—a person who,
having spent his life within the necessary duties of a technical
profession, from which he has been at length emancipated, finds
himself without any occupation whatever, and is apt to become the
prey of ennui, until he discerns some petty subject of investigation
commensurate to his talents, the study of which gives him employment
in solitude; while the conscious possession of information peculiar
to himself, adds to his consequence in society. I have often
observed, that the lighter and trivial branches of antiquarian study
are singularly useful in relieving vacuity of such a kind, and have
known them serve many a Captain Clutterbuck to retreat upon; I was
therefore a good deal surprised, when I found the antiquarian Captain
identified with a neighbour and friend of my own, who could never
have been confounded with him by any one who had read the book, and
seen the party alluded to. This erroneous identification occurs in a
work entitled, "Illustrations of the Author of Waverley, being
Notices and Anecdotes of real Characters, Scenes, and Incidents,
supposed to be described in his works, by Robert Chambers." This
work was, of course, liable to many errors, as any one of the kind
must be, whatever may be the ingenuity of the author, which takes the
task of explaining what can be only known to another person. Mistakes
of place or inanimate things referred to, are of very little moment;
but the ingenious author ought to have been more cautious of
attaching real names to fictitious characters. I think it is in the
Spectator we read of a rustic wag, who, in a copy of "The Whole
Duty of Man," wrote opposite to every vice the name of some
individual in the neighbourhood, and thus converted that excellent
work into a libel on a whole parish.The
scenery being thus ready at the author's hand, the reminiscences of
the country were equally favourable. In a land where the horses
remained almost constantly saddled, and the sword seldom quitted the
warrior's side—where war was the natural and constant state of the
inhabitants, and peace only existed in the shape of brief and
feverish truces—there could be no want of the means to complicate
and extricate the incidents of his narrative at pleasure. There was a
disadvantage, notwithstanding, in treading this Border district, for
it had been already ransacked by the author himself, as well as
others; and unless presented under a new light, was likely to afford
ground to the objection of
Crambe bis cocta.To
attain the indispensable quality of novelty, something, it was
thought, might be gained by contrasting the character of the vassals
of the church with those of the dependants of the lay barons, by whom
they were surrounded. But much advantage could not be derived from
this. There were, indeed, differences betwixt the two classes, but,
like tribes in the mineral and vegetable world, which, resembling
each other to common eyes, can be sufficiently well discriminated by
naturalists, they were yet too similar, upon the whole, to be placed
in marked contrast with each other.Machinery
remained—the introduction of the supernatural and marvellous; the
resort of distressed authors since the days of Horace, but whose
privileges as a sanctuary have been disputed in the present age, and
well-nigh exploded. The popular belief no longer allows the
possibility of existence to the race of mysterious beings which
hovered betwixt this world and that which is invisible. The fairies
have abandoned their moonlight turf; the witch no longer holds her
black orgies in the hemlock dell; andEven
the last lingering phantom of the brain,
The churchyard ghost, is now at rest again.From
the discredit attached to the vulgar and more common modes in which
the Scottish superstition displays itself, the author was induced to
have recourse to the beautiful, though almost forgotten, theory of
astral spirits, or creatures of the elements, surpassing human beings
in knowledge and power, but inferior to them, as being subject, after
a certain space of years, to a death which is to them annihilation,
as they have no share in the promise made to the sons of Adam. These
spirits are supposed to be of four distinct kinds, as the elements
from which they have their origin, and are known, to those who have
studied the cabalistical philosophy, by the names of Sylphs, Gnomes,
Salamanders, and Naiads, as they belong to the elements of Air,
Earth, Fire, or Water. The general reader will find an entertaining
account of these elementary spirits in the French book entitled,
"Entretiens de Compte du Gabalis." The ingenious Compte de
la Motte Fouqu? composed, in German, one of the most successful
productions of his fertile brain, where a beautiful and even
afflicting effect is produced by the introduction of a water-nymph,
who loses the privilege of immortality by consenting to become
accessible to human feelings, and uniting her lot with that of a
mortal, who treats her with ingratitude.In
imitation of an example so successful, the White Lady of Avenel was
introduced into the following sheets. She is represented as connected
with the family of Avenel by one of those mystic ties, which, in
ancient times, were supposed to exist, in certain circumstances,
between the creatures of the elements and the children of men. Such
instances of mysterious union are recognized in Ireland, in the real
Milosian families, who are possessed of a Banshie; and they are known
among the traditions of the Highlands, which, in many cases, attached
an immortal being or spirit to the service of particular families or
tribes. These demons, if they are to be called so, announced good or
evil fortune to the families connected with them; and though some
only condescended to meddle with matters of importance, others, like
the May Mollach, or Maid of the Hairy Arms, condescended to mingle in
ordinary sports, and even to direct the Chief how to play at
draughts.There
was, therefore, no great violence in supposing such a being as this
to have existed, while the elementary spirits were believed in; but
it was more difficult to describe or imagine its attributes and
principles of action. Shakespeare, the first of authorities in such a
case, has painted Ariel, that beautiful creature of his fancy, as
only approaching so near to humanity as to know the nature of that
sympathy which the creatures of clay felt for each other, as we learn
from the expression—"Mine would, if I were human." The
inferences from this are singular, but seem capable of regular
deduction. A being, however superior to man in length of life—in
power over the elements—in certain perceptions respecting the
present, the past, and the future, yet still incapable of human
passions, of sentiments of moral good and evil, of meriting future
rewards or punishments, belongs rather to the class of animals, than
of human creatures, and must therefore be presumed to act more from
temporary benevolence or caprice, than from anything approaching to
feeling or reasoning. Such a being's superiority in power can only be
compared to that of the elephant or lion, who are greater in strength
than man, though inferior in the scale of creation. The partialities
which we suppose such spirits to entertain must be like those of the
dog; their sudden starts of passion, or the indulgence of a frolic,
or mischief, may be compared to those of the numerous varieties of
the cat. All these propensities are, however, controlled by the laws
which render the elementary race subordinate to the command of
man—liable to be subjected by his science, (so the sect of Gnostics
believed, and on this turned the Rosicrucian philosophy,) or to be
overpowered by his superior courage and daring, when it set their
illusions at defiance.It
is with reference to this idea of the supposed spirits of the
elements, that the White Lady of Avenel is represented as acting a
varying, capricious, and inconsistent part in the pages assigned to
her in the narrative; manifesting interest and attachment to the
family with whom her destinies are associated, but evincing whim, and
even a species of malevolence, towards other mortals, as the
Sacristan, and the Border robber, whose incorrect life subjected them
to receive petty mortifications at her hand. The White Lady is
scarcely supposed, however, to have possessed either the power or the
inclination to do more than inflict terror or create embarrassment,
and is also subjected by those mortals, who, by virtuous resolution,
and mental energy, could assert superiority over her. In these
particulars she seems to constitute a being of a middle class,
between the esprit
follet who places
its pleasure in misleading and tormenting mortals, and the benevolent
Fairy of the East, who uniformly guides, aids, and supports them.Either,
however, the author executed his purpose indifferently, or the public
did not approve of it; for the White Lady of Avenel was far from
being popular. He does not now make the present statement, in the
view of arguing readers into a more favourable opinion on the
subject, but merely with the purpose of exculpating himself from the
charge of having wantonly intruded into the narrative a being of
inconsistent powers and propensities.In
the delineation of another character, the author of the Monastery
failed, where he hoped for some success. As nothing is so successful
a subject for ridicule as the fashionable follies of the time, it
occurred to him that the more serious scenes of his narrative might
be relieved by the humour of a cavaliero of the age of Queen
Elizabeth. In every period, the attempt to gain and maintain the
highest rank of society, has depended on the power of assuming and
supporting a certain fashionable kind of affectation, usually
connected with some vivacity of talent and energy of character, but
distinguished at the same time by a transcendent flight, beyond sound
reason and common sense; both faculties too vulgar to be admitted
into the estimate of one who claims to be esteemed "a choice
spirit of the age." These, in their different phases, constitute
the gallants of the day, whose boast it is to drive the whims of
fashion to extremity.On
all occasions, the manners of the sovereign, the court, and the time,
must give the tone to the peculiar description of qualities by which
those who would attain the height of fashion must seek to distinguish
themselves. The reign of Elizabeth, being that of a maiden queen, was
distinguished by the decorum of the courtiers, and especially the
affectation of the deepest deference to the sovereign. After the
acknowledgment of the Queen's matchless perfections, the same
devotion was extended to beauty as it existed among the lesser stars
in her court, who sparkled, as it was the mode to say, by her
reflected lustre. It is true, that gallant knights no longer vowed to
Heaven, the peacock, and the ladies, to perform some feat of
extravagant chivalry, in which they endangered the lives of others as
well as their own; but although their chivalrous displays of personal
gallantry seldom went farther in Elizabeth's days than the tilt-yard,
where barricades, called barriers, prevented the shock of the horses,
and limited the display of the cavalier's skill to the comparatively
safe encounter of their lances, the language of the lovers to their
ladies was still in the exalted terms which Amadis would have
addressed to Oriana, before encountering a dragon for her sake. This
tone of romantic gallantry found a clever but conceited author, to
reduce it to a species of constitution and form, and lay down the
courtly manner of conversation, in a pedantic book, called Euphues
and his England. Of this, a brief account is given in the text, to
which it may now be proper to make some additions.The
extravagance of Euphuism, or a symbolical jargon of the same class,
predominates in the romances of Calprenade and Scuderi, which were
read for the amusement of the fair sex of France during the long
reign of Louis XIV., and were supposed to contain the only legitimate
language of love and gallantry. In this reign they encountered the
satire of Moliere and Boileau. A similar disorder, spreading into
private society, formed the ground of the affected dialogue of the
Praecieuses, as
they were styled, who formed the coterie of the Hotel de Rambouillet,
and afforded Moliere matter for his admirable comedy,
Les Praecieuses Ridicules.
In England, the humour does not seem to have long survived the
accession of James I.The
author had the vanity to think that a character, whose peculiarities
should turn on extravagances which were once universally fashionable,
might be read in a fictitious story with a good chance of affording
amusement to the existing generation, who, fond as they are of
looking back on the actions and manners of their ancestors, might be
also supposed to be sensible of their absurdities. He must fairly
acknowledge that he was disappointed, and that the Euphuist, far from
being accounted a well drawn and humorous character of the period,
was condemned as unnatural and absurd. It would be easy to account
for this failure, by supposing the defect to arise from the author's
want of skill, and, probably, many readers may not be inclined to
look farther. But as the author himself can scarcely be supposed
willing to acquiesce in this final cause, if any other can be
alleged, he has been led to suspect, that, contrary to what he
originally supposed, his subject was injudiciously chosen, in which,
and not in his mode of treating it, lay the source of the want of
success.The
manners of a rude people are always founded on nature, and therefore
the feelings of a more polished generation immediately sympathize
with them. We need no numerous notes, no antiquarian dissertations,
to enable the most ignorant to recognize the sentiments and diction
of the characters of Homer; we have but, as Lear says, to strip off
our lendings—to set aside the factitious principles and adornments
which we have received from our comparatively artificial system of
society, and our natural feelings are in unison with those of the
bard of Chios and the heroes who live in his verses. It is the same
with a great part of the narratives of my friend Mr. Cooper. We
sympathize with his Indian chiefs and back-woodsmen, and acknowledge,
in the characters which he presents to us, the same truth of human
nature by which we should feel ourselves influenced if placed in the
same condition. So much is this the case, that, though it is
difficult, or almost impossible, to reclaim a savage, bred from his
youth to war and the chase, to the restraints and the duties of
civilized life, nothing is more easy or common than to find men who
have been educated in all the habits and comforts of improved
society, willing to exchange them for the wild labours of the hunter
and the fisher. The very amusements most pursued and relished by men
of all ranks, whose constitutions permit active exercise, are
hunting, fishing, and, in some instances, war, the natural and
necessary business of the savage of Dryden, where his hero talks of
being
—"As
free as nature first made man,
When wild in woods the noble savage ran."But
although the occupations, and even the sentiments, of human beings in
a primitive state, find access and interest in the minds of the more
civilized part of the species, it does not therefore follow, that the
national tastes, opinions, and follies of one civilized period,
should afford either the same interest or the same amusement to those
of another. These generally, when driven to extravagance, are
founded, not upon any natural taste proper to the species, but upon
the growth of some peculiar cast of affectation, with which mankind
in general, and succeeding generations in particular, feel no common
interest or sympathy. The extravagances of coxcombry in manners and
apparel are indeed the legitimate and often the successful objects of
satire, during the time when they exist. In evidence of this,
theatrical critics may observe how many dramatic
jeux d'esprit are
well received every season, because the satirist levels at some
well-known or fashionable absurdity; or, in the dramatic phrase,
"shoots folly as it flies." But when the peculiar kind of
folly keeps the wing no longer, it is reckoned but waste of powder to
pour a discharge of ridicule on what has ceased to exist; and the
pieces in which such forgotten absurdities are made the subject of
ridicule, fall quietly into oblivion with the follies which gave them
fashion, or only continue to exist on the scene, because they contain
some other more permanent interest than that which connects them with
manners and follies of a temporary character.This,
perhaps, affords a reason why the comedies of Ben Jonson, founded
upon system, or what the age termed humours,—by which was meant
factitious and affected characters, superinduced on that which was
common to the rest of their race,—in spite of acute satire, deep
scholarship, and strong sense, do not now afford general pleasure,
but are confined to the closet of the antiquary, whose studies have
assured him that the personages of the dramatist were once, though
they are now no longer, portraits of existing nature.Let
us take another example of our hypothesis from Shakspeare himself,
who, of all authors, drew his portraits for all ages. With the whole
sum of the idolatry which affects us at his name, the mass of readers
peruse, without amusement, the characters formed on the extravagances
of temporary fashion; and the Euphuist Don Armado, the pedant
Holofernes, even Nym and Pistol, are read with little pleasure by the
mass of the public, being portraits of which we cannot recognize the
humour, because the originals no longer exist. In like manner, while
the distresses of Romeo and Juliet continue to interest every bosom,
Mercutio, drawn as an accurate representation of the finished fine
gentleman of the period, and as such received by the unanimous
approbation of contemporaries, has so little to interest the present
age, that, stripped of all his puns, and quirks of verbal wit, he
only retains his place in the scene, in virtue of his fine and
fanciful speech upon dreaming, which belongs to no particular age,
and because he is a personage whose presence is indispensable to the
plot.We
have already prosecuted perhaps too far an argument, the tendency of
which is to prove, that the introduction of an humorist, acting like
Sir Piercie Shafton, upon some forgotten and obsolete model of folly,
once fashionable, is rather likely to awaken the disgust of the
reader, as unnatural, than find him food for laughter. Whether owing
to this theory, or whether to the more simple and probable cause of
the author's failure in the delineation of the subject he had
proposed to himself, the formidable objection of
incredulus odi was
applied to the Euphuist, as well as to the White Lady of Avenel; and
the one was denounced as unnatural, while the other was rejected as
impossible.There
was little in the story to atone for these failures in two principal
points. The incidents were inartificially huddled together. There was
no part of the intrigue to which deep interest was found to apply;
and the conclusion was brought about, not by incidents arising out of
the story itself, but in consequence of public transactions, with
which the narrative has little connexion, and which the reader had
little opportunity to become acquainted with.This,
if not a positive fault, was yet a great defect in the Romance. It is
true, that not only the practice of some great authors in this
department, but even the general course of human life itself, may be
quoted in favour of this more obvious and less artificial practice of
arranging a narrative. It is seldom that the same circle of
personages who have surrounded an individual at his first outset in
life, continue to have an interest in his career till his fate comes
to a crisis. On the contrary, and more especially if the events of
his life be of a varied character, and worth communicating to others,
or to the world, the hero's later connexions are usually totally
separated from those with whom he began the voyage, but whom the
individual has outsailed, or who have drifted astray, or foundered on
the passage. This hackneyed comparison holds good in another point.
The numerous vessels of so many different sorts, and destined for
such different purposes, which are launched in the same mighty ocean,
although each endeavours to pursue its own course, are in every case
more influenced by the winds and tides, which are common to the
element which they all navigate, than by their own separate
exertions. And it is thus in the world, that, when human prudence has
done its best, some general, perhaps national, event, destroys the
schemes of the individual, as the casual touch of a more powerful
being sweeps away the web of the spider.Many
excellent romances have been composed in this view of human life,
where the hero is conducted through a variety of detached scenes, in
which various agents appear and disappear, without, perhaps, having
any permanent influence on the progress of the story. Such is the
structure of Gil Blas, Roderick Random, and the lives and adventures
of many other heroes, who are described as running through different
stations of life, and encountering various adventures, which are only
connected with each other by having happened to be witnessed by the
same individual, whose identity unites them together, as the string
of a necklace links the beads, which are otherwise detached.But
though such an unconnected course of adventures is what most
frequently occurs in nature, yet the province of the romance writer
being artificial, there is more required from him than a mere
compliance with the simplicity of reality,—just as we demand from
the scientific gardener, that he shall arrange, in curious knots and
artificial parterres, the flowers which "nature boon"
distributes freely on hill and dale. Fielding, accordingly, in most
of his novels, but especially in Tom Jones, his
chef-d'oeuvre, has
set the distinguished example of a story regularly built and
consistent in all its parts, in which nothing occurs, and scarce a
personage is introduced, that has not some share in tending to
advance the catastrophe.To
demand equal correctness and felicity in those who may follow in the
track of that illustrious novelist, would be to fetter too much the
power of giving pleasure, by surrounding it with penal rules; since
of this sort of light literature it may be especially said—tout
genre est permis, hors le genre ennuyeux.
Still, however, the more closely and happily the story is combined,
and the more natural and felicitous the catastrophe, the nearer such
a composition will approach the perfection of the novelist's art; nor
can an author neglect this branch of his profession, without
incurring proportional censure.For
such censure the Monastery gave but too much occasion. The intrigue
of the Romance, neither very interesting in itself, nor very happily
detailed, is at length finally disentangled by the breaking out of
national hostilities between England and Scotland, and the as sudden
renewal of the truce. Instances of this kind, it is true, cannot in
reality have been uncommon, but the resorting to such, in order to
accomplish the catastrophe, as by a
tour de force, was
objected to as inartificial, and not perfectly, intelligible to the
general reader.Still
the Monastery, though exposed to severe and just criticism, did not
fail, judging from the extent of its circulation, to have some
interest for the public. And this, too, was according to the ordinary
course of such matters; for it very seldom happens that literary
reputation is gained by a single effort, and still more rarely is it
lost by a solitary miscarriage.The
author, therefore, had his days of grace allowed him, and time, if he
pleased, to comfort himself with the burden of the old Scots song,"If
it isna weel bobbit.
We'll bob it again."