Erhalten Sie Zugang zu diesem und mehr als 300000 Büchern ab EUR 5,99 monatlich.
Shirin Ebadi - Iranian, Muslim, Lawyer, Nobel Peace Prize laureate - has personally experienced violence, oppression, and terrorism in the name of religion. Rising above these tribulations, she became a fighter for human rights and an activist for peace and stability. Her weapons are words: the only way to convinve people that religion can never justify violence and murder.
Sie lesen das E-Book in den Legimi-Apps auf:
Seitenzahl: 40
Das E-Book (TTS) können Sie hören im Abo „Legimi Premium” in Legimi-Apps auf:
AN APPEAL BY SHIRIN EBADITO THE WORLD
WITH GUDRUN HARRER
That’s Not What the Prophet Meant
Despite making every effort to be accurate and researching carefully, the author(s) respectively editor and the publisher take no responsibility and accept no liability for the content provided.
© 2016 Benevento Publishing,
A brand of Red Bull Media House GmbH,
Wals near Salzburg, Austria
All rights, especially for public readings, radio and television transmissions, and whole or partial translations into other languages, are reserved. No part of the work may be reproduced in any form (by photography, microfilm, or any other means) or processed, duplicated, or disseminated using electronic systems without the publisher’s written consent.
Owner, publisher, and responsible for content:
Red Bull Media House GmbH
Oberst-Lepperdinger-Straße 11–15
5071 Wals near Salzburg, Austria
Cover design: b3K design, Andrea Schneider/ diceindustries
Cover image: Getty Images / Dan Tuffs
Translated by: Jake Schneider
E-Book: Satzweiss.com Print Web Software GmbH
ISBN 978-3-7109-5023-0
When I was in primary school, I had my first brush with politics. In history lessons we were told about wars, when they had started, who had started them, and how many people had been killed. And there have been a lot of them. My country has always been tumultuous. I used to think to myself: what is the point of all this? I used to think: why don’t they just write a book in which they predict what would happen or tell us what would have happened if this or that war had not occurred?
My parents were the best guides one could possibly have for teaching me what justice meant. My family treated me and my brother as complete equals. Islam was of course present, but we were sent to a non-Islamic primary school. At that time, it seemed to me that there must always be a way to resolve injustice.
Much later, during my years in law school studying Islamic penal law, it entered my mind that being a woman is a political category. And when the Islamic revolution took place toward the end of the 1970s, it became obvious to me. Reading Islamic penal law, I learned that the value of a woman’s life is half that of a man’s. And that made me angry. So angry that I got a migraine. When I got demoted from my position as a court judge, it became even clearer. At that time, many Iranians packed their bags and left the country. But it was precisely that anger that kept me in Iran. I thought that in my profession as a lawyer it was my duty to stay put and fight for the women in Iran. I have two daughters, and I imagined that one day they would grow up, and they would turn around and ask me: what did you do to help? What did you do to improve the fate of women in Iran? And I imagined I would have to be ready to give them an answer. Just having escaped would not be a sufficient answer for them.
The then new rule of the Islamic state affected me in many ways. When I got married, the law stipulated that a husband had absolute power over his wife and future children. My husband went to the authorities to officially renounce that power. After he had agreed to treat me as an equal in every respect, I found that it helped me deal with many problems around us with more patience. And I always advise men that if they want a good marital life, to enjoy it and experience peace and calm within it, they have to have respect for their wives and make sure that they receive equal treatment in every possible way.
During my years as a lawyer, I represented many clients pro bono. While doing research on one of my cases, I found my own death warrant with an official signature. At that time, I felt that these people who really pursue us must be completely irrational creatures. I was not a political opponent. I was merely a lawyer. And killing me would not have been of any political benefit to the government. And this demonstrated the utmost stupidity of a government that ordered the assassination of someone who is not even a political rival.