PREFACE. TO THE BOOK-LOVER.
CHAPTER I. THEOLOGY.
CHAPTER II. FANATICS AND FREE-THINKERS.
CHAPTER III. ASTROLOGY, ALCHEMY, AND MAGIC.
CHAPTER IV. SCIENCE AND PHILOSOPHY.
CHAPTER V. HISTORY.
CHAPTER VI. POLITICS AND STATESMANSHIP.
CHAPTER VII. SATIRE.
CHAPTER VIII. POETRY.
CHAPTER IX. DRAMA AND ROMANCE.
CHAPTER X. BOOKSELLERS AND PUBLISHERS.
CHAPTER XI. SOME LITERARY MARTYRS.
PREFACE. TO THE BOOK-LOVER.
To
record the woes of authors and to discourse
de libris fatalibus
seems deliberately to court the displeasure of that fickle mistress
who presides over the destinies of writers and their works. Fortune
awaits the aspiring scribe with many wiles, and oft treats him
sorely. If she enrich any, it is but to make them subject of her
sport. If she raise others, it is but to pleasure herself with their
ruins. What she adorned but yesterday is today her pastime, and if
we now permit her to adorn and crown us, we must tomorrow suffer her
to crush and tear us to pieces. Today her sovereign power is
limited: she can but let loose a host of angry critics upon us; she
can but scoff at us, take away our literary reputation, and turn away
the eyes of a public as fickle as herself from our pages. Surely that
were hard enough! Can Fortune pluck a more galling dart from her
quiver, and dip the point in more envenomed bitterness? Yes, those
whose hard lot is here recorded have suffered more terrible wounds
than these. They have lost liberty, and even life, on account of
their works. The cherished offspring of their brains have, like
unnatural children, turned against their parents, causing them to be
put to death.Fools
many of them—nay, it is surprising how many of this illustrious
family have peopled the world, and they can boast of many authors'
names which figure on their genealogical tree—men who might have
lived happy, contented, and useful lives were it not for their insane
cacoethes scribendi.
And hereby they show their folly. If only they had been content to
write plain and ordinary commonplaces which every one believed, and
which caused every honest fellow who had a grain of sense in his head
to exclaim, "How true that is!" all would have been well.
But they must needs write something original, something different
from other men's thoughts; and immediately the censors and critics
began to spy out heresy, or laxity of morals, and the fools were
dealt with according to their folly. There used to be special houses
of correction in those days, mad-houses built upon an approved
system, for the special treatment of cases of this kind; mediaeval
dungeons, an occasional application of the rack, and other gentle
instruments of torture of an inventive age, were wonderfully
efficacious in curing a man of his folly. Nor was there any special
limit to the time during which the treatment lasted. And in case of a
dangerous fit of folly, there were always a few faggots ready, or a
sharpened axe, to put a finishing stroke to other and more gentle
remedies.One
species of folly was especially effective in procuring the attention
of the critics of the day, and that was satirical writing. They could
not tolerate that style—no, not for a moment; and many an author
has had his cap and bells, aye, and the lining too, severed from the
rest of his motley, simply because he would go and play with Satyrs
instead of keeping company with plain and simple folk.Far
separated from the crowd of fools, save only in their fate, were
those who amid the mists of error saw the light of Truth, and strove
to tell men of her graces and perfections. The vulgar crowd heeded
not the message, and despised the messengers. They could see no
difference between the philosopher's robe and the fool's motley, the
Saint's glory and Satan's hoof. But with eager eyes and beating
hearts the toilers after Truth worked on."How
many with sad faith have sought her?
How many with crossed hands have sighed for her?
How many with brave hearts fought for her,
At life's dear peril wrought for her,
So loved her that they died for her,
Tasting the raptured fleetness
Of her Divine completeness?"In
honour of these scholars of an elder age, little understood by their
fellows, who caused them to suffer for the sake of the Truth they
loved, we doff our caps, whether they jingle or not, as you please;
and if thou thinkest, good reader, that 'twere folly to lose a life
for such a cause, the bells will match the rest of thy garb. The
learning, too, of the censors and critics was often indeed
remarkable. They condemned a recondite treatise on Trigonometry,
because they imagined it contained heretical opinions concerning the
doctrine of the Trinity; and another work which was devoted to the
study of Insects was prohibited, because they concluded that it was a
secret attack upon the Jesuits. Well might poor Galileo exclaim, "And
are these then my judges?" Stossius, who wrote a goodly book
with the title "Concordia rationis et fidei," which was
duly honoured by being burnt at Berlin, thus addresses his
slaughtered offspring, and speculates on the reason of its
condemnation: "Ad librum a ministerio damnatum."Q.
Parve liber, quid enim peccasti, dente sinistro. Quod te
discerptumturba
sacrata velit? R. Invisum dixi verum, propter quod et
olim,
Vel dominum letho turba sacrata dedit."But
think not, O Book-lover, that I am about to record all the race of
fools who have made themselves uncomfortable through their insane
love of writing, nor count all the books which have become
instruments of accusation against their authors. That library would
be a large one which contained all such volumes. I may only write to
thee of some of them now, and if thou shouldest require more, some
other time I may tell thee of them. Perhaps in a corner of thy
book-shelves thou wilt collect a store of Fatal Books, many of which
are rare and hard to find. Know, too, that I have derived some of the
titles of works herein recorded from a singular and rare work of M.
John Christianus Klotz, published in Latin at Leipsic, in the year
1751. To these I have added many others. The Biographical Dictionary
of Bayle is a mine from which I have often quarried, and discovered
there many rare treasures. Our own learned literary historian, Mr.
Isaac Disraeli, has recorded the woes of many of our English writers
in his book entitled "The Calamities of Authors" and also
in his "Curiosities of Literature." From these works I have
derived some information. There is a work by Menkenius, "Analecta
de Calamitate Literatorum"; another by Pierius Valerianus, "De
Infelicitate Literatorum"; another by Spizelius, "Infelix
Literatus"; and last but not least Peignot's "Dictionnaire
Critique, Littéraire et Bibliographique, des Livres condamnés au
Feu" which will furnish thee with further information concerning
the woes of authors, if thine appetite be not already sated.And
if there be any of Folly's crowd who read this book—of those, I
mean, who work and toil by light of midnight lamp, weaving from their
brains page upon page of lore and learning, wearing their lives out,
all for the sake of an ungrateful public, which cares little for
their labour and scarcely stops to thank the toiler for his pains—if
there be any of you who read these pages, it will be as pleasant to
you to feel safe and free from the stern critics' modes of former
days, as it is to watch the storms and tempests of the sea from the
secure retreat of your study chair.And
if at any time a cross-grained reviewer should treat thy cherished
book with scorn, and presume to ridicule thy sentiment and scoff at
thy style (which Heaven forfend!), console thyself that thou livest
in peaceable and enlightened times, and needest fear that no greater
evil can befall thee on account of thy folly in writing than the lash
of his satire and the bitterness of his caustic pen. After the manner
of thy race thou wilt tempt Fortune again. May'st thou proceed and
prosper!
Vale.I
desire to express my many thanks to the Rev. Arthur Carr, M.A., late
Fellow of Oriel College, Oxford, for his kind assistance in revising
the proofs of this work. It was my intention to dedicate this book to
Mr. John Walter, but alas! his death has deprived it of that
distinction. It is only possible now to inscribe to the memory of him
whom England mourns the results of some literary labour in which he
was pleased to take a kindly interest.