History of the Templars Knights
History of the Templars KnightsPREFACE.CHAPTER I.CHAPTER II. Regula Pauperum Commilitonum Christi et Templi Salomonis. *CHAPTER III.CHAPTER IV.CHAPTER V.CHAPTER VI.CHAPTER VII.CHAPTER VIII.CHAPTER IX.CHAPTER X.CHAPTER XI. THE TEMPLE CHURCH.CHAPTER XII.CHAPTER XIII.CHAPTER XIV.Copyright
History of the Templars Knights
Charles G. Addison
PREFACE.
THE extraordinary and romantic career of the Knights Templars,
their exploits and their misfortunes, render their history a
subject of peculiar interest.
Born during the first fervour of the Crusades, they were flattered
and aggrandized as long as their great military power and religious
fanaticism could be made available for the support of the Eastern
church and the retention of the Holy Land, but when the crescent
had ultimately triumphed over the cross, and the religio-military
enthusiasm of Christendom had died away, they encountered the
basest ingratitude in return for the services they had rendered to
the christian faith, and were plundered, persecuted, and condemned
to a cruel death, by those who ought in justice to have been their
defenders and supporters. The memory of these holy warriors is
embalmed in all our recollections of the wars of the cross; they
were the bulwarks of the Latin kingdom of Jerusalem during the
short period of its existence, and were the last band of Europe's
host that contended for the possession of Palestine.
To the vows of the monk and the austere life of the convent, the
Templars added the discipline of the camp, and the stern duties of
the military life, joining
"The fine vocation of the sword and lance,
With the gross aims, and body-bending toil
Of a poor brotherhood, who walk the earth
Pitied."
The vulgar notion that the Templars were as wicked as they were
fearless and brave, has not yet been entirely exploded; but it is
hoped that the copious account of the proceedings against the order
in this country, given in the ninth and tenth chapters of the
ensuing volume, will tend to dispel many unfounded prejudices still
entertained against the fraternity, and excite emotions of
admiration for their constancy and courage, and of pity for their
unmerited and cruel fate.
Matthew Paris, who wrote at St. Albans, concerning events in
Palestine, tells us that the emulation between the Templars and
Hospitaliers frequently broke out into open warfare to the great
scandal and prejudice of Christendom, and that, in a pitched battle
fought between them, the Templars were slain to a man. The solitary
testimony of Matthew Paris, who was no friend to the two orders, is
invalidated by the silence of contemporary historians, who wrote on
the spot; and it is quite evident from the letters of the pope,
addressed to the Hospitaliers, the year after the date of the
alleged battle, that such an occurrence never could have taken
place.
The accounts, even of the best of the antient writers, should not
be adopted without examination, and a careful comparison with other
sources of information. William of Tyre, for instance, tells us
that Nassr-ed-deen, son of sultan Abbas, was taken prisoner by the
Templars, and whilst in their hands became a convert to the
Christian religion; that he had learned the rudiments of the Latin
language, and earnestly sought to be baptized, but that the
Templars were bribed with sixty thousand pieces of gold to
surrender him to his enemies in Egypt, where certain death awaited
him; and that they stood by to see him bound hand and foot with
chains, and placed in an iron cage, to be conducted across the
desert to Cairo. Now the Arabian historians of that period tell us
that Nassr-ed-deen and his father murdered the caliph and threw his
body into a well, and then fled with their retainers and treasure
into Palestine; that the sister of the murdered caliph wrote
immediately to the commandant at Gaza, which place was garrisoned
by the Knights Templars, offering a handsome reward for the capture
of the fugitives; that they were accordingly intercepted, and
Nassr-ed-deen was sent to Cairo, where the female relations of the
caliph caused his body to be cut into small pieces in the seraglio.
The above act has constantly been made a matter of grave accusation
against the Templars; but what a different complexion does the case
assume on the testimony of the Arabian authorities!
It must be remembered that William archbishop of Tyre was hostile
to the order on account of its vast powers and privileges, and
carried his complaints to a general council of the church at Rome.
He is abandoned, in everything that he says to the prejudice of the
fraternity, by James of Vitry, bishop of Acre, a learned and most
talented prelate, who wrote in Palestine subsequently to William of
Tyre, and has copied largely from the history of the latter. The
bishop of Acre speaks of the Templars in the highest terms, and
declares that they were universally loved by all men for their
piety and humility. "Nulli molesti erant!" says he, "sed ab omnibus
propter humilitatem et religionem amabantur."
The celebrated orientalist Von Hammer has recently brought forward
various extraordinary and unfounded charges, destitute of all
authority, against the Templars; and Wilcke, who has written a
German history of the order, seems to have imbibed all the vulgar
prejudices against the fraternity. I might have added to the
interest of the ensuing work, by making the Templars horrible and
atrocious villains; but I have endeavoured to write a fair and
impartial account of the order, not slavishly adopting everything I
find detailed in antient writers, but such matters only as I
believe, after a careful examination of the best authorities, to be
true.
It is a subject of congratulation to us that we possess, in the
Temple Church at London, the most beautiful and perfect memorial of
the order of the Knights Templars now in existence. No one who has
seen that building in its late dress of plaster and whitewash will
recognize it when restored to its antient magnificence. This
venerable structure was one of the chief ecclesiastical edifices of
the Knights Templars in Europe, and stood next in rank to the
Temple at Jerusalem. As I have performed the pilgrimage to the Holy
City, and wandered amid the courts of the antient Temple of the
Knights Templars on Mount Moriah, I could not but regard with more
than ordinary interest the restoration by the societies of the
Inner and the Middle Temple of their beautiful Temple Church.
The greatest zeal and energy have been displayed by them in that
praiseworthy undertaking, and no expense has been spared to repair
the ravages of time, and to bring back the structure to what it was
in the time of the Templars.
In the summer I had the pleasure of accompanying one of the chief
and most enthusiastic promoters of the restoration of the church
(Mr. Burge, Q.C.) over the interesting fabric, and at his
suggestion the present work was commenced. I am afraid that it will
hardly answer his expectations, and am sorry that the interesting
task has not been undertaken by an abler hand.
P.S. Mr. Willement, who is preparing some exquisitely stained glass
windows for the Temple Church, has just drawn my attention to the
nineteenth volume of the "MEMOIR ES DE LA SOCIÉTÉ ROYALE DES
ANTIQUAIRES DE FRANCE," published last year. It contains a most
curious and interesting account of the church of Brelevennez, in
the department des Cotes-du-Nord, supposed to have formerly
belonged to the order of the Temple, written by the Chevalier du
FREMANVILLE. Amongst various curious devices, crosses, and symbols
found upon the windows and the tombs of the church, is a copper
medallion, which appears to have been suspended from the neck by a
chain. This decoration consists of a small circle, within which are
inscribed two equilateral triangles placed one upon the other, so
as to form a six-pointed star. In the midst of the star is a second
circle, containing within it the LAMB of the order of the Temple
holding the banner in its fore-paw, similar to what we see on the
antient seal of the order delineated in the title-page of this
work. Mr. Willement has informed me that he has received an offer
from a gentleman in Brittany to send over casts of the decorations
and devices lately discovered in that church. He has kindly
referred the letter to me for consideration, but I have not thought
it advisable to delay the publication of the present work for the
purpose of procuring them.
Mr. Willement has also drawn my attention to a very distinct
impression of the reverse of the seal of the Temple described in
page 106, whereon I read very plainly the interesting motto,
"TESTIS SVM AGNI.
CHAPTER I.
"Yet ’midst her towering fanes in ruin laid,
The pilgrim saint his murmuring vespers paid;
’Twas his to mount the tufted rocks, and rove
The chequer’d twilight of the olive-grove:
’Twas his to bend beneath the sacred gloom,
And wear with many a kiss Messiah's tomb."
THE extraordinary and romantic institution of the Knights Templars,
those military friars who so strangely blended the character of the
monk with that of the soldier, took its origin in the following
manner:--
On the miraculous discovery of the Holy sepulchre by the Empress
Helena, the mother of Constantine, about 298 years after the death
of Christ, and the consequent erection, by command of the first
christian emperor, of the magnificent church of the Resurrection,
or, as it is now called, the Church of the Holy Sepulchre, over the
sacred monument, the tide of pilgrimage set in towards Jerusalem,
and went on increasing in strength as Christianity gradually spread
throughout Europe. On the surrender of the Holy City to the
victorious Arabians, (A.D. 637,) the privileges and the security of
the christian population were provided for in the following
guarantee, given under the hand and seal of the Caliph Omar to
Sophronius the Patriarch.
"From OMAR EBNO ’L ALCHITAB to the inhabitants of ÆLIA."
"They shall be protected and secured both in their lives and
fortunes, and their churches shall neither be pulled down nor made
use of by any but themselves." *
Under the government of the Arabians, the pilgrimages continued
steadily to increase; the old and the young, women and children,
flocked in crowds to Jerusalem, and in the year 1064 the Holy
Sepulchre was visited by an enthusiastic band of seven thousand
pilgrims, headed by the Archbishop of Mentz and the Bishops of
Utrecht, Bamberg, and Ratisbon. † The year following, however,
Jerusalem was conquered by the wild Turcomans. Three thousand of
the citizens were indiscriminately massacred, and the hereditary
command over the Holy City and territory was confided to the Emir
Ortok, the chief of a savage pastoral tribe.
Under the iron yoke of these fierce Northern strangers, the
Christians were fearfully oppressed; they were driven from their
churches; divine worship was ridiculed and interrupted; and the
patriarch of the Holy City was dragged by the hair of his bead over
the sacred pavement of the church of the Resurrection, and cast
into a dungeon, to extort a ransom from the sympathy of his flock.
The pilgrims who, through innumerable perils, had reached the gates
of the Holy City, were plundered, imprisoned, and frequently
massacred; an aureus, or piece of gold, was exacted as the price of
admission to the holy sepulchre, and many, unable to pay the tax,
were driven by the swords of the Turcomans from the very threshold
of the object of all their hopes, the bourne of their long
pilgrimage, and were compelled to retrace their weary steps in
sorrow and anguish to their distant homes. * The melancholy
intelligence of the profanation of the holy places, and of the
oppression and cruelty of the Turcomans, aroused the religious
chivalry of Christendom; "a nerve was touched of exquisite feeling,
and the sensation vibrated to the heart of Europe."
Then arose the wild enthusiasm of the crusades; men of all ranks,
and even monks and priests, animated by the exhortations of the
pope and the preachings of Peter the Hermit, flew to arms, and
enthusiastically undertook "the pious and glorious enterprize" of
rescuing the holy sepulchre of Christ from the foul abominations of
the heathen.
When intelligence of the capture of Jerusalem by the Crusaders
(A.D. 1099) had been conveyed to Europe, the zeal of pilgrimage
blazed forth with increased fierceness; it had gathered intensity
from the interval of its suppression by the wild Turcomans, and
promiscuous crowds of both sexes, old men and children, virgins and
matrons, thinking the road then open and the journey practicable,
successively pressed forwards towards the Holy City, with the
passionate desire of contemplating the original monuments of the
Redemption. * The infidels had indeed been driven out of Jerusalem,
but not out of Palestine. The lofty mountains bordering the
sea-coast were infested by bold and warlike bands of fugitive
Mussulmen, who maintained themselves in various impregnable castles
and strongholds, from whence they issued forth upon the high-roads,
cut off the communication between Jerusalem and the sea-ports, and
revenged themselves for the loss of their habitations and property
by the indiscriminate pillage of all travellers. The Bedouin
horsemen, moreover, making rapid incursions from beyond the Jordan,
frequently kept up a desultory and irregular warfare in the plains;
and the pilgrims, consequently, whether they approached the Holy
City by land or by sea, were alike exposed to almost daily
hostility, to plunder, and to death.
To alleviate the dangers and distresses to which these pious
enthusiasts were exposed, to guard the honour of the saintly
virgins and matrons, † and to protect the gray hairs of the
venerable palmer, nine noble knights formed a holy brotherhood in
arms, and entered into a solemn compact to aid one another in
clearing the highways of infidels, and of robbers, and in
protecting the pilgrims through the passes and defiles of the
mountains to the Holy City. Warmed with the religious and military
fervour of the day, and animated by the sacredness of the cause to
which they had devoted their swords, they called themselves the
Poor Fellow-soldiers of Jesus Christ. They renounced the world and
its pleasures, and in the holy church of the Resurrection, in the
presence of the patriarch of Jerusalem, they embraced vows of
perpetual chastity, obedience, and poverty, after the manner of
monks. * Uniting in themselves the two most popular qualities of
the age, devotion and valour, and exercising them in the most
popular of all enterprises, the protection of the pilgrims and of
the road to the holy sepulchre, they speedily acquired a vast
reputation and a splendid renown.
At first, we are told, they had no church and no particular place
of abode, but in the year of our Lord 1118, (nineteen years after
the conquest of Jerusalem by the Crusaders,) they had rendered such
good and acceptable service to the Christians, that Baldwin the
Second, king of Jerusalem, granted them a place of habitation
within the sacred inclosure of the Temple on Mount Moriah, amid
those holy and magnificent structures, partly erected by the
christian Emperor Justinian, and partly built by the Caliph Omar,
which were then exhibited by the monks and priests of Jerusalem,
whose restless zeal led them to practise on the credulity of the
pilgrims, and to multiply relics and all objects likely to be
sacred in their eyes, as the Temple of Solomon, whence the Poor
Fellow-soldiers of Jesus Christ came thenceforth to be known by the
name of "the Knighthood of the Temple of Solomon." †
A few remarks in elucidation of the name Templars, or Knights of
the Temple, may not be altogether unacceptable.
By the Mussulmen, the site of the great Jewish temple on Mount
Moriah has always been regarded with peculiar veneration. Mahomet,
in the first year of the publication of the Koran, directed his
followers, when at prayer, to turn their faces towards it, and
pilgrimages have constantly been made to the holy spot by devout
Moslems. On the conquest of Jerusalem by the Arabians, it was the
first care of the Caliph Omar to rebuild "the Temple of the Lord."
Assisted by the principal chieftains of his army, the Commander of
the Faithful undertook the pious office of clearing the ground with
his own hands, and of tracing out the foundations of the
magnificent mosque which now crowns with its dark and swelling dome
the elevated summit of Mount Moriah. *
This great house of prayer, the most holy Mussulman Temple in the
world after that of Mecca, is erected over the spot where "Solomon
began to build the house of the Lord at Jerusalem on Mount Moriah,
where the Lord appeared unto David his father, in the place that
David had prepared in the threshing-floor of Oman the Jebusite." It
remains to this day in a state of perfect preservation, and is one
of the finest specimens of Saracenic architecture in existence. It
is entered by four spacious doorways, each door facing one of the
cardinal points; the Bab el D'jannat, or gate of the garden, on the
north; the Bab el Kebla, or gate of prayer, on the south; the Bab
ib’n el Daoud, or the gate of the son of David, on the east; and
the Bab el Garbi, on the west. By the Arabian geographers it is
called Beit Allah, the house of God, also Beit Almokaddas, or Beit
Almacdes, the holy house. From it Jerusalem derives its Arabic
name, el Kods, the holy, el Schereef, the noble, and el Mobarek,
the blessed; while the governors of the city, instead of the
customary high-sounding titles of sovereignty and dominion, take
the simple title of Hami, or protectors.
On the conquest of Jerusalem by the crusaders, the crescent was
torn down from the summit of this famous Mussulman Temple, and was
replaced by an immense golden cross, and the edifice was then
consecrated to the services of the christian religion, but retained
its simple appellation of "The Temple of the Lord." William,
Archbishop of Tyre and Chancellor of the Kingdom of Jerusalem,
gives an interesting account of this famous edifice as it existed
in his time, during the Latin dominion. He speaks of the splendid
mosaic work, of the Arabic characters setting forth the name of the
founder, and the cost of the undertaking, and of the famous rock
under the centre of the dome, which is to this day shown by the
Moslems as the spot whereon the destroying angel stood, " with his
drawn sword in his hand stretched out over Jerusalem." * This rock
he informs us was left exposed and uncovered for the space of
fifteen years after the conquest of the holy city by the crusaders,
but was, after that period, cased with a handsome altar of white
marble, upon which the priests daily said mass.
To the south of this holy Mussulman temple, on the extreme edge of
the summit of Mount Moriah, and resting against the modern walls of
the town of Jerusalem, stands the venerable christian church of the
Virgin, erected by the Emperor Justinian, whose stupendous
foundations, remaining to this day, fully justify the astonishing
description given of the building by Procopius. That writer informs
us that in order to get a level surface for the erection of the
edifice, it was necessary, on the east and south sides of the hill,
to raise up a wall of masonry from the valley below, and to
construct a vast foundation, partly composed of solid stone and
partly of arches and pillars. The stones were of such magnitude,
that each block required to be transported in a truck drawn by
forty of the emperor's strongest oxen; and to admit of the passage
of these trucks it was necessary to widen the roads leading to
Jerusalem. The forests of Lebanon yielded their choicest cedars for
the timbers of the roof, and a quarry of variegated marble,
seasonably discovered in the adjoining mountains, furnished the
edifice with superb marble columns. * The interior of this
interesting structure, which still remains at Jerusalem, after a
lapse of more than thirteen centuries, in an excellent state of
preservation, is adorned with six rows of columns, from whence
spring arches supporting the cedar beams and timbers of the roof;
and at the end of the building is a round tower, surmounted by a
dome. The vast stones, the walls of masonry, and the subterranean
colonnade raised to support the south-east angle of the platform
whereon the church is erected, are truly wonderful, and may still
be seen by penetrating through a small door, and descending several
flights of steps at the south-east corner of the inclosure.
Adjoining the sacred edifice, the emperor erected hospitals, or
houses of refuge, for travellers, sick people, and mendicants of
all nations; the foundations whereof, composed of handsome Roman
masonry, are still visible on either side of the southern end of
the building.
On the conquest of Jerusalem by the Moslems, this venerable church
was converted into a mosque, and was called D’jamé al Acsa; it was
enclosed, together with the great Mussulman Temple of the Lord
erected by the Caliph Omar, within a large area by a high stone
wall, which runs around the edge of the summit of Mount Moriah, and
guards from the profane tread of the unbeliever the whole of that
sacred ground whereon once stood the gorgeous temple of the wisest
of kings. *
When the Holy City was taken by the crusaders, the D’jamé al Acsa,
with the various buildings constructed around it, became the
property of the kings of Jerusalem; and is denominated by William
of Tyre "the palace," or "royal house to the south of the Temple of
the Lord, vulgarly called the Temple of Solomon." † It was this
edifice or temple on Mount Moriah which was appropriated to the use
of the poor fellow-soldiers of Jesus Christ, as they had no church
and no particular place of abode, and from it they derived their
name of Knights Templars. *
James of Vitry, Bishop of Acre, who gives an interesting account of
the holy places, thus speaks of the Temple of the Knights Templars.
"There is, moreover, at Jerusalem another temple of immense
spaciousness and extent, from which the brethren of the knighthood
of the Temple derive their name of Templars, which is called the
Temple of Solomon, perhaps to distinguish it from the one above
described, which is specially called the Temple of the Lord. " † He
moreover informs us in his oriental history, that "in the Temple of
the Lord there is an abbot and canons regular; and be it known that
the one is the Temple of the Lord, and the other the Temple of the
Chivalry. These are clerks, the others are knights." ‡
The canons of the Temple of the Lord conceded to the poor
fellow-soldiers of Jesus Christ the large court extending between
that building and the Temple of Solomon; the king, the patriarch,
and the prelates of Jerusalem, and the barons of the Latin kingdom,
assigned them various gifts and revenues for their maintenance and
support, § and the order being now settled in a regular place of
abode, the knights soon began to entertain more extended views, and
to seek a larger theatre for the exercise of their holy
profession.
Their first aim and object had been, as before mentioned, simply to
protect the poor pilgrims, on their journey backwards and forwards,
from the sea-coast to Jerusalem; * but as the hostile tribes of
Mussulmen, which everywhere surrounded the Latin kingdom, were
gradually recovering from the stupifying terror into which they had
been plunged by the successful and exterminating warfare of the
first crusaders, and were assuming an aggressive and threatening
attitude, it was determined that the holy warriors of the Temple
should, in addition to the protection of pilgrims, make the defence
of the christian kingdom of Jerusalem, of the eastern church, and
of all the holy places, a part of their particular
profession.
The two most distinguished members of the fraternity were Hugh de
Payens and Geoffrey de St. Aldemar, or St. Omer, two valiant
soldiers of the cross, who had fought with great credit and renown
at the siege of Jerusalem. Hugh de Payens was chosen by the knights
to be the superior of the new religious and military society, by
the title of "The Master of the Temple;" and he has, consequently,
generally been called the founder of the order.
The name and reputation of the Knights Templars speedily spread
throughout Europe, and various illustrious pilgrims from the far
west aspired to become members of the holy fraternity. Among these
was Falk, Count of Anjou, who joined the society as a married
brother, (A.D. 1120,) and annually remitted the order thirty pounds
of silver. Baldwin, king of Jerusalem, foreseeing that great
advantages would accrue to the Latin kingdom by the increase of the
power and numbers of these holy warriors, exerted himself to extend
the order throughout all Christendom, so that he might, by means of
so politic an institution, keep alive the holy enthusiasm of the
west, and draw a constant succour from the bold and warlike races
of Europe for the support of his christian throne and
kingdom.
St. Bernard, the holy abbot of Clairvaux, had been a great admirer
of the Templars. He wrote a letter to the Count of Champagne, on
his entering the order, (A.D. 1123,) praising the act as one of
eminent merit in the sight of God; and it was determined to enlist
the all-powerful influence of this great ecclesiastic in favour of
the fraternity. "By a vow of poverty and penance, by closing his
eyes against the visible world, by the refusal of all
ecclesiastical dignities, the Abbot of Clairvaux became the oracle
of Europe, and the founder of one hundred and sixty convents.
Princes and pontiffs trembled at the freedom of his apostolical
censures: France, England, and Milan, consulted and obeyed his
judgment in a schism of the church: the debt was repaid by the
gratitude of Innocent the Second; and his successor, Eugenics the
Third, was the friend and disciple of the holy St. Bernard."
*
To this learned and devout prelate two knights templars were
despatched with the following letter:
"Baldwin, by the grace of the Lord JESUS CHRIST, King of Jerusalem,
and Prince of Antioch, to the venerable Father Bernard, Abbot of
Clairvaux, health and regard.
"The Brothers of the Temple, whom the Lord hath deigned to raise
up, and whom by an especial Providence he preserves for the defence
of this kingdom, desiring to obtain from the Holy See the
confirmation of their institution, and a rule for their particular
guidance, we have determined to send to you the two knights, Andrew
and Gondemar, men as much distinguished by their military exploits
as by the splendour of their birth, to obtain from the Pope the
approbation of their order, and to dispose his holiness to send
succour and subsidies against the enemies of the faith, reunited in
their design to destroy us, and to invade our christian
territories.
"Well knowing the weight of your mediation with God and his vicar
upon earth, as well as with the princes and powers of Europe, we
have thought fit to confide to yon these two important matters,
whose successful issue cannot be otherwise than most agreeable to
ourselves. The statutes we ask of you should be so ordered and
arranged as to be reconcilable with the tumult of the camp and the
profession of arms; they must, in fact, be of such a nature as to
obtain favour and popularity with the christian princes.
"Do you then so manage, that we may, through you, have the
happiness of seeing this important affair brought to a successful
issue, and address for us to heaven the incense of your prayers."
*
Soon after the above letter had been despatched to St. Bernard,
Hugh de Payens himself proceeded to Rome, accompanied by Geoffrey
de St. Aldemar, and four other brothers of the order, viz. Brother
Payen de Montdidier, Brother Gorall, Brother Geoffrey Bisol, and
Brother Archambauld de St. Amand. They were received with great
honour and distinction by Pope Honorius, who warmly approved of the
objects and designs of the holy fraternity. St. Bernard had, in the
mean time, taken the affair greatly to heart; he negotiated with
the Pope, the legate, and the bishops of France, and obtained the
convocation of a great ecclesiastical council at Troyes, (A.D.
11280 which Hugh de Payens and his brethren were invited to attend.
This council consisted of several archbishops, bishops, and abbots,
among which last was St. Bernard himself. The rules to which the
Templars had subjected themselves were there described by the
master, and to the holy Abbot of Clairvaux was confided the task of
revising and correcting these rules, and of framing a code of
statutes fit and proper for the governance of the great religious
and military fraternity of the Temple.
Footnotes2:* Elmacin, Hist. Saracen. Eutychius.
2:† Ingulphus, the secretary of William the Conqueror, one of the
number, states that he sallied forth from Normandy with thirty
companions, all stout and well-appointed horsemen, and that they
returned twenty miserable palmers, with the staff in their hand and
the wallet at their back.--Baronius ad ann. 1064, No. 43, 56.
3:* Will. Tyr., lib. i. cap. 10, ed. 1564.
4:* Omnibus mundi partibus divites et pauperes, juvenes et
virgines, senes cum junioribus, loca sancta visitaturi Hierosolymam
pergerent.--Jac. de Vitriaco. Hist. Hierosol. cap. lxv.
4:† "To kiss the holy monuments," says William of Tyre, "came
sacred and chaste widows, forgetful of feminine fear, and the
multiplicity of dangers that beset their path."--Lib. xviii. cap.
5.
5:* Quidam autem Deo amabiles et devoti milites, charitate
ferventes, mundo renuatiantes, et Christi se servitio mancipantes
in manu Patriarchæ Hierosolymitani professione et voto solemni sere
astrinxerunt, ut a prædictis latronibus, et viris sanguinum,
defenderent peregrinos, et stratas publicas custodirent, more
canonicorum regularium in obedientia et castitate et sine proprio
militaturi summo regi. Jac. de Vitr. Hist. Hierosol. apud Gesta Dei
per Francos, cap. lxv. p. 1083.--Will. Tyr. lib. xii. cap. 7. There
were three kinds of poverty. The first and strictest (altissima)
admitted not of the possession of any description of property
whatever. The second (media) forbade the possession of individual
property, but sanctioned any amount of wealth when shared by a
fraternity in common. The lowest was where a separate property in
some few things was allowed, such as food and clothing, whilst
everything else was shared in common. The second kind of poverty
(media) was adopted by the Templars.
5:† Pantaleon, lib. iii. p. 82.
6:* D’Herbelot Bib. Orient. p. 270, 687, ed. 1697. William of Tyre,
who lived at Jerusalem shortly after the conquest of the city by
the Crusaders, tells us that the Caliph Omar required the Patriarch
Sophronius to point out to him the site of the temple destroyed by
Titus, which being done, the caliph immediately commenced the
erection of a fresh temple thereon, "Quo postea infra modicum
tempus juxta conceptum mentis suæ feliciter consummato, quale hodie
Hierosolymis esse dinoscitur, multis et infinites ditavit
possessionibus."--Will. Tyr. lib. i. cap. 2.
7:* Erant porro in eodem Templi ædificio, intus et extra ex opere
musaico, Arabici idiomatis literarum vetustissima monimenta, quibus
et auctor et imperarum quantitas et quo tempore opus inceptum
quodque consummatum fuerit evidenter declaratur. . . . In hujus
superioris areæ medio Templum ædificatum est, forma quidem
octogonum et laterum totidem, tectum habens sphericum plumbo
artificiose copertum. . . . Intus vero in medio Templi, infra
interiorem columnarum ordinem rupes est, &c.--Will. Tyr. lib.
i. cap 2, lib. viii. cap. 3. In hoc loco, supra rupem quæ adhuc in
eodem Templo consistit, dicitur stetisse et apparaisse David
exterminator Angelus. . . . Templum Dominicum in tanta veneratione
habent Saraceni, ut nullus eorum ipsum audeat aliquibus sordibus
maculare; sed a remotis et longinquis regionibus, a temporibus
Salomonis usque ad tempora præsentia, veniunt adorare.--Jac. de
Vitr. Hist. Hierosol. cap. lxii. p 1080.
8:* Procopius de ædificiis Justiniani, lib. 5.
9:* Phocas believes the whole space around these buildings to be
the area of the ancient temple. Ἑν τῶ ἀρχαίω δαπεδω τοῦ περιώνῦμου
ναου έκείνοὺ Σὸλομῶντος θεωρουμενοσ . . . Ἔξωθεν δὲ του ναου ἐστι
περιαύλιον μεγα λιθόστωτον τὸ παλαιὸν, ὼς οῖμαι, του μεγαλου ναου
δάπεδον.--Phocæ descript. Terr. Sanc. cap. xiv. Colon. 1653.
9:† Quibus quoniam neque ecclesia erat, neque certum habebant
domicilium, Rex in Palatio suo, quod secus Templum Domini ad
australem habet partem, eis concessit habitaculum.--Will. Tyr. lib.
xii. cap. 7. And in another place, speaking of the Temple of the
Lord, he says, Ab Austro vero domum habet Regiam, quæ vulgari
appellatione Templum Salomonis dicitur.--Ib. lib, viii. cap.
3.
10:* Qui quoniam juxta Templum Domini, ut prædiximus, in Palatio
regio mansionem habent, fratres militiæ Templi dicuntur.--Will.
Tyr. lib. xii. cap. 7.
10:† Est præterea Hierosolymis Templum aliud immensæ quantitatis et
amplitudinis, a quo fratres militiæ Templi, Templarii nominantur,
quod Templum Salomonis nuncupatur, forsitan ad distinctionem
alterius quod specialiter Templum Domini appellatur.--Jac. de Vitr.
cap. 62.
10:‡ In Templo Domini abbas est et canonici regulares, et sciendum
est quod aliud est Templum Domini, aliud Templum militiæ. Isti
clerici, illi milites.--Hist. Orient. Jac de Vitr. apud Thesaur.
Nov. Anecd. Martene, tom. iii. col. 277.
10:§ Will. Tyr. lib. xii. cap. 7.
11:* Prima autem eorum professio quodque eis a domino Patriarcha et
reliquis episcopis in remissionem peccatorum injunctum est, ut vias
et itinera, ad salutem peregrinorum contra latronum et incursantium
insidias, pro viribus conservarent.--Will. Tyr. lib. xii. cap.
7.
12:* Gibbon.
13:* Reg. Constit. et Privileg. Ordinis Cisterc. p.
447.
CHAPTER II. Regula Pauperum Commilitonum Christi et Templi
Salomonis. *