Erhalten Sie Zugang zu diesem und mehr als 300000 Büchern ab EUR 5,99 monatlich.
"Introducing Aristotle" guides the reader through an explosion of theories, from the establishment of systematic logic to the earliest rules of science. Aristotle's authority extended beyond his own lifetime to influence fundamentally Islamic philosophy and medieval scholasticism. For fifteen centuries, he remained the paradigm of knowledge itself. But can Aristotelian realism still be used to underpin our conception of the world today?
Sie lesen das E-Book in den Legimi-Apps auf:
Seitenzahl: 114
Veröffentlichungsjahr: 2015
Das E-Book (TTS) können Sie hören im Abo „Legimi Premium” in Legimi-Apps auf:
Published by Icon Books Ltd, Omnibus Business Centre, 39–41 North Road, London N7 9DP Email: [email protected]
ISBN: 978-184831-986-8
Text copyright © 2012 Icon Books Ltd
Illustrations copyright © 2012 Icon Books Ltd
The author and illustrator has asserted their moral rights
Originating editor: Richard Appignanesi
No part of this book may be reproduced in any form, or by any means, without prior permission in writing from the publisher.
Cover
Title Page
Copyright
A Universal Mind
Aristotle’s Family Background
Education in Athens
The Symposium
Aristotle and Plato
Murky Affairs
Aristotle’s Partners
Gone Fishing
Alexander the Great
The Return to Athens
Aristotle Founds the Lyceum
The Peripatetics
“Sinning Twice”
Evidence of a True Story
The End
A Good Man
His Writings
Lecture Notes
History of Aristotle’s Works
The Arab Connection
The Works
Realist and Relativists
The Eleatic View of Monism
Achilles and the Tortoise
Time and the Arrow
Plato’s Ideal Forms
Ultimate Reality
Empiricism: the Basis of Science
The Middle Way
Definitions and Descriptions
Ontology: the Essential Quality
What is “Is”?
Existence: the Problem of Being
Genus and Species
Thisness
Thisness Is Not An Illusion
The Categories
Aristotle and My Cat
Are the Categories Real?
Science and the Categories
Individual Substances
Universals
The Kinds of Change
Form and Matter
Teleology: Arguing from Design or Purpose
Ancient and Modern Reductionism
Aritotle’s View of Cause
The Nature of Change
Aition or “Type of Explanation”
The Four Causes
Aristotle’s Explanation of Change
The Problem of Purpose
Emergent Features
Natural Things and Artefacts
The Problem of Form
The Metaphysical Solution
Basic Species
The Potential and the Actual
What is Logic?
Logic and Doing Science
A Satisfying Conclusion
Deductive Interference
The Truth of Pythagoras’ Theorem
The Syllogism or Valid Deduction
Higher-level Syllogisms
Rules of Thought
The Two Principles
Induction
The Dialectic
The Agon
Primary Propositions
The Problem of “Noun”
The Great Chain of Being
Determinism
How “Empirical” was Aristotle?
Assumptions and Misconceptions
Aristotle’s Science
Position and Motion
A Theory of the Universe
Incorrect Dynamics
The Cosmos
An Odd Mixture
Psychology
Consciousness: a Product of History
Mind and Body
The Capacities of the Soul
The Brain
The Objects of Sensation
Imagination and Memory
Transformation into Universals
Active and Passive Reason
The Ethics
A Flourishing Life
Eudaimonia
Is Pleasure a Good?
Contemplation Is Happiness
The Influence of Emotions on Reason
The Virtue of the Soul
The Doctrine of the Mean
Generosity and the Average
The Role of the State
Good Advice
Virtue Ethics Today
The Politics
Politics and Ethics
The Family as Political Economy
The Purpose of the City State
The Economy of Slavery
What is the Best Constitution?
Rule by One or Few …
Rule by a Middle Class
The Politics of Education
Politics, Education and Art
Plato’s Condemnation of Art
Aritotle’s Poetics
Techne and Mimesis
Higher Than History
Tragedy and Katharsis
Aritotle’s Unities
The Uses of Rhetoric
The Legacy of Aristotle
Aristotle and Islamic Science
Before Europe
Albert the Great and Thomas Aquinas
The Decline of Aristotellanism
Is Aristotle “Scientific”?
Descartes’ Doubt
Does Empiricism Eliminate Doubt?
Hume’s Scepticism
Kant’s Theory of Knowledge
The Importance of Aristotle Today
Further Reading
Acknowledgements
Index
The Master of those who know.Dante Alighieri (1265–1321), poet of The Divine Comedy
Aristotle has been described as the most intelligent person who ever lived. He had an impact on human culture, understanding and knowledge that is difficult to match. Many of the ways in which we think can be traced back to him and his work, all too often unacknowledged today. In particular, the rational, scientific and technological culture that pervades much of the Western world owes more to him than to anyone else. He also made major contributions to the development of ethics, psychology, biology, politics and our appreciation of literature.
From a distance of two and a half thousand years, Aristotle remains a shadowy figure.
I WAS BORN IN THE SMALL TOWN OF STAGIRA, A GREEK COLONY IN THRACE, IN 384 BC. MY FATHER WAS NICOMACHUS, THE COURT DOCTOR TO KING AMYNTAS OF MACEDONIA.
It may be that the family had acted in this role for some generations of Macedonian Kings. The medical background is also significant. Medicine, even then, would have depended on acute observation, and this characterizes all of Aristotle’s work.
It is not known whether Aristotle practised medicine during his lifetime, but he did say later, rather pompously …
A MAN IS ADEQUATELY EDUCATED IF HE KNOWS THE THEORY OF MEDICINE BUT DOES NOT HAVE THE PRACTICAL EXPERIENCE.
He probably had a prosperous childhood, in a comfortable rather than magnificent court, where a high priority was put on combining theoretical wisdom with pragmatic action.
Aristotle lost both his parents while still a youth and passed into the care of Proxenus, who was probably a relative of his father. His intelligence must have been evident, because at seventeen he was sent to complete his education in Athens. The Thracian scholars must have become exasperated with a brilliant pupil for whom they could do nothing more. Shortly after he arrived in Athens, he joined Plato’s Academy.
Plato’s reputation attracted students and scholars from all over the eastern Mediterranean, as well as the sons of prosperous and powerful Athenians.
PLATO (c. 428-347 BC) WAS ALREADY FAMOUS FOR HIS OWN PHILOSOPHICAL IDEAS AND HIS ACCOUNTS OF SOCRATES (470-399 BC).
Plato encouraged penetrating discussions of obscure and difficult topics, but also taught the youth of Athens as a preparation for their adult life.
PARTICIPATION IN CIVIC AFFAIRS IS A DUTY FOR CITIZENS OF ATHENS. SOME TRAINING IN POLITICS AND ETHICS IS NEEDED. DINNERS IN ATHENS, WHERE STUDENTS AND OTHERS DISCUSS PHILOSOPHICAL ISSUES, ARE CALLED SYMPOSIA.
A symposium could be sublimely intellectual or downright orgiastic. We should not, however, be thinking about the Academy in terms of examinations or qualifications. It sounds like the ideal life, and Aristotle’s later writings seem to indicate that he thought so.
Aristotle stayed for about twenty years in Plato’s Academy and must have become a very senior member. We know frustratingly little about the relationship between the two most significant philosophers in the greatest philosophical period of Western history. The intellectual legacies of Plato and Aristotle are sharply divergent, but this divergence may have taken place after Aristotle left the Academy. On the other hand, he may have, with the arrogance of youth, opposed Plato’s ideas from the start.
PLATO CALLED HIM “THE INTELLIGENCE OF THE SCHOOL”. I ALSO SAID THAT ARISTOTLE NEEDED “A BRIDLE RATHER THAN A SPUR”. AND I REFERRED TO PLATO’S ACADEMY AS “OUR FRIENDS”.
So it is safe to assume that the relationship might have been acrimonious from time to time, but was not bitter. Isocrates (436–338 BC) had a rival school to the Academy. Aristotle wrote and spoke on the opposing Academy “team”.
Plato died in 347 BC and Aristotle left the school. We don’t know why, but we can guess at some possibilities. Maybe it was because the Academy was putting too much emphasis on mathematics and pure theory and not enough on the practical sciences that interested Aristotle. The school passed into the hands of Plato’s nephew, Speusippus, who was not distinguished.
ARISTOTLE MAY HAVE THOUGHT THAT HE SHOULD HAVE BEEN APPOINTED SUCCESSOR. BUT THERE COULD ALSO HAVE BEEN A POLITICAL FACTOR INVOLVED.
Athens and Macedon were not on the best of terms because Philip of Macedon, Amyntas’ successor, had recently sacked another Greek city. Aristotle might have been seen to be too pro-Macedonian. It may also have been the case that ownership of a school was possible only for citizens, and Aristotle was never an Athenian citizen.
Aristotle was away for twelve years. He went first to Atarneus, on the coast of Asia Minor, the other side of the Aegean Sea. The local ruler, or “tyrant” as they were called, was Hermias, who seems to have had some links with the Academy and who had fostered a small academic community under his protection. Hermias provided Aristotle and a friend, Xenocrates, who had gone with him with all that they needed.
Aristotle married Hermias’ niece, Pythias, who bore him a daughter. They might have been in love.
In The Politics, which he may well have written at this time, he says that the ideal age for a man to marry was thirty-seven, and for a woman, eighteen. Since he was thirty-seven at the time, we may guess that Pythias was eighteen. He also strongly, and rather oddly, condemned adultery, calling it “disgraceful”.
THIS INCLUDED THE SMALL TOWN OF ASSOS TO LIVE IN. WE WERE ABLE TO SPEND TIME IN TALKING, CONTEMPLATING AND PHILOSOPHISING. GREEK MARRIAGES WERE NORMALLY OF CONVENIENCE, FOR ESTABLISHING POLITICAL AND ECONOMIC LINKS AND FOR PRODUCING HEIRS. IT WOULD BE CUSTOMARY FOR A MAN IN ARISTOTLE’S POSITION TO FIND SEXUAL SATISFACTION IN PROSTITUTES, CONCUBINES OR HETAIRAE … … WHO WERE RATHER LIKE JAPANESE GEISHAS.
Sadly, Pythias died. Aristotle later took another partner, called Herpyllis, who bore him a son, Nicomachus, who gave his name to The Nicomachean Ethics. We don’t know whether they married. Aristotle died before Herpyllis. He was kind to her in his will, which remains. She was to be given away well, if she chose to re-marry.
I RECEIVED MONEY IN THE FORM OF SILVER, FIVE SERVANTS AND PROPERTY IN EITHER CHALCIS OR STAGIRA.
However, in a reminder that these were also brutal times, the city state of Atarneus was captured by the Persians in 341 BC and Hermias was tortured to death.
Just before this, Aristotle had moved away from Assos to the island of Lesbos and lived in the main city of Mytilene. There he met Theophrastus, who had been born on the island, and again set up a philosophical group similar to that at Assos.
I BECAME HIS MOST FAMOUS PUPIL. MY INTEREST NOW FOCUSED ON BIOLOGY.
He spent much of his time in and around a large sea lagoon that was mostly surrounded by land, an ideal place for specimens. Much of his work shows a keen appreciation of how living things work. His main method of explaining how things change, teleology, can be seen as having its origins in this giant rockpool.
In 343 BC came the invitation that history remembers. Philip of Macedon asked Aristotle to act as tutor to his thirteen year old son Alexander, who went on to conquer most of the known world during his short lifetime.
AS WITH PLATO, WE CAN BE SURE OF LITTLE OR NOTHING ABOUT THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE GREATEST MIND OF HIS TIME AND THE BOY WHO WAS TO BE THE GREATEST POWER. ARISTOTLE’S EXISTING POLITICAL WRITINGS BETRAY NO PARTICULAR INTEREST IN THE MACEDONIAN EMPIRE.
There is nothing in Alexander’s bloody career for which we can hold Aristotle responsible. Perhaps the most striking feature of the whole relationship was what little impact each had on the other.
Philip would have wanted the very best tutor for his son, and the existing family ties from their fathers’ days must have pointed unmistakably at Aristotle. Perhaps Aristotle tried to combine the classical virtues of the heroes of Homer’s Iliad with the most recent thinking on ethics and politics. He was convinced of the superiority of the Greeks.
I REGARD ALL NON-GREEKS AS BARBARIANS … WOULD THIS VIEW – TYPICAL OF ALL GREEKS – HAVE ENCOURAGED ME TO CONQUER AND DOMINATE THEM?
This seems to have been only partly effective. Alexander chose a Persian wife and strongly encouraged intermarriage among his troops. Aristotle would certainly have disapproved of this. Alexander may also have arranged to have animals and plants sent back to Aristotle from the conquered lands.
Philip was killed in 346 BC and Alexander had no more time for school. Aristotle stayed in Stagira for a while and then left northern Greece the next year to return to Athens. Although his association with Alexander gave him security and prosperity in Athens, the relationship may have ended on a sour note. Aristotle’s nephew, Callisthenes, had been appointed as the official historian of the conquests. Alexander, becoming increasingly paranoid, charged him with treason.
I INCARCERATED HIM IN A TRAVELLING CAGE AND THEN EXECUTED HIM.
It is possible that Alexander also contemplated a similar fate for Aristotle as a relative of Callisthenes, but, fortunately, nothing came of it.
Aristotle was almost fifty years old when he returned to Athens, a mature and respected philosopher. The leadership of the Academy was again vacant at this time, following the death of Speusippus, but Aristotle was not appointed. He seems not to have been prepared to work under his old colleague Xenocrates, and opened his own school, the Lyceum.
IT WAS SITUATED JUST OUTSIDE ATHENS NEXT TO THE TEMPLE OF APOLLO LYCEUS, AN AREA WHICH WAS A HAUNT OF PHILOSOPHERS EVEN BEFORE THIS. THE ARCHAEOLOGICAL REMAINS OF THE LYCEUM HAVE RECENTLY BEEN DISCOVERED UNDER THE STREETS OF MODERN ATHENS.
It was here, at the Lyceum, that Aristotle lived and worked for the next twelve years, overseeing the work of scholars and researchers and providing teaching. He taught in the covered walkway of the building, called the peripatos in Greek.
FROM THIS, MY COLLEAGUES, STUDENTS AND I BECAME KNOWN AS THE PERIPATETICS – THE WALKERS.
The school had a very wide range of interests, but tended to specialize in history and biology.
In 323 BC, Alexander the Great died. The Macedonian Empire, which Alexander held together, began to disintegrate. The Athenians seized the opportunity and tried to break free of Macedon. Aristotle was in danger. His Macedonian links were well-known and he was a friend of the Macedonian Regent of Athens. A trumped up charge of impiety (disrespect for the Gods) was brought against him, as it had before against Socrates. He left Athens.
I SHALL DENY THE ATHENIANS THE OPPORTUNITY OF SINNING TWICE AGAINST PHILOSOPHY.