Karezza Method
Karezza MethodPrefaceSOUL-BLENDINGWHAT IS KAREZZA?MAGNETATIONCLEANNESSSEX AND SOULWHEN SEX SATISFIESDUALITY AND SPIRITUALITY IN SEXSEX-COMMERCE AND THE ELIXER OF LIFETHE WINE OF SEXTHE KAREZZA METHODTHE WOMAN'S PART IN KAREZZATHE WOMAN'S TIME OF GREAT DESIREDOES THE WOMAN NEED THE ORGASM?THE WOMAN'S SHOCKPSYCHIC IMPOTENCEKAREZZA THE BEAUTIFIERTHE DANGER OF EXCESSFINAL CONSIDERATIONSAPPENDIX TO THE KAREZZA METHODCopyright
Karezza Method
J. William Lloyd
Preface
It was, I believe, in the winter of 1915-16 that a woman-friend in
California wrote and asked me why I did not write a special little
book on Karezza.
As events had convinced me that there certainly was crying need of
instruction on the matter, her suggestion took root and this small
brochure is the fruit.
For though quite a number have written more or less concerning
controlled intercourse, they have usually done so guardedly and so
vaguely that to the average inquirer the subject remains a mystery
and the beginner does not know how to proceed. For which reason
most men fail and give up who could just as well succeed. And
success or failure here may make all the difference between divorce
or a lifetime of love-happiness.
SOUL-BLENDING
And still beyond the embrace that begets the body is the embrace
that begets the soul, that invokes the soul from the Soul.
The wonderful embraces, sacred, occult and unspeakably tender, pure
as prayer;
The hour-long, longer indwelling of him within her, conceiving her
again like a child, the hour-long, longer, over-closing of her upon
him, bearing him again like a babe in her womb.
The infinite understanding of each by the other, the transcendent
uplift of each by the other;
No tumult orgasmal here; not because crushed out, simply because
not desired, simply because this is beyond that, a saner, broader
joy; the great currents, flowing through wider channels, rage not
nor whirl, for where the greater is there the lesser is not
demonstrative.
Here is harmony too sweet for violence, osmosis of soul within
soul, rhythmically blending, inflowing, outflowing; singing without
words; silent music of divine instrument.
Symphony of sex of nerve, heart, thought, and soul in touch,
at-one-ing.
Absolute peace, realized heaven, the joy that never disappoints,
that exceeds imagination, that cannot be described.
The love ineffable, the inspiration of brain, the energizing of
muscle, the illumination of feature, the healing of body, the
expression of soul.
Spiritual sex-exchanging; the masculine in her uttering, the
feminine in him receiving, positive and negative alternating at
will.
Spiritual sex-begetting; the impregnation of each by the other with
beautiful thoughts, divine dreams, high hopes, noble ambitions,
pure aspirations, clairvoyant vision, the birth-bed of
genius.
The giving of each to the other to the uttermost impulse of
blessing, the receiving of each by the other to the uttermost nerve
terminal of body, to the uttermost fine filament of spirit.
Not followed by exhaustion, but by days of genius, clear and
exalted vision, buoyant and happy health.
Not followed by revulsion, but by hours, days, weeks, years, a
lifetime, maybe, of tender memories, clinging, affectionate longing
to caress again, to be re-embracing.
(Nay, is it not true, beyond all truth, that those who have once
thus bathed, blended, soul in soul, are eternally married?)
The embrace of at-one-ness, of expression, and purification and
revivification, that incarnates the divine in the human.
Not possible except to the pure and poetic, to true and innocent
lovers, fitting, responding, liberating.
To whom soul and body are both sacred, to whom this communion is a
religious rite the most sacred.
The embrace of the Cosmic souls, the angel-mates in their
heaven.
No vision this, dear friends, no poetic metaphor merely, for lo! I
have lived it all many, many times, hundreds of others have lived
it many times, every member of the race shall sometime, in some
life, live it.
It is joy and truth, the joy of joys and truth of truths.
WHAT IS KAREZZA?
Karezza is controlled non-seminal intercourse. The word Karezza
(pronounced Ka-ret-za) is from the Italian and means a caress.
Alice B. Stockham, M.D., was the first one who applied it as the
distinctive name of the art and method of sexual relations without
orgasmal conclusion. But the art and method itself was discovered
in 1844 by John Humphrey Noyes, the founder of the Oneida
Community, by experiences and experiments in his own marital life.
He called it Male Continence. Afterwards George N. Miller, a member
of the Community, gave it the name of Zugassent's Discovery in a
work of fiction, The Strike of a Sex. There are objections to both
these names. Zugassent was not a real person, therefore did not
discover it. It was Noyes' Discovery, in fact. Continence, as Dr.
Stockham points out, has come to mean abstinence from all
intercourse. The Oneida Communists do not appear to have opposed
the female orgasm, therefore it was well enough for them to name it
Male Continence, but Dr. Stockham and I agree that in the highest
form and best expression of the art neither man nor, woman has or
desires to have the orgasm, therefore it is no more male than
female continence. And a single-word name is always more convenient
than a compound. For which reasons I have accepted Dr. Stockham's
musical term, which is besides, beautifully suggestive and
descriptive. Another writer on this art (I first heard of it
through him; he deriving it from Noyes) was Albert Chavannes, who
in a little book on it, called it Magnetation, a name which I
coined for him. It is perhaps not a bad name; but I now think
Karezza better.
Noyes' honor to the discovery has been disputed. Others, it is
asserted, discovered it before him or independently since. 1 It is
necessary to contest this. Various Europeans and Asiatics probably
discovered America before Columbus, but he first made it known and
helpful to the world at large, therefore the honor is rightfully
his. Exactly so with Noyes - he first made Karezza available to
mankind in general.
His little work, Male Continence, is a model of good argument on
the matter; but I believe Karezza, by Dr. Stockham, is the only
book now in print which treats of it. Several other small works
have appeared, but mostly they treat of the subject in such poetic
and transcendental terms that the seeker after practical
instruction is left still seeking. All writers, too, have tacitly
assumed that the woman could do as she pleased in the matter and
that success or failure all depended on the man. I regard this as a
fundamental error and the cause of most disappointments.
Considerations such as these have mainly decided me to write this
little work. At this time of agitation on birth control, also, it
appears timely. And beyond all looms the extraordinary, one might
say unaccountable ignorance of it, not only of ordinary sexual
students, but of practically all physicians and even the greatest
sexual specialists and teachers. Actually the general public knows
more about it than its educators. Thus Forel, in his Sexual
Question, never mentions it at all, therefore presumably never
heard of it. Bloch, in his professedly exhaustive work, The Sexual
Life of Our Times, though he once mentions Dr. Stockham on another
matter, has only one ambiguous paragraph in the whole book that can
possibly refer to Karezza (apparently some imperfect form of it),
disapproving of it on theory only, evidently, without the slightest
personal knowledge, or even observation. Havelock Ellis, in
the Psychology of Sex, is more instructed and favorable, but
appears to have derived his knowledge almost entirely from the
Oneida Communists; not at all at first hand. And the general
ignorance, indifference, or aversion, even to any experiment, among
men, is simply amazing. Most men say at once that it is impossible,
most physicians that it is injurious, though with no kind of real
knowledge. Most women, on the other hand, who have had any
experience of it, eulogize it in unmeasured terms, as the very
salvation of their sexual life, the very art and poetry of love,
which indeed it is, but, as most men will not attempt it, most
women are necessarily kept in ignorance of its inestimable benefits
to their sex.
The first objection that is certain to meet one who would recommend
Karezza is that it is "unnatural." Noyes confronts this objection
very ably, and it is indeed absurd, when you came to think of it,
to hear men who drink alcohol, smoke, use tea and coffee, take
milk, though adults, eat cooked food, live in heated houses, wear
clothes, write books, shave their faces, use machinery, and do a
thousand and one things which the natural man, the true aborigine,
knew nothing of, condemn a mere act of moderation and self-control
in pleasure as "unnatural."
They do not stop to think that if their appeal is to original or
animal nature, then they must never have intercourse with the
female at all, except when she invites it, is in a certain
condition, at certain seasons of the year, and for procreation
only. For all intercourse as a love act is clearly "unnatural" in
their use of the term. How would they relish that?
These same men will recommend and have their women use douches,
drugs, and all sorts of mechanical means to nullify the natural
consequences of their act, with never a lisp of protest at the
unnaturalness of it all.
As a matter of fact, Karezza is absolutely natural. It employs
Nature only and from first to last. To check any act which prudence
suggests, or experience has shown, likely to have undesired
consequences, is something constantly done throughout all Nature,
even among the lowest animals. Karezza is such a check. It is
simply prudence and skill in the sexual realm, changing its form
and direction of activity in such wise that the desired pleasure
may be more fully realized and the undesired results avoided.
Nothing more.
The denunciation of it as injurious is almost equally an expression
of thoughtless prejudice. I have now had personal knowledge of it
for over forty years. I learned of it from A. Chavannes, who with
his wife had practiced it twenty years. It has been before the
American people since 1846. The Oneida Communists practiced it,
Havelock Ellis states, thirty years. I have known members of the
Oneida Community. I have read all I possibly could on it, talked
with everyone I could hear of who had knowledge of it; I have yet
to meet or hear of a single woman who has the slightest accusation
to make against it on the score of injury to health or disagreeable
sensations or after effects. Three only (all with slight
experience) told me they thought there was more pleasure in the old
embrace; the others most emphatically to the contrary. Van de
Warker, says, Havelock Ellis, "studied forty-two women of the
community without finding any undue prevalence of reproductive
diseases, nor could he find any diseased condition attributable to
the sexual habits of the community." (Italics mine.) Contrast this
with the usual sex-relation, which is constantly being accused,
particularly by women, of causing all sorts of injurious and
painful consequences, apparently upon the best of evidence. After
twenty-five years experience, the Oneida Community, upon request of
the New York Medical Gazette, instituted "a professional
examination" and had a report made by Theodore R. Noyes, M.D., in
which it was shown, by careful comparison of our statistics with
those of the U. S. census and other public documents, that the rate
of nervous diseases in the Community is considerably below the
average of ordinary society. This report was published by the
Medical Gazette, and was pronounced by the editor "a model of
careful observation; bearing intrinsic evidence of entire honesty
and impartiality."
Physicians freely condemn it, or express doubts of it, almost
invariably with no knowledge of it of any kind. They think it
should cause ill-health, therefore they say it will. It is said to
cause nervousness, prostatitis, an inflamed state of organs, etc.
Now we all know how much pure guesswork figures in so-called
medical "science"; how often that which merely coincides is
asserted to hold a relation of cause and effect. However I think I
can see how, very easily, the ignorant or imperfect use of this art
might lead to the above-described bad results. In ideal and
successful Karezza the sexual passion is transmuted and sublimated,
to a greater or less degree, into tenderness and love, and the
thought is maintained that the orgasm is not desired or desirable.
Now if a man, on the contrary, entered the embrace with the thought
that he terribly desired the orgasm, but by the sheer force of will
must prevent it; if he excited himself and his partner to the
utmost sexual furore, but at last denied it culmination; caring
nothing for love at any time, but for sex only all the time, I can
see how, very reasonably, his denied passion might react
disastrously on his nervous system, just as any strongly repressed
emotion may. Just as a man who indulges in the most furious
thoughts of rage, but clenches his fists and shuts his mouth tight,
rather than express it, may burst a blood vessel or get an
apoplexy. This may indeed be a sort of "male continence," on the
physical side, but real Karezza, as I know it and would present it,
is very different.