❦ SECTION I. ❦
❦ SECTION II. ❦
TO MINERVA.
APPENDIX.
ORPHIC HYMNS.
HYMN OF CLEANTHES.
GLOSSARY.
“’Tis not merely
The human being’s pride that peoples space
With life and mystical predominance,
Since likewise for the stricken heart of Love
This visible nature, and this common world
Is all too narrow; yea, a deeper import
Lurks in the legend told my infant years
That lies upon that truth, we live to learn,
For fable is Love’s world, his home, his birthplace;
Delightedly he dwells ’mong fays and talismans,
And spirits, and delightedly believes
Divinities, being himself divine.
The intelligible forms of ancient poets,
The fair humanities of Old Religion,
The Power, the Beauty, and the Majesty,
That had their haunts in dale or piny mountain,
Or forests by slow stream, or pebbly spring,
Or chasms or wat’ry depths;—all these have vanished.
They live no longer in the faith of Reason,
But still the heart doth need a language; still
Doth the old instinct bring back the old names.”Schiller: The Piccolomini, Act. ii. Scene 4.
INTRODUCTION
In offering to the public a new edition of Mr.
Thomas Taylor’s admirable treatise upon the Eleusinian and Bacchic
Mysteries, it is proper to insert a few words of explanation. These
observances once represented the spiritual life of Greece, and were
considered for two thousand years and more the appointed means for
regeneration through an interior union with the Divine Essence.
However absurd, or even offensive they may seem to us, we should
therefore hesitate long before we venture to lay desecrating hands
on what others have esteemed holy. We can learn a valuable lesson
in this regard from the Grecian and Roman writers, who had learned
to treat the popular religious rites with mirth, but always
considered the Eleusinian Mysteries with the deepest reverence.
It is ignorance which leads to profanation. Men ridicule what
they do not properly understand. Alcibiades was drunk when he
ventured to touch what his countrymen deemed sacred. The
undercurrent of this world is set toward one goal; and inside of
human credulity—call it human weakness, if you please—is a power
almost infinite, a holy faith capable of apprehending the supremest
truths of all Existence. The veriest dreams of life, pertaining as
they do to “the minor mystery of death,” have in them more than
external fact can reach or explain; and Myth, however much she is
proved to be a child of Earth, is also received among men as the
child of Heaven. The Cinder-Wench of the ashes will become the
Cinderella of the Palace, and be wedded to the King’s Son.
The instant that we attempt to analyze, the sensible,
palpable facts upon which so many try to build disappear beneath
the surface, like a foundation laid upon quicksand. “In the deepest
reflections,” says a distinguished writer, “all that we call
external is only the material basis upon which our dreams are
built; and the sleep that surrounds life swallows up life,—all but
a dim wreck of matter, floating this way and that, and forever
evanishing from sight. Complete the analysis, and we lose even the
shadow of the external Present, and only the Past and the Future
are left us as our sure inheritance. This is the first
initiation,—the vailing [muesis] of the eyes to the external. But
as epoptæ, by the synthesis of this Past and Future in a living
nature, we obtain a higher, an ideal Present, comprehending within
itself all that can be real for us within us or without. This is
the second initiation in which is unvailed to us the Present as a
new birth from our own life. Thus the great problem of Idealism is
symbolically solved in the Eleusinia.” *
These were the most celebrated of all the sacred orgies, and
were called, by way of eminence, The Mysteries. Although exhibiting
apparently the features of an Eastern origin, they were evidently
copied from the rites of Isis in Egypt, an idea of which, more or
less correct, may be found in The Metamorphoses of Apuleius and The
Epicurean by Thomas Moore. Every act, rite, and person engaged in
them was symbolical; and the individual revealing them was put to
death without mercy. So also was any uninitiated person who
happened to be present. Persons of all ages and both sexes were
initiated; and neglect in this respect, as in the case of Socrates,
was regarded as impious and atheistical. It was required of all
candidates that they should be first admitted at the Mikra or
Lesser Mysteries of Agræ, by a process of fasting called
purification, after which they were styled mystæ, or initiates. A
year later, they might enter the higher degree. In this they
learned the aporrheta, or secret meaning of the rites, and were
thenceforth denominated ephori, or epoptæ. To some of the interior
mysteries, however, only a very select number obtained admission.
From these were taken all the ministers of holy rites. The
Hierophant who presided was bound to celibacy, and required to
devote his entire life to his sacred office.
He had three assistants,—the torch-bearer, the kerux or
crier, and the minister at the altar. There were also a basileus or
king, who was an archon of Athens, four curators, elected by
suffrage, and ten to offer sacrifices.
The sacred Orgies were celebrated on every fifth year; and
began on the 15th of the month Boëdromian or September. The first
day was styled the agurmos or assembly, because the worshipers then
convened. The second was the day of purification, called also aladé
mystai, from the proclamation: “To the sea, initiated ones!” The
third day was the day of sacrifices; for which purpose were offered
a mullet and barley from a field in Eleusis. The officiating
persons were forbidden to taste of either; the offering was for
Achtheia (the sorrowing one, Demeter) alone. On the fourth day was
a solemn procession. The kalathos or sacred basket was borne,
followed by women, cistæ or chests in which were sesamum, carded
wool, salt, pomegranates, poppies,—also thyrsi, a serpent, boughs
of ivy, cakes, etc. The fifth day was denominated the day of
torches. In the evening were torchlight processions and much
tumult.
The sixth was a great occasion. The statue of Iacchus, the
son of Zeus and Demeter, was brought from Athens, by the
Iacchogoroi, all crowned with myrtle. In the way was heard only an
uproar of singing and the beating of brazen kettles, as the
votaries danced and ran along. The image was borne “through the
sacred Gate, along the sacred way, halting by the sacred fig-tree
(all sacred, mark you, from Eleusinian associations), where the
procession rests, and then moves on to the bridge over the
Cephissus, where again it rests, and where the expression of the
wildest grief gives place to the trifling farce,—even as Demeter,
in the midst of her grief, smiled at the levity of Iambé in the
palace of Celeus. Through the ‘mystical entrance’ we enter Eleusis.
On the seventh day games are celebrated; and to the victor is given
a measure of barley,—as it were a gift direct from the hand of the
goddess. The eighth is sacred to Æsculapius, the Divine Physician,
who heals all diseases; and in the evening is performed the
initiatory ritual.
“Let us enter the mystic temple and be initiated,—though it
must be supposed that, a year ago, we were initiated into the
Lesser Mysteries at Agræ. We must have been mystæ (vailed), before
we can become epoptæ (seers); in plain English, we must have shut
our eyes to all else before we can behold the mysteries. Crowned
with myrtle, we enter with the other initiates into the vestibule
of the temple,—blind as yet, but the Hierophant within will soon
open our eyes.
“But first,—for here we must do nothing rashly,—first we must
wash in this holy water; for it is with pure hands and a pure heart
that we are bidden to enter the most sacred enclosure [μυστικος
σηκος, mustikos sekos]. Then, led into the presence of the
Hierophant, * he reads to us, from a book of stone [πετρωμα,
petroma], things which we must not divulge on pain of death. Let it
suffice that they fit the place and the occasion; and though you
might laugh at them, if they were spoken outside, still you seem
very far from that mood now, as you hear the words of the old man
(for old he he always was), and look upon the revealed symbols. And
very far, indeed, are you from ridicule, when Demeter seals, by her
own peculiar utterance and signals, by vivid coruscations of light,
and cloud piled upon cloud, all that we have seen and heard from
her sacred priest; and then, finally, the light of a serene wonder
fills the temple, and we see the pure fields of Elysium, and hear
the chorus of the Blessed;—then, not merely by external seeming or
philosophic interpretation, but in real fact, does the Hierophant
become the Creator [δημιουργος, demiourgos] and revealer of all
things; the Sun is but his torch-bearer, the Moon his attendant at
the altar, and Hermes his mystic herald * [κηρυξ, kerux]. But the
final word has been uttered ‘Conx Om pax.’ The rite is consummated,
and we are epoptæ forever!”
Those who are curious to know the myth on which the “mystical
drama” of the Eleusinia is founded will find it in any Classical
Dictionary, as well as in these pages. It is only pertinent here to
give some idea of the meaning. That it was regarded as profound is
evident from the peculiar rites, and the obligations imposed on
every initiated person. It was a reproach not to observe them.
Socrates was accused of atheism, or disrespect to the gods, for
having never been initiated. * Any person accidentally guilty of
homicide, or of any crime, or convicted of witchcraft, was
excluded. The secret doctrines, it is supposed, were the same as
are expressed in the celebrated Hymn of Cleanthes. The philosopher
Isocrates thus bears testimony: “She [Demeter] gave us two gifts
that are the most excellent; fruits, that we may not live like
beasts; and that initiation—those who have part in which have
sweeter hope, both as regards the close of life and for all
eternity.” In like manner, Pindar also declares: “Happy is he who
has beheld them, and descends into the Underworld: he knows the
end, he knows the origin of life.”
The Bacchic Orgies were said to have been instituted, or more
probably reformed by Orpheus, a mythical personage, supposed to
have flourished in Thrace. * The Orphic associations dedicated
themselves to the worship of Bacchus, in which they hoped to find
the gratification of an ardent longing after the worthy and
elevating influences of a religious life. The worshipers did not
indulge in unrestrained pleasure and frantic enthusiasm, but rather
aimed at an ascetic purity of life and manners. The worship of
Dionysus was the center of their ideas, and the starting-point of
all their speculations upon the world and human nature. They
believed that human souls were confined in the body as in a prison,
a condition which was denominated genesis or generation; from which
Dionysus would liberate them. Their sufferings, the stages by which
they passed to a higher form of existence, their katharsis or
purification, and their enlightenment constituted the themes of the
Orphic writers. All this was represented in the legend which
constituted the groundwork of the mystical rites.
Dionysus-Zagreus was the son of Zeus, whom he had begotten in
the form of a dragon or serpent, upon the person of Kore or
Persephoneia, considered by some to have been identical with Ceres
or Demeter, and by others to have been her daughter. The former
idea is more probably the more correct. Ceres or Demeter was called
Koré at Cnidos. She is called Phersephatta in a fragment by
Psellus, and is also styled a Fury. The divine child, an avatar or
incarnation of Zeus, was denominated Zagreus, or Chakra (Sanscrit)
as being destined to universal dominion. But at the instigation of
Hera * the Titans conspired to murder him.
Accordingly, one day while he was contemplating a mirror, *
they set upon him, disguised under a coating of plaster, and tore
him into seven parts. Athena, however, rescued from them his heart,
which was swallowed by Zeus, and so returned into the paternal
substance, to be generated anew. He was thus destined to be again
born, to succeed to universal rule, establish the reign of
happiness, and release all souls from the dominion of death.
The hypothesis of Mr. Taylor is the same as was maintained by
the philosopher Porphyry, that the Mysteries constitute an
illustration of the Platonic philosophy. At first sight, this may
be hard to believe; but we must know that no pageant could hold
place so long, without an under-meaning. Indeed, Herodotus asserts
that “the rites called Orphic and Bacchic are in reality Egyptian
and Pythagorean.” * The influence of the doctrines of Pythagoras
upon the Platonic system is generally acknowledged. It is only
important in that case to understand the great philosopher
correctly; and we have a key to the doctrines and symbolism of the
Mysteries.
The first initiations of the Eleusinia were called Teletæ or
terminations, as denoting that the imperfect and rudimentary period
of generated life was ended and purged off; and the candidate was
denominated a mysta, a vailed or liberated person. The Greater
Mysteries completed the work; the candidate was more fully
instructed and disciplined, becoming an epopta or seer. He was now
regarded as having received the arcane principles of life. This was
also the end sought by philosophy. The soul was believed to be of
composite nature, linked on the one side to the eternal world,
emanating from God, and so partaking of Divinity. On the other
hand, it was also allied to the phenomenal or external world, and
so liable to be subjected to passion, lust, and the bondage of
evils. This condition is denominated generation; and is supposed to
be a kind of death to the higher form of life. Evil is inherent in
this condition; and the soul dwells in the body as in a prison or a
grave. In this state, and previous to the discipline of education
and the mystical initiation, the rational or intellectual element,
which Paul denominates the spiritual, is asleep. The earth-life is
a dream rather than a reality. Yet it has longings for a higher and
nobler form of life, and its affinities are on high. “All men yearn
after God,” says Homer. The object of Plato is to present to us the
fact that there are in the soul certain ideas or principles, innate
and connatural, which are not derived from without, but are
anterior to all experience, and are developed and brought to view,
but not produced by experience. These ideas are the most vital of
all truths, and the purpose of instruction and discipline is to
make the individual conscious of them and willing to be led and
inspired by them. The soul is purified or separated from evils by
knowledge, truth, expiations, sufferings, and prayers. Our life is
a discipline and preparation for another state of being; and
resemblance to God is the highest motive of action. *
Proclus does not hesitate to identify the theological
doctrines with the mystical dogmas of the Orphic system. He says:
“What Orpheus delivered in hidden allegories, Pythagoras learned
when he was initiated into the Orphic Mysteries; and Plato next
received a perfect knowledge of them from the Orphean and
Pythagorean writings.”
Mr. Taylor’s peculiar style has been the subject of repeated
criticism; and his translations are not accepted by classical
scholars. Yet they have met with favor at the hands of men capable
of profound and recondite thinking; and it must be conceded that he
was endowed with a superior qualification,—that of an intuitive
perception of the interior meaning of the subjects which he
considered. Others may have known more Greek, but he knew more
Plato. He devoted his time and means for the elucidation and
dissemination of the doctrines of the divine philosopher; and has
rendered into English not only his writings, but also the works of
other authors, who affected the teachings of the great master, that
have escaped destruction at the hand of Moslem and Christian
bigots. For this labor we cannot be too grateful.
The present treatise has all the peculiarities of style which
characterize the translations. The principal difficulties of these
we have endeavored to obviate—a labor which will, we trust, be not
unacceptable to readers. The book has been for some time out of
print; and no later writer has endeavored to replace it. There are
many who still cherish a regard, almost amounting to veneration,
for the author; and we hope that this reproduction of his admirable
explanation of the nature and object of the Mysteries will prove to
them a welcome undertaking. There is an increasing interest in
philosophical, mystical, and other antique literature, which will,
we believe, render our labor of some value to a class of readers
whose sympathy, good-will, and fellowship we would gladly possess
and cherish. If we have added to their enjoyment, we shall be
doubly gratified.
ADVERTISEMENT TO THE AUTHOR’S EDITION.As there is nothing more celebrated than the Mysteries of the
ancients, so there is perhaps nothing which has hitherto been less
solidly known. Of the truth of this observation, the liberal reader
will, I persuade myself, be fully convinced, from an attentive
perusal of the following sheets; in which the secret meaning of the
Eleusinian and Bacchic Mysteries is unfolded, from authority the
most respectable, and from a philosophy of all others the most
venerable and august. The authority, indeed, is principally derived
from manuscript writings, which are, of course, in the possession
of but a few; but its respectability is no more lessened by its
concealment, than the value of a diamond when secluded from the
light. And as to the philosophy, by whose assistance these
Mysteries are developed, it is coeval with the universe itself;
and, however its continuity may be broken by opposing systems, it
will make its appearance at different periods of time, as long as
the sun himself shall continue to illuminate the world. It has,
indeed, and may hereafter, be violently assaulted by delusive
opinions; but the opposition will be just as imbecile as that of
the waves of the sea against a temple built on a rock, which
majestically pours them back, Broken and Vanquish’d, foaming to the
main.
Footnotes13:* Atlantic Monthly, vol. iv. September, 1859.
17:* In the Oriental countries the designation פתר Peter (an
interpreter), appears to have been the title of this personage; and
p. 18 the petroma consisted, notably enough, of two tablets of
stone. There is in these facts some reminder of the peculiar
circumstances of the Mosaic Law which was so preserved; and also of
the claim of the Pope to be the successor of Peter, the hierophant
or interpreter of the Christian religion.
18:* Porphyry.
19:* Ancient Symbol-Worship, page 12, note. “Socrates was not
initiated, yet after drinking the hemlock, he addressed Crito: ‘We
owe a cock to Æsculapius.’ This was the peculiar offering made by
initiates (now called kerknophori) on the eve of the last day, and
he thus symbolically asserted that he was about to receive the
great apocalypse.”
See, also, “Progress of Religious Ideas,” by Lydia Maria
Child, vol. ii. p. 308; and “Discourses on the Worship of Priapus,”
by Richard Payne Knight.
20:* Euripides: Rhaesus. “Orpheus showed forth the rites of
the hidden Mysteries.”
Plato: Protagoras. “The art of a sophist or sage is ancient,
but the men who proposed it in ancient times, fearing the odium
attached to it, sought to conceal it, and vailed it over, some
under the garb of poetry, as Homer, Hesiod, and Simonides: and
others under that of the Mysteries and prophetic manias, such as
Orpheus, Musæus, and their followers.”
Herodotus takes a different view—ii. 49. “Melampus, the son
of Amytheon,” he says, “introduced into Greece the name of Dionysus
(Bacchus), the ceremonial of his worship, and the procession of the
phallus. He did not, however, so completely apprehend the whole
doctrine as to be able to communicate it entirely: but various
sages, since his time, have carried out his teaching to greater
perfection. Still it is certain that Melampus introduced the
phallus, and that the Greeks learnt from him the ceremonies which
they now practice. I therefore maintain that Melampus, who was a
sage, and had acquired the art of divination, having become
acquainted with the worship of Dionysus through knowledge derived
from Egypt, introduced it into Greece, with a few slight changes,
at the same time that he brought in various other practices. For I
can by no means allow that it is by mere coincidence that the
Bacchic ceremonies in Greece are so nearly the same as the
Egyptian.”
23:* Hera, generally regarded as the Greek title of Juno, is
not the definite name of any goddess, but was used by ancient
writers as a designation only. It signifies domina or lady, and
appears to be of Sanscrit origin. It is applied to Ceres or
Demeter, and other divinities.
24:* The mirror was a part of the symbolism of the
Thesmophoria, and was used in the search for Atmu, the Hidden One,
evidently the same as Tammuz, Adonis, and Atys. See Exodus xxxviii.
8; 1 Samuel ii. 22; and Ezekiel viii. 14. But despite the assertion
of Herodotus and others that the Bacchic Mysteries were in reality
Egyptian, there exists strong probability that they came originally
from India, and were Sivaic or Buddhistical. Coré-Persephoneia was
but the goddess Parasu-pani or Bhavani, the patroness of the Thugs,
called also Gorée; and Zagreus is from Chakra, a country extending
from ocean to ocean. If this is a Turanian or Tartar Story, we can
easily recognize the “Horns” as the crescent worn by lama-priests:
and translating god-names as merely sacerdotal designations, assume
the whole legend to be based on a tale of Lama Succession and
transmigration. The Titans would then be the Daityas of India, who
were opposed to the faith of the northern tribes; and the title
Dionysus but signify the god or chief-priest of Nysa, or Mount
Meru. The whole story of Orpheus, the institutor or rather the
reformer of the Bacchic rites, has a Hindu ring all through.
25:* Herodotus: ii. 81.